Tag Archives: saints

A reprimand from the great Catherine of Siena

[Re-publishing of this post in honor of Saint Catherine of Sienna. Forgive dated references!]

sower went out to sow googled image

Dominica in Sexagesima…

In illo témpore: Cum turba plúrima convenírent, et de civitátibus properárent ad Iesum, dixit per similitúdinem: Exiit, qui séminat, semináre semen suum…

The parable of the sower is the Gospel in the Extraordinary Form today. Even if you will be attending the Ordinary Form, I would like to call your mind to some commentary I made some years ago on a phrase of Saint Catherine of Siena. Keep in mind some words of Saint Paul for the Epistle: “With the weak I am weak…” That’s an examination of conscience as opposed to the opposite, and is necessary for understanding all this, or anything for that matter. O.K. Here we go. This is one to mull over, so I’ll just let it sit here for a while:

We find some of the fruits of the conversations between our Lord Jesus and Saint Catherine in The Divine Doctrine of Jesus Christ. In this post, I include a vignette representing the incisiveness of this doctrine and the wonderful clarity of her own spiritual life. These few words provide the key to understanding what is – it seems for us priests – by far the most difficult passage in the Gospels, a passage found, in one way or another, throughout the Scriptures of both Testaments. One will have to go through quite a purgatory in this life or the next in order to sound out the truth of her words. I once heard her words being mocked by an ecclesiastic who is influential in seminary formation for many Episcopal Conferences, and who for many years now has begged me not to publish my own comments, wanting, as he does, to be the first to write on this passage of Catherine, but to mock it instead of explaining it. Such drama! What to do? Publish this post, of course!

In this passage of The Divine Doctrine, Christ’s words are incisive and ironic, and lead us to the seeming paradox of caritas in veritate, of charity in truth. The words under discussion are found in the Gospels between the Parable of the Sower and Jesus’ explanation of the Parable of the Sower.

saint paul googled imageCatherine is relating her report of what our Lord is dictating to her. Jesus is speaking about Saint Paul’s interpretation of the key of knowledge, by which we see what the eye cannot see, hear what the ear cannot hear, and understand in our hearts what otherwise cannot arise in the heart of man. Saint Paul, in 1 Corinthians 2,9, does interpret Isaiah 64,10 – cited in Matthew 13,15, Acts 28,27, et al. – by saying it is by way of the love of God, by way of the crucified Lord of glory, that we see and hear and understand. Paul is accurate, says our Lord – as Saint Catherine relates – so much so that “questo parbe che volesse dire Paulo,” so much so that “this seems to be what Paul wanted to say,” that is, as if it were Paul’s revelation, Paul’s knowledge, Paul’s very own desire. In other words, Paul was so transformed by grace, that it was as if Paul spoke on his own authority. Yet, in this passage, the most erudite of all academic Pharisees himself happily admits that he is speaking by the power of God and the revelation of the Holy Spirit. Jesus was not conjecturing about what it seems to Him that Paul wanted to say, as if Jesus were Paul’s student: “It seems to me that Paul wanted to say this…” Jesus was rather confirming just how correct Paul’s words were, for they were actualized in Paul’s life with the grace of Jesus, that power of God, and the revelation of the Holy Spirit.

Jesus Himself fulfilled the vocation of Isaiah, to blind eyes, stop up ears, harden hearts, and remove all understanding lest people, including us priests, turn to the Lord to be saved. Good! We are not to pretend that we can turn to the Lord under our own power like some Pelagian work-your-own-way-to-God idiot. We must allow ourselves, by God’s grace, to be turned to the Lord, to be brought up into His mercy. We hate any demand to give up control over ourselves, even of our spiritual lives, even to the Lord Himself. This is our fallen human condition. It is a crucifixion of our fallen spirits simply to watch the Lord bringing us to Himself. If people want to have a work to do in the spiritual life, it is this, to be crucified. When we have our eyes fixed on Him, our ears listening in obedience, our hearts able to love whatever the cost of a pierced heart, this will then be our greatest joy, a proof of the resurrection of the Lord in our lives, for we cannot be led by a dead god in this way, but only in friendship with the Living God.

But let’s test this friendship with our Lord, shall we? Let’s take a sentence from the Theologian, Saint Gregory of Nyssa, who also makes a comment on Paul’s letters, this time on Ephesians, 5,23 – “The husband is the head of the wife just as Christ is also the Head of the Church, Himself Savior of the Body.” The question is, who interprets whom? Does Jesus guess what His Body wants, or does the Body know, because of intimate friendship, what the Head of the Body wants?

saint gregory of nyssa googled imageO de kefalhn thV EkklhsiaV ton Criston einai maqwn, touto pro pantwn dianoeisqw, oti pasa kefalhn tw upokeimenw swmati omofuhV esti kai omoousioV.

Here’s my translation of that, since the usual one is absolutely pitiful:

But the one learning the Head of the Church to be Christ thoroughly understands this before all things, that the entire Head, in subjection to the Body, is of the same nature and same being.

[Gregorius Nyssenus, De Perfectione et qualem oporteat esse Christianum, ad Olypium MonachumPatrologia Graeca, XLVI, 1863, ed. J.-P. Migne, 1863, 251-286. If I remember correctly, this quote is spread across columns 274-275.]

This is Gregory’s greatest spiritual work, and he here flies into the heavens. He is at his absolute best, his most sublime. He doesn’t say that Christ is subject to us, but that Christ is teaching us to be subject to Himself, making us capable of learning this by way of Himself taking on our human nature. Christ Jesus doesn’t need to learn from us what we seem to want to express (“questo parbe che volesse dire Paulo” – “this, it seems to me – is what Paul wanted to say”). Instead, as Catherine analogously reports Jesus’ words, It seems as if this is what Paul himself wanted to say, though Paul actually said this by the power of God and the revelation of the Holy Spirit!

So, in this friendship with our Lord, blessed are we priests if we thank our Lord for sending women like Saint Catherine of Siena into our lives in every which way. Thank you, Lord! — Jesus is just this good, just this kind. Now, think about it: “A sower went out to sow…”

Leave a Comment

Filed under Catholic, saints

Saint George, awesome among the very saints of God

Outside of my great friend, Saint Philomena – the veracity of whose existence as a virgin and martyr of the early Church has recently been sustained by exhaustive scientific evaluations of the evidence — outside of her… there is perhaps no saint more scorned as being no more than a figment of pious imagination than Saint George, who, however, boasts of more archeological and historical evidence than most any other saint in the history not only of the early Church, but for some lesser known saints, right into our own day. Churches dedicated to Saint George sprang up in their dozens throughout the ancient world immediately after news of his martyrdom on 23 April 303.

Liberal warning: The most obnoxious denial of the existence of Saint George comes from a super liberal professor of “ecumenism” (which I put in quotes because he had no idea what ecumenism is). Many of my fellow priests today have had Father XXX as a professor in the various countries, seminaries and universities where he’s mislead people. Anyway, he had the idea that Saint George couldn’t possibly have existed because of the iconography of him slaying a dragon. His arrogant idea was that we’re so very smart today, and people of the past were so very gullible and stupid. He laughed his nervous, mocking laugh when I tried to explain a few things about the iconography:

  • Those in the first centuries, who were suffering under the severe persecutions of the dragon of the Apocalypse, namely, the possessed-by-Satan pre-Constantinian Roman Empire, understood the dragon to be the Roman Empire. Even so, such depictions only came later, but for this very reason.
  • The white horse, similarly, is the white horse of the Apocalypse 6,2, whose rider goes out conquering and to further his conquering.
  • In the early fourth century, after George was martyred, it is interesting to note that all martyrs in the Montefiascone/Bolsano region of Tuscany, whether male or female, with no regard to how they met their deaths, were all depicted as riding on the white horse of the Apocalypse.
  • The woman who is to be saved in the background of some Renaissance paintings is, similarly, Holy Mother Church, who is represented by her saints.
  • The point of all this wonderful triumphalism in the iconography is not that Saint George or the other martyrs successfully fought their way out of being martyred, that they slew the dragon by, for instance, assassinating the Emperor of the time, but rather that they conquered the demonically controlled world by witnessing to Christ Jesus’ goodness and kindness right unto their deaths, so hated is goodness and kindness by the demonically controlled world. Saint George and the other martyrs slew the dragon by being slain themselves.

None of this — or the archeological proofs — made any impression on this super-liberal priest, for the last thing he wanted to hear was faithfulness to the Church unto death. That’s not what his own life was about. Since he couldn’t answer in any reasonable way, he merely laughed his mocking laugh once again. I had to live with that kind of nonsense for… well… pretty much my whole priesthood. Yikes! This kind of thing can occasion an increase in friendship with Christ Jesus and the Saints!

This icon was given to me by Cardinal —. It’s from the Mount Zion crowd just outside the wall of the Old City of Jerusalem. There is great devotion to Saint George in Palestine until today, with about every third boy being called after Saint George.

George’s father, Gerontius, was well known to the Emperor Diocletian as one of his very best soldiers. When Gerontius’ son George applied to Diocletian to be in the military service of the Emperor, Diocletian quickly made him part of the Imperial Guard and gave him the rank of Tribune. These positions taken together made young George, perhaps in his early twenties, almost as powerful as the Emperor himself. Very few people would have ever had such power, both military and political, and at such a young age. George was an instant phenomenon. Everyone would have known exactly who he was in the entire ancient world.

Diocletian was persuaded by the might-makes-right Galerius to have all his soldiers offer sacrifice to the Roman gods. George, with the zeal of the saints, loudly and with great reason proclaimed his worship of Christ Jesus, so that he couldn’t possibly offer sacrifice to any Roman gods. Diocletian, distraught — for he had never intended this — offered George all sorts of bribes, all of which were scorned by our Saint. Diocletian then set out to make an example of him, first attaching him to a wheel of swords and then having him decapitated.

Saint George and Saint Michael the Archangel sometimes meld into one presentation with wings being granted to Saint George on his white horse. That’s O.K. I’m sure they were great friends!

By the way, George is the Name of God the Father: ὁ πατήρ μου ὁ γεωργός ἐστιν (John 15,1). “My Father is George.” O.K., so, a pedantic translation would be “My Father is the Farmer” or “My Father is the Tiller of the Ground.” Some translations have “Vinedresser.” Truth be told, it’s γεωργός, that is, George!

Just to be insistent about this: “Adam” means “Tiller of the Ground.” “Adam” = “George.” Jesus is the New Adam. Jesus is the New George. Yours truly is merely the old George, the old Adam. But Christ has conquered and goes out to conquer still. Thanks be to God our Father that Jesus sets about slaying me so that, dead to myself, I live for Him alone. Yikes!

Update: This just in from ObisCatholicusSecundus:

saint george flag

21 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Military, saints

An exegesis of the phrase “Peter the Roman” – Saint Malachi’s ecclesiological teaching. Too Cool!!!

saint peter crucified upside down googled image

Many of you have followed the presentation of various interpretations of Saint Malachi’s, an excellent bishop who prophesied about future popes, about 860 some years’ worth. There have been differing reactions about Saint Malachi and his prophesies:

  • He’s a saint!
  • He’s a fraud!
  • He’s wrong!
  • He’s right!
  • It means this!
  • It means that!
  • Blah blah blah.

At any rate, the last bit on the list is Peter the Roman, the one succeeding Benedict XVI:

In persecutione extrema S.R.E. sedebit Petrus Romanus, qui pascet oues in multis tribulationibus: quibus transactis ciuitas septicollis diruetur, et Iudex tremendus iudicabit populum suum. Finis.

That is…

In an extreme persecution of the Holy Roman Church, there will sit Peter the Roman, who will feed the sheep through many tribulations, which once concluded, the city of seven hills will be destroyed, and the fearful Judge will judge his people. The end.

My comment: Although the great Saint Malachi provides descriptions of sorts for each of the reigning Pontiffs (and other difficult characters), outside of the anti-Popes included, there is only one Supreme Pontiff who reigns, that is Saint Peter himself, so that all successors of Saint Peter are Saint Peter, so that the Royal “We” used by the Pontiffs has nothing to do with any Royal “We”, but rather means “Saint Peter and I, as his successor” do proclaim this or that. In other words, Peter the Roman is any and every legitimately elected Successor to Saint Peter, that Bishop of Rome, who was martyred, crucified upside down, on the Epistle side of the Basilica (remember the way the altar faces East!).

In other words, Saint Malachi was making an ecclesiological statement, absolutely correct, about the Papacy. Pretty cool, that. The successor to Pope Benedict XVI, rest assured, will be Peter the Roman, whatever name he takes. It will not be Peter the Roman.

But he will be Peter the Roman in the Office in which he is personally established by the Lord Jesus Himself, who is forever the King of kings, the Lord of lords and the Prince of the Most Profound Peace, Son of the Immaculate Conception.

5 Comments

Filed under Catholic, saints

Saint Paul’s reception of enmity (Genesis 3,15)

On this day, six years ago, this is how I closed off the comments of thanksgiving prefacing the doctoral thesis on Genesis 3,15. I call the conversion of Saint Paul (today’s feast), the feast of Saint Paul’s reception of the enmity (as described in Genesis 3,15):

Rome – 25 January 2007

Feast of the reception of enmity by Saul of Tarsus

וַיְמַהֵר וַיִּקְרָא בְּבָתֵּי כְנֵסִיּוֹת אֶת־יֵשׁוּעַ לֵאמֹר כִּי־הוּא בֶּן־הָאֱלֹהִים הוּא ׃ (Acts 9,20)

Saint Paul understands Genesis 3,15. That’s why the more knuckleheaded of the past 60 years of commentary, say, on Romans 5,12, utterly ignores Genesis. Interesting, no? If one part of scripture clearly explicitly commenting on another part of scripture, one has to take a look at that other part of Scripture, no? But it’s not done. I’ll try to rectify that with a popular version of thesis, where I mentioned this difficulty. This is very much what Holy Souls Hermitage is all about. Yikes!

1 Comment

Filed under Genesis, saints

On this Christmas, honoring servant of God, Jérôme Lejeune, the great hero of Down Syndrome and all humanity

This is a MOST. BEAUTIFUL. VIDEO. Here’s a link to the foundation.

jerome lejeune

4 Comments

Filed under Pro-Life, saints, videos

Every last thing I was told about John the Baptist was a lie… for decades… But here’s the truth about John for this Advent.

beheading john baptist

Holy Mother Church spends a great deal of time in the Sacred Liturgy calling to mind the texts of Sacred Scripture referring to Saint John the Baptist, to the end of letting his eager expectation of the Savior on behalf of all Israel provide us with The Example of how to look to the coming of Jesus into our own lives and His second coming.

But all I ever heard about Saint John the Baptist since I was a kid until today was …

  • … that he was a raving maniac, out of his mind, screaming away to anyone or no one at all, out in the desert of all places, in the middle of nowhere, half naked, half clad in skins of beasts, eating things that would turn anyone’s stomach. [I knew these were exaggerations at the least. This ad hominem attack on him intrigued me. He must really be cool, thought I. I took him for my Confirmation name.]
  • … that he was an Old Testament saint, who had that Jewish stuff down cold, ice cold, nothing but justice and cruelty and name-calling and judgmentalism and anything that was the opposite of Christianity, the opposite of us, we who are enlightened, and always and everywhere ever so niiiiiice! [Even as a little kid, I knew something rather hypocritical with a side of self-righteous protectionism was being vomited at me from the pulpit. I had Jewish friends since I just a few years old. When I continued to hear this kind of diatribe in lecture halls in the seminary, I started to become downright angry. This is what turned my stomach.]

Part of this is surely the old nyeah nyeah nyeah nyeah nyeaaaaaaah kind of thing, whereby we’re better than others just because we’re us and they’re them and we live today and they don’t. It’s the old put others down to promote ourselves kind of thing. The blindness is so dark, and the darkness of the last half of the twentieth century was dark indeed. Part of this is fear of the message. So — hey! — let’s attack the messenger! We owe it to ourselves to look at this a bit more closely. Otherwise, our neglect is a decision to be plunged ever more deeply into the quagmire of that darknes which continues to darken all around us.

John, the messenger, heard the message from God: the Word of God came to him. What did he hear? That which he immediately put into practice. He heard of the goodness and kindness of the Most High.

How did he put that into action? By sharing this, the greatest love of his life, with others, and doing the necessary in the face of the Standard of Goodness and Kindness, namely, calling all to repentance unto the forgiveness of their sin.

John couldn’t stand “entitlement to holiness”, the hypocrisy of the Pharisess and scribes, who were “holy” just because they said so, because they were who they were, not like others. They’re the one’s who say that John was a big ol’ meanie for calling them to repentance: “You’re so mean in saying that God loves us so much!” Imagine the laughter of the fallen angels and the damned in hell when one trundles off to the lower depths with a sign around one’s neck that says: “I’m entitled to holiness because I’m me, sinless me!” AAAAaaaaagghh! Aloofness and the condemnation and mockery of John doesn’t get anyone anywhere good.

John knew that we all stand in need of the mercy of God, a gratuitous gift of The Most High, for which no claim to entitlement is actually so entitled, and that one of the very greatest mercies we can show to another is to invite them to know the goodness and kindness of Jesus so well that they will want to repent, all things being equal, one not regreting extending the invitation even if it is turned down with bitterness. Anyone with a bit of experience in these things will know that such bitterness works on people, helping them, in fact, to come to repentance. That’s the hope, often enough fulfilled.

The way to go is to heaven, to that goodness and kindness that John heard in that Word of God which came to him in the desert, that Word of God who became incarnate, and dwelt among us… — “And we saw His glory, the glory as of the Father’s only begotten Son, full of grace and truth” (John 1,14) — … the way to go is reverence and humble thanksgiving before that Goodness and Kindness Incarnate, that Word of God, who in whom John rejoiced from the time that he was in the womb.

Now then, if you have the fortitude for it, here’s a link to a ferocious post on John baptizing Jesus. What a fright! HERE! Just a sample:

The upshot of all this? Go to confession this Advent.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Catholic, Confession, saints, Spiritual Life

A King Size Bed for Christmas: Lest we forget true Advent preparations…

king size bed manger bethlehem sent in by reader

Sometimes people think they have to kill their children with the reason being that they have no place for them. There is always a place if we have love in our hearts. Truly.

I am reminded of Saint Vincent de Paul searching for someone to take care of one more orphan child in the midst of one of the horrific plagues raging throughout Europe at the time. He would only give the child to a woman for whom this would be impossible. Of course. This is the way true charity works. You can always add more water to the soup! Just the first couple of minutes of this 3rd snippet of this wonderful Catholic movie:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Pro-Life, saints, videos

Laudie, the guard dog, ever vigilant (and a note on Saint Teresa of Avila about keeping vigil)

I’m sorry, but these two pictures of Laudie guarding Holy Souls Hermitage in her sleep…

laudie guarding 1laudie guarding 2

…remind me of Saint Teresa of Avila saying that she learned how to keep one eye open, if you will, so to speak, looking to our Lord, spiritually, even while asleep. She complained that she didn’t quite know how that was possible or how to explain it, but that there it was. That’s what was happening.

Yep. Typical Saint Teresa. She let’s you know just enough so that you can begin to identify with what she was saying, and then — bam! — she’s off founding another convent and getting herself into trouble with all sorts of priests and bishops! A great saint. All her writings, autobiography included, make for great Advent spiritual reading. Why? Because it’s a saint who knows Jesus, and points out how He draws us to heaven. I love that.

2 Comments

Filed under Catholic, saints, Spiritual Life

The day Satan knelt down in my confessional and asked for absolution

I wish I had this account of Satan kneeling down in the Confessional of canonized stigmatist, Padre Pio of Pietrelcina, when I was teaching the Confession Practicum for the good and holy deacons (all now priests) at the Pontifical Seminary Josephinum up in Columbus, Ohio. In the words of the great saint himself:

“One day, while I was hearing confessions, a man came to the confessional where I was.

He was tall, handsome, dressed with some refinement and he was kind and polite. He started to confess his sins, which were of every kind: against God, against man and against the morals. All the sins were obnoxious!

I was disoriented, in fact for all the sins that he told me, but I responded to him with God’s Word, the example of the Church, and the morals of the Saints. But the enigmatic penitent answered me word for word, justifying his sins, always with extreme ability and politeness. He excused all the sinful actions, making them sound quite normal and natural, even comprehensible on the human level.. He continued this way with the sins that were gruesome against God, Our Lady, the Saints, always using disrespectful round-about argumentation.

He kept this up even with with the foulest of sins that could be conjured in the mind of a most sinful man. The answers that he gave me with such skilled subtlety and malice surprised me. I wondered: who is he? What world does he come from? And I tried to look at him in order to read something on his face.

At the same time I concentrated on every word he spoke, trying to discover any clue to his identity.. But suddenly; through a vivid, radiant and internal light I clearly recognized who he was.

With a sound and imperial tone I told him: “Say long live Jesus, long live Mary!” As soon as I pronounced these sweet and powerful names, Satan instantly disappeared in a trickle of fire, leaving behind him an unbearable stench.” [ h/t V ]

Had I had this account in the Confession Practicum, I would have used this as an example of a “penitent” who has zero penitence, and therefore cannot fruitfully take in the grace of the sacrament, and therefore is not to be provided with an absolution.

Of course, there are many priests who are not like Padre Pio, and who will, on perverse principle, absolve absolutely everyone no matter what, even if they are blaspheming and spitting on you in the confessional and screaming that they DO NOT WANT absolution. Yet, those priests will absolve them anyway, sending them ever more quickly on their way to hell, along with such priests themselves. It does no good, and truly hurts someone, even for eternity, to absolve them when they are not ready and/or do not want that absolution. It is to spit on Christ Jesus Himself.

As I read this account, I recall that perhaps, in fact, Satan has visited my own confessional, and not just once, but very many times. Not to worry! You see, it’s not a mind game. Cutting through the mind games of Satan is all about love, about reverence for Immaculte Mary’s Divine Son, Jesus. As Saint Pio found out with the added effect of a demonic stench, this way to cut through the mind games of Satan works every time, infallibly.

Such reverence is an expression of humble thanksgiving, friendship with our Lord, which is our Lord’s gift, not something we come up with ourselves. We can and should and must ask Him for this gift of His friendship, for the opportunity to be in humble thanksgiving before Him.

When going to Confession, remember the four “C”s. You will want to be:

  • courteous
  • complete
  • concise
  • contrite

In view of the account above, you’ll want to just accuse yourself in the simplest way of your sins, without making excuses that are irrelevant and unneccessary, and may be a real temptation not to be contrite. Yikes! It’s very refreshing just to confess, get absolution, and then rejoice in the Lord’s goodness and kindness. And He is just so good, just so kind.

I saw this view again while on my way to anoint one of the priests up the mountain before he had an operation. Meanwhile, all the rest of the priests were on retreat. Hermits do this kind of thing when need be! Meanwhile, I took the opportunity to go to Confession. Wonderful!

More recently, I went to Confession down the mountain. Priests are great for Confession anywhere of course. And you don’t need gorgeous views to go to Confession. You’ll love the view where that Confession will hopefully eventually bring you, that is, in heaven, face to Face with our Heavenly Father!

2 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Confession, saints

This fellow will just have to be a major patron saint of Holy Souls Hermitage

St. Leonard: I love just everything about him. A reader and dear benefactor sent this in. Thank you!

Feastday: November 6 Patron of political prisoners, imprisoned people, prisoners of war, and captives, women in labour, as well as horses [and donkeys, I'm sure!] Died: 559.

According to unreliable[!] sources, he was a Frank courtier who was converted by St. Remigius, refused the offer of a See from his godfather, King Clovis I, and became a monk at Micy. He lived as a hermit at Limoges and was rewarded by the king with all the land he could ride around on a donkey in a day for his prayers, which were believed to have brought the Queen through a difficult delivery safely. He founded Noblac monastery on the land so granted him, and it grew into the town of Saint-Leonard. He remained there evangelizing the surrounding area until his death. He is invoked by women in labor and by prisoners of war because of the legend that Clovis promised to release every captive Leonard visited. His feast day is November 6.

3 Comments

Filed under saints

Padre Pio: Just your run-of-the-mill priest (To hell with novelty!)

This is Padre Pio reprimanding, literally, thankfully, the hell out of a bishop who had permitted, unbenounced to Padre Pio, that the good padre’s confessional be bugged. He’s furious. Rightly so.

Today is the 45th anniversary of the death of Padre Pio. While the Catholic media is persnickety about calling him Saint Pio, skipping the bit about him being a Father, the sensus fildelium gets it right, continuing to call him Padre Pio, Father Pio, or even, just to aggravate the situation, Saint Padre Pio. Hah!

People wonder what the secret of his sanctity was. His stigmata? His knowledge of souls? His visions of Jesus and Mary and the saints? No, none of this. To hell with novelty.

As with all saints, the “secret” of Padre Pio’s sanctity was the sanctifying grace provided to him in all friendship by Mary Immaculate’s Son, Jesus. End of story.

Pretty boring, huh? Not at all. All those who know something of sanctifying grace, in trying to keep up with the sacraments, know something about the love our Lord has for us, providing us with our faith, our hope, and the charity into which our Lord draws our lives. Enthralling.

Of course, all saints manifest a particular aspect of God’s love for us. Padre Pio’s “specialty”, if you will, was to show us what it means to be a priest, just your run-of-the-mill priest. The mill, mind you, which grinds the “wheat”, is the passion and death of our Lord, His resurrection, His Sacred Heart having priestly hearts be like unto His own.

  • The more Padre Pio was acutely aware of the stigmata of Christ Jesus Himself, the more he knew that such are imprinted upon the souls of all priests. If we were to see the eternally imprinted character of the Sacrament of Orders upon the soul of a priest, I think we should see the stigmata of our Lord. All priests are to carry about the death of Christ so as to manifest His resurrection.
  • The more Padre Pio heard confessions, hours and hours and hours on end, the more he is an example to all priests of what they are to do in their priestly ministry.
  • The more Padre Padre Pio knew things about the souls into which he came in contact, the more it is evident that all priests are to intercede for the souls given to them whether they know anything about them or not.
  • The more Padre Pio worked this or that miracle, the more your run-of-the-mill priest is to know that he is also take care, inasmuch as he can, of the physical needs of those in his care. He is to be a Father in every way.

You get the idea. We mustn’t be distracted with such things, as if they were special to Padre Pio. They are not. Not in any truly extraordinary fashion, outside of his having taken up the grace provided to him, of course. You have to understand that, as Padre Pio himself said, the worst suffering he had in this life is not the pain of the stigmata, or the attack of Satan, but the humiliation he had of being given the stigmata in his body, for he knew he was nothing special. He learned that it was his vocation to let us know that, indeed, such things are not special to him. Of course, there are many, very many priests who do not know anything of this. Pray for us priests.

An analogy. When I began the doctoral thesis on Genesis, I had the idea that I absolutely did not want to come up with anything novel, anything new, anything effervescently exciting and nice, anything politically correct. I just wanted to examine the text – rather closely mind you – like no one else had done so before, purposely distancing myself from anything that did not emanate from the text itself. I knew that it this way, I would meet up with that the very revelation of God, which is never boring, but always enthralling.

Indeed, after the most unrelentingly scientific, letter by letter, historical philological study, and after letting, against all odds, the historical syntax speak for itself across the centuries – and having done all this with a completeness incomparably outdoing the thousands of commentaries and studies and monographs and Festschriften and such like that I’ve been through – what I saw was a presentation of God, incarnate of the Immaculate Virgin, our Redeemer, our Savior, the One who will provide us with life eternal, having undone original sin (passed along by propagation, not imitation) and having brought us to Himself.

In other words, the results of an application of common sense, of steely reason (so boring to the innovators) mirrored what we have always believed about this passage by way of the faith, for faith and reason, both given by God, go together. I don’t mean that there was any eisegesis, any reading of any doctrine into the passage. Rather, faith rejoiced to see what was scientifically manifested in the passage, faith first of all having done the favor of stripping the soul of the researcher of any fear of what might be found, such as the absolutely terrifying battle between the Son of the Woman and Satan, a battle which we are all to witness.

The more thoroughly the work was stripped of novelty, the more enthralling it was, however agonizing the actual scientific work was to do. No novelty = great joy. O.K., one could say that the novelty of the work was to have no novelty whatsoever. One could say that the novelty was the proof of what the primary purpose of the text happens to be (outlined above) against the same having been thought to be merely a secondary nicety of the text by our more noveltied exegetes. To hell with novelty!

The same with Padre Pio.

This was the statement of his priesthood to us priests: To hell with novelty! We priests are just to manifest The Priest, Christ Jesus, Mary Immaculate’s Son, in our lives. That’s it, and that’s wonderful. But novelty, throwing in something of our own stupidity, is boring. There is nothing more boring than novelty. There is no One more life giving than Jesus.

Padre Pio was all about Christ Jesus, a good example for us priests.

But there is more. I’ve been thinking about Padre Pio quite a bit recently (here and here and here and here, etc., as has Father Gordon MacRae – abouthere). If I could make a prophesy, it would be this, that Padre Pio is destined to become a great saint in the eyes of most all priests in the world. This has not been the case. But this will come about. Padre Pio, pray for us!

If anyone thinks I’ve dissed the stigmata, miracles, etc., of Padre Pio in this article, that person would be wrong. These other manifestations of Christ’s enthusiastic priesthood among us were meant to bring us to Christ’s enthusiastic priesthood among us. The novelty to which I’m referring above is the idea that these other things were somehow extra special, even more important than the priesthood of Jesus in Padre Pio (by way of Holy Orders and sanctifying grace). What is most important is Who is most important: Jesus and His Priesthood.

3 Comments

Filed under saints

Balancing the weight of the wood on Jenny the Jeep (and on the Mystical Body of Christ) More on Padre Pio

Jenny the Jeep made it up the mountain, even though… even though… the path up was still a bit muddy after the 8 1/2 inches of rain the other day. How is that possible, you ask? Isn’t the path up Mount Carmel, that is, Holy Souls Mountain, already way too steep even when it’s dry and conditions are perfect for climbing? Well, yes, that’s true, unless…

The trick is to balance the wood, spreading out the burden, indeed, even coming up with extraordinary ways to do this:

In this way, with a good couple hundred pounds out front, not to mention — well, I don’t even want to think how much the total weight of this wet red oak came to in the rest of Jenny — she went right up the mountain, accompanied by some rather fervent prayers to guardian angels. Another two trips like coming up. Yikes!

The Lord Jesus, Mary’s Son, carried the cross for us, redeemed us, and, please God, provides us sanctifying grace, saving us, having us hope in the grace of final perseverance, of a happy death. Yes, that’s true. However! As Saint Paul says, we are to make up what is lacking to the sufferings of Christ.

What could be lacking? He’s God! Of course, we can’t make that redemption any more perfect than it was and is. However, upon reception of such friendship with our Lord, we become so one with Him that when He goes into battle with Satan, so do we. When He lays down His life for us, being crushed by Satan even as He crushes Satan, He lays down our lives with His own as well. For we are but one with Him, His Mystical Body of which He is the Head.

How very many times He told His apostles that He must suffer and die, and then rise on the third day. How very many times He told all his disciples that we are to take up the cross and carry it, looking not at the cross, but to Him, following Him. He doesn’t want to carry the cross alone. He wants our company so that we go up Mount Calvary together. He spreads out the weight of the wood, the wood of the cross. And up we go, right up Mount Carmel.

When we see horrific, diabolical injustice, we must ask our Lord for the grace to see that Satan easily manipulates those who are not perfectly saints, that we are not fighting them, but rather Satan, and that, indeed, we are not fighting Satan, but our Lord is, and He would have us with Him in this battle.

In the battle, the wood, the torture, physical, mental, spiritual, emotional, is to be carried up the mountain, but it takes spreading out the burden.

Padre Pio carried the weight of diabolical injustice wrecked on innocent priests, innocent himself. Jesus also carried this cross of being slandered.

There are many, ridiculously, betraying fear, who immediately say that our Lord, unlike Padre Pio and so many others, was not accused of sexual misconduct, as if suffering such a slander, as if undergoing such an injustice for the sake of the kingdom of the heavens, would not be proper for our Lord. What idiocy.

Instead… instead… our Lord carried all the injustice, all the weight of the wood of the cross that we carry, as if it were an injustice that happened to Him: “What you have done to the least of these, you have done to Me.”

Padre Pio carried the wood of the cross, and was nailed to the cross, helping to bear the burden that all of us should be carrying.

We receive from Christ and those who are with Him, like Padre Pio. However, we can’t just receive (for then, we don’t really receive anything), but we must shoulder the weight of the wood as well. We don’t have the strength, but Christ does, and we are to look to Him, not to ourselves.

It’s interesting that of stigmata of Padre Pio included the shoulder wound of Christ carrying the cross. Padre Pio said that this was a most painful wound, the shouldering of the weight of the wood. But we can shoulder this wood of the cross as well, looking to Jesus. And up we go, right up the mountain.

3 Comments

Filed under ., abuse, saints

Padre Pio Miracle Man — DVD film (Just. Wow.)

Padre Pio receiving the habit in the O.F.M.Cap.

I watched Padre Pio – Miracle Man on DVD last night. The neighbors know I’ve been mentioning Padre Pio on the blog, and gave me the DVD to watch. In was made in the 1990′s, copyrighted in 2000, and started to be redistributed by Ignatius Press in 2006.

Padre Pio’s canonization was in 2002 in the very midst of the sex abuse crisis, in the very midst, in fact, of The Judas Crisis. I think that Father Gordon MacRae (about) is on to something when he said that Pope John Paul II scheduled the canonization with a specific purpose in mind (see here).

If you’ve seen this film back in 2000, now is the time to see it again. You will be surprised at what you now see in the film, namely, the most horrific example of The Judas Crisis to date, though it started, in his case, in the early part of the last century and continued until the day of his death.

The pain of the stigmata was nothing compared to the betrayal he knew from among his own brethren in religious life, from priests, from bishops, archbishops, cardinals, from local ordinaries to unfortunate examples of the priesthood in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and in the Secretariat of State. He had the backing of many of the popes, but that didn’t matter to those who were so easily bent to be agents of Satan himself in Padre Pio’s persecution.

Here on Amazon: Padre Pio Miracle Man.

Padre Pio is very quickly becoming my all time favorite saint. I had lots of emotions during this film, including rage at those who ordered his confessional bugged with listening equipment. They should excommunicated post-mortem, just to make a statement, no matter where that order came from, however high up in the hierarchy. Remember, The Judas Crisis does not admit to a limit of evil.

But with our Lord there is no limit of goodness and kindness, and that is what we see with our Lord Jesus shining out from within this Father called Pio. Thanks be to God.

3 Comments

Filed under abuse, saints

An encounter with Padre Pio, chainsaw in hand, swarmed by yellowjackets (and Jenny the Jeep gets the last laugh)

Not that Padre Pio ever held a chainsaw, or could with those stigmata of his, or was ever swarmed by yellowjackets. That would be me, yesterday, cutting up a gargantuan red oak that had smashed down on Holy Souls Mountain road the other stormy day, still green, meaning wet, meaning incredibly heavy. The last piece I cut measured about 28″ across. Four trips with the pickup truck.

Yellowjackets were swarming all over the shattered bits of this tree, trying to lick up the sap on the edges. They were everywhere, under the rim of my hat, next to my ears and neck, landing on my hands. But they had little interest in me. I was storming heaven, mind you, that I not be taken out of this life then and there by the little flying beasts.

With chainsaw blazing, exhaust clouding, wood chips flying, sweat falling, branches creaking and breaking, chunks of log splitting off from the main tree and splashing into the water of the ditch beneath – not to mention the yellowjackets swarming – with all of that I couldn’t help but calmly think of a long phone conversation I had the other week with Father Gordon MacRae about Padre Pio. For something about that, read this.

Padre Pio, as Father said, repeating the words of the inquisitors sent from the Holy See, was a “most extraordinary soul.” The interrogators were quite antagonistic toward him before meeting with him. But they all independently and unbenounced to the others, came away in awe of Jesus in his soul, and manifested even in his body.

I had no heavenly visitation, no vision. Nothing like that. Just the tiniest smidgeon of a sense – with all that lumberjack mayhem going on – of the humble reverence in all humble thanksgiving that Padre Pio constantly lived before Mary’s Son, Jesus, seeing Jesus, as it were, in His love for us, giving Himself for us, still bearing those wounds now, manifesting the union of charity He provides for souls, union with the Most Holy Trinity. Such love for us itsybitsy creatures. We are just so very much nothing, but our Lord Jesus is just so very good and just so very kind.

I was encouraged not to be afraid of such love. Perfect love casts out fear, does it not? Yes, it does. But I am far from perfect love, often distracted, in fact, by the crashing of trees and the swarming of yellowjackets. But I was encouraged, it seemed, so very personally, by this Father called Pio.

Oh, and, just to say — HAH! — I didn’t use Jenny the Jeep to get the wood, as it is still too wet after that last storm (about 8 ½” of rain in about ten hours) to have her venture down the mountain path. If she started sliding, the sudden stop would be quite catastrophic. Had I been able to take Jenny down the way, I think she would have laughed, seeing which particular tree was to be cut to pieces. It was right there at that spot, I am given to understand, that the local kids, with their jeeps, would spin about just there in the ditch, where there was always water and plenty, plenty of mud. It’s great to cover one’s jeep with mud, mind you.

Anyway, one idiotic evening, as the story goes, one of the kids, who had a winch on the front of his jeep, threw the hook and cable over the branch of a great red oak, and then set the winch in motion, hauling his jeep right up the tree on a dare. When it left the ground, he found out that he had no way to right it again as he tried to set it down, causing much laughter all around. It seems that this is the very oak tree I cut up. I’m guessing that it was Jenny the Jeep who had the humiliating experience. This is, perhaps, how the seats got to be in such a terribly broken up state. At least Jenny will have the joy of bringing the wood up the last leg of Holy Souls Mountain. She has the last laugh. Hah!

I think I should mention in my next confession all the distraction with which I let myself be distracted. One doesn’t have to be distracted just because one is plagued with distractions. Laughter, of course, is not a distraction.

2 Comments

Filed under saints

Saint Lawrence, Father Alexamenos, Don Hash, Jackass for the Hour & Holy Souls Hermitage

In “Jackass for the Hour”, a tightly scripted and so needing to be revised, not yet published ecclesiastical thriller novel of some 750 pages (which I wrote while in between chapters of the doctoral thesis on Genesis 2,4–3,24), the major conversion of one of the protagonists, Don Hash, comes about when he realizes that his previous self-congratulations that he would never burn someone like Saint Lawrence to death was the very proof that he would do just that. Of course he would, given the circumstances, the political correctness, the fervor of the day.

Any attitude of self-congratulations is a license to kill, carrying with it the same attitude that saw the genocide rage in Rwanda. How stupid we are to build the shrines of the saints and proclaim we are their friends, saying that if we had lived back in the day, we would have kept such saints safe, never harming them ourselves. Such hypocrisy! Listen to Christ’s words:

Matthew 23,27 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within they are full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness. 28 So you also outwardly appear righteous to men, but within you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. 29 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you build the tombs of the prophets and adorn the monuments of the righteous, 30 saying, `If we had lived in the days of our fathers, we would not have taken part with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.’ 31 Thus you witness against yourselves, that you are sons of those who murdered the prophets. 32 Fill up, then, the measure of your fathers. 33 You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell? 34 Therefore I send you prophets and wise men and scribes, some of whom you will kill and crucify, and some you will scourge in your synagogues and persecute from town to town” (rsv).

When we pray to the saints, or have them as our patrons, or build their shrines, or give them a word of praise, or ask their intercession, we are, instead to put ourselves before them with humility, saying that surely we would have killed them just as others had killed them back in the day, that we are no different, that we stand in need of his or her intercession before the Throne of the Most High God in order to live by Christ’s love and not by way of our own self-congratulation. You get the idea.

For your distraction, here is part of a chapter from that novel, Jackass for the Hour. We are in media res, some hundreds of pages into the story. The hero, Father Alexamenos, after having been submitted to a violent interrogation at the airport, is being sequestered away in a prison which housed Saint Lawrence for three days. Father Alexámenos was to be put on trial, but his death was sought by too many for him to be put in a normal prison. The tiny church dedicated in honor of Saint Lawrence, which had been built over the prison, had been temporarily closed and reclaimed by the city for some restoration work which never seemed to begin. It was the dead of winter, on a particularly cold night, well below freezing. Excuse the English spelling of English, which I used to write the novel…

Two soldiers in plain clothes showed up to transport Father Alexámenos. They drove him to the junction of Via Leonina and Via Urbana, the lower entrance of the Metro stop on Via Cavour. The trains were not running at this time of night. Father Alexámenos had been blindfolded, but was listening carefully, trying to discern where they were taking him. They unlocked the gate and brought him in, locking it behind them, and throwing him to the floor. He successfully fell on his side, avoiding crushing his hands, which were cuffed behind his back. One of the soldiers made a phone call, letting it ring three times. He didn’t speak. Father Alexámenos noted through his blindfold that the lights of wherever they were had been cut.

They went far into the station and, instead of bothering to walk around the kiosk, grabbed Father Alexámenos and tossed him over the turnstiles like a sack of potatoes. Through their laughter, and through his pain, Father Alexámenos heard the telltale sounds of their climbing over the locked turnstiles, and knew that he was in a subway stop, somewhere with no steps leading into the station.

They dragged him to his feet and pushed him along for a short distance, then shouted at him to stop. Father Alexámenos listened to the cavernous silence and thought he must be on the platform itself. They told him to turn left and walk. Father Alexámenos counted the paces.

Before they came to the end of the platform they simply pushed him off, blindfolded, unto the tracks, a four and a half foot drop. He landed hard on his back between the rails, on the rocks and cement ties. The momentum of the impact rolled him over onto his face, almost unconscious, against one of the rails. His hands were still hand-cuffed behind his back. He had landed on them. The soldiers jumped down next to him, slamming the rocks into the back of his head.

They dragged Father Alexámenos by his hand-cuffs for a short distance, but then lifted him to his feet, pushing him along the tracks, walking in a north-easterly direction toward Stazione Termini. Father Alexámenos was still counting. At exactly one hundred and forty paces, one of the soldiers put his foot out and shoved him hard, causing him to fall once again onto the rocks and cement ties between the rails. Because of the way he was tripped, he fell directly on his face, opening the cuts next to his eyes once again. He had instinctively tried to break his fall by holding out his hands, but since they were shackled, his violent pulling on the handcuffs only managed to cut his wrists more, right through the bandages. He was again almost knocked unconscious. He knew he was on subway tracks, and wondered if being run over by a subway train would be his fate.

He heard the two soldiers busy behind him, making metal on metal noises. They were opening a manhole cover. They rolled him onto his back and dragged him into the hole, letting him drop. They heard him hit the water below and started cursing at him loudly, trying to get a reaction out of him. When this didn’t work, they repeatedly kicked rocks into the hole. They heard him try to move out of the way, splashing in the shallow water. He wasn’t unconscious. He wouldn’t drown. They had done their work. They replaced the cover, bolting it down, hiding it again with the stones.

It was then so absolutely quiet that Father Alexámenos could hear the pulse of his blood in his ears. He was in no sewer, which would be full of noise. This water was stagnant, and there were no rats. He rubbed his head against the wall in an attempt to remove his blindfold. It took him some minutes, but he finally succeeded. He could feel blood trickling down his face once again. What he then saw disappointed him. He didn’t see anything. It was pitch black.

But then he heard the rocks being weakly knocked away from the cover, and then some feeble struggling with the bolts… to no avail. He then heard his name being called, “Don Alexámenos, Don Alexámenos…” He recognised the voice. It belonged to Signor Kondrat, an engineer from Sophia, Bulgaria. For the crime of believing in God, his parents and his priest had been burned alive in the local communist era gulag, in which even cannibalism was not an uncommon fate for many Jews, Muslims, Orthodox and Catholic Christians. Father Alexámenos had rescued him from the Roman street mafia, which had amputated his left foot and maimed his right hand, so that he had to make his way by hopping on one crutch. After his wounds healed, he lived in the subway tunnels at night – loving his independence – finding it easy to avoid detection by the security cameras at the ends of the subway platforms during the early morning and late afternoon rush. He would sleep in the adjacent storage areas under whatever material was there. During the day he volunteered for some religious Sisters as a greeter of visitors to their street hospice.

Father Alexámenos didn’t even try to respond to him, knowing that he had been almost totally deaf for years. He concluded from this, however, that he must be close to the hospice, since Signor Kondrat couldn’t walk very far. [...]

Father Alexámenos now took stock of his situation. The hole he was in had about thirty centimetres of water in it, and was hardly larger than the manhole cover, but was fairly deep. He could feel with his head that there was a hole in the wall to the right, which rose about half a metre above water level. The floor level rose above the water on the other side of the hole, but there would be enough room to squeeze through. The risk was that he would be completely soaked with the freezing water if he did this, though he was almost entirely soaked already. There was no guarantee that there would be enough room for him on the other side of the hole, yet, it was a lost cause waiting for someone to rescue him there. Signor Kondrat could not leave the metro station until morning. After much effort, he finally pushed himself onto the dry dirt floor.

He was able to stand up, and wondered where he was. With his hand-cuffed hands, despite the injuries, he felt diamond shaped rocks making up the lower part of the wall behind his back. He took a step to the left of the floor and hit his head on the low ceiling. He moved along another step and immediately came to a spiral, rock staircase. Taking a few steps up, he stopped. Both the ceiling and the staircase were sealed off. Coming down the steps, crouching down, he slowly went in the opposite direction, scraping his elbow along the wall as a guide. He seemed to be in a narrow passageway, the low ceiling of which – as he could feel with his head – was smooth concrete. As he cautiously used his feet to sense any change in direction in what seemed to be a catacomb, he noted that the floor suddenly fell away. It was a staircase. He walked down a half dozen steps, sitting down on the lowest step, having lost his balance on what he then realized were two wobbly planks having water on either side. The ceiling was very low once again. He now knew exactly where he was. The low concrete ceilings were the bottoms of the subway tunnels which cut through the historic site. He had been here a number of times on pilgrimage. The church entrance was one hundred paces from the Metro stop, which was the only one in Rome without an escalator or any steps, inside or outside the station, and whose platform was not on an incline. It was another forty paces down into the prison from the church to the point where he had been dropped into the water.

Father Alexámenos remembered don Hash having spent a day during the previous summer taking him around to all the churches dedicated to Saint Lawrence, who, don Hash said, was imprisoned here, in the cellar of the Centurion Hippolytus, just before he was burned to death on the hill above, on Via Panisperna, in 258 A.D. Father Alexámenos remembered don Hash’s passion in recounting Lawrence’s ‘crime’ of having distributed the goods of the Church to the poor so that, when asked by the Emperor where the treasures of the Church were, Lawrence pointed to the poor, who were themselves the treasures of the Church. Father Alexámenos knew that, for a few days so long ago, that cellar, deep underground, witnessed great rejoicing in the Lord. Don Hash had said that Lawrence’s fellow prisoner, Lucillus, was blind, but, after being catechised and baptised by Lawrence, was cured. The Centurion, seeing this, also desired to be baptised by Lawrence. When the Centurion Hippolytus proclaimed his conversion to the Emperor Valerian, he was dragged to death behind horses along the Via Sacra just below the Palatine Hill. Father Alexámenos wondered if the first Alexámenos, his namesake, had witnessed the martyrdom.

[...] /// [Note to readers of the blog: I'm guessing that the first Alexamenos was also a martyr. He was the one being mocked for worshiping a crucified God, depicted by his mockers as a Jackass. See the detail of this ancient graffito in the header of the blog: here] /// [...]

Father Alexámenos knew that if he followed the passage up, he would come to a metal gate. Yet, the air would be less humid higher up. Seeing that he was sopping wet, that would be a plus. He crossed the wobbly planks, which required total concentration. All pilgrims would steady themselves with both hands on the walls to either side of the passage as they bent over. He, however, was handcuffed. Finally reaching the other side, he walked up the steps of the winding passage and pressed against the metal gate. It was locked. He couldn’t decide if it was colder there or colder further below.

He sat down on the steep steps and thought about this move of the Italian government, putting him in the prison of Saint Lawrence. Surely they were keeping him out of the reach of the media, and surely he was out of the way of causing trouble in public or military prisons, where he himself would be in danger because of the crimes with which he was being accused. This would certainly be the last place anyone would think to look for him, but there were a multitude of such unknown places. Why here? Were they sending a message to the Holy See as to the kind of punishment they expected for him? He thought of how Saint Lawrence had pointed to the poor when asked where the treasure of the Church was, and that he himself would not have the same opportunity, for he was accused of crimes against the poor themselves.

It was the coldest part of winter, and the coldest part of the night. He guessed that the temperature was below zero, and that his wet clothes were not freezing hard quite yet, perhaps because of the little body heat that he had left. He knew that he should keep moving in order to keep warm, but he was afraid that if he did so he would pass out on his feet from a combination of pain, lack of sleep and the confusion that comes with hypothermia. He could not afford to fall down the steps. Sitting crouched up to conserve body heat was a dangerous option, but was the only one he had. His hands, like his feet, were now completely numb. He could not even tell if his hands were touching the floor behind him as he sat with his back to the metal gate. Yet, some vertebrae and ribs were so painful that he could hardly breathe. Distracted by his pain, he didn’t remember that the gate opened inwardly.

He then realised his mistake in sitting down; he began to violently and uncontrollably shiver. He perceptibly felt heat escape his body in successive waves, but he felt too weak to get up. He remembered don Hash telling him about some military exercises in the Italian Alps, when one of the soldiers came down with hypothermia. “To sleep is to die,” he said.

In order to keep himself awake, he began reciting the mysteries of the Rosary out loud, but soon found himself drifting into longer and longer periods of reciting the prayers only in his mind. The prayers he did manage to say out loud made him wonder if he had been drugged, for his words were unclear even to himself. He finished and said, “No gaoler yet.” [...]

After the Litany of Loretto, he recited the end of the Salve Regina in earnest: “and after this our exile, show unto us the fruit of thy womb, Jesus, O Clement, O loving, O sweet Virgin Mary.”

When he finished these words, he was still shivering, though with much less vehemence. As the hours went by, his body was going through various stages of shutting down, becoming so cold that he could not move even with concerted effort. He was dying. He knew it. He couldn’t even open his eyes. He watched his own confusion, as if from a distance. He didn’t realise that, medically speaking, he had already long slipped into a coma. He started to recite Psalm 22 in Hebrew, but only reached the first line, not remembering the rest. He repeated the first line in Aramaic, words which Christ Himself had quoted upon the Cross: “Eli! Eli! Lema sabachtani? My God! My God! Why have you abandoned me?” He knew the cry spoke of an ongoing relationship, filled, like the rest of the Psalm, with filial love and praise of the Father… Jesus was speaking with the Father, who was listening. The abandonment – in the eyes of those on Calvary – confirmed the sign of the greatest love, that of the Son dying for us, as sent by the Father. The abandonment manifested their unity, just how completely Jesus, continuing in obedience to the will of the Father, took on what we deserved for our sins so as to have the right in justice, before the Father, to have mercy on us: “Father! Forgive them!” These thoughts swirled through his head. He was trying to stay awake. [...]

6 Comments

Filed under Catholic, saints

15 Holy Souls Hermitage Heroes and Heroines — Saint Aloysius Gonzaga, S.J.

The 1962 Missale Romanum has this as the opening prayer for the feast of Saint Aloysius:

Cæléstium donórum distribútor, Deus, qui in angélico júvene Aloísio miram vitae innocéntiam pari cum pæniténtia sociásti: ejus méritis et précibus concéde; ut, innocéntem non secúti, pœniténtem imitémur.

O God, Distributor of heavenly gifts, Who in the angelic youth Aloysius combined a wonderful innocence of life with penance, grant to his merits and prayers that we, who have not followed him in innocence, may imitate his penance.

What wisdom the Church has. Of course, there are those who equal Aloysius in purity of soul, and even, I would think, surpass him. I’m one of those who don’t come anywhere near his clarity of vision, his agility of soul. That’s one of the reasons why he’s a patron of the hermitage. A good reason, no?

Take note of the vesting prayers for Mass, in particular that of the cincture:

Præcinge me, Domine, cingulo puritatis, et exstingue in lumbis meis humorem libidinis; ut maneat in me virtus continentiæ et castitatis.

Gird me, O Lord, with the cincture of purity, and extinguish within me all evil desires, that the virtue of continence and chastity may abide in me.

We must pray that all priests might always have this virtue, no? We want all priests to have that purity of soul, that agility of spirit whereby we priests might all take in what is happening at the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, no?

I remember I was very quietly saying this very prayer in the sacristy of the chapel of Saint Gabriel in preparation for Holy Mass. A gentleman came into the sacristy who wanted to know what hymns were to be sung. He stopped himself from enquiring about this, and decided to berate me for praying such prayers, since that belonged to another time and we just don’t do that kind of thing anymore. Really? Today we don’t need these prayers? Really?

I remember that in the dark years of the latter half of the 20th century, Saint Aloysius was singled out to be mocked by those who should know better. They almost equated purity with being effeminate. This is really stupid. Only the most manly can be pure with the grace of God. I contend that people are scared to death of purity not so much because they won’t be able to indulge themselves in sensuality, but especially because they are afraid of the agility of soul that they would have, permitting them, by the Lord’s grace, to see what the wounds of Christ’s Passion and Death were and are all about. This is a crushing reality of truth and charity for those who are impure, but the weight of the glory of God bringing one into humble reverence before our Redeemer for those who are thankful in the Lord’s grace.

The artwork I chose for this post reflects his preoccupation at the end of his life. It is how he died, caring for those thrown away. He died of the plague he thus contracted, a man’s man expressing Christ’s love. Good on him.

If I remember correctly, that artwork is to be found in Santo Spirito in Saxia hospital on the Tiber River near the Vatican, where he did a bit of his care for the sick. It was in that very hospital where I myself was a patient. It was like being on the receiving end of his saintly ministrations. The nursing staff, however, were not expressive of the purity of Saint Aloysius. Yikes! I think that he should be a patron saint of health care workers.

Leave a Comment

Filed under saints

Saint who? Romuald? Born before electricity? What’s that got to do with Holy Souls Hermitage blogging?

“Saint Romuald was an Italian hermit born around 950 A.D. The son of aristocratic parents, Saint Romuald indulged as a lavish and thoughtless youth. Shocked by witnessing his father win a dual, Saint Romuald fled to a local abbey and entered religious life. Drawn to eremitic simplicity, he traveled through Italy reforming monasteries and eventually founded the Camaldolese Order. As Saint Peter Damian described, Saint Romuald’s goal was to, “…turn the whole world into a hermitage, and make all the multitude of the people associates of the monastic order” (divineoffice.org) :)

Not everyone will know that the great saint kind of more or less hermit (though admittedly super incredibly austere) not only has his feast today in the Novus Ordo, but had his feast for one year on this date in a post-tridentine calendar just a bit after the reforms. His feast was then transferred to the date of the transfer of his relics.

Leave a Comment

Filed under saints

The arrogant hell of universal salvation – the heaven of humble thanksgiving for the few being saved

O.K. folks! You want a cool (so to speak) fire and brimstone sermon that will shake you up?
http://olrl.org/snt_docs/fewness.shtml
That’s the great Saint Leo of Port Maurice. Super wonderful.

Now then, having read that most Yikesfull sermon, see the post AND comments of the post: Why would a nice priest go to hell? – Yikes! - HERE!

It’s about humble thanksgiving for Mary’s Son, about enthusiastic friendship with Him! Look to Him!

But, that’s only if you’re brave enough to have a serious thought for the day…

I double dare you!

Yep. This thought for the day is like extreme sport fully sick awesomeness.

1 Comment

Filed under Catholic, saints, Spiritual Life

Saint Damien de Veuster (“Unclean! Unclean!”) and Father Gordon J. MacRae (“Unclean! Unclean!”)

This picture of Saint Damien de Veuster – Molokai was sent in by Father Gordon J MacRae

While Bishop Louis Désiré Maigret, vicar apostolic, believed that the lepers at the very least needed a priest to minister to their needs, he realized that this assignment could potentially be a death sentence, and thus did not want to send any one person “in the name of obedience”. [...] Father Damien was the first to volunteer and on May 10, 1873, Father Damien arrived at the secluded settlement at Kalaupapa, where Bishop Maigret presented him to the 816 lepers living there. [Father] Damien’s first course of action was to build a church and establish the Parish of Saint Philomena. [Go Saint Philomena!] His role was not limited to being a priest: he dressed ulcers, built homes and beds, built coffins and dug graves. Six months after his arrival at Kalawao he wrote his brother, Pamphile, in Europe:

…I make myself a leper
with the lepers
to gain all
to Jesus Christ.

[Father] Damien’s arrival is seen by some as a turning point for the community. Under his leadership, basic laws were enforced, shacks became painted houses, working farms were organized and schools were erected. At his own request, and that of the lepers, Father Damien remained on Molokai (wikipedia, but see OK FSSP site here).

In the following picture, look at the eyes with which he beheld the lepers and the Most Blessed Sacrament, and hands that cared for the lepers and consecrated the Most Blessed Sacrament… Yikes!

Father Damien died 15 April 1889, at 49 years of age. I think it’s way, way cool that his feast day was NOT assigned to the day he died, but rather to 10 May, as that was the day in 1873 when he arrived at the leper coloney for the first time, the day, to the point, that he laid down his life for his fellow man. Imagine his priest’s heart! Yikes! and Yikes! again.

“The leper who has the disease shall wear torn clothes and let the hair of his head hang loose, and he shall cover his upper lip and cry, `Unclean, unclean’ (Leviticus 13,45 rsv).

Of course, there were those at the time who said that it was Father Damien’s own fault that he got leprosy, for he was dirty (digging graves!), wore torn clothes (giving the best to the lepers), and let the hair of his head hang loose (there was a sea breeze…). And since Father Damien wasn’t about to shout “Unclean! Unclean!”, his detractors did this for him, usually preachers making sure their flocks weren’t “taken in” by the charity of the Catholic priest. Sigh. Father Damien was never ever a social worker. He served Jesus in the most marginalized. It was Father Damien’s joy to be mistreated for the sake of Jesus.

I wonder if Father Damien frequently met with non-leper “lepers” who were mistakenly thought to have leprosy, or, for ulterior motives, were maliciously declared to have leposy, and were put in with other lepers on the boat to Molokai, and unceremoniously dumped on the beach as a kind of exorcism of evil from the “civilization” enjoyed by the other islands. I bet this was frequent enough. “Ooooh! Loooook! That one has a non-pigmented spot on his skin! He must be a leper!” with the one saying that knowing full well that it was only a scar from a fire that had broken out in a sugar-cane shed. No trial. Just banishment. And… and… a new job opening for non-lepers.

An analogy: Let’s take Father MacRae. Those who know anything ABOUT Father MacRae know of his innocence and, hopefully, the upcoming overturning of his conviction. But for some, he remains the poster boy of perpetrators of sexual abuse by clergy.

Not surprisingly, there are priests and bishops who will beat the drum of priestly solidarity — you know, in all niceness — but who will not only not say anything in favor of Father MacRae, but will brow beat into hell anyone who would mention his name. They stay away, distancing themselves: “It’s just that I don’t want to get leprosy too! I don’t want to take the heat of the media, and SNAP, and VOTF! I don’t! I don’t! I’m a coward! Toooooooooo weeeeeeaaaak!!!!”

  • Father Damien about himself – “I make myself a leper with the lepers to gain all to Jesus Christ.”
  • Saint Paul about himself – “To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some” (1 Corinthians 9,22).
  • Saint Paul about our Heavenly Father and Jesus — “For our sake He made Him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in Him we might become the righteousness of God” (2 Corinthians 5,21).
  • Cardinal Avery Dulles about Father Gordon MacRae “Someday your story and that of your fellow sufferers will come to light and will be instrumental in a reform. Your writing, which is clear, eloquent, and spiritually sound will be a monument to your trials” (About).

Quotations of Saint Damien de Veuster – Molokai, sent in by Father Gordon J MacRae

3 Comments

Filed under abuse, Catholic, saints

| LUMENA | PAX TECUM FI | Indeed: Peace be with you, Philomena, you Lover of the Light of Christ! (Update on the Autism Novena and the coolest icon to date)

This is the best representation by way of a written Icon or a painted image that I’ve come across yet. It’s be Vivian Imbruglia, who has a child living on the autism spectrum. She was inspired to write this icon because of a favor granted while participating in the autism novena.

For those of you following the blog by email or the WordPerfect “reader”, you probably don’t notice that I’ve added a couple hundred more names to the autism widget of the HSH blog from Mary Ann’s Autism Novena over on Missionbell.

I dumped the names in a word-processor, turned on the line-numbering, and discovered that there are now 2857 names of those with autism included in the parayers.

If you know of anyone who’s anywhere on the autism spectrum, send Mary Ann the first name of the person. Of course, a whole family has autism in a manner of speaking when one person has it. They are included in the prayers as well! In case you didn’t click on the link above: HERE!

Leave a Comment

Filed under autism, saints

Monsignor Michael and These Stone Walls

Monsigor Michael, an extraordinary canon lawyer, has an awesome guest-post over on These Stone Walls. It’s a great read about not counting the cost, about witnessing to our Lord when no one else will, about taking the heat for that but rejoicing in the friendship of our Lord. Totally cool! He has a much easier style of writing than yours truly. Very enjoyable. A sign that someone knows what they’re talking about. Lots of suffering behind what he’s written. Awesome. HERE.

Leave a Comment

Filed under abuse, martyrdom, saints

The incredible irony of the real Saint Catherine of Siena — A HSH special — parce que je suis un enfant terrible! Hah!

Some snippets from a previous post:

We find some of the fruits of the conversations between our Lord Jesus and Saint Catherine in The Divine Doctrine of Jesus Christ. In this post, I include a vignette representing the incisiveness of this doctrine and the wonderful clarity of her own spiritual life. These few words provide the key to understanding what is – it seems for us priests – by far the most difficult passage in the Gospels, a passage found, in one way or another, throughout the Scriptures of both Testaments. One will have to go through quite a purgatory in this life or the next in order to sound out the truth of her words. I once heard her words being mocked by an ecclesiastic who is influential in seminary formation for many Episcopal Conferences, and who for many years now has begged me not to publish the comments in this post, wanting, as he does, to be the first to write on this passage of Catherine, but to mock it instead of explaining it. Such drama! What to do? Publish the post, of course!

In this passage of The Divine Doctrine, Christ’s words are incisive and ironic, and lead us to the seeming paradox of caritas in veritate, of charity in truth

She is relating her report of what our Lord is dictating to her. Jesus is speaking about Saint Paul’s interpretation of the key of knowledge, by which we see what the eye cannot see, hear what the ear cannot hear, and understand in our hearts what otherwise cannot arise in the heart of man. Saint Paul, in 1 Corinthians 2,9, does interpret Isaiah 64,10 – cited in Matthew 13,15, Acts 28,27, et al. – by saying it is by way of the love of God, by way of the crucified Lord of glory, that we see and hear and understand. Paul is accurate, says our Lord – as Saint Catherine relates – so much so that “questo parbe che volesse dire Paulo,” so much so that “this seems to be what Paul wanted to say,” that is, as if it were Paul’s revelation, Paul’s knowledge, Paul’s very own desire. In other words, Paul was so transformed by grace, that it was as if Paul spoke on his own authority. Yet, in this passage, the most erudite of all academic Pharisees himself happily admits that he is speaking by the power of God and the revelation of the Holy Spirit. Jesus was not conjecturing about what it seems to Him that Paul wanted to say, as if Jesus were Paul’s student: “It seems to me that Paul wanted to say this…” Jesus was rather confirming just how correct Paul’s words were, for they were actualized in Paul’s life with the grace of Jesus, that power of God, and the revelation of the Holy Spirit.

Jesus Himself fulfilled the vocation of Isaiah, to blind eyes, stop up ears, harden hearts, and remove all understanding lest people, including us priests, turn to the Lord to be saved. Good! We are not to pretend that we can turn to the Lord under our own power like some Pelagian work-your-own-way-to-God idiot. We must allow ourselves, by God’s grace, to be turned to the Lord, to be brought up into His mercy. We hate any demand to give up control over ourselves, even of our spiritual lives, even to the Lord Himself. This is our fallen human condition. It is a crucifixion of our fallen spirits simply to watch the Lord bringing us to Himself. If people want to have a work to do in the spiritual life, it is this, to be crucified. When we have our eyes fixed on Him, our ears listening in obedience, our hearts able to love whatever the cost of a pierced heart, this will then be our greatest joy, a proof of the resurrection of the Lord in our lives, for we cannot be led by a dead god in this way, but only in friendship with the Living God.

But let’s test this friendship with our Lord, shall we? Let’s take a sentence from the Theologian, Saint Gregory of Nyssa, who also makes a comment on Paul’s letters, this time on Ephesians, 5,23 – “The husband is the head of the wife just as Christ is also the Head of the Church, Himself Savior of the Body.” The question is, who interprets whom? Does Jesus guess what His Body wants, or does the Body know, because of intimate friendship, what the Head of the Body wants?

O de kefalhn thV EkklhsiaV ton Criston einai maqwn, touto pro pantwn dianoeisqw, oti pasa kefalhn tw upokeimenw swmati omofuhV esti kai omoousioV.

Here’s my translation of that, since the usual one is absolutely pitiful:

But the one learning the Head of the Church to be Christ thoroughly understands this before all things, that the entire Head, in subjection to the Body, is of the same nature and same being.

[Gregorius Nyssenus, De Perfectione et qualem oporteat esse Christianum, ad Olypium Monachum, Patrologia Graeca, XLVI, 1863, ed. J.-P. Migne, 1863, 251-286. If I remember correctly, this quote is spread across columns 274-275.]

This is Gregory’s greatest spiritual work, and he here flies into the heavens. He is at his absolute best, his most sublime. He doesn’t say that Christ is subject to us, but that Christ is teaching us to be subject to Himself, making us capable of learning this by way of Himself taking on our human nature. Christ Jesus doesn’t need to learn from us what we seem to want to express (“questo parbe che volesse dire Paulo” – “this, it seems to me – is what Paul wanted to say”). Instead, as Catherine analogously reports Jesus’ words, It seems as if this is what Paul himself wanted to say, though Paul actually said this by the power of God and the revelation of the Holy Spirit!

So, in this friendship with our Lord, blessed are we priests if we thank our Lord for sending women like Saint Catherine of Siena into our lives in every which way. Thank you, Lord!

1 Comment

Filed under saints

I, for one, voted “Yes” for Gavin.

Totally awesome. What. A. Saint! Watch. Weep. Rejoice. Vote: HERE

And, with such as Gavin speaking to us, I can’t resist putting this up:

1 Comment

Filed under Catholic

Saints Dominic Savio and Gerard Majella on false accusation. Yikes!

A reader sends this in. Wow. The saints are awesome!

The Life of Saint Dominic Savio by Saint John Bosco   From Ch. 6, “Taking Punishment” …

His teacher tells us a striking episode:

“One day some of my pupils did something very wrong that warranted expulsion. The culprits sensed the danger and agreed to tell me that it was all Dominic’s fault. I did not think him capable of such a thing, but so convincingly did they speak that, against my better judgment, I believed them. In just anger I stormed into the classroom and, after speaking in general terms, I turned to Savio and shouted: ‘And it had to be you! Don’t you know that you can be expelled? You’re lucky it’s your first serious fault. Make sure it’s your last!’”

“Dominic could easily have cleared himself and had his innocence affirmed, but instead he kept silent, lowered his head as in guilt, and stared at the floor. But God defends the innocent, and the next day the real culprits were found and Dominic’s innocence proved. Sorry for having given him an undeserved scolding, I took him aside and asked: ‘Why didn’t you tell me you were innocent?’”

“‘Because that boy had been in trouble before and would have been expelled. I hoped I would be forgiven because this would have been my first fault. Besides, I remembered too that Our Lord had been falsely accused once.’”   “No more was said, but everybody admired Dominic’s endurance. He had returned good for evil, prepared to take punishment for the boy who had lied about him.’”

Yikes! Well, this reminds me of Saint Gerard Majella, who was falsely accused of making babies with a farm girl who lived between his home and the novitiate of the Redemptorists freshly founded by Alphonsus Liguori. It was the practice to go home for a couple of weeks a few times during the noviate to test the vocations of the candidates. Gerard slept in the barn of that family on his long trek home. The girl made advances. Gerard rejected them. She was already pregnant by her boyfriend, but wanted Gerard for the father, not her boyfriend. Even though Gerard rejected her advances, she told everyone that Gerard had done this. He was forthwith thrown out of the novitiate, but said nothing, never defending himself. Yikes!

After some time, the girl repented and told everyone the true story. Gerard was immediately hailed as a saint. On returning to the novitiate of the Redemptorists, Alphonsus asked Gerard why he had not defended himself, but let himself be disgraced for all the world to see. He said that he was just following the rule of the community which Alphonsus himself had written. In the rule it was stated that if anyone were to be falsely accused, they should keep their silence and suffer like Christ, who, in fact, went to His death based on false accusation. I think this inicident is what made Alphonus into Saint Alphonsus, and it surely helped Gerard to become Saint Gerard. Yikes!

I wonder if any of us would have the guts not to say anything. Yikes!

Leave a Comment

Filed under saints

Conversion of Saint Paul and HSH

On this day, five years ago, this is how I closed off the comments of thanksgiving prefacing the doctoral thesis on Genesis 3,15. I call the conversion of Saint Paul (today’s feast), the reception of the enmity as described in Genesis 3,15:

Rome – 25 January 2007

Feast of the reception of enmity by Saul of Tarsus

וַיְמַהֵר וַיִּקְרָא בְּבָתֵּי כְנֵסִיּוֹת אֶת־יֵשׁוּעַ לֵאמֹר כִּי־הוּא בֶּן־הָאֱלֹהִים הוּא ׃ (Acts 9,20)

Saint Paul understands Genesis 3,15. That’s why the more knuckleheaded of the past 60 years of commentary say, on Romans 5,12, utterly ignores Genesis. Interesting, no? So afraid of the truth. This is a mortal sin in Exegesis. If one part of scripture clearly explicitly commenting on another part of scripture, one has to take a look at that other part of Scripture, no? But, nope. It’s not done. I’ll try to rectify that with a popular version of thesis, where I mentioned this difficulty. This is very much what Holy Souls Hermitage is all about. See the My Books page. Yikes!

1 Comment

Filed under saints