Tag Archives: Saint Paul

“The sower went out to sow…” Great! An easy parable! I don’t have to listen! A reprimand from Saint Catherine of Siena

sower went out to sow googled image

Dominica in Sexagesima…

In illo témpore: Cum turba plúrima convenírent, et de civitátibus properárent ad Iesum, dixit per similitúdinem: Exiit, qui séminat, semináre semen suum…

The parable of the sower is the Gospel in the Extraordinary Form today. Even if you will be attending the Ordinary Form, I would like to call your mind to some commentary I made some years ago on a phrase of Saint Catherine of Siena. Keep in mind some words of Saint Paul for the Epistle: “With the weak I am weak…” That’s an examination of conscience as opposed to the opposite, and is necessary for understanding all this, or anything for that matter. O.K. Here we go. This is one to mull over, so I’ll just let it sit here for a while:

We find some of the fruits of the conversations between our Lord Jesus and Saint Catherine in The Divine Doctrine of Jesus Christ. In this post, I include a vignette representing the incisiveness of this doctrine and the wonderful clarity of her own spiritual life. These few words provide the key to understanding what is – it seems for us priests – by far the most difficult passage in the Gospels, a passage found, in one way or another, throughout the Scriptures of both Testaments. One will have to go through quite a purgatory in this life or the next in order to sound out the truth of her words. I once heard her words being mocked by an ecclesiastic who is influential in seminary formation for many Episcopal Conferences, and who for many years now has begged me not to publish my own comments, wanting, as he does, to be the first to write on this passage of Catherine, but to mock it instead of explaining it. Such drama! What to do? Publish this post, of course!

In this passage of The Divine Doctrine, Christ’s words are incisive and ironic, and lead us to the seeming paradox of caritas in veritate, of charity in truth. The words under discussion are found in the Gospels between the Parable of the Sower and Jesus’ explanation of the Parable of the Sower.

saint paul googled imageCatherine is relating her report of what our Lord is dictating to her. Jesus is speaking about Saint Paul’s interpretation of the key of knowledge, by which we see what the eye cannot see, hear what the ear cannot hear, and understand in our hearts what otherwise cannot arise in the heart of man. Saint Paul, in 1 Corinthians 2,9, does interpret Isaiah 64,10 – cited in Matthew 13,15, Acts 28,27, et al. – by saying it is by way of the love of God, by way of the crucified Lord of glory, that we see and hear and understand. Paul is accurate, says our Lord – as Saint Catherine relates – so much so that “questo parbe che volesse dire Paulo,” so much so that “this seems to be what Paul wanted to say,” that is, as if it were Paul’s revelation, Paul’s knowledge, Paul’s very own desire. In other words, Paul was so transformed by grace, that it was as if Paul spoke on his own authority. Yet, in this passage, the most erudite of all academic Pharisees himself happily admits that he is speaking by the power of God and the revelation of the Holy Spirit. Jesus was not conjecturing about what it seems to Him that Paul wanted to say, as if Jesus were Paul’s student: “It seems to me that Paul wanted to say this…” Jesus was rather confirming just how correct Paul’s words were, for they were actualized in Paul’s life with the grace of Jesus, that power of God, and the revelation of the Holy Spirit.

Jesus Himself fulfilled the vocation of Isaiah, to blind eyes, stop up ears, harden hearts, and remove all understanding lest people, including us priests, turn to the Lord to be saved. Good! We are not to pretend that we can turn to the Lord under our own power like some Pelagian work-your-own-way-to-God idiot. We must allow ourselves, by God’s grace, to be turned to the Lord, to be brought up into His mercy. We hate any demand to give up control over ourselves, even of our spiritual lives, even to the Lord Himself. This is our fallen human condition. It is a crucifixion of our fallen spirits simply to watch the Lord bringing us to Himself. If people want to have a work to do in the spiritual life, it is this, to be crucified. When we have our eyes fixed on Him, our ears listening in obedience, our hearts able to love whatever the cost of a pierced heart, this will then be our greatest joy, a proof of the resurrection of the Lord in our lives, for we cannot be led by a dead god in this way, but only in friendship with the Living God.

But let’s test this friendship with our Lord, shall we? Let’s take a sentence from the Theologian, Saint Gregory of Nyssa, who also makes a comment on Paul’s letters, this time on Ephesians, 5,23 – “The husband is the head of the wife just as Christ is also the Head of the Church, Himself Savior of the Body.” The question is, who interprets whom? Does Jesus guess what His Body wants, or does the Body know, because of intimate friendship, what the Head of the Body wants?

saint gregory of nyssa googled imageO de kefalhn thV EkklhsiaV ton Criston einai maqwn, touto pro pantwn dianoeisqw, oti pasa kefalhn tw upokeimenw swmati omofuhV esti kai omoousioV.

Here’s my translation of that, since the usual one is absolutely pitiful:

But the one learning the Head of the Church to be Christ thoroughly understands this before all things, that the entire Head, in subjection to the Body, is of the same nature and same being.

[Gregorius Nyssenus, De Perfectione et qualem oporteat esse Christianum, ad Olypium MonachumPatrologia Graeca, XLVI, 1863, ed. J.-P. Migne, 1863, 251-286. If I remember correctly, this quote is spread across columns 274-275.]

This is Gregory’s greatest spiritual work, and he here flies into the heavens. He is at his absolute best, his most sublime. He doesn’t say that Christ is subject to us, but that Christ is teaching us to be subject to Himself, making us capable of learning this by way of Himself taking on our human nature. Christ Jesus doesn’t need to learn from us what we seem to want to express (“questo parbe che volesse dire Paulo” – “this, it seems to me – is what Paul wanted to say”). Instead, as Catherine analogously reports Jesus’ words, It seems as if this is what Paul himself wanted to say, though Paul actually said this by the power of God and the revelation of the Holy Spirit!

So, in this friendship with our Lord, blessed are we priests if we thank our Lord for sending women like Saint Catherine of Siena into our lives in every which way. Thank you, Lord! — Jesus is just this good, just this kind. Now, think about it: “A sower went out to sow…”

1 Comment

Filed under Catholic, Spiritual Life

Saint Paul’s reception of enmity (Genesis 3,15)

On this day, six years ago, this is how I closed off the comments of thanksgiving prefacing the doctoral thesis on Genesis 3,15. I call the conversion of Saint Paul (today’s feast), the feast of Saint Paul’s reception of the enmity (as described in Genesis 3,15):

Rome – 25 January 2007

Feast of the reception of enmity by Saul of Tarsus

וַיְמַהֵר וַיִּקְרָא בְּבָתֵּי כְנֵסִיּוֹת אֶת־יֵשׁוּעַ לֵאמֹר כִּי־הוּא בֶּן־הָאֱלֹהִים הוּא ׃ (Acts 9,20)

Saint Paul understands Genesis 3,15. That’s why the more knuckleheaded of the past 60 years of commentary, say, on Romans 5,12, utterly ignores Genesis. Interesting, no? If one part of scripture clearly explicitly commenting on another part of scripture, one has to take a look at that other part of Scripture, no? But it’s not done. I’ll try to rectify that with a popular version of thesis, where I mentioned this difficulty. This is very much what Holy Souls Hermitage is all about. Yikes!

1 Comment

Filed under Genesis, saints

Conversion of Saint Paul and HSH

On this day, five years ago, this is how I closed off the comments of thanksgiving prefacing the doctoral thesis on Genesis 3,15. I call the conversion of Saint Paul (today’s feast), the reception of the enmity as described in Genesis 3,15:

Rome – 25 January 2007

Feast of the reception of enmity by Saul of Tarsus

וַיְמַהֵר וַיִּקְרָא בְּבָתֵּי כְנֵסִיּוֹת אֶת־יֵשׁוּעַ לֵאמֹר כִּי־הוּא בֶּן־הָאֱלֹהִים הוּא ׃ (Acts 9,20)

Saint Paul understands Genesis 3,15. That’s why the more knuckleheaded of the past 60 years of commentary say, on Romans 5,12, utterly ignores Genesis. Interesting, no? So afraid of the truth. This is a mortal sin in Exegesis. If one part of scripture clearly explicitly commenting on another part of scripture, one has to take a look at that other part of Scripture, no? But, nope. It’s not done. I’ll try to rectify that with a popular version of thesis, where I mentioned this difficulty. This is very much what Holy Souls Hermitage is all about. See the My Books page. Yikes!

1 Comment

Filed under saints

18 Exorcism tips from Holy Souls Hermitage — The weaker you are, the better!

Here’s my pedantic translation of the Greek of 2 Corinthians 12,7b-9a:

In order that I might not raise myself beyond myself, a thorn in the flesh was given to me, a messenger of Satan, that he may pummel me, lest I raise myself beyond myself. For this one, I called to the Lord for help three times, in order that he [the messenger of Satan] might stand apart from me. And He definitively stated to me: “My grace suffices for you, for power is perfected within a lack of power.”

There is always a temptation for us, in our weakness, to work our own way to heaven instead of depending on our Lord and Savior, Christ Jesus, a temptation to raise ourselves beyond ourselves, to pick ourselves up, as it were, by both of our bootstraps at the same time, being so intent on this that we don’t realize that instead of going upwards, we crash down on our keisters, sliding down to hell. Not good.

Saint Paul, himself an exorcist, was, most ironically, given what he derogatorily calls a thorn in the flesh, a pummeling, as it were, of fists, by a messenger, an angel of Satan. Sound familiar? Curé of Ars? Padre Pio? Satan is always at the ready to do his worst against any of us, but must look to the will of our Heavenly Father for a permission such as we see in the Book of Job. Satan has a right to us in this world, but since Jesus died for us, he is restrained by God until we can benefit from such an onslaught. Our heavenly Father is not cruel. He is just, and will give the devil his due in this world. Our heavenly Father will only give such a permission in view of His mercy, in view of His drawing good out of evil. In this case, with Saint Paul, as with so many of us, the good to be drawn out of our being pummeled by a messenger, an angel of Satan, is that we might not lift ourselves beyond ourselves, something we cannot do anyway. Our Heavenly Father wants that we might avoid hurting ourselves. Much better to suffer a bit from a messenger of Satan than to go to hell. Much better for us to learn humility, to be simple children of our Heavenly Father lifted up to Him by our Lord Jesus.

But how weak we are in being weak! Paul (Saint Paul, mind you), despite the good that could be drawn from all this, called to the Lord about this one (the fallen angel pummeling him) for help three times, that he (the fallen angel pummeling him) might leave him. He might have begged for the humility from which Satan runs. Saint Paul is confessing here. We should listen. He not doing this just to be humble as he’s writing, but also for our benefit. We would do well to ask our Lord for humility, that we might not fall into the temptation to lift ourselves beyond ourselves (which, idiots that we are, cannot be done anyway).

So, Jesus makes a definitive statement to Paul (see the perfect “tense”): “My grace suffices for you, for power is perfected within a lack of power.”

Wow. We stay weak in this world as we are perfected in the spiritual life, the Lord Jesus, with power, raising us up beyond ourselves to Himself. What is so majestically awesome about this is that the Lord drew us to Himself when He Himself was lifted up on the Cross.

The spiritual life of an exorcist has to be rather incisive. We must know that our Lord has control of our spiritual lives. We don’t have such control. He draws us to Himself. We cannot lift ourselves beyond ourselves up to Him. We cannot draw on strength that we do not have. We must depend entirely on Jesus. Sometimes we think that we are in control, but, you know, just need a little help from Jesus, just on the side. Help from Jesus would be nice, but not really necessary in this view. We have to forget about being merely helped. We have to be killed off so that we are dead to ourselves, but Christ lives within us. That, of course, is from the same Saint Paul. Awesome, no?

The mistake of pretty much everyone is to think that we become stronger as we progress in the spiritual life. Instead, we just realize how weak we truly are, though this in view of how strong Christ Jesus is in lifting us beyond ourselves to Himself. And that is truly awesome. So much so that Saint Paul doesn’t know what to say. He comes out with one of his unfathomable statements, from which, in context, we can, however, glean what he intends to say. He says: “When I am without power, then I am powerful (2 Corinthians 12,10b). We rejoice with Saint Paul!

Paul then goes on to speak of all the other conditions of weakness we ourselves might well complain about with him, but he boasts of them so that, as he says, the power of Christ may dwell within him. He speaks of being content with all lack of power, all insulting mistreatment, all distress, persecutions, and difficulties for the sake of Christ. A bit of an exam of conscience there for us, no? The weaker we are, the better for us in an exorcism, the better for those who are possessed. We look more to Jesus, and can therefore encourage the same.

Thanks for the great example, Saint Paul! Pray for us, that we might be happy to be weak, the weaker the better! Yikes!

Leave a Comment

Filed under exorcism