Tag Archives: pro-life

“Patient Dumping” — The new “ethnic cleansing” — some memories of my own

hudson river psychiatric centerSurely you’ve heard of federal allegations of patient dumping against the State of Nevada, which have it that over some years, hundreds of psych patients have been thrown into buses and transported to anywhere but within the borders of Nevada, to be unceremoniously dumped, regardless of the consequences for the patients. Saves money.

I heard talk of that about a facility in Poughkeepsie, what was once called the New York State Insane Asylum, where Rosemary Kennedy had her lobotomy, and where I was once the Catholic chaplain. The Hudson River facility once had a population of 18,000, with 9,000 patients and 9,000 staff and administration. The idea in its remaining years was to reduce numbers of patients and close the money hungry facility, no matter what. It finally closed the other year.

While I didn’t hear of carrying patients across state lines, I did hear of allegations about simply leading the patients into the forest down by the river and abandoning them. They would be found dead of exposure within a number of days. That seemed a bit too incredible. When I would ask about that, the process seemed to be a bit more complicated, with a bit more distance between the hospital and the deaths, so that the alleged situation involved having patients who were truly incapable of living in group homes assigned to group homes nevertheless. It wouldn’t take long to see the same result in the forest down by the river, it seems.

Whatever about that, I was once sitting in one of the admin offices, waiting to speak to one of the higher-ups, and whiled away the time by paging through some of the pamphlets left by pharmaceutical companies trying to sell their wares. One was a medicine that purportedly “cured” schizophrenia. Wow, thought I. So, I read it more carefully, including the microscopic fine print on the back of the pamphlet. It said that the medicine would allow nearly all patients to be discharged successfully from psychiatric institutions. The only catch was that the medicine would certainly kill at least one in every one hundred patients for an unknown reason. But — hey! — you save money!

Of course, such things may only be urban myths (and I don’t know if they used that medicine or not). However, I do know that there was a great deal of tension about finding ways to reduce the patient population.

transfiguration googled image

It is a sign of a total collapse of a culture and nation when the most vulnerable are treated like trash to be dumped.

We’ve being doing that for decades — and by the tens of millions — with the unborn and just born.

Now we’ve moved on to vulnerable adults.

Very soon it will be about saying that Catholics cannot act according to their consciences as formed by the Church, and they will be penalized and worse for respecting life. But we’ve already come to that too. All out genocides follow pretty quickly. Know your history. But even if you don’t, that should be common sense.

One of the greatest gifts one could give society is to take care of those who are disabled in any way. Sure, we sometimes need help. Sometimes, institutions are necessary. I know of one set up for children who… eat… themselves… :( But, if it is possible, taking care of the disabled at home bears a witness that is known far and wide, and is greatly appreciated. If more would do this, we would have a much more loving culture. But right now, few do. And we live in a culture of death.

This is the greatness of Jesus, that He reached into this darkness, taking it all on Himself, so that He would have the right in justice to have mercy on us.

That mercy is not about doing away with the just effects of original sin in this life, such as weakness of mind and will, emotions all over the place, and sickness, and death.

Rather, that mercy of His is about having us, weak as we are, live His love for others, respecting them, caring for them, having hope that all will be different in heaven, where sickness and disability and death are no longer. When we do live this love, we ourselves gain so much.

Remember the FoxNews  interview of the father of the little boy embraced by Pope Francis?

pope francis boy-

It’s the little boy who teaches us how to love. It’s the disabled who teach us how to love. It’s the disabled who teach us that there is no “we” and “them”, but only WE, all of us together, hear on this earth, and for eternity, when we will be whole and entire, when the tables will be reversed on those who so hated the disabled as to have them killed for the sake of money, for the sake of convenience, for the sake of the sense of “power”, of playing god.

Jesus was that disabled boy, that disabled girl, disabled man, disabled woman, while He willingly hung on the cross to teach us how to love without counting the cost, never backing down, no matter how convenient, how expedient that might seem to have been for some. Love right unto death. And Jesus would have us learn that. And we can. We have all the opportunities in the world right before us, if we would only open our eyes.

Jesus is just that good, just that kind, to provide the strength.

Question: Although patient dumping is common to both political parties, is this new bid for patient dumping a fairly direct consequence of Obamacare?

17 Comments

Filed under Pro-Life

The Gosnell Trial: Missing the Point So As To Favor Abortion

gosnell trial nbcphiladelphia com

The MSM who have reported on the Gosnell trial, now moving into the defense segment, have missed the point on purpose.

  • Oooo! He did icky things! But abortion is great if you’re not icky!
  • Oooo! His “clinic” was dirty! But abortion is great if you sweep the floor!
  • Oooo! His “clinic” was unsanitary! But abortion is great if you throw bleach on everything!

Instead, abortion is abortion is abortion is abortion is abortion. Within minutes, one is dead and one is injured if not also murdered. Death. Always. That’s what everyone should learn. The baby doesn’t care about dirty or unsanitary conditions.

For a super excellent perspective from a post-abortive, penitent woman, an excellent writer taking us along on her post-abortive journey of healing, see her article: What difference does it make?

20 Comments

Filed under Pro-Life

Meanwhile, at Café Latino (with an emphasis on Latin): Day Brightener!

cafe latino

There’s a Catholic and very much pro-life café in Australia which was recently established by a young old friend. So very Australian. Brings back good memories. She writes:

Dear Friends,

A photo of two beautiful baby girls each in the arms of her Mother. They posed for a quick photo for the Café Latino facebook page today, after their lunch.

“Today Café Latino was very privileged to have little Aurelia & Mummy visit us and cuddly Isabella and her Mama!”

Café Latino welcomes Mums and Bubs to come and enjoy the space for their Mum’s Groups get-togethers. The toy area and children’s books make it very appealing for children and for parents with toddlers. Have a look at the facebook page and help by clicking ‘like’ on:

https://www.facebook.com/cafelatinoadelaide

Please also ‘like’ the beautiful photo of the babies today!

Love, Marguerite

What a great idea that others might imitate. I don’t have facebook so I can’t “like” anything. But if you have facebook, “like” this!

6 Comments

Filed under Pro-Life

Updates and a P.S.: The Purposely Blackened Dome of Saint Peter’s Basilica in Rome — 2 April 2013

saint peter basilica rome 2 April 2013 -- blacked out for the occasion

Pope Francis is extremely astute. He is not politically correct. He analyzes situations. He has integrity. He’s a gentleman, a scholar, a missionary, a priest for you and me and the most marginalized of all.

A poor Church for the poor. Indeed. In doing this, he’s sent a message, a strong message, whose subtlety will not be lost on those for whom it is intended.

The Roman Curia and the world episcopacy will be on their toes more than ever. No more manipulation. No more political correctness. This helps to define his pontificate.

Lobbyists and politicians are freaking out. The dome was meant to be all lit up in a certain color.

Thank you for being a Father to the poor, Holy Father! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!

Update: Still the same…

saint peter basilica rome 2 May 2013 -- blacked out for the occasion

Those of you with ears to hear, listen to what the Spirit is telling to the Churches!

Update: Still the same. Heh heh heh.

saint peter basilica rome 2 May 2013 blackened dome4

 

P.S. To those who are really, really, really upset with this, I have a question: Why not just send me what I asked for? I mean, sometimes, things are just unworkable until things are taken care of.

For instance, you might remember that meeting at the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations over in Rome, you know, when Al Gore arrived for the planned smack-down of the Holy See, the one where he prepared by sending out letters to all the prime ministers and presidents and emperors and kings, you know, the heads of state, asking them to help him destroy the Holy See’s observations about, you know, nefarious things like “women’s health issues” and “prevention”. Remember how he got out of the car at FAO, and was immediately met, right at the curb, by some diplomats of the Secretariat of State of the Holy See, bearing copies of all those letters, since all those heads of state sent them right along to the Holy See, and how those diplomats showed him one of the letters and asked him if that was his signature, and how, without saying a word, he got back into his limo and went straight back to airport, straight back home with his tail between his legs? No? Ask about it. ;)

So, let’s try all this again: Why not just send me what I asked for? I thought you promised to do that from the beginning so we could see if we could speak with one voice. Because, you know, if we could, that would really be cool. Why not give it a try?

27 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Pro-Life

Pope Francis’ “Poor Church of the Poor” — Dhimmitude & Abortion Insurance Mandate non-compliance

saint francis

I think people have the totally wrong idea about Pope Francis and his “poor church of the poor” thing.

Because of the no-red-shoes bit, at least for now, and the lack of mozzetta, at least for now, and the simpler Mass vestments, many think it all has to do with some liberal agenda to destroy the liturgy. I don’t think so.

Pope Francis is utterly taken with our Lord and Savior, Christ Jesus, Divine Son of the Immaculate Conception. Saint Francis was too. Pope Francis’ question to us is about whether or not we are willing to know the poverty of the crucifixion.

Obama’s anti-life ideology of persecution of the Catholic Church in any way he can is catching on right around the world. Pope Francis is not unaware of this. There are many Catholics who will comply with this. This is why they voted for Obama in the first place. But, some will not comply.

So, just in the USA…

  • We are already losing adoption centers, etc., and we will be losing much more.
  • Businesses of those insisting on non-compliance will shut down.
  • Individuals who will not pay any penalty will suffer a great deal.
  • Muslims are exempt. This is about attacking Catholics.

Are we willing to witness to Christ? Or do we so love our lives in this world that we will throw eternity in heaven away just to get along for an ever so brief time here upon this earth?

Welcome to the poverty of dhimmitude. But I think Pope Francis will try to meet with Obama like Saint Francis met with the Sultan in Constantinople. Poor analogy there, I understand, but you know what I mean. I believe the Sultan to have been much more open to reason than Obama. The American President has the blood of millions of babies on his hands. That entrenches him. Of course, there have been spectacular conversions.

We follow Pope Francis in his lead. We hope. We pray. We stay close to Christ Jesus. We live the beatitudes.

Did I say that there was a ferocious series on the beatitudes on the sidebar of http://holysoulshermitage.com ?

16 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Pro-Life, separation of church and state

My lifelong friend, Don Reto Nay, the priest who heads up Gloria.TV, kicked in the face over the German episcopacy pushing the abortion pill

Gloria.TV – News Briefs: Don Reto Nay states his position

Don Reto Nay states his position - A raw online translation from the German page of Gloria.tv

One has the feeling that in the Val Tujetsch the devil was active.

Those are your words and I agree.

What has happened?

On the evening of 13 March – the day of the election of Pope Francis and the birthday of my late father in 1978 – my appointment was canceled as administrator of the parish Tujetsch Pfarreirat.

Why?

This is in connection with a witch hunt perpetrated by the German press.

The Crucible?

This hunt was launched by two homosexual activists from Germany, one is a well-known ex-Catholic and the other a priest.

What is Gloria.TV?

Gloria.TV is a site of Catholic orientation where any videos or audios can be uploaded including images and text. We have 21 voice-compartments, each with its own video. Gloria.TV has six editors in various languages, contains over 400,000 video, audio, text and images, and is visited by two million unique visitors each month. The events of the past several weeks has led to Gloria.TV becoming even more popular.

Of What is Gloria.TV accused?

The English-language editor of Gloria.TV criticized the German bishops in their hospitals because they have introduced the abortive “morning after” pill. When this pill is taken, statistics show that from every 100 women who have intercourse, approximagtely 5 and 7 cases of abortion occur killing a newly-conceived child. In other words, Catholic German bishops allow the killing of a newly conceived child in Catholic hospitals.

How is Gloria.TV criticized?

The English-language editors – not Gloria.TV – has associated the contempt for innocent human life with the German bishops and made that association by means of a swastika.

Why?

The swastika is a symbol of contempt for life and the “morning after pill” is a symbol of a disregard for life.

Can we compare these two things?

Each comparison is based on one aspect and not on the whole. With the Nazis, we know that they had no conscience. With respect to Catholic bishops, we may assume that this is not the case, although the introduction of the “morning-after” pill in Catholic hospitals proves otherwise.

Father Reto Nay

A strong symbol – the swastika

For who? When the Pope was presented in the media in a Nazi uniform (with swastika), very few were disturbed and also when he was shown with feces and urine on the cassock few objected. Was not this a scandal? Or, should one be dismissive when it comes to the Church, the doctrine, morality and truth when attacks originate from the secular media?

Nevertheless, bishops and swastika …

Whoever allowed the killing of newly-conceived children should not be overly sensitive. The swastika has ensured that the issue of the “morning after pill” remains a topic of discussion. This is crucial. We must save the living of today. The dead of yesterday, we can only mourn.

The use of the swastika has made a huge commotion

Anyone who would focus on a symbol from seventy years ago and who would object more to this symbol that for innocent human life, shows a complete lack of perspective and is simply trying to divert attention from the more critical issue which is protection of life in the womb.

For what?

For Gloria.TV, the current campaign resembles an independent voice on the Internet which is not under the control of the large and powerful big media where abortion and the “morning after pill” are accepted and promoted.

There have been allegations against you as administrator of the parish in Tujetsch.

It is not difficult today to find people who throw dirt on a pastor. It also requires no courage. The people who no longer practice their faith toss their spiritual filth at priests who faithfully teach the Catholic faith. It would have been very easy for me to be a pastor who would be approved by these people and by the secular newspapers. But then, I would no longer be a faithful Catholic priest.

Is this a criticism of the Parish Council who dismiss them?

Not in the least. The Parish Council Tujetsch is an excellent body. From the very start until today I have had a warm and friendly with our members, an open and positive relationship. But, I know that they must do what they must do and so they behave accordingly. Where the power of the powerful unfolds, the individual loses his freedom.

Is there a problem with the staff or volunteers of the parish?

Not at all. With respect to the staff and volunteers of the parish Tujetsch is not good but very good. I say this not to flatter someone or to give false praise. The collaboration with the catechists and pastoral sacristans was a pleasure. For all of them, I have very fond memories. It was an honor for me to be working with these people.

They were confronted with criticism of this page?

Of course, also because I have asked staff and volunteers always to express their views. I’m a priest not a journalist and can therefore tolerate the opinions of others. In my time in Tujetsch, I have received many good reviews. There has also been some criticism.

What do you mean?

I am referring to comments made in the local newspaper “Tuatschina” (the official bulletin of the community Tujetsch), which is published by Claudi Monn-Widera. Without contacting me, he published rumors of a local malcontent against my person. I knew from various sources that the author spoke out against me. He was encouraged by various parties to speak personally with me. But, he has cowardly refused to do so.

Why have not you talked to him?

Those who have pointed out the man responsible did so with confidence. But, when the “Tuatschina” by Claudi Monn has published its unfair article, I, on the same evening, went to his house for a open discussion. A window was lit in his house yet no one opened the door.

How do you look back on your experience in the Val Tujetsch?

With gratitude. God has directed everything very well.
————————————————-
English corrections made by:

Anthony Principe
Gloria.tv
USA16/03/2013 03:34:49

5 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Pro-Life

Bill Donohue on HHS revision of abortion mandate

New HHS Rules Welcomed

February 1, 2013
Bill Donohue comments on the revised rules, announced today, regarding the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate:

The rules proposed today by HHS appear to go a long way toward rectifying the most problematic provisions of the mandate. Essentially, the rules provide insularity for Catholic institutions: they will not be directly involved in providing health insurance coverage for contraception, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs.

Perhaps the most welcome aspect of the new strictures is the elimination of the criteria that define what constitutes a religious institution. Gone altogether is the highly objectionable definition that excludes an exemption for those religious entities that hire and serve mostly people of other religions. As has been pointed out many times, this definition punishes Catholic institutions for not discriminating against Jews, Protestants, Muslims, Mormons, agnostics, and atheists.

The new rules now simply revert to the established understanding of a religious employer as defined by the IRS. This makes eminently good sense.

Still unresolved is the issue of private employers who invoke a religious objection to providing insurance coverage for services they deem morally objectionable. Because the new rules have not been finalized, and there is an opportunity for further public discussion, more progress may yet be made.

While many aspects of the new proposal need to be examined before a final conclusion can be rendered, the decision to expand religious exemptions, and to adopt the IRS definition of a religious institution, is a sign of goodwill by the Obama administration toward the Catholic community.

HSH Comment: Actually, I just think Obama figured out that he was going to lose in court, so instead of being slammed down by the courts again, he took the hit, kind of, for he can still play with it for months. And, actually, the court cases can still go forward since nothing is finalized yet, and, therefore, the penalties still apply, right?

2 Comments

Filed under Catholic, news, politics, Pro-Life

ICE ICE ICE

ice

All roads closed. Ice everywhere. Powerlines may break soon. The picture above shows the frozen rain and sleet in my roof-water buckets outside.

Maybe my thermometer is broken, but it said 11 degrees Farhenheit, and that was at 8:00 AM. At least the inside of the hermitage is warmer than outside, sporting indoor temps in the 30s Fahrenheit. Extreme sport hermiting!

Just to say, I did put up a bit of insulation on part of one wall. I wouldn’t want to think what it would be like without that bit of help. And I did move my chair, which was five feet away and facing away from the wood-stove. Now I’m about three feet away, alongside the stove.

I count my blessings, however, and praise the Lord. The marginalized sleep in their millions out in the cold, you know, “street-people”, victims of down-sizing of psych hospitals, and so very many refugees, so many who are homeless after natural disasters (like those still out in the cold from hurricane Sandy, because FEMA, with zillions of dollars won’t do much: here), so many who are on the run because of lack of religious freedom, such as in China, where the persecutions especially against Catholics are always worsening, and all with the blessings and now the beginnings of imitation of America.

I think of all the march for life crowd in Washington, D.C., who welcome the opportunity of such iciness to be all the more in solidarity with the unborn, who can face such icey bleakness as they grow up, hopefully, in their mothers’ wombs. Yikes!

I think in particular of one lady who is till in need of much healing, here.

We look forward to heaven!

3 Comments

Filed under Pro-Life, Weather

The American Pledge of Allegiance — Christmas version from K of C — a great example of the separation of Church and State (under God – born/unborn)

usmc flag marines googled image

I pledge allegiance to the flag of
the United States of America and
to the Republic for which it stands,
one nation under God, indivisible,
with liberty and justice for all, born & unborn.

From the Knights of Columbus:

The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States originated on Columbus Day, 1893. It contained no reference to Almighty God, until in New York City on April 22, 1951, the Board of Directors of the Knights of Columbus adopted a resolution to amend the Pledge of Allegiance as recited at the opening of each of the meetings of the 800 Fourth Degree Assemblies of the Knights of Columbus by the addition of the words “under God” after the words “one nation”.

The adoption of this resolve by the Supreme Board of Directors had the effect of an immediate initiation of this practice throughout the aforesaid Fourth Degree Assembly meetings. At their annual State Meetings, held in April and May of 1952, the State Councils of Florida, South Dakota, New York and Michigan adopted resolutions recommending that the Pledge of Allegiance be so amended and that Congress be petitioned to have such amendment made effective.

On August 21, 1952, the Supreme Council of the Knights of Columbus, at its annual meeting, adopted a resolution urging that the change be made general and copies of this resolution were sent to the President, the Vice President (as Presiding Officer of the Senate) and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. The National Fraternal Congress meeting in Boston on September 24, 1952, adopted a similar resolution upon the recommendation of its President, Supreme Knight Luke E. Hart. Several State Fraternal Congresses acted likewise almost immediately thereafter. At its annual meeting the following year, on August 20, 1953, the Supreme Council of the Knights of Columbus repeated its resolution to make this amendment to the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag general and to send copies of this resolve to the President, Vice President, Speaker of the House, and to each member of both Houses of Congress.

From this latter action, many favorable replies were received, and a total of seventeen resolutions were introduced in the House of Representatives to so amend the Pledge of Allegiance as set forth in the Public Law relating to the use of the flag. The resolution introduced by Congressman Louis C. Rabaut of Michigan was adopted by both Houses of Congress, and it was signed by President Eisenhower on Flag Day, June 14, 1954, thereby making official the amendment conceived, sponsored, and put into practice by the Knights of Columbus more than three years before.

In a message to Supreme Knight Luke E. Hart at the meeting of the Supreme Council in Louisville, August 17, 1954, President Eisenhower, in recognition of the initiative of the Knights of Columbus in originating and sponsoring the amendment to the Pledge of Allegiance, said:

“We are particularly thankful to you for your part in the movement to have the words ‘under God’ added to our Pledge of Allegiance. These words will remind Americans that despite our great physical strength we must remain humble. They will help us to keep constantly in our minds and hearts the spiritual and moral principles which alone give dignity to man, and upon which our way of life is founded. For the contribution which your organization has made to this cause, we must be genuinely grateful.”

In August, 1954, the Illinois American Legion Convention adopted a resolution whereby recognition was given to the Knights of Columbus as having initiated, sponsored and brought about the amendment to the Pledge of Allegiance; and on October 6, 1954, the National Executive Committee of the American Legion gave its approval to that resolution.

* * * Rant * * *

I once knew a Catholic priest who campaigned to remove the phrase “one God” from the Pledge of Allegiance for the reason that he didn’t want to offend Muslims, because… (begin sarcasm:) as we all know, of course, Muslims would never ever say that the world and the United States belong to Allah, whom they hold to be God. (end sarcasm).

As it is, any Muslim who happened to have a sword in his hand at the time it was said to him by a liberal Catholic priest that the words “under God” should be removed from the Pledge would just that quickly cut the head off the liberal Catholic priest. On second thought, he would probably let him live, since he served to deaden his parish to their virtue of patriotism so as to think that they were being nice to Muslims. That can serve a purpose for Islam.

Fortunately, real patriots are not slowed down by liberal Catholic priests. Real patriots are good servants of the nation, but of God first, always faithful to the Church.

* * * end rant * * *

The Knights have also begun to add the words “born and unborn” at the end. Good thing, because this is what we’ve come to in anti-Christmas America:

eagle baby

The president’s Planned Parenthood even opens on Christmas just to mock both God and man. This can’t go on. Such bloodshed must be followed by a persecution of the church of unprecedented proportions.

Mind you, many martyrs are a blessing for eternal life and even for the conversion and enlivened faith of those who remain on earth for just another short period of time before they also enter into eternity.

Now, this from a story of hope and healing after abortion.

2 Comments

Filed under Catholic, politics, Pro-Life, religion, separation of church and state

The Determinator’s Movie — An absolute must see. Obamacare will kill you

You will be euthanized by your doctor with Obamacare.

It’s all totally anti-American, against the constitution, and immoral.

A perfect reflection of the culture of death, Obama style: death for all.

Help this video to go viral: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5ju8IgaiGk

6 Comments

Filed under politics, Pro-Life

Monstrous Pro-Abortion Child-Abuser Democrats Scream at 11-Year-Old Pro-Life Girl at Democratic National Convention in Charlotte

By Bryan Kemper | Charlotte, NC | LifeNews.com

I want you to meet my friend and fellow abortion abolitionist, 11-year-old Zoe Griffin. In a world when grown adults ignore, deny or just don’t care about the abortion holocaust that has claimed over 55 Million of Zoe’s generation, she is willing to take a stand no matter what people think. Zoe joined her mother and friends to lay thousands of roses outside the site of the democratic convention and pray for the babies, the politicians and this generation.

While Zoe was praying, pro-abortion activists who claim to stand up for women began to belittle and scream at Zoe for her stand for life. What is so sad is that one of the women who did this to Zoe, Sunsara Taylor, is a well know anti-porn activist who claims to be against the degradation of women. I guess just not 11-year-olds who believe that women should not be dehumanized by the abortion industry. Sunsara Taylor’s Blog http://sunsara.blogspot.com

I could write a lot about this and how much I am sickened by what happened, but I wanted to let Zoe tell you in her own words how what happened and why she will never quit being a Stand True Activist. Praise God for young women like Zoe, she is why this is the generation who will abolish abortion. Here is Zoe’s account:

“Hi, I’m Zoe. Something happened Friday night that a friend wanted me to blog about. I don’t have Facebook or Twitter or anything like that so I’m borrowing my mom’s page for now. “What happened was a pro-life rally. We had showed up when only 4 people were there. I guess we were supposed to get there early. As more and more people came, a car arrived. A woman came out and opened the trunk. There were 3,300 carnations in the back of that car. We started to unload and unwrap the flowers. Lily, Bella, and I started to write pro-life statements with chalk on the sidewalks when some pro-abortionists came.

They were holding signs and chanting: “A baby’s not a baby till it comes out, that’s what birthdays are all about!” They were blowing whistles and jumping around acting like 5-year-old children. I was so sad that these people were so blinded I started crying. Then we started laying down the flowers all across the sidewalk. When we finished, the line of carnations was probably a mile long. A pro-life woman let me hold a crucifix that she had. I started clutching it close to my heart. My knees were shaking, so were my hands.

“The pro-abortionists turned to us and started pointing at different people, saying, “You’re a person! You’re a person! Fetuses are not!” Then the woman saw me crying and said,” You are making this girl cry with your bull____”. I couldn’t stand any more of those lies. They pushed it too far. In the highest-pitched voice I have ever spoken in, I screamed, “THEY ARE NOT THE ONES MAKING ME CRY! YOU ARE! WITH YOUR DARK HEARTS, YOUR DARK MINDS TURNED AGAINST GOD!” My mom ran over to me, put her hand on my shoulder, and calmed me down. Then she went up to them and said, “HOW DARE YOU ATTACK A CHILD LIKE THAT!” While she was yelling, pro-lifers came over to me to calm me down. My whole body was shaking. Our friend, Mrs. McKinney, took me, Jack, and Bella to a CVS that was nearby. We got water and chips and went back. I sat down on a bench when a man from the Charlotte Observer came over to me and started interviewing me. Once he was done, a man came over and gave us ice cream. While I was eating, the pro-abortionists left. Then we started to clean up.

“On the way home I felt sorry that I yelled at those people. I told my mom, and she said, “Do you know why you feel that way? It’s because you have a heart. You have a conscience, and you know what’s right and what’s wrong. Those people attacked you like that because they don’t have a heart.” I will never, ever forget what happened last night. I had a dream that night that they all converted to pro-life activists. I hope that dream becomes a reality.”

h/t http://sanctepater.com

4 Comments

Filed under abuse, news, politics, Pro-Life

02 Rosary Rant – Joyful – 2 – Visitation

[The painting above is from peregabriel.com. A very cool site!]

Remember that the easiest way to pray the rosary is to recognize that Jesus and Mary and Joseph are with you right here, right now, as they are in heaven, not as they were a couple thousand years ago. Sure, take a look at what they did for you and all back in the day, but, in our Lord’s grace, with a spirit of humble thanksgiving for them, right here, right now.

Remember, it’s not about your imagination that you are in their presence – which Pelagian effort of imagination is a lot of hooey – rather, your act of the will, in our Lord’s grace, to humbly thank Him and our Blessed Mother is what the prayer of the rosary is all about.

Clever meditations, whether in “rant” style or, later, please God, in a style presented in a more genteel manner (when I get all the Scripture tomes out of the boxes and on some now non-existent shelves), don’t get anyone anywhere. The only way what is presented on this blog is going to help anyone is if that someone, by the grace of our Lord, uses these words as an occasion to humbly thank the Holy Family right now for what went in back in the day.

* * *

For this preliminary “rant meditation” on the second joyful mystery of the most holy rosary, let’s leave off Luke 1,5-25 (the scene with Zachariah) and Luke 1,46-80 (saving those for future meditations!), concentrating on Luke 1,39-45, for which a summary interlinear comment will be provided, based on my own in-your-face translation from the Greek, with an eye to the Vulgate. I’m not into the esoteric practice of translating one word for one word, as if, magically, all languages had absolutely perfect one word for one word equivalents. Such pretension cannot ever provide a great translation, unless you’re in a position to create the language, as was the case with the Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures, which made up a goodly number of words, but paraphrased the rest. Instead, trying to avoid coining any words, I’ll provide a translation with more in-your-face accuracy than any one word for one word translation could ever present. Note that the “perfect” verbs, with their continuing perfection, are not easy to translate! …

Luke 1,39 But Mary, having arisen in these days, went out into the hill country with enthusiastic haste, into a city of Judah, 40 and she entered into the house of Zachariah and greeted Elizabeth. 41 And it came about that as Elizabeth listened to the greeting of Mary, the unborn child leapt in her womb, and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit. 42 And she cried out with a great exclamation and said: “You are perfectly continuing to remain perfectly blessed among women, and the Fruit of your womb is perfectly continuing to remain perfectly blessed. 43 And how has this come about to me that the Mother of my Lord might come to me? 44 For behold! As the voice of your greeting came about in my ears, the unborn child leapt in exaltation in my womb. 45 And blessed is she who has believed that the things spoken to her by the Lord, perfectly continuing to remain with their perfective force, will have fulfillment.”

O.K. Let’s try some interlinear commentary:

Luke 1,39 But Mary, having arisen in these days [“these days,” not “those days.” This speaks to what is happening to Mary interiorly. She’s immediately thinking of Hanna’s words, and singing the “Magnificat”. But, more on that in a, please God, future meditation.], went out into the hill country [which is also way up from Nazareth] with enthusiastic haste, into a city of Judah [Just a couple of miles down from Jerusalem: “enthusiastic haste”... I remember walking from the Sea of Galilee down to Jericho with enthusiastic haste the day before the first Gulf War with Saddam Hussain. I had intended to go up to Jerusalem past Saint George monastery, but the military nicely, but forcefully had some of the settlers crowd drive me the rest of the way to Jerusalem. Anyway, just to say, I was about twice the age that Mary would have been. It took me one day to do that. Her enthusiastic haste bore the Son of God, giving wings to her feet], 40 and she entered into the house of Zachariah and greeted Elizabeth. [What a greeting! Mary was filled with her “Magnificat” already, her heart and soul bursting with the praise of God...] 41 And it came about that as Elizabeth listened to the greeting of Mary, the unborn child leapt in her womb [This is traditionally understood as the sanctification of John the Baptist in the womb of Elizabeth. This is why the birthday of John the Baptist is celebrated, along with that of Mary and Jesus. He was already holy in the womb, as were Jesus and Mary.], and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit [This cannot but give great joy to our hearts and souls!]. 42 And she cried out with a great exclamation [to be repeated countless times in later centuries] and said: “You are perfectly continuing to remain perfectly blessed among women, and the Fruit of your womb is perfectly continuing to remain perfectly blessed [which completes the first part of the Hail Mary, the earlier parts being those said by the angel Gabriel to Mary, a very biblical prayer...]. 43 And how has this come about to me [such humility, which can always be had before the greatest goodness and kindness, so far beyond us, and yet with us...] that the Mother of my Lord might come to me? [“The Mother of my Lord”... A prophecy to be noted today: the blastocyst is not implanted in the uterus in the mother until about nine days after conception. Give Mary and all her enthusiastic haste, very likely traveling alone, about – what? – a day, two days, three to get to Elizabeth... At any rate, before implantation of the conceived Child, just a few cells at this stage: “The Mother of my Lord”... Pius XII instructed us that the just conceived Jesus in the womb of Mary embraced the entire Mystical Body of Christ from, in fact, the first instant of His conception.] 44 For behold! As the voice of your greeting came about in my ears, the unborn child leapt in exaltation in my womb [Not the normal “kick”!]. 45 And blessed is she who has believed that the things spoken to her by the Lord, perfectly continuing to remain with their perfective force, will have fulfillment.” [Elizabeth... What a great saint... So filled with the Holy Spirit, instructed by the Holy Spirit... knowing the truth of it all. Wow! The two of them! What joy they would have had during those months with Mary helping Elizabeth. Our Lord Jesus, always foremost in their thoughts... Just so awesome... ]

4 Comments

Filed under Prayer, Pro-Life, Rosary Rants

The Angelus of Holy Souls Hermitage

In the Extraordinary Form Calendar, the “Regina Coeli” rings out until sunset on the Octave of Pentecost. Still another few days to go. In the Ordinary Form Calendar, the Angelus has been ringing out since daybreak of the Monday after Pentecost. Yikes!

Jean-François Millet himself intended this painting to be a pro-life representation of prayer to the God of Life, the prayer being the Angelus. He immediately added the steeple when the American who commissioned the painting didn’t front up with the money. Freakishly, Salvador Dali insisted like a madman that this was a painting of sexual agression, and that there was a coffin of an infant between the couple. Upon analysis, it seems that there might have been tracings, in fact, of some sort of box there between them. Probably the potato basket, but lets take the worst case scenario, shall we?

Let’s suppose that they plotted to kill any child born to them, since all they wanted was sex, sex and more sex, apart from any children. In that case, what we have here is a representation of repentance from such sexual aggression, and prayer to repair their misdeads, begging the Lord of mercies, born a little Child among us, for forgiveness and the grace of a firm purpose of amendment of life. Hah! A great message for society today, especially today.

The point of the steeple is to indicate the type of prayer that they are saying as good Catholics in the then as now oppressively anti-Catholic “enlightened” society. The Church bells at that time of day would have been ringing out the Angelus, as would be the case also at noon and at sunset. Let’s take a look at this most Christmasy of all prayers:

* * *

V. Angelus Domini nuntiavit Mariæ, (The angel of the Lord declared unto Mary,)
R. Et concepit de Spiritu Sancto. (and she conceived of the Holy Spirit.)

V. Ave Maria, gratia plena, Dominus tecum. Benedicta tu in mulieribus, et benedictus fructus ventris tui, Jesus. (Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus.
R. Sancta Maria, Mater Dei, ora pro nobis peccatoribus, nunc et in hora mortis nostræ. Amen. (Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death. Amen.)

[With this first versical/response and Hail Mary, one begs for an increase in the virtue of faith by way of the intercession of she who believed by faith in Him who she conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit. What agility and purity of soul one must have to have such faith in the blood-filled world of yesteryear and today! We turn to her who had more than all of us put together, more agility of soul and purity than we could ever begin to know in this world. The Church Militant beseeches the Lord by way of the Church Triumphant.]

V. « Ecce Ancilla Domini. » (Behold the handmaid of the Lord.)
R. « Fiat mihi secundum Verbum tuum. » (Be it done unto me according to thy word.)

Ave Maria… (Hail Mary…)

[With this second versical/response and Hail Mary, we ask our Lady's intercession that the Lord might grant us an increase in the virtue of hope, which our Lady had so very abundantly, bravely accepting what the Lord had in mind for her even though she risked, in human terms, being stoned to death as an unwed mother. Mary said and does say "Yes!" to life, even when risking death. The saints did that in yesteryear as they do today. We need only think of the very recent Saint Gianna Beretta Molla and so many like her, who, in fact, give their lives that their children might live, instead of the other way around. Far from killing her Son for the sake of convenience or as a "sacrifice to Satan" as so many do today, Mary rejoices to have the opportunity to bravely be the bearer of Him who is Life.]

V. Et Verbum caro factum est. (And the Word was made flesh,)
R. Et habitavit in nobis. (and dwelt among us.)

Ave Maria… (Hail Mary…)

[With this third versical/response and Hail Mary, we ask our Lady's intercession with her Incarnate, Divine Son, that we might have an increase in the virtue of charity, by which she gave us the greatest Christmas gift of all, her Divine Son. Christmas means "Christ, who was sent". And Mary "sends" Christ to us, giving Him to the whole world. She followed Him everywhere, even to the Cross, even to the Sepulcher. Once a mother, always a mother. Always. Such great charity. Mary remained a virgin before, during, and after the birth of Christ, showing that she had not yet given birth to the entire Christ, to His Mystical Body, to us, doing this for us by way of her perfect intercession under the Cross, for which Christ was born. Her intercession was that the life of Christ be given to us, and this by way of His death, by way of His having the right in justice to have mercy on us, He taking on the worst we could give out, death, but remaining innocent, and being able to insist, then, with His heavenly Father: Father, forgive them! In her purity, by way of her Immaculate Conception, by way of her extraordinary agility of soul, of her clarity of vision, she could see the goodness of her Son, and, by way of contrast, all the hell that we would vomit on Him from the beginning of time to the end. All she had to do was behold her Son of the Cross, and she could see it all, exactly what we needed. She saw our need perfectly, perfectly interceeded for us, and was, and is, therefore, the mediatrix of all graces, and is rightly called as a fitting human complement of the sole Mediator, the co-Redemptrix, that is, because of her perfect intercession for ALL that Christ would give us in redemption and salvation. What great charity, giving Christ, her Son, to us. ]

V. Ora pro nobis, Sancta Dei Genetrix. (Pray for us, O Holy Mother of God,)
R. Ut digni efficiamur promissionibus Christi. (That we may be made worthy of the promises of Christ.)

[Technically, we don't pray to Mary. We pray to our Lord, but asking the intercession of His good Mother! She desires that we be made worthy of the promises of Christ by way of the grace of Christ Himself.]

Oremus: Gratiam tuam quæsumus, Domine, mentibus nostris infunde; ut qui, angelo nuntiante, Christi Filii tui Incarnationem cognovimus, per passionem eius et crucem, ad resurrectionis gloriam perducamur. Per eumdem Christum Dominum nostrum. Amen.

(Let us pray: Pour forth, we beseech Thee, O Lord, Thy grace into our hearts, that we — to whom the Incarnation of Christ Thy Son was made known by the message of an angel – may, by His Passion and Cross, be brought to the glory of His resurrection, through the same Christ our Lord. Amen.)

[Basically, the whole history of redemption right there in that one sentence. Not bad to call to mind thrice daily, is it?!]

V. Gloria Patri et Filio et Spiritui Sancto, (Glory be to the Father and to the Son and to the Holy Spirit)
R. Sicut erat in principio et nunc et semper et in saecula saeculorum. Amen. (As it was in the beginning, is now and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.)

[The Gloria is repeated three times.] [You'll note the Roman Pontiffs always add three times the Gloria, one for each round of versical/response, for each increase in faith, hope and charity granted by our Lord, all in sanctifying grace.

The avatar of Holy Souls Hermitage is a church bell, which is rung for the Angelus. By tradition, each versical/response recieves three rings, while the bell is rung rather vigously during the final prayer.]

* * *

In the title to this post I mentioned Holy Souls Hermitage. There’s a story there. On the way up the path to Holy Souls Hermitage on Holy Souls Mountain, at the base of the ridge, I have constantly been greeted — how can I say this — by what must be an angel. I suppose that sounds a bit out of the ordinary, and, believe me, for me it is just that, very out of the ordinary, not only because I’m not one who very good at paying attention to my guardian angel all the time, but also because of the heavenly goodness and kindness of the — how to say it? — presense of a spiritual being, who encourages me, invites me, rather insistingly, if also in a friendly manner, to pray, and very specifically to pray the Angelus. This happens without fail, going up and coming down. So, what else can I do? I pray the Angelus, very frequently! There are different intentions, with the bishop of the diocese being front and center with this intention, but also the priests and seminarians and benefactors, living and deceased. Yikes! I can only think that my little prayer is nothing, that my prayer is worthless, but that, nevertheless, our Lord wants me to pray, so much so — and so blockheaded am I — that such a good and kind angel almost has to whoop me upside the head to get me into gear. How far I am from the agility of soul Mary knew when the angel came to her. I suppose it’s for that very reason that she, as Queen of the Angels, makes sure that I’m well taken care of by my guardian angel. Only the very weak need to get whooped upside the head on a regular basis. Here’s one weak hermit! But, guardian angels are really very cool. They rejoice to overlook the weakness in favor of the triumph of our Lord’s grace. Such weakness, but such power of the goodness and kindness of Mary’s Son!

Why not make it a practice to pray the Angelus thrice daily? Memorize it today. When’s the last time you ever memorized something? I usually pace about when memorizing. It doesn’t take long. Give it a shot. We’re now in the 12 days of Christmas. Go on!

4 Comments

Filed under Prayer, Pro-Life

War between the Catholic Church and anti-Catholic Obama. Ergo: Flowers for the Immaculate Conception

The Catholic Church in America launched what is perhaps the largest legal defence of religious liberty in history, but the “mainstream” (= leftist) media won’t carry the story of the persecution of the Catholic Church by the Obama Administration. This is exactly how things worked out in Germany before the Holocaust. Yep. Will we refuse yet again to learn from history? Perhaps the MSM is waiting for the decision about commerce laws coming up in June. If it’s decided that everyone must purchase a certain product (abortion insurance, thus paying into the pot which will pay for abortions), and this against their consciences, mayhem will ensue. The next decision, more specifically about religious liberty, if this is not taken up within the commerce decision, will need to happen before 1 August, or mayhem will ensue. What to do, I mean, you know, practically speaking?

Actually, the most practical thing one can do is to pick some flowers, put them in a little vase, and bring them to church, and put them before a statue of our Lady, the Immaculate Conception. I hope no one has forgotten that she is the Patronness of the United States. I hope no one has forgotten that she, as a mother, is solicitous for our welfare. I hope no one has fogotten that her intercession is most powerful before the throne of the Most High. We are her little children, are we not? Don’t little kids pick flowers to bring to their mothers? Sure, it’s a simple thing to do. But, you know, it changes everything. It sets everything in proper order. We are in humble thanksgiving for the intercession that our heavenly mother provides for us. Aren’t flowers appropriate? Don’t underestimate the fortitude for facing what is to come with a small action like this. Just do it.

And then… and then… while you’re in church, do what is actually even more practical than that, something that our Lady will push you to do while you are there. Go to confession. Yep. It’s useless to battle for religious freedom if there is no usage for the freedom! And confession brings such a great grace to us! So, flowers for our Lady, and then the confessional. You can do it.

And don’t think for a second that you have to buy flowers (though you may if you can!), nor that they have to be super spiffy like the forest flowers of Holy Souls Mountain in this post. None of that is necessary. Just some simple wild flowers will be more than adequate. And… and… if you can’t do that, and even if you can, know that there another flower or set of flowers that you can give to our Lady: the Hail Mary, indeed, the Rosary. The rosary is so called because the Hail Marys are roses, no? Roses have thorns: ouch! I’m sure our Lady will see your sacrifice as well! There are often “thorns” to put up with when we do projects like this, as so many things, like thorns, can get in the way. Get past the thorns, and get to the flowers!

5 Comments

Filed under Catholic, florae, Immaculate Conception, news, politics, separation of church and state

The absolutely most awesome adoption story ever! What a woman! Forget mere foster homes…

One of our readers is hoping to adopt multiple children, older children. I put up this post as an encouragement if times ever get a bit rough, not that they will, but just if they do…

This is a “how-to-do-it” true account of adopting the most troubled older children. This is not to impune the “foster” care families who have volunteered and done enormously good work in impossible situations. It is to say that adoption is good, and that orphanages are not bad (all things being equal, right?… but that holds true for “foster” families and adoptive families as well). I know that there are different systems for doing this, but I’m just taking the extreme example, because that’s what was the case here in this worst of all worst case true life scenarios. I also realize that foster homes these days have developed a bit, replacing orphanages until such time as adoption is possible. However, I still question the dynamic of all of that… Can’t we do better? In this case, it was foster care while looking forward to the green light to adopt kind of a situation…

They were two brothers and a sister, seven, nine and eleven years old, who, by this time, had been in and out of literally hundreds of “foster homes” (which insults the word “foster” and “home”). A week here. A few days there. Perhaps a day over yonder. Always, always thrown out. Those who lasted a week with them were incomparably more patient than all the rest, but then they also caved. After all, they were just “foster” homes, right? They weren’t going to adopt anyone. If times get rough, just throw them out on the street for the next foster home to pick up, right?

Well, as it happened, these three kids had already become the world’s greatest cynics. There was no one who would love them, which had been shown to them time and again as they were tossed out time and again. You can’t beat experience. They had come to a point, unconsciously, where they were immediately going to show their worst to whoever it was that was going to take them on with what they just knew could not be true generosity of spirit. Would that person still love them, even though they showed their worst? or would that person throw them out right away, as had hundreds of others? They became proficient in showing their worst.

In my very first parish as a deacon, on the very first day I was in the office “on duty”, a woman came in stating that she wanted to adopt these three children, and wanted them baptised (that also being their desire). “You are a very strong, charitable woman to want to adopt children of this age,” I said, “since they would have been through miserable experiences of being rejected in foster homes so many times.

This great woman of faith recounted, in fact, her firm, consistent love for them, with firm, consistent correction where needed, giving the children a sense of security, of predictability. She had lasted with them for six months. She hadn’t thrown them out on the street. She hadn’t said: “You can’t stay here! I don’t care where you go — nor will I help you — but you can’t stay here. I don’t care if you can’t get there from here!” No, not that.

Instead, this woman recounted that the first three months with them seemed like they were scripted in hell. The children showed their worst, breaking the windows, breaking the dishes, taking razors to the carpets and furniture and curtains — destroying everthing — destroying the steps, destroying the walls…  and… and… almost succeeding to burn the house down… count them… five times. “Firm, consistent correction and love,” she said…

And it worked, three months into the saga, it just hit the children that… hey… this woman really loves us, that she’s not going to dump us, even though we’ve showed her our worst, and that she wants us, of all people, as her family. Not that they voiced that even mentally, but, this woman said, from that moment they were angels, and had stayed that way for three months. They were always so helpful, wanting to do the dishes, sweep the floor, wash the windows…

They had had their cynicism answered. They now knew what it was to be in a family, perhaps for the first time in their lives… They wanted what this woman had, the faith, and wanted it now. So, O.K.!

This was a good lesson for me for my diaconate, for my priesthood: never, ever compromise, always but always be there for the most vulnerable, even when the most aloof — who should know better — kick you in the face for doing so.

So many times people are thown out as garbage for the sake of other people’s convenience. Sometimes self-congratulatory comfort zones are invaded… Sometimes people are pro-life until the going gets rough. Then they get nervous and lash out at anyone who would take them out of their comfort zones. It’s comfortable being pro-life, unless pressure is put on… Things happen, especially when we are growing closer to our Lord, when He has us go againt the culture of death, when He has us encourage life…

To the point: Have we not all tested the Lord in our sin, showing our worst? Has He not shown us firm, consistent correction and mercy, giving us a sense of security with the very wounds which we inflicted in His hands and feet and side… and Heart? Are we not those children, so cynical, that the Lord has to work on with His truth, His love, His enthusiastic joy in knowing that He will drag us to Himself? The Lord is just that good, just that kind.

What’s the absolutely most awesome adoption story ever? That the great Woman, clothed with the sun and with the moon under her feet, crowed with twelve stars, the Church, would adopt us, and bring us right into the family of faith with great joy. Mary’s Son. Jesus’ Mother. Saint Joseph. All the rest. Just so wonderful.

Comments Off

Filed under Pro-Life

This hermit’s review of Brian J. Gail’s Trilogy, vol. 1 — Fatherless

Thanks again to TMB for sending the Trilogy in to the hermitage.

Let me just direct this review to Brian… My disclaimer, Brian, is that I’m not very well read with novels. I’ve only read Fatherless once. I haven’t yet read the other two volumes in the Trilogy, yet, though I immediately started in on the second volume, Motherless, which is a good sign, no? This is just a first exclamation following a quick read… And only a few thoughts, as I didn’t jot things down as I was reading. Your work brought back many memories of my own pro-life work, and that’s another good sign for me of the book’s reflection of the reality about which you write.

My first impression: Excellent. Because of your business ranking, your work is sure to be read by some rather important execs, just to know who you are and what you’ve done. They will surely take an interest in the how-to-do-business-and-succeed aspect to the book, which will draw them in to the points you want to make. I do think it will work on all who read it, and on some it will hit home sooner than later. The elite movers and shakers are clearly your intended readership, along with some of our weaker, silent or more liberal priests and bishops. I thank you for your effort. You certainly have my prayers and blessings. I was happy to see that you were on the board for Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary in Overbrook, on whose behalf I’ve done some teaching for one of their seminarians all the way from the hermitage.

Brian, you may help to save uncountable women from suffering and dying from breast and cervical cancer induced by the contraceptive/abortifacient pill, not to mention the lives of untold numbers of children otherwise subjected to such an early chemical abortion. I like the way you repeated some of the info again at the end, just before closing. That will clinch the argument for some individuals. It’s not just clever. We see that you’re a true believer, both in the Natural Law and with the faith. And, yes, that does work on the hearts of those trying to make themselves believe they are hardened atheists. Your work should be gifted to all in the Fortune 500, not to mention to all the bishops, not to mention ad agencies, pharmaceutical companies, investment firms and politicians, though with hand signed cover letters covering the points on just one page. You know how these things go.

The timing of the publishing and republishing of the volumes couldn’t be better, with the Obama administration pushing chemical contraceptive/abortifacients the way he is. We all thank you. I’ve scheduled a Mass to be offered for you and yours and your intentions on 27 March 2012, here at Holy Souls Hermitage, in thanksgiving… motu proprio.

Perhaps, Brian, you could write something on the introduction of the “date rape” abortifacients introduced into Catholic hospital emergency rooms. This would be extremely timely. Obama is sure to point out the hypocrisy of the present push of the USCCB (and as of the last count today, more than one hundred individual bishops) to complain about Obama’s infringement on conscience rights regarding the non-provision of contraceptives/abortifacients, and will therefore, perhaps, get a favorable hearing from the Supreme Court. Florida has a bill put forward to repeal Obama’s attack on religion, but will it succeed with this congress? If you want to know the history of the introduction of abortifacients into Catholic Hospital emergency rooms, with uttterly unexpected names and dates and places — and a monitum about who those people are today — send me an email (see the graphic on the sidebar of the blog — also, check your inbox). I was right in the middle of all that, hospitals, ethics committees, journalists, priests and bishops. You name it. The lie is that one can know at the very moment of conception that the woman has conceived or not. This is, of course, categorically, scientifically impossible, at the moment of conception, just before, during or immediately after the sperm has reached the ovum, but it’s just at this time when such harse chemicals would be provided to — usually — girls and young women. As I’ve said before, one is not to act on a doubt, especially when homicide is at stake, but it happens all the time, with the blessings of the icons of clerical moral theology orthodoxy, with the blessings of priests and bishops. Having said all that, maybe this is one of the major themes in “Childless”, which I’ve not yet read. If it isn’t, perhaps you might fit this in for a revised edition. I note that the other two volumes are already revised.

I’m guessing that you’ve had a hard time of it with some of the ecclesiastics of today’s Church and… and… that you haven’t come to know well very many good priest or bishops. That’s understandable, given the times in which we live.  I understand the point of the book is about being “Fatherless”, both in parish families and biological families, and why. I’ll save my thoughts about Grogan and Father John until I’ve read a bit more! Whoever advised you on the exorcism bits made some terribly grave mistakes about exorcism. Your exorcist also has a mistaken idea of vicarious suffering. Back in the day, I knew very well the exorcist in New York, indeed, Father James Le___ (R.I.P.) and helped to teach the one back in the day in Philadelphia, and, through pastoral circumstances, know way more than I want to know about Euteneuer’s case…

Sorry to say, there is a rather appalling bit to Father John’s talk with JPII. The blessed Pontiff is depicted as listening to Father John indirectly (perhaps because of the uniqueness of the unrepeatable circumstances, directly) violating the seal of confession. I’m sure any priest who attempted to do that with Cardinal Ratzinger or John Paul would have been stopped dead in his tracks. Having met up with so much of this kind of rubbish, I had a long chat with now Cardinal Raymond Burke. Something was done about it, as he promised me, so that now also the indirect breaking of the seal of confession is, in law, held to be among the gravest of crimes, ranking along with sexual abuse of minors. This is something to change in a future revised edition.

I don’t think these last comments of mine should stop people from getting the book, reading it, sharing it. But these are my monitums.

A last suggestion would be for your own reading pleasure, a simple Master’s Thesis at the Dominican House of Studies written by a rather outgoing New York journalist, truly worthy of a Pulitzer for her efforts. Anyone reading Dawn Eden’s very readable work (here’s a free .PDF) would hesitate to put up those she mentions as those promoting their books. It’s a short read, well worth it.

Finally, again, thanks, Brian, for this wonderful first volume. Everyone should read it. Again, you have my prayers and blessings.

2 Comments

Filed under books, Pro-Life

Redefining the pro-life movement by… get this… listening to post-abortive women. Do it, right here, right now. That means you, my priest and bishop friends and all “elites” of the pro-life movement…

This great woman, this mulier fortis, this post-abortive woman, this one-time mulier adultera with the culture of death, this fragile woman, filled with fortitude, overwhelmed with the joy of humble thanksgiving for Mary’s Son, Jesus, is set, right here, right now, to redefine the “tactics” of the pro-life movement. Just by being who she is before God and man. After all: she’s honest.

Here’s her utterly honest first reflection on the first March for Life in which she’s participated in the actual walk. A must read, especially for our priests and bishops in the trenches, if you will, of this war for life, especially for the elites, if you will, of pro-life organizations. Really.

Read her post and bookmark her blog. Over here at HSH, this is post #1 on her work. I’ll have another, please God, soon, all about John 7,53–8,11, a very, very wise choice on her part, very insightful. This is the work of the Holy Spirit in her, and not only for her.

Such… such enthusiastic joy of our Lord Jesus in all this… Now go read her post.

5 Comments

Filed under Pro-Life

Happy Feast Day! Our Lady of Guadalupe!

Today we remember how our Lady stopped human sacrifice, inlcuding human sacrifice, in Mexico. We still have child sacrifice going on in the United States with all the abortifacients and abortion and infanticide. However, while we weep for that, we also celebrate what our Lady has done for us on this her feast. Catholics know how to celebrate on feasts. The bravest pilot in the world took this hermit out for a pizza and beer and a dessert. Some instructional pics about how how to celebrate on this feast day, including beer from Mexico, of course!

Recollections of Guadalupe come to mind. About a dozen years ago I drove down to Guadalupe with a priest friend, this time not from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, but from the Congregation for the Clergy. We offered Holy Mass before the image of our Lady, that is, up on the balcony. Good memories! And how many times I remember praying outside of abortion clinics with a huge image of our Lady of Guadalupe being present. Our Lady is so good and so kind.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Benefactors