Tag Archives: John Paul II

An In-Your-Face anecdote about defending the person of the Holy Father at the Congregation for Bishops

john paul ii -3What with all the attacks from the ditch on the right and now, starting up, from the ditch on the left, against the person of the Holy Father, Pope Francis, I thought I might offer you an anecdote about defending the person of the Holy Father, this time, Pope John Paul II, an event which took place in the parlors of the Congregation for Bishops.

This was at the time of the run up to the encyclical Centesimus Annus, which kicked Communism in the face, but also extreme forms of Capitalism.

pope Francis tiaraOne of those consulted for this particular meeting in the back room of the offices of the episcopal hierarchy of that Congregation (very well-known to me) was an American economist, known to be a devout Catholic. He was very upset that any criticism of any form of capitalism was to voiced in the upcoming encyclical letter. This extremely popular-among-conservative-Catholics commentator on the economy was so upset that he began to voice ad hominem criticism against the person of the Holy Father.

Needless to say, he was stopped dead in his tracks. He protested all the more vehemently. And that, my friends, was the end of the meeting. He was forcefully cut off. He was told in no uncertain terms that no attack on the person of the Holy Father would be entertained at the Holy See. They were unceremoniously escorted out of the building, out of Vatican City State.

Mind you, this had its good effect. That particular economist became the leading defender of the Centesimus annus. Hah! Great fellow, really. I like him a lot. He does great work. He just let himself get all in a fluster at the time. And don’t we all, from time to time?

Take now, for instance, with Pope Francis. People are all in a fluster, on the right and on the left. I do believe that they will get over it, but that, until then, they need to be taken to task, with firmness, with an aim to conversion. It can happen you know. It did in the case cited above. And that was a tough, tough case.

1 Comment

Filed under Catholic

Ecclesia Militans – The Church Militant – Benedict XVI and “Friends”

 HSH emphases and [comments]

WORDS OF HIS HOLINESS BENEDICT XVI
AT THE LUNCHEON WITH THE CARDINALS

Hall of Dukes, Apostolic Palace – Monday, 21 May 2012

Your Eminence, Dear Brothers,

At this moment my words can only be of gratitude. A “thank you” first of all to the Lord for the many years he has given me; years filled with many days of joy, marvelous times but also with dark nights. Yet, in retrospect, one understands that those nights were necessary and good, a cause for thanksgiving. [He is using his experience in the spiritual life to teach the Cardinals. He never says things that are not needed to be spoken. He is confirming his brothers in the faith. These are not mere words of nostalgia, but the testimony of someone who knows that death will come sooner than later, but only by way of very, very dark times, with much evil afoot, but with much goodness being brought out of that evil, for the greater glory of God. He is rightly imposing on the hearts and souls of the Princes of the Church. He is calling on them to be faithful, now, and in times to come, no matter what. Lets see:]

Today the phrase ecclesia militans [the Church Militant, or better, reflecting the participle: The Church Being Militant!] is somewhat out of fashion [put out of fashion by those who would have the Church surrender, as they have done, to the enemy forces, to Satan himself...] but in fact we can understand ever more so that it is true, that it contains within it the truth [The Church on earth is only the Church inasmuch as it is Militating against the Evil One. Being with Christ Jesus in His victory, in the ultimate victory in the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, in The Battle spoken of in Genesis 3,15, is where this battle is done par excellence.]. We see how evil wishes to dominate in the world ["dominate" = it's always about power. Always. Non serviam! I will not serve! For I, Satan, want to be God!] and that it is necessary to fight against evil [necessary to fight = sine qua non. Passifists just go to hell. Consensus builders with Satan go to hell. Nicey nice people who never stand up in all truth and charity for all truth and charity just go to hell. To repeat: "It is necessary to fight."]. We see that it [evil] does so in so many ways: cruelty, through the different forms of violence, but even disguised as good and thereby undermining the moral foundations of society. [such as giving Holy Communion to pro-abort politicians who mock God, the Church and their fellow man. This erodes the moral foundations of society. This is using the Blessed Sacrament to further divide the Church. "But I was just trying to be nice!" Nope. You've lost the battle. Those who are not with Christ are fighting against Him.]

St Augustine said that all history is a struggle between two loves: [1] love of self to the point of despising God; and [2] love of God to the point of despising oneself, in martyrdom. [He's saying that he's been prepared to be a martyr, and that he is asking his cardinals to be martyrs with him. Martyrdom is fullest sign of love of neighbor as well, for this is a witness to the love of God, an invitation to believe in a love that is stronger than death, a love that calls ones enemies, "friends", just as Christ did to Judas in the Garden of Gethsemane even as Judas was betraying Jesus (see Matthew 26,50).] We are caught up in this struggle and in this struggle it is very important to have friends. [Remember, the first collegial act of the apostles was recalled in one short verse, Mark 14,50: "And abandoning Him, they all fled."] And as for myself, I am surrounded by my friends in the College of Cardinals; you are my friends and I feel at home with you, I feel safe in this company of great friends, who are here with me and all together with the Lord. [Our Holy Father is always, always the most perfect gentlemen, always trying to attract by way of goodness and kindness. It's not that he is unaware of the presence of Judas among the ranks. It is because he is aware of this that he so graciously says such things in the hope of winning them over for Christ before it is too late for them.]

Thank you for this friendship. [Those who are true will feel that friendship themselves. Those who are with Judas will feel only contempt.] Thank you, Your Eminence, for all you have done for this event today and for all that you always do. Thank you for the communion in joys and in troubles. Let us move ahead, the Lord said: Courage, I have conquered the world. We are on the Lord’s team, hence on the winning team. [just to use the terminology of the consensus builders. Hah!] I thank you all. May the Lord bless all of you. And let us raise our glasses. [The fraternity of the saints in heaven is very wonderful indeed. We have nothing to fear with being martyrs. Let's us arise and go forth!]

© Copyright 2012 – Libreria Editrice Vaticana

Did I mention that “For Greater Glory” (Cristiada) is now playing. Go and see it!

Info HERE and here and, on this blog, here!

2 Comments

Filed under Catholic, martyrdom, Military, Persecution, politics, separation of church and state

“The rights of man: what a load of sh*t!” — to quote Cardinal Cipriani with Blessed Pope John Paul II — Les droits de l’homme: C’est de la merde! Esa cojudez!

Such bad language! For shame! For shame! For shame! For SHAME! And moreover: Be NICE!

Whatever. Get over it. Or, better yet, if you are really offended by this, go and complain to one of our greatest South American Cardinals, the Archbishop of Lima, Peru, his Eminence, Juan Luis Cipriani Thorne. These are his words. After your discussion with him about your rights, you’ll likely hear the same words hurled your way, as it seems that this is one of his favorite phrases. And you have to know, I just love that.

O.K., then, after you get uncerimoniously tossed out on your keister, and probably using the latter part of his words against him (ironically, despite yourself), I urge you, go and kneel at the tomb of Blessed John Paul II, who named the good Archbishop a Cardinal within a few weeks after he made this internationally publicized statement. There were protests to the Vatican and no end to the headlines, which were put in such huge bold type that there were no stories on the front pages, only this one quotation. Throughout France, I’m told, all you could see everywhere on the front pages was this:

Les droits de l’homme:

 C’est de la merde!

Friends across the border, down in Tor Ciudad, in Spain, were celebrating to no end. Their Cardinal (their second Cardinal) had gotten it right, though the whole world thought that he had gotten it oh so wrong.

The world had been turned upside down, the media were in non-stop frenzy mode, but JPII’s answer was to make him a Cardinal. And you have to know, I just love that. I mean, really, go and kneel at John Paul’s tomb and complain to him about this. You’ll likely hear a voice from heaven repeating the same words without missing a beat. Hah! But, go ahead! You have to know that there is something to learn about how passionate we must be with the new evangelization amidst the total idiocy of this world: “The rights of man: what a load of sh*t!” Gasp!

But Father, but Father! Doesn’t man have rights? How could the Cardinal and Blessed John Paul get it so very wrong? Isn’t that what the USCCB is fighting the Obama administration about, saying that we have rights? And what about priest’s like Father Gordon MacRae? Shouldn’t he fight for his rights?

Seldom affirm, almost never deny, always distinguish… Let’s investigate this.

A little preface: Your’s truly, always the troublemaker, took a course on Liberation Theology from none other than Father Gustavo Gutiérrez (now O.P.), at – where else? – the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas in Rome. The Aula Minor was packed. I was one of the very few to get perfect marks for the course. I know how to take exams!

He had two good things to say: (1) He publically repented for having pushed for the murder of various individuals. (2) He said that if someone is profound in their own time, they will be profound in all times. One really off the mark statement he made was that God made mistakes in coming to know His people, Israel.

But let’s take this down to Peru, home of quite a few extremely violent Marxists, who kill indiscriminately just to get people angry so that they will fight the “oppressors”: onward to No Place, to Utopia. There are always some knucklehead priests who go along with this. They hated the Opus Dei Archbishop, and got together a protest outside the Cathedral, where the Archbishop was offering Holy Mass. All the media were present, taking notes, filming, recording the event as he walked out of the Cathedral to take on whatever stupidity the might-makes-right attention seekers had to hurl at him.

They chanted that men have rights, the right to kill one’s oppressors vigilante style! Kill! Kill! Kill! Tit for tat! We want a spiral of violence! Men have rights!

There can be plenty of injustice, and one does have the right to defend oneself, but to foment a war by way of vigilantism – where there is almost never justice done for anyone – instead of using other means to bring society to a change for the better (and there are plenty) is just plain wrong. If one has to change the government by way of peaceful protest. Fine! Umpteen countries in Europe have done this, also thanks to Blessed John Paul II.

The distinction: the rights of man provided by man to himself for self-serving reasons are wrongly hailed as something being over and above the inalienable rights that God provides to us, over and above to the point of being able to ignore what God wants of us, the rights of God. But that’s wrong. The rights of man, as the Cardinal said and John Paul affirmed… the mere rights of man are sh*t.

Why bring this up here and now? What’s the point? The inalienable rights given to us by God, some of which are also enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, such as in the first amendment of the Bill of Rights and precisely as inalienable rights which are not provided by any government but by God Himself, are now being trampled upon by the Obama administration in favor of the mere rights of man, this time the “right” to murder children in the womb, being born, or even, as Obama has had it, just now born, infanticide. There is no right to murder an innocent human being. The rights of man are sh*t.

That the rights of man are sh*t is a good call by the greatest of the great South American Cardinals, His Eminence, Juan Luis Cipriani Thorne. How great that Blessed Pope John Paul II confirmed this just some weeks later. But did the Holy Father really do that? Just because he made Cipriani a Cardinal while the whole world was in an uproar against Cipriani for this statement does not prove anything, does it? Remember this video of Pope John Paul II down in Sicily. I bet that this is exactly where Cipriani was inspired to say what he said. Go John Paul II! To read that post, go here. Now, watch the video of the Great John Paul II again!

Leave a Comment

Filed under separation of church and state

The Mafia’s sense of “entitlement”, Blessed John Paul II’s ferocity against these parasitic cowards, and…

I don’t know why it is, but I somehow got to know more than I wanted to know about the mafiosi, their ways and means, their infighting, factions, mockery of the Church, and so on. Of course, “more than I wanted to know” amounts to almost nothing: “I know nothing!” say I. “Troppe cose…  conosci… Padre…” is the predictable, mangled syntax, response: “Too many things… do you know… Father.” All said with pregnant pauses and a raspy voice, of course.

Perhaps it was all the priests and bishops – and nuns! — that I knew in Italy for the 20 some years I was there, who recollected this and that anecdote, and their own dealings with the mafia, how to combat them in their pastoral ministry, and so on. Not infrequently I met with priests who were ignorant of anything to do with the mafia (which I doubted), or who were afraid to say anything (most likely). It is so very easy to be compromised by the mafia if they don’t like you. They “own” some of the priests in this way. Those who remain independent are a thorn in the side of the mafiosi, who try to make the lives of good priests and bishops miserable indeed. But this, of course, only sets those good priests and bishops on fire all the more, which is a joy to see.

Perhaps I also got to know so much about the mafia because of friendships with the anti-mafiosi of the Guardia di Finanza, not to mention the Italian Ministry of Defense point-man between the Italian govenment and the Holy See, who wanted to set me up in a parish near some likely skirmishes between the independent minded Sacra Corona Unita and the the frightful, horrific, monstrous ‘Ndrangheta (with Cosa Nostra and the Camorra becoming ever more insignificant). Perhaps I’ll recount that scenario another day.

Check out the above video of Blessed John Paul II condemning the mafia in The Valley of the Temples in Agrigento, Sicily, the icy heart of the more “famous” Cosa Nostra. You can see the Master of Ceremonies of JPII cringing in the background of this video, fearing, it seems, that he is going to get shot with the Holy Father at any second, so strong, so forceful is the Sovereign Pontiff, who shakes his fist non-stop at the mafia bosses.

Fearless, John Paul immediately went down to speak this condemnation when the Cardinal of Palermo was threatened by the local gangsters. They had already been killing priests and their parishioners and generally being a nuisance by breaking peoples bones, wrecking their homes and businesses, prostituting their sons and daughters, forcing drugs and crime and extortion and corruption on all and sundry, killing the anti-mafia crowd of the Guardia di Finanza, executing judges, on and on and on. “Pay your ‘pizzo’ (the Mafia ‘tax’), or we will kill your two year old daughter.” Like that. Thugs, yes. But total cowards.

Imagine you’re a young priest who’s called to the hospital on a Saturday evening, and find out that your own grandmother has had both her arms broken because she didn’t have the money to pay her “mafia protection”, and wouldn’t have paid it even if she had had the money. Full of emotion, you preach against the mafia the next morning at Sunday Mass, inviting them to convert, and encouraging your little flock amidst the daily, deadly harassment of such parasites.

Then, later that night, the mafia quietly enter your bedroom with a teenage girl, a parishioner in your youth group, who, because of your successful work with all the youth, does not prostitute herself for the mafia, or agree to get married to one of the local godfather’s sons against her will. She’s unconscious, but they hold her head up by her hair, gun to her head, and ask you if you are going to continue your supposed “crusade” against the mafia. You are speechless for some seconds, and before you can speak, they blow her brains out all over the walls of your bedroom, then drop the gun on her as they leave, wanting the weapon to be found by their friends in law-”enforcement”. Do you continue to fight? Well, yes, with more work with the youth, with prayer vigils, with Eucharistic and Rosary processions through the neighborhoods, all of them, even those down by the sea… And… and… you rejoice in the words of the correctly entitled Blessed John Paul II.

John Paul II, as memorialized in the above video, made a great distinction between the self-congratulatory “rights” created by fallen man, and the rights provided to man inalienably by God. The mafia, you see, has a sense of entitlement, a sense that they have rights no one else has, the ‘rights of man’ created by man egotically to suit himself, as opposed to the inalienable rights provided by God in the Natural Law.

Such a sense of entitlement is the bane of mankind. The mafia are the bane of mankind. Anyone anywhere who for any reason has a sense of entitlement is the bane of mankind.

Error has no rights. Fallen man as fallen, egotistic man, has no rights apart from what God gives him. The rights of man, apart from God given rights, are (How to say it best? … perhaps in the words of the great Cardinal Cipriani) esa cojudez! But more on that, please God, in a future post!

Sometimes you just can’t warn people enough. One of the seminarians I taught in one of the many seminaries where I have been on the faculty, got himself into so much trouble with his local mafia that he had to be transferred by the bishop. After his ordination, he was assigned to the mafia parish of that part of the country. He was a bit of show-boat, and would often end up singing while standing on top of tables at wedding receptions, and so on. The mafia noted that he liked attention. The mafia work on any weakness, like Satan. The mafia quietly sent newspaper reporters to him so that he was front page news very frequently. They also sent television reporters to get sound bites from him to put on the evening news. They made sure that the radio proclaimed the wonders of this up and coming priest loudly for all to hear. On and on. And the young fellow sucked it all in, actually thinking he was pretty hot stuff. Sad, that. Well, as time went on, the mafia crowd would invite him more an more to their villas and retreats, to parties with the rich and famous. They would sit him down for banquets and slowly, ever so slowly, begin to talk more and more business in front of him, as if he were not there. In other words, he was trusted. But, in this way, they owned him. He knew too much. If he says anything, he’s dead. All too dramatic for him, so this point didn’t register. When he heard details of huge movements of drugs spoken in front of him, he got scared. Back at the rectory he breathlessly told the secretary that he was going to the local police to tattle on the mafia. “But don’t tell anyone!” he said. She waited until he left, and then called the mafia herself. And the police, were they not owned by the mafia as well? The bishop recieved a call, and the young priest was removed forthwith, to save his life. He’s still alive to this day, somewhat wiser, I hope. Perhaps he’s studied up a bit more on the rights of God verses the “rights” of man. I hope so.

Having a sense of entitlement to being popular is just as bad as that sense of entitlement which has you stomp on others. They are just different aspects of the same idiocy and end up hurting others one just as much as the other.

Who are the mafiosi? Those who have a sense of entitlement…

Leave a Comment

Filed under Just me, Mafia

05 Rosary Rant – “Infancy”[!] – “4″ – The Martyrdom of the Holy Innocents

This post was going to be put up on 28 December, the Feast of the Holy Innocents, but the internet connection was so bad I got on to other things.

Some readers might be surprised at seeing “The Martyrdom of the Holy Innocents” as a mystery of the rosary, and doubly surprised to see it categorized under the mysteries of the Infancy of Jesus. O.K. An explanation is in order!

First of all, this is not an “official mystery” — that’s true, I admit that, accept that — but I thought I would include it in this series for pedagogical reasons. That’s all. Have patience with this hermit!

Secondly, we have to know that there have been other non-universally accepted mysteries of the rosary prayed since time immemorial. For instance, there are some orders of religious and umpteen zillion individuals who pray a “sixth decade” after the official mysteries (and followed, always, by the Litany of Loretto, always). Their rosaries sometimes reflect this, with not five, but six decades of beads. That mystery is “the Immaculate Conception of the ever Virgin Mother of God.” I love that. It’s not bad, not evil, not an attempt to scandalize, not an attack on devotion, piety, Tradition or even the tradition of the Church, nor is it an attempt to confuse the faithful and have them throw up their hands in frustration that the whole Church is sliding down into the place of wailing and grinding of teeth! Really! I emphasize this since some get nervous about anything and everything. But we just need to see that prayer, even if not absolutely “official”, is not evil. Saint Teresa of Avila and Saint John of the Cross would be the first to teach this, and in fact, did. God leads souls on many and diverse ways, as many as there are souls.

The “Infancy mysteries” were not promulgated in any official manner, as were the mysteries of light (which are quite specifically mysteries of the rosary designed for priests, but we’ll get to that later in the series). It was, however, again, Blessed John Paul II who ”used” these mysteries on various occasions, using the first three joyful mysteries, followed by 4. The Martyrdom of the Holy Innocents and 5. The Exile of the Holy Family into Egypt. I did not know this. It was a close friend in Rome, a Cardinal of Holy Mother Church, who explained all this to me years ago.

These two mysteries are not exactly joyful, but point to the permissive will of God. Our heavenly Father can and does draw great good out of real evil. He’s God. He knows how to do these things!

Think about it, are not these two mysteries, or, as a group, the Infancy mysteries, appropriate today, when there is such an attack on life, on the most helpless among us, by the most ferocious cowards, cowards like Herod and Archilaus? I think so. But I’m not making a bid of any kind. Just pointing out some things in the life of a newly beatified Roman Pontiff.

And… and… and… it’s not as if these mysteries did not take place in the life of our dear Lord! And… and… and… these are recounted by the Holy Spirit in the Sacred Scriptures, which He inspired. It is most appropriate, for instance, during prayer before the Most Blessed Sacrament, to humbly thank our Lord for the what He and His Holy Family suffered on our behalf during His younger years. If one were to recite, say, oh, ten Hail Marys during this reflection, I don’t think our Lord would be displeased! I write all this with a smile on my face and joy in my heart. Our Lord is so very good and so very kind. Of course He is most pleased with such humble thanksgiving.

Perhaps the 4th Infancy mystery, that of the Martyrdom of the Holy Innocents, will be especially appreciated by ministries which care for women who are so very lost after having had an abortion, helping them not to commit suicide, helping them to turn to Jesus. One such ministry I’ve heard a lot about is Rachel’s Vineyard. Rachel is mentioned in the Infancy Narratives of the Gospel, weeping for her children, who have been slaughtered, because they are no more.

In this particular post, I won’t go through a translation of the entire second chapter of Saint Matthew, which recounts the Martyrdom of the Holy Innocents and the Exile of the Holy Family into Egypt. Instead, I would just like to point out a few things in the promised rant style of this particular series of meditation of the rosary:

(1) Children are always the first to die when it comes to cowards, who are, in the first place, politicians like Herod, so afraid that he would be upstaged by a baby! Today, politicians not only promote, but force the abortion of untold millions of children each year. In China, women are simply ripped open with a knife, and their babies held before them as they both die, much like the pre-Guadalupe crowd gauged out the hearts of their victims, showing them their beating hearts as they died. Our vice-president (2011) thinks that that’s all very nice, the China bit: remember that little talk he gave to students over in China?

(2) The sacrifice of children is at the heart of all major religions. 1. There’s worship of Satan by today’s American pro-aborts. I think all the militantly active pro-aborts with whom I’ve spoken, at different times and in different place and in different years, told me verbatim that they worship a different god. 2. Kali, the blood goddess of the Hindus, received the sacrifice of untold numbers of children. 3. The Aztecs of years past. 4. Judaism, with the would-be sacrifice of Isaac by Abraham (more on that in a future series of posts), who is their Father in Faith for this reason. 5. Christianity, and, specifically, the Church founded by our Lord, the universal, that is, Catholic Church, which also looks to the would-be sacrifice of Isaac by Abraham as a type of the Messiah to come, Jesus, who would be worthy to be that sacrifice for our sins, a vicarious sacrifice. 6. Islam, whose central act of worship is child-sacrifice, for when they bow down to the ground, they are immitating Isaac in getting his head cut off in the would-be sacrifice of the Abraham’s son by Abraham (though for Islam it is all merely about bloodthirstiness, not about an immediate resurrection from the dead, as it is in the Old and New Testaments of Judeo-Catholic revelation. 7. Etc.

(3) God, the Father of Mercies, won’t hesitate to show His goodness and kindness, even though this will mean untold suffereing and misery! This doesn’t mean He is cruel. It just means that He is respecting, in this world, the consequences of sin which we ourselves have chosen in original and any personal sin. If Incarnate Goodness and Kindness is shown to us in Christ Jesus, the Father’s only begotten Son, we, in our sin, go berzerk, thinking this goodness and kindness to be an incrimination of our lack of goodness and kindness, instead of an invitation to be truly good and kind by the grace of God. So, what do we do in our sin: we put to death goodness and kindness, crucifying Him, and, in this case of the martyrdom of the Holy Innocents, killing off the image of that goodness and kindness in children, whether unborn or just born or as infants. Our Heavenly Father knows that we go berzerk. That’s not going to stop Him from showing us goodness and kindness. Some will accept that goodness and kindness. That the little ones of Bethlehem and the surrounding villages had to be slaughtered in an attempt to kill of Goodness and Kindness Incarnate was necessary. However, that doesn’t mean that these children are annihilated.

(4) Women who have had an abortion are not abandoned by our Lord. They also can and do[!] find healing, though, in this world, refusing to be consoled, since “they are no more.” There is no sin that is too great for our Lord to forgive. If there were such a sin, we would be God, wouldn’t we? For we would then be more powerful than God. No. Instead, He is good and kind. He knows that killing our children is what we do in our fallen human nature. He knows that this is the reverse of being His image, which He created us to be. Knowing this, He sent His only Son to take on what we deserve, death, so as to have the right in all justice to have mercy on us. God can and does forgive: “Father, forgive them!” is what our demanded on the Cross! Yes, women who repent of their abortions can and do[!] find forgiveness and downright enthusiastic friendship with our Lord both in this life and the life to come. That they “refuse to be consoled” is one of those things from which our Lord draws great good. Women who have had an abortion note other children who would be the same age as their own children had they not been aborted. This can go on for a lifetime. HOWEVER, this is not an invitation to get depressed and go into despair. Instead, it is an opportunity to calmly pray for the conversion of women about to have an abortion or who have had an abortion. It is an opportunity to pray for the conversion of abortionists and for politicians. We are enjoined to pray for our rulers, that we might have peace upon the earth. I’m guessing that most of such prayer goes up before the throne of God, like a pleasing incense, as sent by women who have repented of their abortions and who are now friends with our Lord Jesus, who, by His grace, has claimed them for a heavenly eternity. Very awesome, that.

(5) The Holy Innocents have, for time immemorial, been hailed as martyrs by Holy Mother Church. For some reason, this makes some of the less intellectual of the “Traditionalist” (but not at all understanding of Tradition or even tradition) crowd go, again — what’s that word? — berzerk. “They’re not baptised, not even by blood, for they had no choice in the matter!” Sigh. Our Lord came to save us. “To such belongs the kingdom of heaven” is what HE said about those children before Him. Baptism is a positive command. It is to be done only if it is possible. For instance, going to Mass on Sunday is a grave obligation, but if one is in traction in the hospital, one is not committing a sin by not going to Mass! This is different from a negative command, such as Do not murder the innocent. There is no good reason ever to murder the innocent. Our Lord’s Sacrifice is way more than sufficient to claim these children as His own. “But this destroys the missionary impetus of the Church!” it is said. No. It doesn’t. For those who can be evangelized, we must always be in great anguish until they are evangelized. We want to share the greatest love in our lives with others, do we not?  That impetus is not destroyed just because Jesus loves children, is it? Nope. Holy Mother Church hails these children as martyrs, who are now in heaven, great saints. Really! I think that that’s just so wonderful. Our Lord is just so good and just so kind. The celebration of martyrdom is a celebration, however distressing it might be: “And she refused to be consoled.” The thing about this world is that we can both be in distress and in great interior joy simultaneously.

(6) Don’t think that the Holy Family didn’t pray for those families whose babies were killed in an attempt to kill Jesus. Imagine their thoughts all the way to Egypt and for all those years of exile. But that’s another meditation on the 5th Infancy mystery!

(7) O.K. I apologize, almost. That was a rant with a tinge of reactionary silliness in favor of those who are way too narrowminded about the beauty of prayer, to melt their hearts just a bit, to set them off guard, to encourage them to be taken by our Lord in prayer in this way and that at the most unexpected times, in the most unexpected ways. That’s alright. Yes, our Lord is just so good and so kind with each of us.

1 Comment

Filed under Rosary Rants

17 Holy Souls Hermitage Heroes and Heroines – Blessed John Paul II

I have a great deal to write about Genesis and John Paul II and Benedict XVI. My sojourn in this direction started years ago at the JPII Institute for Marriage and the Family at the Pontifical Lateran University over in Rome. I was a student of JPII’s appointee to found this institute: Cardinal Carlo Caffarra. There were many short moments I had with JPII, on one of which I was able to mention my hopes to write at length on his General Wednesday Audiences about what he called the Theology of the Body. My much more recent thesis on Genesis 2,4–3,24 has prepared me for this beyond measure. Here’s a picture of that little encounter:

Here are some other pics of a few of the other times I met JPII. We’re both of varying age!

Leave a Comment

Filed under ., saints

The famous apologies of Blessed John Paul II: On second thought…

When I was a most stupid priest, stupider than I am now I think (which is hard to do), I used to think that the apologies on behalf of the Church wrought by Blessed John Paul II in view of the sins not of the Church (which, as The Church, cannot sin) but rather in view of certain individuals, was all just plumb wrong. The Church cannot sin! thought I, correctly. And that’s all the further I thought. I was quite shallow, really. Not that I’m not still that way!

But there is more to this. Did not Christ Jesus take on our sin as if it were His own? Did He not – as in Saint Paul’s shorthand – become sin for us? Does He not constitute the Church in His very Person, making us members of His very Body?

I have for some time been of the perhaps scandalous opinion that Christ’s redemptive actions were like Him going to confession to our Heavenly Father, reciting all our sins as if they were His own. As a penance, he is condemned to death. He does this willingly, for us, out of love, while we are yet sinners, crucifying Him with our sins. He takes it all on Himself. “I’m sorry, Father,” He says for us, apologizing, begging for forgiveness for us.

Was Blessed John Paul II so far wrong in apologizing for others? On second thought – so many years later – I don’t think so.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Popes