Tag Archives: Immaculate Conception

Msgr Edward Arsenault: Some perspective, with florae for the Immaculate Conception

florae2

Much of the day was spent on the phone catching up with the various contacts, trying to fathom what is happening with Monsignor Edward J. Arsenault.

I’ve written quite a bit this afternoon and this evening as well. But that article is not finished, nor will it be today. There is so very much going on right now. But I do intend to publish something on RICO tomorrow.

Meanwhile, in trying to put this into perspective…

The chickens are put to bed, and prayers still need to be said, and Laudie-dog is chewing on a bone. And… and…

When times are especially dark and dreary, I like to give a flower to the Immaculate Conception, from Holy Souls Mountain, of course. That, more than anything, helps put things in perspective.

Mary was a tough woman. She knew how and knows how to be a good mother. There’s no greater warrior than a Mother who’s protecting her only son.  I spoke about her up in Washington, D.C. a while back. Here’s what I said:

jesus mary cross googled image

1. The first is a link to the *.mp3 file. If you want to download the file to listen at any time, just click on it, but using Microsoft Internet Explorer. Diversely, in that same browser, right-click and choose “Save target as…”, saving it to the location and with the name you desire. Chrome will not download such files, only play them, just click for Chrome.

GENESIS IMMACULATE CONCEPTION GEORGE DAVID BYERS IVE CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 7 2013

2. If you just want to listen, use this:


3. If you just want to listen, you can use this as well:

Update Required To Play MediaUpdate your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.

For the *.PDF of the talk: IVE GENESIS IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CONFERENCE 7 FEBRUARY 2013

For the *.PDF of the entire thesis (for which I want to write a popular version): GENESIS THESIS

And then, just for fun, because it’s still within the Easter season, and because I’m from Minnesota:


1 Comment

Filed under abuse, Catholic, Immaculate Conception

Why is Saturday Dedicated to Mary? Holy Souls Mountain Florae for the Immaculate Conception

florae

Saturday is the seventh day of the week. It’s the day that God rested from the six days of creation. All was perfect.

Adam was created on the sixth day, and also fell on that day. He undid himself and all creation groans, as Saint Paul says.

Adam couldn’t possibly fully appreciate creation, indeed, even himself, that is, in relation to God.

But Mary, the Immaculate Conception, free from original sin, alone fully rejoiced in thanksgiving on the seventh day.

The Sabbath, the perfection of the seventh day, the day of rest, belongs to her with the Most High.

Yes, she also had to be redeemed so that she could stand transformed in grace from the first instant of her conception (see Luke 1,28).

But there’s a huge difference in the absolutely clear vision and agility of soul inherent with being immaculately conceived and the dullness of mind and heart that the rest of us suffer through with the consequences of original sin that, even though forgiven, do not leave us until we enter heaven (please God!).

Saturday is, therefore, a day when we, as Mary’s little children, can rightly rejoice that she was able to rejoice in thanksgiving like none of us could.

We rejoice to have such a good mother, Immaculate from the beginning, her divine Son being just that good, just that kind.

2 Comments

Filed under florae, Immaculate Conception

Ad orientem on 25 March at Holy Souls Hermitage

ad orientem 25 march 2013

The ad orientem scene at Holy Souls Hermitage on 25 March 2013.

Those who haven’t read this bit about the Immaculate Conception in Genesis 3,15 in context with 2,4–3,24 won’t regret spending part of their coffee/lunch break doing so. It goes to the heart of the thesis proving original sin and the promise of redemption to be wrought by the Son of the Immaculate Woman.

This has never been done before, not even upon requests to exegetes from Pius IX and Pius XII before the declaration of the recent Marian dogmas. I really must see about publishing this somehow. Here’s the pdf and the audio:

Immaculate Conception Conference 2-7-13

Update Required To Play MediaUpdate your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.

The ad orientem side-altar of the first mystery of the Rosary in the Rosary Basilica in Lourdes, France, a picture I took when I was chaplain there for some years.

Just as the donkey which had the great privilege of carrying Jesus into Jerusalem had this, his hour, fierce and sweet, with shouts about his ears for his Burden, and with palms beneath his feet, just so does this donkey of Holy Souls Hermitage think that carrying this truth about original sin and the Immaculate Conception in Genesis is his hour, fierce and sweet, a gift from the Holy Family to this most utterly mangey, flea-ridden, spider-bitten and otherwise altogether foundered and useless donkey.

I mean, I’m sure you all have Chesterton’s poem on a certain donkey memorized. If you don’t, you’ll want to…

This is the donkey that can be seen on lower Holy Souls Mountain, a Palestinian donkey, of course, what with the cross over his shoulders…

Continue reading

8 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Genesis, Immaculate Conception, Scripture, Spiritual Life

Ad orientem moon?! Stomp on it! A bit of prose in honor of the Immaculate Conception

moon

Monitum: I am the worst prose writer in the world, writing as fast as I can type. But here goes!

If you look carefully at the picture above, you can see the crucifix above the tabernacle of the ad orientem altar here at Holy Souls Hermitage. The full moon is just rising, faking us all out, on its way, as it is, to becoming a crescent moon, with a piece missing somewhere in a big box in Mecca, and needing to be stomped on by our Lady.

Mary crushing serpent TSWHow dare it have the pretense of taking the place of the sun, sneaking up at night, as if it had any power for good, but scared even to reflect the sun, waning away until it is nothing, only to try, in hubris, again, with a complete lack of wisdom, to take over the night, but looking ever so much, as it wanes away, like a serpentine horror of old, slinking away before the mighty sun flashes true flames of fire.

fish ichtus Jesus Christ God's Son Savior HSH

The sun, the Son, burning away all falsity with celestial, clear, immaculate blue, a reflection of the sea, the mar, Mary, bitter as the sea in her intercession, as life-giving as the Fish she bears, that ichthus, that ιχθυς, ι-Jesus-χ-Christ-θ-God’s-υ-Son-ς-Savior, who jumps from the sky, brighter than the sun, and into the sea, reflecting with seeming lunacy that dependent satellite, becoming the very darkness of sin until… the resurrection, ourselves reflecting His glory.

* * *

Now, I suppose typing at breakneck speed can make for a rather mysterious result, but in that case, I should like to call Hilaire Belloc to my defense, citing a few lines of his about irony, which readers of HSH will have almost memorized by this time, prefacing this with a bit from Saint Paul (2 Corinthians 5,21): “For our sake He [God the Father] made Him [Jesus] to be sin [receiving the punishments of sin] who did not know sin [for He was always innocent], so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.”

guadalupe maryTo the young, the pure, and the ingenuous, irony must always appear to have a quality of something evil, and so it has, for [...] it is a sword to wound. It is so directly the product or reflex of evil that, though it can never be used – nay, can hardly exist – save in the chastisement of evil, yet irony always carries with it some reflections of the bad spirit against which it was directed. [...] It suggests most powerfully the evil against which it is directed, and those innocent of evil shun so terrible an instrument. [...] The mere truth is vivid with ironical power [...] when the mere utterance of a plain truth labouriously concealed by hypocrisy, denied by contemporary falsehood, and forgotten in the moral lethargy of the populace, takes upon itself an ironical quality more powerful than any elaboration of special ironies could have taken in the past. [...] No man possessed of irony and using it has lived happily; nor has any man possessing it and using it died without having done great good to his fellows and secured a singular advantage to his own soul. “On Irony” (pages 124-127; Penguin books 1325. Selected Essays (2/6), edited by J.B. Morton; Harmondsworth – Baltimore – Mitcham 1958).

Our Lady, mind you, was always with her Son. Such goodness and kindness!

O.K. A further explanation: Remember the fiery saraph serpents that were killing the chosen people in the desert during the Exodus? Remember how Moses was commanded to make a bronze serpent, crucify it, and lift it up so that all who looked upon it might be healed, an image which looked just like that which was hurting them?

And remember how our Lord was lifted high on the Cross, looking like one of us, looking like a sinner, being condemned as a servant of Satan, and yet He is our Savior?

Something like that.

1 Comment

Filed under ad orientem, Immaculate Conception, Spiritual Life

Audio options for the Genesis 3,15 conference on original sin and the Immaculate Conception

jesus mary cross googled image
A number of readers have mentioned difficulty in accessing the audio files, either to listen or download. So, here are three different methods.

1. The first is a link to the *.mp3 file. If you want to download the file to listen at any time, just click on it, but using Microsoft Internet Explorer. Diversely, in that same browser, right-click and choose “Save target as…”, saving it to the location and with the name you desire. Chrome will not download such files, only play them.

GENESIS IMMACULATE CONCEPTION GEORGE DAVID BYERS IVE CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 7 2013

2. If you just want to listen, use this:


3. If you just want to listen, you can use this as well:

Update Required To Play MediaUpdate your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.

Again, for the *.PDF of the talk: IVE GENESIS IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CONFERENCE 7 FEBRUARY 2013

Again, for the *.PDF of the entire thesis (for which I want to write a popular version):GENESIS THESIS

And then, just for fun, because it’s Lent, and because I’m from Minnesota:


5 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Genesis

Audio of the Genesis 3,15 Original Sin and Immaculate Conception Conference at the IVE in Washington D.C.

florae for the immaculate conception

This shows from the Hebrew text of Genesis 2,4–3,24 how it is that original sin is extended to us by propagation, but not multiplied by imitation. After pouring over many thousands of works of this topic from across the centuries, it seems that this is indeed a first in Judeo-Catholic history. The same is to said about the demonstration of the Immaculate Conception from the Hebrew text of Genesis. That’s also a first. This has many consequences, I think, for Scripture studies, theology and Judeo-Catholic relations.

I downloaded the Switch Sound File Converter and compressed the nearly 700 MB WAV file to a mere 78 MB file.

This is one hour, eight minutes including both the conference and the few questions for which we had time. There were many other questions, but these were asked after the recorder was shut off.

Update Required To Play MediaUpdate your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.

5 Comments

Filed under Genesis, Immaculate Conception

In preparation for talking about Genesis 2,4–3,24 in D.C., I read this… [and now I'm petrified]

For a summary of the thesis, scoll to the end of this page.

Click on the picture of the thesis in order to download the *.PDF of the original technical version. Yikes!

Preliminary disclaimers:

(1) I would like to get the thesis out there a bit more, and not only downloaded, but printed out, examined, and put forward for a much wider publishing. Thus, with a few edits, I’m republishing this post from my now defunct blog I had when a chaplain in Lourdes. This post is my advertisement for the project of my life, not just the thesis, but the popular version of the thesis. For many reasons, on so many levels, some of which I mention below, this is a battle in our Church Militant that needs to be fought and won. Other things have always gotten in the way. You decide.

(2) I would ask those who get nervous with any “controversy” whatsoever, who crawl out of their skin at the least indication that the status quo of the lowest common denominator is being challenged, who think any controversy is a dismissable controversy merely among scholars, and would never, as a controversy, have anything seriously to do with defending the established doctrine and morality of the Church, and therefore shouldn’t be aired in public… I would ask them to calm down and be deadly careful about what is put into such a dismissable category as “mere controversy among scholars.” Are doctrines of faith and morals dismissable controversies of scholars just because some scholars reject the teaching of Holy Mother Church? Really? One should think long and hard about that.

Now there is, I admit, in this post and in the future posts about Genesis that I hope to write, some good amount of “controversy”.

In fact, I hope to cite some of the most in-your-face statements of Continue reading

5 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Genesis, Immaculate Conception, interreligious dialogue, Scripture

3:00 PM — The Immaculate Conception and the Hour of Mercy

Mary at the foot of the Cross googled image

It is because Mary has the clarity of vision possible only to the one immaculately conceived, she can see the goodness of her Divine Son, and the difference there is between Him and ourselves. All the sorrow in the world is as nothing compared to what she knew. She did not become bitter with us, but with her immaculate heart full of love, seeing exactly what we needed, all of us, from the first man to the last of any time or place just by looking upon her Son, she, with that knowledge, interceded for us, prayed for us, these being her birth pangs which gave birth to the entirety of the Mystical Body of Christ. How dare anyone say that Mary never knew birth pangs because she was immaculately conceived (an increase in anguish being one of the punishments for original sin)! Sure, the birth of our Lord was miraculous. But our belonging to the Mystical Body of Christ…. such a miracle brought about by purity, by sorrow, by intercession, by solidarity with her divine Son, Christ our God. Her Immaculate heart was pierced open with sorrow as we read in the Gospel of Luke. His Sacred Heart was pierced through by our sins symbolized by the spear of the soldier.

The Immaculate Conception and the Hour of Mercy? Yes. This is her hour of intercession for us as foretold by our Lord at the wedding of Cana. It is at this hour that we receive the true Wine, the Blood of Christ. It is at this hour that we celebrate the marriage of the Lamb with His bride the Church at the Last Supper with those wedding vows of His: This is my Body and Blood given over and poured out for you… in sacrifice. Is this The Hour of the Immaculate Conception to finish her work of maternity, of giving birth to us precisely because of her immaculateness? Is this the hour when she is mediatrix of all graces? Is this the hour when she is co-redemptrix, that title given to her some dozens of times by Pope John Paul II and so many others, pointing to the justice of it all, that we are redeemed only by her Divine Son even while it is most fitting in all justice that one of us perfectly intercede, pray for those graces of redemption? Well, yes, it is that hour. The hour taken from Satan and now owned by the Prince of the Most Profound Peace, and by His Mother, the Immaculate Conception.

Happy Feast Day.

Know that there is great rejoicing in heaven on this day.

May the Lord continue to bless you all according to the perfect intercession of the Immaculate Conception.

4 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Immaculate Conception

Have a blessed feast day: May the Lord bless you according to the perfect intercession of the Immaculate Conception!

Immaculate Conception Piazza di Spagna

This is the statue of the Immaculate Conception found in Piazza di Spagna in Rome. I took this picture when I was a chaplain in Lourdes, on the yearly trip taken by all the chaplains together to various pilgrimage destinations. It was a very misty day. Now, here’s Pope Benedict XVI a couple of years back:

If I’m able, I’ll put up Saint Maximilian Kolbe’s novena to the Immaculate Conception today, hour by hour, on the hour, beginning, say, at 6:00 AM EST USA. Stay tuned. Check back hourly! Perhaps I’ll also be able to put some meditations on the Immaculate Conception and some posts involving certain conversions involving the Immaculate Conception. Yikes!

3 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Immaculate Conception, videos

Everything you ever wanted to know about: “Que soy era Immaculada Councepciou” — Our Lady’s words in Lourdes

When I was in Lourdes as a chaplain for a couple of years, I must admit to being rather distracted, time and again, by the exclamatory words of the Immaculate Conception – now highlighted in raised gold lettering under the statue of the grotto -  which are usually translated as “I am the Immaculate Conception.”

Going down from the Chaplain’s house on the “zig-zag path” to the grotto to offer Holy Mass followed by adoration (from 11:00 PM until midnight, my favorite time in Lourdes), or passing by the grotto on my way to the Rosary or Eucharistic Processions, or to hear Confessions in the morning and afternoon, I would stare hard at these words. I knew I just had to hunt down some of the rapidly diminishing in number local Bigourdan speakers. You probably can’t tell it from my blog posts, but I’m a bit of a grammar freak, and these words just bothered me to no end. Sorry. I think I was born this way.

So, I went Bigourdan-speaker hunting and spoke with an elderly, retired gentleman who, though not knowing anything about grammar or spelling, was quite certain of the following, for he has lived the language. If I remember rightly, he was the legendary head sacristan who retired just days after my speaking with him.

The “què” [yes, with the grave accent, impossible in French], he said, has nothing to do with the French subjunctive. It means “je” in French (or “I” in English). I’m sure he’s correct, though I bet this derived from the subjunctive as a cultural oddity, which speaks to the humility of the locals, not wanting to put themselves forcefully forward, but always using the subjunctive for themselves.

Anyway, the “soy” is “suis” in French (or “am” in English).

“Immaculada Councepciou” is clearly “Immaculée Conception” in French (or “Immaculate Conception” in English).

The “éra” [yes, with the accute accent], he continued, is not part of a compound verb (perhaps giving us something like a presently continuing situation of a past event [and wouldn't that be interesting?]) but is rather what he called a definite article, as in “la” = ” l’ ” in French (or “the” in English). But then he backtracked and said that, in reality, “era” is the Bigourdan way of saying “elle” in French (or “she” in English), giving us something exclamatory like: “I am she: Immaculate Conception!” Wow… I can’t imagine that being said except with much joy. No wonder Bernadette ran, ran, ran to the parish priest, repeating what our Lady had said the entire way.

But then this elderly gentleman got complicated on me, saying that, in his opinion, it is not written the right way, that “Què soy éra Immaculada councepciou” is unacceptably too proper. The “éra”, he says, would be contracted into “Immaculada”, giving us this: “Què soy érimaculada councepciou”. So, not an exclamation. The pronoun was simply used over time as a definite article: “I am the Immaculate Conception.”

But then, why was the phrase written the way it was written, especially if this is so unacceptable? Did the parish priest try to clean up the language a little bit, falling into a linguistic error himself? No. I doubt that. I mean, when the words ‘Que soy era Immaculada Concepciou’ were put up, wouldn’t all the locals who knew how to read know exactly what the words meant? And wouldn’t they have realized that there was a mistake if there indeed was one?

So, back to the exclamation: “I am she: Immaculate Conception!”

I should be satisfied with that, I suppose. But the accent in “éra” bothers me. The opening deadened “e” in the French “elle” would hardly develop into “é”, even if the double “ll” easily turned into an “r”. A self-proclaimed expert said that this could be a past tense verb of some kind, but that surely it was just a definite article. Given the difficulties with the “unacceptable” nature of the “éra” standing on its own, I’m guessing that it is some kind of past tense verb, giving us presently continuing action begun in the past. This would be the perfect rendition of the Greek perfect in Luke’s Gospel, where the angel says, “Rejoice, O you who stand transformed in grace” (in context, from the first moment of her vocation to be the Mother of God, from the first moment of her conception). Now, wouldn’t that be wonderful? This would be a gentle push for the Church at that time (1858) to look more closely at the Gospel, and this just a short time after the very correct definition that Mary was immaculately conceived (1854). The doctrine of Sacred Tradition is not only reflected in the Sacred Scriptures, but it is in the Sacred Scriptures themselves (not only in Luke 1,28, but also in Genesis 2,4–3,24). Mary was not only immaculately conceived, but she is still perfectly what she was when she was just conceived, to wit, the Immaculate Conception. Wonderful.

While in Lourdes, I kept asking Bigourdan speakers about the “éra”. While they admit that Bigourdan is way closer to Italian than it is to Spanish, and while they admit that however much French there is in this dialect, there really is quite a bit of Italian influence, some are adament that this is a definite article, or, at least, something along the lines of “She is”, giving us “I am she is… Immaculate Conception.” More smoothly: “I am she: Immaculate Conception.” So, does that solve the mystery? Perhaps the “definite article” did not have to be in a contracted form at that time. Moreover, the continuing action begun in the past is perfectly rendered here: “I am” is present tense, while “Immaculate Conception” hails to the time of her conception. Again, that perfectly reflects what’s happening in Luke 1,28, where we read of Mary perfectly continuing to be perfectly transformed in grace from the first instant she could begin to live her vocation to the Mother of God, that is, at her conception, her Immaculate Conception!

How very humble of Mary. Instead of pointing to her being the Mother of God, she instead emphasizes the glory of being the Mother of God, which is doing the will of God, which she did perfectly, by the way, at the time of her being immaculately conceived. She was always, from the first instant, utterly transformed in grace, just as she is today as Queen of heaven and earth, angels and men, the Virgin Mother of God assumed soul and body into heaven. It is God’s life within us that counts the most, doing his will.

You might want to click on this blog’s category “Immaculate Conception.”

/// A great seminarian wrote in the other day to say that he was offering the Emergency Chaplet of the Immaculate Conception for me (very, very much appreciated), but with some changes. He said that before and after this chaplet, on the three beads one finds by themselves on a rosary, he added the words three times each: “Que soy era Immaculada Councepciou!” He called these statements “prayers”… This seminarian is very close to Saint Bernadette. I got to thinking about that repetition of those words, and Bernadettes breathless run came to mind, from the grotto to her parish priest up the steep hill, up in town, incessantly repeating these words,  “Que soy era Immaculada Councepciou!” Imagine what the parish priest would have thought with such a child, totally out of breath, utterly uneducated, stammering on his doorstep: “I am she: Immaculate Conception! I am she! Immaculate Conception! I am she! Immaculate Conception!” …. and only after just a bit explaining that this was the name of the lady she saw in the grotto. To repeat those words with the innocence of a little child, with such enthusiasm, yes, this also is a prayer. Was not Jesus, the High Priest, also Mary’s little child? Yes, by the way, He was, and is! Are we not as well? Yes, I think we are!

7 Comments

Filed under Immaculate Conception

Brief thoughts on Christ the King, Son of the Immaculate Conception!

Christus Rex. Christ the King. Today’s Feast Day in the Ordinary Form Calendar. In the Extraordinary Form, this falls on the last Sunday of October. I suppose that the reasoning of the transposition of the feast for the ordinary form has to do with the end of the liturgical year, a summary, if you will, of all that the Lord Jesus, Son of the Immaculate Conception, has done for us, and continues to do from heaven.

There is no designation about how it is that Christ is Christ the King, just that He is the Universal King, the King of kings, the Lord of lords, the Prince of the Most Profound Peace.

Throughout my life of preaching, I have, on this day, related the thoughts of Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen, that Christ is King, reigning from that throne of love, lifted on high, from which He draws all to Himself, that throne of the Cross.

And then I might have added some bits from events occuring at the Epiphany, with the wise men presenting their gifts of gold, frankincense and myhrr in honor of the little King of angels and men, the little Priest, Himself in the manger[!], the little Prophet, who, like all prophets, must be rejected and put to death, the body being prepared for burial with that aromatic oleoresin of the Middle East. This was — mind you — before I knew that the last Sundays of the liturgical year in the Extraordinary Form took their inspiration from the Sundays after Epiphany. Yikes! The faith is univocal, is it not?!

Here are some meditations on the Last Supper, the Birth of our Lord, and the Baptism, with the meditations on the Last Supper and the Baptism being aimed at my fellow priests and bishops of the Priesthood of Jesus. Yikes!

Today, I’d like to stick with the image of the infant King. Was He not the Universal King of the Universe, of angels and men, of the Church Triumphant, the Church Suffering, the Church Militant, and even of the damned, who He hands over to the justice without mercy that they so desire? Yes, He is. In fact, He is so from the very beginning, from the very first moment of His conception in the womb of His dear Virgin Mother by the power of the Holy Spirit.

This reminds me of something I wrote on everything you ever wanted to know about the exclamation in Lourdes Que soy era Immaculada Councepciou: “I am the Immaculate Conception”:

This perfectly reflects what’s happening in Luke 1,28, where we read of Mary perfectly continuing to be perfectly transformed in grace from the first instant she could begin to live her vocation to the Mother of God, that is, at her conception, her Immaculate Conception.

How very humble of Mary. Instead of pointing to her being the Mother of God, she instead emphasizes the glory of being the Mother of God, which is doing the will of God, which she did perfectly, by the way, at the time of her being immaculately conceived. She was always, from the first instant, utterly transformed in grace, just as she is today as Queen of heaven and earth, angels and men, the Virgin Mother of God assumed soul and body into heaven. It is God’s life within us that counts the most, doing his will.

Jesus, always obedient to His Heavenly Father, as much King as an Infant, indeed, in the womb of Mary Immaculate, as He is now, gloriously reigning in Heaven and among us in the Most Blessed Sacrament.

Such a King we have, who is concerned with the likes of us, each of us, each one of us. He loves us, He being just that good, just that kind.

1 Comment

Filed under Catholic, Immaculate Conception, Jesus, Spiritual Life

Flybys at the hermitage – the Spirits of the Air – Mary Immaculate – Saint Michael

I did not go out to see the fireball of the jet fighter that did a flyby of the hermitage before sunrise this morning. I did not see the jet. I heard it. That was enough for my curiosity so early in the morning! Besides last year here at the hermitage, the last time I heard such a scrape the tops of the trees painstakingly slow, almost stalling out flyby was decades ago at our religious house in Kentucky, which is just over a bit from Fort Campbell. I couldn’t believe my eyes, as the fighter seemed to be no more than fifty feet off the ground. Happy to hear these flybys, if not see them. They’ve been much less frequent, I must say, in the last while. I haven’t seen another Predator B since last year, you know, the MQ-9 Hunter Reaper Killer UAV super payloaded General Atomics version of what the drone kingdom should be like. However, I think there was another AH 64 again the other week. Yikes!

Neither John the Baptist nor Jesus had any difficulty whatsoever with the fact of a military, though they did insist on justice. When there is justice, there is no threat, neither at home nor abroad. This is what the U.S. Military strives to be all about. When Cromwell threatened Thomas More with justice, the great statesman replied that, therefore, he was not threatened. Holy Souls Hermitage supports our military.

Saint Paul (see Ephesians 6,12) says that we are not fighting flesh and blood, against each other, but against the fallen spirits. Trouble is, is that some people like to go after the ways of the fallen spirits. To remain just in such a situation demands that one be non-reactionary, but instead one who simply acts to re-establish justice, serving God, who is, as the USMC says, Semper Fi, that is, semper fidelis, that is, always faithful, that is, in such a way that the Marine might participate in that faithfulness in the re-establishment of that justice which is a service to all mankind.

Trouble is, is that there are those who are unjust, as Satan is unjust, and Satan wants people to fight against him (and them) on his own terms, that is, with injustice, overreacting, being evil in a violence which could otherwise be a contribution to the virtue of justice. Saint Paul says that we fight against the fallen spirits, but, the thing is, in this fight, we fight with God and for Him; we don’t just attack Satan as if we could do something on our own, depending on our fallen selves. If we thus – actually – fight against ourselves, Satan will taunt us into getting terribly upset, losing sight of God. This is captured in a great statue of Saint Michael slaying Satan in the Saint Michael Chapel (next to the Crypt Chapel) above the grotto in Lourdes. Satan seems to be positively enjoying getting slain by Saint Michael, as if to say that Saint Michael is having no effect, that this does not hurt him, that Saint Michael is finally “playing” on Satan’s terms. You know, the old “Nyeah nyeah nyeah nyeah nyeah” type of thing:

Saint Michael, however, doesn’t fall for it. He simply does his job, with calm, serenity. After all, Michael, “Like unto God,” is acting on God’s behalf, not simply reacting to Satan. Here’s the rest of that statue…

Notice how terribly calm Saint Michael is. That’s the way he was always depicted, until more recently, when, now, people think that they have to do battle with Satan on their own, and thus get frustrated, and angry (with themselves), and then project the agonized face they make onto that of Saint Michael.  That’s just not right.

To prove the point, on this feast of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in the Extraordinary Form, or the Queenship of Mary in the Ordinary Form, lets take a look at any image whatsoever of Mary crushing Satan beneath her feet. Is she frustrated and angry with herself? Never!

Our Immaculate Queen Mother simply does what she does by the power of the Holy Spirit, looking to him. The stained glass above is found in Immaculate Conception Catholic Church in Hendersonville, NC, way, way, way down the mountain and to the South and East.

Conclusion: Whether your job is as ferocious as the daily life of any of the USMC, or as ferocious as day to day living while being Semper Fi, always, always, always faithful, do this so as to fulfill justice (upon which virtue mercy is built). In this, you’ll have to be looking to the Holy Spirit, and by His grace, ever so simply, as a child, however ferocious.

1 Comment

Filed under Immaculate Conception, Military

Revising the Emergency Chaplet of the Immaculate Conception?

Today is the vigil of the feast we have tomorrow in the calendar of the Extraordinary Form, as also in the Ordinary Form where this has been granted, such as with the Missionaries of Charity right around the world:

Festum Immaculati Cordis Beatae Mariae Virginis ~ II. classis
Tempora: Feria Quarta infra Hebdomadam XII post Octavam Pentecostes III. Augusti

So, to begin to honor the Immaculate Heart of Mary, how about we review the Emergency Chaplet of the Immaculate Conception? I think that would be a good in these days. After all, it was last year at this time that I put up a first mention of the chaplet with a story about how it started, here.

Basically, the idea, using the rosary, is this:

  1. Recite your act of contrition on the “Pater noster” beads.
  2. Ask for the intercession of the Immaculate Conception on the “Ave Maria” beads: “Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.”

I’ve always used my own act of contrition.

I know that many of you have your own act of contrition.

Over time, as I started to share this, others have had some ideas about this, also on the blog here. I should have jotted them down. I remember one from seminarian Philip, and I received another written out in a letter recently from one of our readers and benefactors. There is another suggestion, often made, about the prayer to Saint Michael. Let’s examine some of these:

(1) Que soy era Immaculada Councepciou!

I’ve written quite a bit about the words Que soy era Immaculada councepciou, the words in the Bigourdan language spoken by our Lady to Saint Bernadette when the later asked her name. Usually translated “I am the Immaculate Conception,” I’m guessing, after quite a bit of analysis, that a closer translation would be: “I am she! Immaculate Conception!” At any rate, Philip had the idea to put these words at the beginning of the chaplet, repeated three times: “I am the Immaculate Conception!” The reason for the repetition, I’m guessing, is to be an aid in placing ourselves in the historical situation of 25 March, 1858, the date when these words were said in the — at the time — horrific conditions at the grotto. Saint Bernadette, not understanding the words in the least, repeated them incessantly, running up to the Parish Priest in the town of Lourdes. When he opened the door of the rectory, there she was, repeating: “I am the Immaculate Conception! I am the Immaculate Conception! I am the Immaculate Conception!” Finally, she was able to explain that this is what the Lady in the grotto said that her name was. Now, to repeat this thrice at the beginning of the chaplet is a most marvelous way to recall how our Lady uses the least amongst us. Bernadette was dirt poor. She basically lived on a heap of horse manure, as the only window in the one room house opened up on top of a hill of horse manure. Her nickname in town was “La petite merdeuse” (The Little Shit). Just like our Lady to appear to The Little Shit while she was collecting firewood in the… wait for it… pig manure of the grotto. Did you ever smell pig manure? At any rate I suppose it would be a bit of a risk that some people, in reciting this, would think that they are the ones immaculately concieved! Instead it is supposed to have the opposite effect. We are so NOT immaculately concieved. It’s a way to start off the chaplet with a bit of humility. Any thoughts? I think it’s a great idea!

(2) The Saint Michael prayer

The addition of the Saint Michael prayer at the end of the chaplet seemed a natural one to many. I agree. In my experience in exorcisms, these two, the Immaculate Conception and Saint Michael, are very powerful by reason of their great humility.


Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio;
contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli
esto praesidium.
Imperet illi Deus, supplices deprecamur:
tuque, Princeps militiae Caelestis,
satanam aliosque spiritus malignos,
qui ad perditionem animarum pervagantur in mundo,
divina virtute in infernum detrude.
Amen.

Saint Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle;
be our protection against the wickedness
and snares of the devil.
May God rebuke him, we humbly pray:
and do thou, O Prince of the heavenly host,
by the power of God,
thrust into hell Satan and all the evil spirits
who prowl about the world seeking the ruin of souls.
Amen.

(3) The sign of the cross

Grabbing the rosary by the crucifix, one makes the sign of the cross, but not done haphazardly, as we might sometimes do, but with full attention. Some things to remember:

  • We trace the cross over ourselves. Yikes! The cross is a horrific instrument of torture and death. Jesus, in taking on the kind of death we deserve because of original sin and any other sin, has the right in all justice to have mercy on us. He asks us to take up our cross, the effects of sin (weakness of will, weakness of mind, emotions all over the place, sickness and death), and then follow Him, so that then we know just how far he had to reach to get us, and just how far reaching our thanksgiving to Him must be. Making the sign of the cross over ourselves is our way of saying, “O.K. I’ll do that. I know I’m too weak to do such a thing, but I trust in you, in the friendship you provide.”
  • The sign of the cross is made with the invocation of the Most Holy Trinity, the Father who sent the Son, and the Holy Spirit who brings us to the Father through, with and in Jesus.
  • We declare that what we are about to do is done “In the Name of…” the Most Holy Trinity. Our perspective, if you will, is that, by the work of the Holy Spirit, we are looking to the Father, through, with and in Jesus, crying out then, “Abba! Father!” We so don’t know how to pray as we ought, but the Holy Spirit is in solidarity with us. He is the Paraclete, the One called to our side by the Father and the Son.
  • The sign of the cross, if possible, is best done with Holy Water, for this reminds us of our baptismal grace, how we were washed of the guilt of original sin and brought into the life of the Most Holy Trinity.

(4) Your further suggestions

Place in the comments box what you’ve been adding to the chaplet on your own, or what you think would be a good addition.

Perhaps the first “Pater noster” bead right after the crucifix might be reserved for the Memorare, which is very much the emergency request for the intercession of our Blessed Mother, hearkening back even to Genesis 3,15:

Remember, O most gracious Virgin Mary, that never was it known that anyone who fled to thy protection, implored thy help, or sought thine intercession was left unaided. Inspired by this confidence, I fly unto thee, O Virgin of virgins, my mother; to thee do I come, before thee I stand, sinful and sorrowful. O Mother of the Word Incarnate, despise not my petitions, but in thy mercy hear and answer me. Amen.

That’s the prayer the neighbor and I have been reciting for the success of the hermitage, should that be God’s will. But, your suggestions…

  • G wrote in with this: “Wanted to let you know that I very much appreciate the chaplet you shared. I’ve been praying it regularly with a few accretions. A Confiteor before, a brief exclamation of praise such Laudetur Iesus Christus! after each decade and a Memorare between the last decade and the Saint Michael prayer.”
  • But, do you others have suggestions… (I’d like to keep it simple!)

6 Comments

Filed under Immaculate Conception

War between the Catholic Church and anti-Catholic Obama. Ergo: Flowers for the Immaculate Conception

The Catholic Church in America launched what is perhaps the largest legal defence of religious liberty in history, but the “mainstream” (= leftist) media won’t carry the story of the persecution of the Catholic Church by the Obama Administration. This is exactly how things worked out in Germany before the Holocaust. Yep. Will we refuse yet again to learn from history? Perhaps the MSM is waiting for the decision about commerce laws coming up in June. If it’s decided that everyone must purchase a certain product (abortion insurance, thus paying into the pot which will pay for abortions), and this against their consciences, mayhem will ensue. The next decision, more specifically about religious liberty, if this is not taken up within the commerce decision, will need to happen before 1 August, or mayhem will ensue. What to do, I mean, you know, practically speaking?

Actually, the most practical thing one can do is to pick some flowers, put them in a little vase, and bring them to church, and put them before a statue of our Lady, the Immaculate Conception. I hope no one has forgotten that she is the Patronness of the United States. I hope no one has forgotten that she, as a mother, is solicitous for our welfare. I hope no one has fogotten that her intercession is most powerful before the throne of the Most High. We are her little children, are we not? Don’t little kids pick flowers to bring to their mothers? Sure, it’s a simple thing to do. But, you know, it changes everything. It sets everything in proper order. We are in humble thanksgiving for the intercession that our heavenly mother provides for us. Aren’t flowers appropriate? Don’t underestimate the fortitude for facing what is to come with a small action like this. Just do it.

And then… and then… while you’re in church, do what is actually even more practical than that, something that our Lady will push you to do while you are there. Go to confession. Yep. It’s useless to battle for religious freedom if there is no usage for the freedom! And confession brings such a great grace to us! So, flowers for our Lady, and then the confessional. You can do it.

And don’t think for a second that you have to buy flowers (though you may if you can!), nor that they have to be super spiffy like the forest flowers of Holy Souls Mountain in this post. None of that is necessary. Just some simple wild flowers will be more than adequate. And… and… if you can’t do that, and even if you can, know that there another flower or set of flowers that you can give to our Lady: the Hail Mary, indeed, the Rosary. The rosary is so called because the Hail Marys are roses, no? Roses have thorns: ouch! I’m sure our Lady will see your sacrifice as well! There are often “thorns” to put up with when we do projects like this, as so many things, like thorns, can get in the way. Get past the thorns, and get to the flowers!

5 Comments

Filed under Catholic, florae, Immaculate Conception, news, politics, separation of church and state

Happy Mother’s Day to the Mother of God!

Today is very dark, very rainy. Did I mention it was very dark… and very rainy? It. is. so. dark. It. is. so. rainy.

But certain things shine in the darkness, like the majestic goodness and kindness of Mary’s Son.

If I ever get around to writing the autobiography that I’ve been requested to write by so many throughout my life — with the first being my father when I was a youngster – I just might be able to describe some very near death experiences, you know, those times when you are certain that death is imminent, and it is except for an intervention of the Lord (and great guardian angels!).

I was once reprimanded by one of our past novice masters for having admitted to him — and he asked — admitted to him that I had not used words to pray to the Lord in the midst of a car accident I had been in on that terribly icy day, the terrible ice-storm of the early 1990s. I said that, instead, everything during that accident was totally calm, in slow motion, and that, although I didn’t use words, my spirit was indeed raised to the Lord in all child-like simplicity and trust. He reprimanded me and said that I should have used words! I guess one has to go through the experience to know what it is like, and he did, dying of brain cancer as a young priest just a few years later. Yikes!

Many other times, in calmer but no less deadly circumstances, being even minutes, seconds from death, I would, silly me, notice the tremendous beauty of a spider, so busy in his work, or the majesty of the clouds, all things, even my dire condition, being in the all embracing providence and permissive will of the Lord. In life, in death, we are the Lord’s, and all things work for the good of those who love Him by His grace.

I suppose some would condemn this simplicity as stupidity, not comprehending that being the simplest of little children of the Lord means that we do not count as so very important our lives here on earth compared to our doing His will, whether here or in heaven, and this so completely that, even in the face of death, one notices, with a heart that rejoices before our heavenly Father, His little acts of goodness and kindness, such as the provision of a spider-acrobat or tumbling clouds.

And then there is the hell of Calvary, with all hell broken loose, mayhem, mocking, spitting, hitting… Mary getting shoved and jostled and mocked… our Lord… Oh my… Our Lord!

And yet… totally calm. “Behold your Mother!” “Woman, behold your son!” — and then Jesus noticing the depth of the glance of Mary and John at each other and then back to Jesus. Did Jesus notice the tremendous motherliness of His mother? Did He notice the new majesty of her new son, John? Did He notice that she was still the “Lovely Lady Dressed in Blue,” as a lady on Cresson Mountain, Pennsylvania once wrote (as quoted by Archbishop Fulton Sheen)? I think He did. Love makes all things grow very calm, whatever mayhem there is. “All things with great serenity,” as Pope Benedict says. Yes, great serenity.

What a lovely video of Archbishop Sheen’s recitation of “Lovely Lady”… Totally awesome:

Did Mary notice utterly simple things amidst her grief and intercession for us? Did she notice, upon the death of her Son, the total appropriateness of the eclipse, and the earthquake, all in the spirit of the littlest child of our Heavenly Father? I think she did, but in a way that none of us will begin to comprehend, for she was always so perfectly doing the will of our Heavenly Father with such a pure heart and soul, as the Immaculate Conception.

And when her Son was dying, so was she, and that sword of sorrow piercing her heart at that moment was worse than a death that any and all of us put together could not begin to experience. And the things she noticed at that moment of death are forever beyond me for reasons other than that she could take in all things so very perfectly, for she did so as a mother. Only mothers know something of this. I could not even begin to guess at the intensity of the simplicity of that love which did not for a second lose sight of all the joyful times in their lives before Jesus’ public ministry, and during those few years on the road. She could still carry the joy of His Incarnation, of His birth, as only a mother can, particularly when one’s own Son is dying!

What a mother! And now they are together again in heaven. What a wonderful day in heaven. Mothers’ Day in heaven. Yikes! It’s not dark there, nor raining! Jesus’ goodness and kindness shine upon all. Happy Mother’s Day, Mary, you who are Jesus’ good mom, you who are that Lovely Lady Dressed in Blue!

1 Comment

Filed under florae, Immaculate Conception

Our Lady Mediatrix of all graces… Today? ALSO today!

This is from a French-Roman style “fiddleback” vestment made for yours truly when I was a chaplain in Lourdes for a couple of years by a wonderful group of ladies from a parish north of Toulouse, whose pastor was concerned that a chaplain in Lourdes responsible for reinstituting the Extraordinary Form of the Mass was surely to have the proper vestments. I think that, in fact, the new vestments were made using bits of pieces of vestments which had been discarded from Lourdes when the shrines suffered wreckovations on every level imaginable. I sure did and do make good use of these vestments to this day!

I received a number of emails from readers in different parts of the world saying that today is, in their local or monastic calendars, also by way of indult, the feast of Our Lady Mediatrix of All Graces.

I think it was in 1960 that a group of Discalced Carmelite Fathers from the Teresianum made their way to the Apostolic Palace for a private audience with Pope John XXIII, requesting that the Pontiff finally declare, by way of Apostolic Constitution, our Lady to be mediatrix of all graces, reflecting what we read in Sacred Scripture and the Fathers of the Church and note in the liturgy and writings of the saints throughout the ages. Blessed John XXIII replied, to their disappointment, that this was unnecessary, given that there is no one who questions this about our Lady anywhere in the universal Church.

Such a statement is, however, one more rather significant example of this belief that can be noted by subsequent Pontiffs in their reflections on our Lady. As it is, I think various and sundry people have counted some dozens of times that a subsequent Blessed Supreme Pontiff went a step beyond this title of mediatrix, using the phrase co-redemptrix for our Lady, namely, of course, Blessed John Paul II.

Many are offended by this title for the reason that they understand neither original sin nor the immaculate conception of our Lady, and therefore cannot begin to fathom her being the mediatrix of all graces, much less co-redemptrix.

The offense that many of what I would call neo-conservative seminarians and young priests is entirely emotional, that is, it issues from the passion to be politically correct with those who take offense for “ecumenical reasons,” etc. This is both intellectually dishonest and flippant in regard to their mother, the theology* regarding whom they should take more seriously because she is their good mother who loves them so much. Moreover, the fact that a beatified sucessor of Saint Peter should have insisted so much on this title should give them pause to reflect that brow beating others into rejecting our Lady both as mediatrix and co-redemptrix is really rather ugly and obtuse. (*Theology studies God and other things and persons inasmuch as they are related to God. Mary is Mother of God!)

Back to our Lady as Mediatrix! — Briefly: Because Mary was immaculately conceived and therefore had an agility of soul and clarity of vision that was perfect, she could take in, she could understand what was happening to her Son on the Cross. In seeing all the hell which we vomited out on her Son on the Cross, from the first man, Adam, to the last, she could see, in looking upon Him, exactly what we needed from her Son by way of Redemption and Salvation. Seeing this perfectly, her heart being pierced with a sword of sorrow (as Simeon prophesied so many years earlier in the Temple), she could therefore have the capactity to intercede, to pray for us perfectly. All she had to do was to be in solidarity with her Son of the Cross. And she was. This makes her, so to speak, mediatrix of all graces. She does not stand between God and ourselves. There is only One Mediator between God and Man, the God-man Jesus Christ, Mary’s Son. Yes! That’s true. But, think of it this way: is it not appropriate that there be one of us, Mary, who prays for all that which her Son wishes to provide to us? Yes, in justice, this is most appropriate. It is most appropriate that she who is the Mother of the Head of the Body of Christ intercede for us that she might then become also the Mother of all the members of the Body of Christ, for she is Mother of entire Christ, Head and members. Understanding this maternal aspect of her prayer, it is natural to use the title Mediatrix with our dearest Mother. She is such a good and kind mom or mum as some say.

But what of the title of co-redemptrix. Surely that is inconvenient for ecumenical relations. Surely we are to brow-beat others into submission of accepting that this is ultra-exaggerated piety of the fringe conservatives who do not know how to be aloof from being with Jesus as little children of Mary, who do not know how to build consensus at ecumenical gatherings. Sigh…

Once — my dear seminarians and priests (and bishops!) reading this blog — once we explain, catechize and most importantly show our unrelentingly respectful and joyful appreciation of our Lady, being brought up into Jesus’ own love for her, it is this, in fact, which will bring many into the Church.

There are many evangelicals and other non-Catholics, even pagans, who have begun to recite the rosary. I hear of them frequently enough. Take that in… reflect on that… The harvest is ripe! How to begin? First of all, be utterly joyful and thankful to our Lady. Thank her. Say it to her, out loud! Do it! “Thank you, Mary, for being my mother!” Didn’t do it? Can’t do it? Out loud? It makes a difference. There can be a bit of a mental block. “That’s so childish!” No. Childlike. That’s what good sons of their mothers do. Just say it, out loud: “Thank you, mom!” “Thank you, mum!”

I bet that made you smile, didn’t it? I bet it did!

Happy feast day!

4 Comments

Filed under Immaculate Conception

Flowers of pure Easter joy for the Immaculate Conception

When’s the last time you picked some flowers and gave them to your mother? When’s the last time you picked some flowers and brought them (with permission) to place before a statue or image of our Lady in your local parish, chapel, oratory?

This week, during the Octave of Easter, would be a good time. Our Lady suffered terribly during the torture and death of her Son, the more so because of her purity of heart, her clear vision.

The joy brought to her heart by Jesus, the Prince of the Most Profound Peace upon His resurrection from the dead… I wonder if He did something so outrageously simple and wonderful, as her little Son, as to bring her a handful of wildflowers…

Leave a Comment

Filed under florae, Immaculate Conception

Rosary rant rerun for the Annunciation!

Remember that the easiest way to pray the rosary is to recognize that Jesus and Mary and Joseph are with you right here, right now, as they are in heaven, not as they were a couple thousand years ago. Sure, take a look at what they did for you and all of back in the day, but, in our Lord’s grace, with a spirit of humble thanksgiving for them, right here, right now.

Remember, it’s not about your imagination that you are in their presence, which Pelagian effort of imagination is a lot of hooey; rather, your act of the will, in our Lord’s grace, to humbly thank Him and our Blessed Mother is what the prayer of the rosary is all about.

Clever meditations, whether in “rant” style or, later, please God, in a style presented in a more genteel manner (when I get all the Scripture tomes out of the boxes and on some now non-existent shelves), don’t get anyone anywhere. The only way what is presented on this blog is going to help anyone is if that someone, by the grace of our Lord, uses these words as an occasion to humbly thank the Holy Family right now for what went in back in the day.

* * *

For this preliminary “rant meditation” on the first joyful mystery of the most holy rosary, a summary interlinear comment on Luke 1,26-38. Here’s my in-your-face translation from the Greek with an eye to the Vulgate. I’m not into the esoteric practice of translating one word for one word, as if, magically, all languages had absolutely perfect one word for one word equivalents. Such pretension cannot ever provide a great translation, unless you’re in a position to create the language, as was the case with the Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures, which made up a goodly number of words, but paraphrased the rest. Instead, trying to avoid coining any words, I’ll provide a translation with more in-your-face accuracy than any one word for one word translation could ever present:

Luke 1,26 But in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent forth from God into a city of Galilee which had the name Nazareth 27 to a virgin being betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph of the city of David, and the name of the virgin was Mary. 28 And, having entered unto her, he said,

“Rejoice, you who continue to be perfectly transformed in grace, the Lord is with you. You continue to be perfectly blessed among women.”

29 But she was greatly troubled over the word, and pondered: “What would such a greeting mean?” 30 And the angel said to her,

“Do not fear, Mary, for you have found grace in the presence of God. 31 And behold! You will conceive in the womb, and you will give birth to a Son, and you are to call His name, Jesus. 32 He will be great, and will be called Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give to Him the throne of David His father, 33 and He will reign over the House of Jacob unto eternity, and of His kingdom there will be no end.”

34 But Mary said to the angel,

“How will this be, since I do not sexually know any man?”

35 And answering, the angel said to her,

“The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. And for this reason, the Child being born holy will be called Son of God. 36 And behold! Elizabeth, your kinswoman, even she has conceived a son in her old age, and this is the sixth month for her, the one being called barren, 37 for there is not any word which is impossible with God.”

38 Then Mary said,

“Behold the woman slave of the Lord. Let it be done to me according to your word.”

And the angel departed from her.

* * *

Now, let’s try some [HSH commentary]

Luke 1,26 But in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent forth from God into a city of Galilee which had the name Nazareth 27 to a virgin being betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph of the city of David, and the name of the virgin was Mary. 28 And, having entered unto her, he said, “Rejoice [eventually, from χάρις, grace, charity, rejoicing because of grace], you who continue to be perfectly transformed in grace, the Lord is with you” [κεχαριτωμένη, from χάρις, grace, charity, a perfect passive participle; the perfect in this Greek unlike other languages, having the meaning that since the action began, and that in a perfect manner, the perfection of the action continues undiminished until the present. Mary's name here is "She who continues to be perfectly transformed in grace"*]. 29 But she was greatly troubled over the word, and pondered: “What would such a greeting mean?” 30 And the angel said to her, “Do not fear, Mary, for you have found grace [from χάρις, grace, charity] in the presence of God [who is χάρις, grace, charity, love]. 31 And behold! You will conceive in the womb ["IN the womb": without the sexual intervention of a man; Mary will remain a virgin], and you will give birth to a Son, and you are to call His name, Jesus [Savior]. 32 He will be great, and will be called Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give to Him the throne of David His father, 33 and He will reign over the House of Jacob unto eternity, and of His kingdom there will be no end.” 34 But Mary said to the angel, “How will this be, since I do not sexually know any man?” 35 And answering, the angel said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. And for this reason, the Child being born holy will be called Son of God. [According to the Law, no man can possibly be born holy, opening the womb in a blood filled manner. The birth will also be miraculous. Mary will remain a virgin.] 36 And behold! Elizabeth, your kinswoman, even she has conceived a son in her old age [another miracle], and this is the sixth month for her, the one being called barren, 37 for there is not any word [reminding one of the Word] which is impossible with God.” 38 Then Mary said, “Behold the woman-slave of the Lord. Let it be done to me according to your word.” And the angel departed from her. [Jesus, just one cell, embraces the entirety of His Mystical Body throughout time from the first instant of His conception, as Pius XII reminded us in his encyclical Mystici Corporis Christi. Thank you, Jesus, and thank you, Mary, for all that you have done for us back in the day. Have us so die to ourselves that we might live for the One who was conceived so as to die so as to bring us to life. Thank you.]

Saint Paul will use the aorist form of κεχαριτωμένη to describe our own, post-conception transformation in grace, that is, at baptism. We are transformed in grace at that time, but this may not be perfectly continuous as it was for Mary! According to the context, Mary was transformed in grace from the fist moment she began to prepare to be the virgin mother of God, that is, from the first instant of her conception, her Immaculate Conception. We read of this in the Hebrew text and context of Genesis 3,15, but a comment on that will have to wait for the popular version of the thesis.

[*I'm in agreement, of course, with a great friend, Father Ignace de la Potterie, S.J. (R.I.P.), on this point.]

HAIL MARY… (x10)… Perhaps you could, in your charity, offer right here, right now, a decade of the rosary for priests and bishops in the purgatory of this life and the next. They will thank you forever!

* * *

Just to say: Mary knew that she could have been stoned to death for it being thought that she conceived a child out of wedlock with someone to whom she was not betrothed. She trusted in God in an impossible circumstance. To make matters difficult, the angel Gabriel did not have a chat with Saint Joseph about this until much later. And Mary couldn’t say anything. How could she? Was Joseph to believe such a story if the angel didn’t appear to him?

The contemplative prayer of Mary must have been so wonderful with Jesus within her womb for nine months…

1 Comment

Filed under Prayer

Ὑπὸ τὴν σὴν εὐσπλαγχνίαν – Sub tuum praesidium – Yikes!

Since I’ve been trying in some small way to be on retreat here at the hermitage (though with innumerable distractions), I’ve been letting readers suggest posts for the blog, at least by way of comments, etc. Some of my recent entries have been pretty intense. I guess that was spurred on by a particularly vicious troll who had gone into total attack mode. Today, something very wonderful. A wonderful supporter of the hermitage and of this hermit send in the words “sub tuum praesidium” with no further comment. I love it! Let me explain…

“Sub tuum praesidium” (Under your protection) is the title of the most ancient hymn to the glorious, Immaculate Virgin Mother of God. In the video above, we hear the monks of Silos and see the words and chant notation in the Liber Usualis. Freak alert: This hymn, at least in its notation, is hated by chant purists. Whatever. I love it do death. I had this chant introduced to the Fathers of Mercy “tradition” when I was but a lowly novice back in the day. The Fathers of Mercy had always recited an English version of the Sub tuum after all liturgical actions. I fought for decades about the translation they used — We fly to your patronage… — saying that this hymn is not about the fatherliness of the Theotokos, but rather and very specifically her maternal protection. Just the other year, they updated their translation to read — We fly to your protection — taking a hint from the Latin version of this hymn.

I’d like to go one step further. Let’s take a look at the Greek version!

Ὑπὸ τὴν σὴν εὐσπλαγχνίαν – Under your good-heartedness — which needs to be explained as to why this would be used with the Virgin Mother of God way, way, way back in the day, when Greek was much closer to Koine, New Testament Greek, and understood for what it was.

In the Gospels, there is a word used for our Lord’s mercy for us, which is only used with Him, no one else; only He has a particular kind of mercy, that of sacrificing His Heart for us. This is found, for instance, upon the return of the prodigal son, when the father, it is translated poorly, has compassion for his son, or that he is moved with mercy for his son. The mercy bit is misericordia, which is getting closer, for that misericordia refers to the misery of heart that one suffers as one takes on the need of the other as one’s own need so as to fulfill that need as if it were one’s own need. There is no idiot “transference” here. In the mystical body of Christ, we all carry each other’s burderns by way of our Lord’s mercy. Back to His unique mercy…

In the Gospels, the word used for the Lord’s mercy is a passive verb — ἐσπλαγχνίσθη — His Heart was sacrificed… Yikes! Yes, Jesus’ Heart was uniquely sacrificed for us. And… and… the Immaculate Heart of His Mother was also pierced with a sword of sorrow as none of our hearts could ever be, for she had a clear vision in her immaculateness of the goodness of her Son, and therefore also saw all the hell vomited upon Him with incisive clarity. What sorrow! What intercession for us! What mercy! What a sacrificing of her heart for us… The Greek used for “protection” refers instead to a goodheartedness which in turn refers to just how good a Heart our Lord had, sacrificed for us, and therefore just how good a heart His Mother had, also sacrificed for us.

I love this hymn to the Mother of God even more!

The usual image that is used with this hymn is that of the Virgin spreading out her mantel to protect those who fly to her for protection. I’ve used the image of our Lady of Guadalupe here, since under her mantel, her extended veil, her cloak, she protects the unborn Jesus in her womb as a sign of her protection for the untold numbers of children who were being sacrificed in Mexico at the time. And are we not her children as well?

9 Comments

Filed under Immaculate Conception

(Already updated with great links!) Is it good to do the consecration to Jesus through Mary according to the great Saint Louis de Montfort?

Saint Louis is one of Holy Souls Hermitage heroes for autobiographical reasons of unrepeatable circumstances. I did the consecration as a seminarian… um… now quite a few years ago! That was really, really good for me. He caught me in a time of confusion and set me on the right path. But is this consecration good for others too?

In the post linked above, an apologia is offered for what contemporary Americana might consider to be over the top flowery language (typical French enthusiasm of the time) and exaggerated rhetoric (once considered one of the high sciences). He was instrumental in returning France to the faith by way of enormous “missions”, which many tens of thousands of people would attend, get back to the sacraments, and be put on the path to heaven once again.

Soon after this, the dark days of the Enlightenment would see Enlightenment child Maximilien François Marie Isidore de Robespierre personally see to the death of some 25,000 Conventual Franciscans, besides all the other priests and nuns laity murdered in this Catholic Holocaust which so many Frenchmen celebrate to this day. Don’t think it can’t happen here. Everything is already in place.

I could mention all those deeply affected by Saint Louis’ devotion to Mary, such as Blessed John Paul II, with the famous “Totus Tuus” in the Papal Coat of Arms, and wax poetic about why the consecration to Jesus through Mary is good for everyone, but I’ll let you read his words yourself.

Instead, I’m not going to try to convince anyone to make the consecration. Instead, I’m going to convince you why it’s not necessary, not in the least. And when I’m done, I think that you’ll be eager to learn as much as you can by ordering books providing you with the saint’s preparation for and exemplar of a consecration to Jesus through Mary so that you can make that total consecration to Jesus through Mary. Hah!

The only point I’m going to make  concerns one of Jesus’ “words” on the cross:

“Jesus, then, seeing His mother and the disciple whom He loved standing nearby, said to the mother, ‘Woman! Behold! Your son!’ Then He said to the disciple, ‘Behold! Your Mother!’” (John 19,26-27).

Now, isn’t it true that such a consecration is merely secondary, and, if anything, merely an unneccesary confirmation on our part of what Jesus has already done for us in a primary way? Isn’t a consecration like this always a bit exterior to the reality of the situation? Isn’t becoming a “slave of Mary” as de Montfort puts it, absolutely nothing compared to what Jesus did in putting us right into the Holy Family, in making Mary our mother in the midst of His passion and death, in the midst of our Redemption? What can we do that can compare with that? Obviously Jesus wants us to be totally given over to His mother… our mother, the Immaculate Conception, just as He is given over to her as the greatest, most loving Son ever to be born of woman; so… are not our meager efforts almost insulting? Don’t we lower the standard He put before us by taking on such a lowly however total consecration? How can we be more directly put into the Holy Family than what Jesus has done for us.

We can’t do anything better than what Jesus has done for us, and we shouldn’t try! But… but… consider this:

Jesus, in redeeming us, in saving us, makes us, as Saint Paul says, members of His body, the Mystical Body of Christ. He, the Head of that Mystical Body, is born of Mary. As Saint Bernard asks, is she to be the mother of a monster, of a head only, and not also of the rest of the body? Exactly right. She is to give birth to the entire Son of God, Head and members. We are never God, but we go to the Father through, with and in Jesus, in the unity of the love of the Holy Spirit. We are brought into the life of the Most Holy Trinity, always and for eternity, through, with and in the Son of Mary.

She gives birth to us by way of her intercession for us as she stands under the cross, where that “hour” of Jesus became her “hour” of intercession (as we read at the wedding of Cana). Most precisely, it is when Jesus declares her to be our mother, at the moment when that intercession is perfect, her birth pangs for us, her heart, her immaculate heart being pierced through with sorrow, seeing with her clear vision exactly what we need, for she sees clearly all the hell vomited on her Son from the beginning of time to the end by simply seeing Him being tortured to death because of our sins on the Cross.

Jesus Himself wants to be entirely born, so to speak, and has this happen by way of His mother’s intercession for us. He is the only mediator between God and man; only He provides us with santifying grace, the life of the Most Holy Trinity within us, by way of uniting us with Himself, but, in justice, it is most appropriate that someone who is “merely” human, unlike Himself, make a perfect act of intercession for all that He was doing and is doing for us. That is most appropriate. And just as He came to us through Mary, so does He want to bring us to Himself through Mary. He wants us to be born of her. He wants us to be her children. He wants us to be one with Him in being her Son. Total consecration to Jesus through the intercession of Mary.

Having said all that, making this consecration of the great Saint Louis de Montfort is not second guessing Jesus, is not trying to outdo Him, is not something which will add something to what He has done for us, nor does it try to do this. It’s just that Jesus does appreciate the little we can do to show Him our eager enthusiasm at being the littlist of tiny children of Mary, like Himself, with Himself. He loves His mother, and wants us sharing that love with Him for her! Of course He does. Mary does nothing if not bring us straight to her Son. And He knows that too. Really, Jesus, and Mary, are just so good, just so kind.

Now, make that consecration!

P.S. Can anyone provide links to books and pamphlets that readers might order to this end? Often, this consecration is made on 25 March or some other Marian feast. It takes some weeks to prepare for, so let’s get a move on!

UPDATE: http://fisheaters.com/totalconsecrationmontfort.html

Check it out now. You’ll be impressed. Very cool!

Gregg the Obscure adds: There’s an Android app available that includes the book “The Secret of Mary”, which describes the consecration and it includes all the material necessary. It works on the Kindle Fire.

There’s a nifty bit more about the consecration here too. Turns out none of us are ever likely to have another year where the optimal day to start coincides with Ash Wednesday.

3 Comments

Filed under Immaculate Conception

Happy Feast of our Lady of Lourdes!

Today’s feast brings back many memories of my two years being a chaplain at Lourdes, living in the chaplains house above the grotto, and wearing the badges alternatively for the Italian chaplaincy, the English chaplaincy, the French chaplaincy, and the Extraordinary Form chaplaincy. Yikes! The Eucharistic processions, the Rosary Processions, the Way of the Cross, the Angelus in the grotto, the Masses, the zillions of confessions, the blessings, the conferences, the tours…. Yikes!

A favorite passtime in these years was grunge-caving with the Immaculate Conception. This video is from my now defunct blog over in Lourdes:

My best memories are just being in the grotto with the pilgrims before the Immaculate Conception. She has seen it all with clear vision in seeing her Son on the Cross. She knows. We can go to her in all our suffering. She knows. She knows.

4 Comments

Filed under Immaculate Conception

08 Rosary Rant – Special sixth mystery – The Immaculate Conception

No, Blessed Pope John Paul II did not promulgate a special sixth mystery in honor of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God. No, this doesn’t belong to any of the sets of five mysteries in particular. No, it’s not officially mandated by the Church.

However, to whatever set of five mysteries one is saying, it has been a custom in very many countries by very many peoples, including religious congregations and orders, to recite an additional mystery, that of the Immaculate Conception. Some rosaries reflect this reality with six decades instead of five. This is an additional devotion, if you will, which is, I think especially in today’s pro-abort mentality, appropriate to include. But what is it about the Immaculate Conception that’s so important? Let me count just a few of the ways:

  • It is entirely appropriate in all justice for Jesus, the Son of God, conceived of the Holy Spirit in the womb of His virgin Mother (with no intervention of man), so that He might not contract original sin (which comes about through propagation, not imitation). However, it was also necessary to this end that His mother be free of original sin, and this she was, as we read in Luke 1,28 (in context) and Genesis 3,15 (in context). In Luke, Mary is said by the angel to be perfectly continuing to be perfectly transformed in grace, and, in context, to when this began, from the first moment she would have begun to live her vocation to be the virgin Mother of God, which was, of course, from the first instant of her conception, therefore, an immaculate conception, free from Adam’s sin, original sin. This is all about Jesus, but it redounds on His mother. In Genesis, it is clear that the woman in Genesis 3,15 is not the wife of Adam, but rather a woman future to the one who is writing the account, a woman who would be Mother of the Redeemer, a woman free from the sin of Adam (which I’ll be writing about, please God, in times to come: My Books page). Non-Catholics claim that the Immaculate Conception is not in Scripture. How wrong they are.
  • It is, again, entirely appropriate, in all justice, that Mary’s consequent purity of vision and agility of soul, would enable her to take note of all that we need by way of redemption, so that she, a “mere” human being, might complement the redemption of the Sole Mediator between God and man, Jesus Christ, her Son. She perfectly saw what we needed in seeing her Son hanging in bleeding shreds of flesh on the Cross, saw what we needed from the first man, Adam, to the last to be conceived. She had merely to intercede for us, to have her Immaculate Heart in solidarity with the Sacred Heart of her Son, to be the mediatrix of all graces. This is what it means for her to be “co-Remptrix”. She perfectly intercedes for all the grace which is perfectly and only provided our her Son, our Savior.
  • As with her Son, Mary did not have to suffer the weaknesses due to original sin. No weakness of mind, weakness of will, feelings and emotions all over the place, sickness, nor even death. However, that doesn’t mean that she had an easy time of it. Quite the opposite. The clearer the vision, the agile of soul, the more one sees the goodness and kindness of God, but, with that standard of comparision, with that bond of love, one all the more incisively sees the evil and cruelty of those who sin. And when she saw her Son on the Cross, her own heart was pierced with a sword of sorrow, as prophesied by Simeon during Jesus’ presentation in the Temple. Outside of her Son, no one suffered more than Mary in this life. She has suffered more than all of us put together. These are her birth pangs for the members of the Mystical Body of her Son. This is how she becomes our mother. Her intercession for us was not easy. She felt every bit of it and persevered to the end.
  • In Lourdes, she called herself the Immaculate Conception, with utter humility. She was perfectly doing the will of God when she was conceived, just as much as she would when she would become the Virgin Mother of God, Queen of heaven and earth, of angels and men. This title, Immaculate Conception, points directly to the goodness and kindness of God for us all.
  • Because of her Immaculate Conception, Mary would not die because of weakness contracted with original sin. She would, instead, be like her Son, who laid down His life for us, that, in taking on what we deserve because of sin (the worst we have to give: death), He might then have the right in justice to have mercy on us. She freely chose to the the mother of such a One, whom she loved, to whom her heart was united. His Heart was pierced through, and so was hers. Jesus’ broken Heart, beginning with what seems to be a massive heart-attack during the agony in the garden of Gethsemane (as we learn about His pericardium from the Doctor on Calvary), would have caused His death even if there was no scourging, no crowning with thorns, no crucifixion). It was His will to follow the will of the Father. Mary’s unity with her Son brought her the same end. She survived for some time with John, but not for all that long. Her death is not about her having original sin; it is about her not having original sin.
  • It’s common to say that we pray to saints, or pray to Mary, but, to be more exact, we ask for their good intercession as we would of anyone else we might know who knows anything at all about prayer. Non-Catholic bigots condemn Catholics for worshiping Mary. Um… no.  At least they are condemning what we also condemn! Whenever I explain this to non-Catholics, it’s an eye-opener for them. Then I ask why they aren’t Catholic. They are dumbfounded that Catholics would want to evangelize. People are very hungry. Let’s feed them.
  • When I was a chaplain in Lourdes, I noted how all and sundry ran to the grotto. There is a sense that Mary is the Mulier Fortis, the Strong Woman, who knew suffering and wants to introduce us further to her dear Son, who also knew suffering. The pilgrims looked to Mary in hope of her intercession, that they might come to know the goodness and kindness of her Son all the more. Typical mother, she would send them trundling off to confession, where they would meet her Son in the most intimate way, heart to Heart, heart with Heart. Reciting this special sixth mystery of the rosary is a good way to pray for those who have been away from the sacrament of Confession for a very long time, that they might have the fortitude to know the friendship of our Lord Jesus, her Son, so good and so kind.

1 Comment

Filed under Confession, Rosary Rants

UPDATE: Emergency Chaplet of the Immaculate Conception: Some Feedback!

From an email:

Father,

Hope you’re keeping warm and healthy and that you’ve had a good and holy Christmas.

I’d like to comment on the Emergency Chaplet to the Immaculate Conception, that you posted some time back.

I have used it several times and have come to the conclusion that – IT WORKS – just as you said !!

I have had three instances where I have prayed and each time have received the petitions that I asked (in fact, these petitions where more like minor miracles).

I owe it to you for sharing this prayer with us and glory to the Almighty God, who loves us so much that he does such wonderful things for us.

A word of warning though. The three times I refer to above, I prayed with true contrition, faith and a heavy heart (also, the petitions where for someone else).

I will admit to praying on other occasions with not quite the same vigour and partially out of superstition (as this prayer can’t fail) – and received nothing. Our Lady knows the difference.

Isn’t God good ! [Yes, Mary's Son is just so good and just so kind!]

Here’s the original post, and here’s another reminder.

UPDATE: Someone saw this post a short time after it was put up. That person prayed the chaplet for a resolution to an absolutely horrific situation that has been ongoing for some days and was absolutely impossible to resolve, causing unimaginable heartbreak and anguish and end-of-the-rope anxiety, affecting all sorts of people. Result of the emergency chaplet: Within 30 minutes all was resolved, simply, easily. Thanks, Blessed Mother!

3 Comments

Filed under Immaculate Conception, Prayer

Today on Holy Souls Mountain: Altar, hoar frost, and a rant or two…

After Mass early this morning:

That’s Our Lady of Lourdes on the gradine. How humble of the Queen Mother of God to speak of herself a conception. That conception, that person, transformed in grace from the first instant, was doing the will of God perfectly, just as she was doing the will of God later. Which one is more worth while? Wrong question! She’s right: “I am the Immaculate Conception.”

That statue is from Father K.L., of Columbus, Ohio. Thanks, Father!

Then there was a vestment I didn’t use today, but which was just off to the side. That was made by some ladies just North of Toulouse, when I was a chaplain in Lourdes:

I wonder if this bit belonged to one of the untold numbers of vestments that were discarded at Lourdes after the “changes”.

Anyway, from the Missale Romanum I used today:

This one is from the Marian Missal:

This one is from the Magnificat Chapel edition:

A RANT: This is in the style of the father of the “Reformation” (Rebellion), Augustinian Father Desiderius Erasmus, mentor of Augustinian Father Martin Luther. The style is the “Devotio Moderna” (Modern Devotion) already back in the day: Ugly, insulting. Doesn’t it look like they’re all too tired of the fake pose?

Anyway, outside after Mass, there was some refreshing ice art:

And then, just over to the side, at a muddy part of the mountain, hoar frost:

Caused by rain followed by icy temps:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Immaculate Conception, Mass, Weather

A reminder about the Emergency Immaculate Conception Chaplet

A while back I posted a note on my favorite “Emergency Chaplet of the Immaculate Conception“. Go there for the story behind this chaplet.

On the large beads of the Rosary, recite your act of contrition. On the small decade beads, say, “Oh Mary conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.” That’s it! I love this chaplet, just love it.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Immaculate Conception