Category Archives: saints

A reprimand from the great Catherine of Siena

[Re-publishing of this post in honor of Saint Catherine of Sienna. Forgive dated references!]

sower went out to sow googled image

Dominica in Sexagesima…

In illo témpore: Cum turba plúrima convenírent, et de civitátibus properárent ad Iesum, dixit per similitúdinem: Exiit, qui séminat, semináre semen suum…

The parable of the sower is the Gospel in the Extraordinary Form today. Even if you will be attending the Ordinary Form, I would like to call your mind to some commentary I made some years ago on a phrase of Saint Catherine of Siena. Keep in mind some words of Saint Paul for the Epistle: “With the weak I am weak…” That’s an examination of conscience as opposed to the opposite, and is necessary for understanding all this, or anything for that matter. O.K. Here we go. This is one to mull over, so I’ll just let it sit here for a while:

We find some of the fruits of the conversations between our Lord Jesus and Saint Catherine in The Divine Doctrine of Jesus Christ. In this post, I include a vignette representing the incisiveness of this doctrine and the wonderful clarity of her own spiritual life. These few words provide the key to understanding what is – it seems for us priests – by far the most difficult passage in the Gospels, a passage found, in one way or another, throughout the Scriptures of both Testaments. One will have to go through quite a purgatory in this life or the next in order to sound out the truth of her words. I once heard her words being mocked by an ecclesiastic who is influential in seminary formation for many Episcopal Conferences, and who for many years now has begged me not to publish my own comments, wanting, as he does, to be the first to write on this passage of Catherine, but to mock it instead of explaining it. Such drama! What to do? Publish this post, of course!

In this passage of The Divine Doctrine, Christ’s words are incisive and ironic, and lead us to the seeming paradox of caritas in veritate, of charity in truth. The words under discussion are found in the Gospels between the Parable of the Sower and Jesus’ explanation of the Parable of the Sower.

saint paul googled imageCatherine is relating her report of what our Lord is dictating to her. Jesus is speaking about Saint Paul’s interpretation of the key of knowledge, by which we see what the eye cannot see, hear what the ear cannot hear, and understand in our hearts what otherwise cannot arise in the heart of man. Saint Paul, in 1 Corinthians 2,9, does interpret Isaiah 64,10 – cited in Matthew 13,15, Acts 28,27, et al. – by saying it is by way of the love of God, by way of the crucified Lord of glory, that we see and hear and understand. Paul is accurate, says our Lord – as Saint Catherine relates – so much so that “questo parbe che volesse dire Paulo,” so much so that “this seems to be what Paul wanted to say,” that is, as if it were Paul’s revelation, Paul’s knowledge, Paul’s very own desire. In other words, Paul was so transformed by grace, that it was as if Paul spoke on his own authority. Yet, in this passage, the most erudite of all academic Pharisees himself happily admits that he is speaking by the power of God and the revelation of the Holy Spirit. Jesus was not conjecturing about what it seems to Him that Paul wanted to say, as if Jesus were Paul’s student: “It seems to me that Paul wanted to say this…” Jesus was rather confirming just how correct Paul’s words were, for they were actualized in Paul’s life with the grace of Jesus, that power of God, and the revelation of the Holy Spirit.

Jesus Himself fulfilled the vocation of Isaiah, to blind eyes, stop up ears, harden hearts, and remove all understanding lest people, including us priests, turn to the Lord to be saved. Good! We are not to pretend that we can turn to the Lord under our own power like some Pelagian work-your-own-way-to-God idiot. We must allow ourselves, by God’s grace, to be turned to the Lord, to be brought up into His mercy. We hate any demand to give up control over ourselves, even of our spiritual lives, even to the Lord Himself. This is our fallen human condition. It is a crucifixion of our fallen spirits simply to watch the Lord bringing us to Himself. If people want to have a work to do in the spiritual life, it is this, to be crucified. When we have our eyes fixed on Him, our ears listening in obedience, our hearts able to love whatever the cost of a pierced heart, this will then be our greatest joy, a proof of the resurrection of the Lord in our lives, for we cannot be led by a dead god in this way, but only in friendship with the Living God.

But let’s test this friendship with our Lord, shall we? Let’s take a sentence from the Theologian, Saint Gregory of Nyssa, who also makes a comment on Paul’s letters, this time on Ephesians, 5,23 – “The husband is the head of the wife just as Christ is also the Head of the Church, Himself Savior of the Body.” The question is, who interprets whom? Does Jesus guess what His Body wants, or does the Body know, because of intimate friendship, what the Head of the Body wants?

saint gregory of nyssa googled imageO de kefalhn thV EkklhsiaV ton Criston einai maqwn, touto pro pantwn dianoeisqw, oti pasa kefalhn tw upokeimenw swmati omofuhV esti kai omoousioV.

Here’s my translation of that, since the usual one is absolutely pitiful:

But the one learning the Head of the Church to be Christ thoroughly understands this before all things, that the entire Head, in subjection to the Body, is of the same nature and same being.

[Gregorius Nyssenus, De Perfectione et qualem oporteat esse Christianum, ad Olypium MonachumPatrologia Graeca, XLVI, 1863, ed. J.-P. Migne, 1863, 251-286. If I remember correctly, this quote is spread across columns 274-275.]

This is Gregory’s greatest spiritual work, and he here flies into the heavens. He is at his absolute best, his most sublime. He doesn’t say that Christ is subject to us, but that Christ is teaching us to be subject to Himself, making us capable of learning this by way of Himself taking on our human nature. Christ Jesus doesn’t need to learn from us what we seem to want to express (“questo parbe che volesse dire Paulo” – “this, it seems to me – is what Paul wanted to say”). Instead, as Catherine analogously reports Jesus’ words, It seems as if this is what Paul himself wanted to say, though Paul actually said this by the power of God and the revelation of the Holy Spirit!

So, in this friendship with our Lord, blessed are we priests if we thank our Lord for sending women like Saint Catherine of Siena into our lives in every which way. Thank you, Lord! — Jesus is just this good, just this kind. Now, think about it: “A sower went out to sow…”

Leave a Comment

Filed under Catholic, saints

Saint George, awesome among the very saints of God

Outside of my great friend, Saint Philomena – the veracity of whose existence as a virgin and martyr of the early Church has recently been sustained by exhaustive scientific evaluations of the evidence — outside of her… there is perhaps no saint more scorned as being no more than a figment of pious imagination than Saint George, who, however, boasts of more archeological and historical evidence than most any other saint in the history not only of the early Church, but for some lesser known saints, right into our own day. Churches dedicated to Saint George sprang up in their dozens throughout the ancient world immediately after news of his martyrdom on 23 April 303.

Liberal warning: The most obnoxious denial of the existence of Saint George comes from a super liberal professor of “ecumenism” (which I put in quotes because he had no idea what ecumenism is). Many of my fellow priests today have had Father XXX as a professor in the various countries, seminaries and universities where he’s mislead people. Anyway, he had the idea that Saint George couldn’t possibly have existed because of the iconography of him slaying a dragon. His arrogant idea was that we’re so very smart today, and people of the past were so very gullible and stupid. He laughed his nervous, mocking laugh when I tried to explain a few things about the iconography:

  • Those in the first centuries, who were suffering under the severe persecutions of the dragon of the Apocalypse, namely, the possessed-by-Satan pre-Constantinian Roman Empire, understood the dragon to be the Roman Empire. Even so, such depictions only came later, but for this very reason.
  • The white horse, similarly, is the white horse of the Apocalypse 6,2, whose rider goes out conquering and to further his conquering.
  • In the early fourth century, after George was martyred, it is interesting to note that all martyrs in the Montefiascone/Bolsano region of Tuscany, whether male or female, with no regard to how they met their deaths, were all depicted as riding on the white horse of the Apocalypse.
  • The woman who is to be saved in the background of some Renaissance paintings is, similarly, Holy Mother Church, who is represented by her saints.
  • The point of all this wonderful triumphalism in the iconography is not that Saint George or the other martyrs successfully fought their way out of being martyred, that they slew the dragon by, for instance, assassinating the Emperor of the time, but rather that they conquered the demonically controlled world by witnessing to Christ Jesus’ goodness and kindness right unto their deaths, so hated is goodness and kindness by the demonically controlled world. Saint George and the other martyrs slew the dragon by being slain themselves.

None of this — or the archeological proofs — made any impression on this super-liberal priest, for the last thing he wanted to hear was faithfulness to the Church unto death. That’s not what his own life was about. Since he couldn’t answer in any reasonable way, he merely laughed his mocking laugh once again. I had to live with that kind of nonsense for… well… pretty much my whole priesthood. Yikes! This kind of thing can occasion an increase in friendship with Christ Jesus and the Saints!

This icon was given to me by Cardinal —. It’s from the Mount Zion crowd just outside the wall of the Old City of Jerusalem. There is great devotion to Saint George in Palestine until today, with about every third boy being called after Saint George.

George’s father, Gerontius, was well known to the Emperor Diocletian as one of his very best soldiers. When Gerontius’ son George applied to Diocletian to be in the military service of the Emperor, Diocletian quickly made him part of the Imperial Guard and gave him the rank of Tribune. These positions taken together made young George, perhaps in his early twenties, almost as powerful as the Emperor himself. Very few people would have ever had such power, both military and political, and at such a young age. George was an instant phenomenon. Everyone would have known exactly who he was in the entire ancient world.

Diocletian was persuaded by the might-makes-right Galerius to have all his soldiers offer sacrifice to the Roman gods. George, with the zeal of the saints, loudly and with great reason proclaimed his worship of Christ Jesus, so that he couldn’t possibly offer sacrifice to any Roman gods. Diocletian, distraught — for he had never intended this — offered George all sorts of bribes, all of which were scorned by our Saint. Diocletian then set out to make an example of him, first attaching him to a wheel of swords and then having him decapitated.

Saint George and Saint Michael the Archangel sometimes meld into one presentation with wings being granted to Saint George on his white horse. That’s O.K. I’m sure they were great friends!

By the way, George is the Name of God the Father: ὁ πατήρ μου ὁ γεωργός ἐστιν (John 15,1). “My Father is George.” O.K., so, a pedantic translation would be “My Father is the Farmer” or “My Father is the Tiller of the Ground.” Some translations have “Vinedresser.” Truth be told, it’s γεωργός, that is, George!

Just to be insistent about this: “Adam” means “Tiller of the Ground.” “Adam” = “George.” Jesus is the New Adam. Jesus is the New George. Yours truly is merely the old George, the old Adam. But Christ has conquered and goes out to conquer still. Thanks be to God our Father that Jesus sets about slaying me so that, dead to myself, I live for Him alone. Yikes!

Update: This just in from ObisCatholicusSecundus:

saint george flag

21 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Military, saints

An exegesis of the phrase “Peter the Roman” – Saint Malachi’s ecclesiological teaching. Too Cool!!!

saint peter crucified upside down googled image

Many of you have followed the presentation of various interpretations of Saint Malachi’s, an excellent bishop who prophesied about future popes, about 860 some years’ worth. There have been differing reactions about Saint Malachi and his prophesies:

  • He’s a saint!
  • He’s a fraud!
  • He’s wrong!
  • He’s right!
  • It means this!
  • It means that!
  • Blah blah blah.

At any rate, the last bit on the list is Peter the Roman, the one succeeding Benedict XVI:

In persecutione extrema S.R.E. sedebit Petrus Romanus, qui pascet oues in multis tribulationibus: quibus transactis ciuitas septicollis diruetur, et Iudex tremendus iudicabit populum suum. Finis.

That is…

In an extreme persecution of the Holy Roman Church, there will sit Peter the Roman, who will feed the sheep through many tribulations, which once concluded, the city of seven hills will be destroyed, and the fearful Judge will judge his people. The end.

My comment: Although the great Saint Malachi provides descriptions of sorts for each of the reigning Pontiffs (and other difficult characters), outside of the anti-Popes included, there is only one Supreme Pontiff who reigns, that is Saint Peter himself, so that all successors of Saint Peter are Saint Peter, so that the Royal “We” used by the Pontiffs has nothing to do with any Royal “We”, but rather means “Saint Peter and I, as his successor” do proclaim this or that. In other words, Peter the Roman is any and every legitimately elected Successor to Saint Peter, that Bishop of Rome, who was martyred, crucified upside down, on the Epistle side of the Basilica (remember the way the altar faces East!).

In other words, Saint Malachi was making an ecclesiological statement, absolutely correct, about the Papacy. Pretty cool, that. The successor to Pope Benedict XVI, rest assured, will be Peter the Roman, whatever name he takes. It will not be Peter the Roman.

But he will be Peter the Roman in the Office in which he is personally established by the Lord Jesus Himself, who is forever the King of kings, the Lord of lords and the Prince of the Most Profound Peace, Son of the Immaculate Conception.

5 Comments

Filed under Catholic, saints

Saint Paul’s reception of enmity (Genesis 3,15)

On this day, six years ago, this is how I closed off the comments of thanksgiving prefacing the doctoral thesis on Genesis 3,15. I call the conversion of Saint Paul (today’s feast), the feast of Saint Paul’s reception of the enmity (as described in Genesis 3,15):

Rome – 25 January 2007

Feast of the reception of enmity by Saul of Tarsus

וַיְמַהֵר וַיִּקְרָא בְּבָתֵּי כְנֵסִיּוֹת אֶת־יֵשׁוּעַ לֵאמֹר כִּי־הוּא בֶּן־הָאֱלֹהִים הוּא ׃ (Acts 9,20)

Saint Paul understands Genesis 3,15. That’s why the more knuckleheaded of the past 60 years of commentary, say, on Romans 5,12, utterly ignores Genesis. Interesting, no? If one part of scripture clearly explicitly commenting on another part of scripture, one has to take a look at that other part of Scripture, no? But it’s not done. I’ll try to rectify that with a popular version of thesis, where I mentioned this difficulty. This is very much what Holy Souls Hermitage is all about. Yikes!

1 Comment

Filed under Genesis, saints

On this Christmas, honoring servant of God, Jérôme Lejeune, the great hero of Down Syndrome and all humanity

This is a MOST. BEAUTIFUL. VIDEO. Here’s a link to the foundation.

jerome lejeune

4 Comments

Filed under Pro-Life, saints, videos

Saint John of the Cross and this little hermit

Mount Carmel

The above picture of the Order of Discalced Carmelite Monastery, situated above the famed biblical cave of Saint Elijah, was taken by yours truly in the Spring of 2009. I have a long, long, long history with the Discalced Carmelites, despite which[!] they were still wanting me to join up and teach at the Teresianum in bella Roma. But I knew that this is not what the Lord had in mind for me, however much I’ve at least wanted to learn from the likes of Saint Teresa of Avila, Saint John of the Cross, Saint Therese of Lisieux, Blessed Elizabeth of the Trinity…

elijah-s

The little I did learn has served me well in my priesthood. I simply could not have endured so very many trials without some understanding of the glories of the cross in our lives. Having taken note of some of my experiences, one bishop, already very many years ago, exclaimed that he did not know how it was possible for anyone to continue wanting to be a priest after having gone through what I had already been through. I said that it wasn’t about me, but was all about Jesus. He nodded in agreement that that would be the only way. Indeed, this is the only way for any priest who wants to remain faithful to our Lord and His Church.

OCD coat of arms from phatmassMy image of Saint John of the Cross is, I suppose, rather different from that of most who breathlessly run to include him in their bibliography of psychobabel, not because they agree with anything he has to say, but because they hope that the mere mention of him legitimizes their endeavors to contradict everything he ever had to say about the spiritual life.

Instead, my image of Saint John of the Cross is — and this is to pay him a great compliment — is that of our Holy Father Elijah (as all Carmelites call the greatest of prophets) while he is cutting off the heads of hundreds of false prophets on the North-Eastern foot of Mount Carmel, just after that great challenge on Mount Carmel itself, during which fire fell from the heavens and consumed Elijah’s sacrifice, but not that of the false prophets.

Carmelite “spirituality” as it is called, is simply the life of sanctifying grace lived at the Heart of the Church. There is no room for relativism, for false prophets of anything that contradicts the doctrine and morality of the Church. But this does not mean that all that which is Carmelite is cold and uncaring, aloof from the drama of redemption and salvation which is accomplished daily among the Lord’s elect. Instead…

All that which is truly Carmelite is entirely Marian, and is therefore all about her Divine Son, Christ our God. The Carmelite has a most agile soul, that is, having the God-given capactity to accompany our Lady in the attention she gives to her Son. I’ll have to ask the Lord about such an agile soul. I’m guessing He’ll say something about getting to know that which Saint John of the Cross embraced willingly, that is, the Cross. For myself, I say, Yikes!

Update Required To Play MediaUpdate your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.

You’ll want to turn up the volume for this, the chant of the Flos Carmeli.

6 Comments

Filed under Catholic, saints, Spiritual Life

Every last thing I was told about John the Baptist was a lie… for decades… But here’s the truth about John for this Advent.

beheading john baptist

Holy Mother Church spends a great deal of time in the Sacred Liturgy calling to mind the texts of Sacred Scripture referring to Saint John the Baptist, to the end of letting his eager expectation of the Savior on behalf of all Israel provide us with The Example of how to look to the coming of Jesus into our own lives and His second coming.

But all I ever heard about Saint John the Baptist since I was a kid until today was …

  • … that he was a raving maniac, out of his mind, screaming away to anyone or no one at all, out in the desert of all places, in the middle of nowhere, half naked, half clad in skins of beasts, eating things that would turn anyone’s stomach. [I knew these were exaggerations at the least. This ad hominem attack on him intrigued me. He must really be cool, thought I. I took him for my Confirmation name.]
  • … that he was an Old Testament saint, who had that Jewish stuff down cold, ice cold, nothing but justice and cruelty and name-calling and judgmentalism and anything that was the opposite of Christianity, the opposite of us, we who are enlightened, and always and everywhere ever so niiiiiice! [Even as a little kid, I knew something rather hypocritical with a side of self-righteous protectionism was being vomited at me from the pulpit. I had Jewish friends since I just a few years old. When I continued to hear this kind of diatribe in lecture halls in the seminary, I started to become downright angry. This is what turned my stomach.]

Part of this is surely the old nyeah nyeah nyeah nyeah nyeaaaaaaah kind of thing, whereby we’re better than others just because we’re us and they’re them and we live today and they don’t. It’s the old put others down to promote ourselves kind of thing. The blindness is so dark, and the darkness of the last half of the twentieth century was dark indeed. Part of this is fear of the message. So — hey! — let’s attack the messenger! We owe it to ourselves to look at this a bit more closely. Otherwise, our neglect is a decision to be plunged ever more deeply into the quagmire of that darknes which continues to darken all around us.

John, the messenger, heard the message from God: the Word of God came to him. What did he hear? That which he immediately put into practice. He heard of the goodness and kindness of the Most High.

How did he put that into action? By sharing this, the greatest love of his life, with others, and doing the necessary in the face of the Standard of Goodness and Kindness, namely, calling all to repentance unto the forgiveness of their sin.

John couldn’t stand “entitlement to holiness”, the hypocrisy of the Pharisess and scribes, who were “holy” just because they said so, because they were who they were, not like others. They’re the one’s who say that John was a big ol’ meanie for calling them to repentance: “You’re so mean in saying that God loves us so much!” Imagine the laughter of the fallen angels and the damned in hell when one trundles off to the lower depths with a sign around one’s neck that says: “I’m entitled to holiness because I’m me, sinless me!” AAAAaaaaagghh! Aloofness and the condemnation and mockery of John doesn’t get anyone anywhere good.

John knew that we all stand in need of the mercy of God, a gratuitous gift of The Most High, for which no claim to entitlement is actually so entitled, and that one of the very greatest mercies we can show to another is to invite them to know the goodness and kindness of Jesus so well that they will want to repent, all things being equal, one not regreting extending the invitation even if it is turned down with bitterness. Anyone with a bit of experience in these things will know that such bitterness works on people, helping them, in fact, to come to repentance. That’s the hope, often enough fulfilled.

The way to go is to heaven, to that goodness and kindness that John heard in that Word of God which came to him in the desert, that Word of God who became incarnate, and dwelt among us… — “And we saw His glory, the glory as of the Father’s only begotten Son, full of grace and truth” (John 1,14) — … the way to go is reverence and humble thanksgiving before that Goodness and Kindness Incarnate, that Word of God, who in whom John rejoiced from the time that he was in the womb.

Now then, if you have the fortitude for it, here’s a link to a ferocious post on John baptizing Jesus. What a fright! HERE! Just a sample:

The upshot of all this? Go to confession this Advent.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Catholic, Confession, saints, Spiritual Life

Saint Juan Diego Cuauhtlatoatzin and this priest, a sinner

Saint Juan Diego

I …

I, who am so proud and arrogant…

I, who am so impatient and judgmental…

I, who am so obtuse and self-centered…

I, who know so little of prayer…

I, who am a poor sinner…

I ask Saint Juan Diego for my conversion to know something of what he knew:

  • A soul that is utterly simple, most sensitive, perceptive, enthusiastic, humble, lowly, piercingly discerning, burgeoning with God given fortitude to do the necessary in face of all opposition, and thankfulness, and a hope which makes all obstacles of the world, the flesh and the devil utterly fade into insignificance, used only as fodder for that divine humor which brings good out of the worst evil, and a devotion, a dedication, to God’s Immaculate Virgin Mother, whereby I cooperate in being brought by her to Christ our God, her Son, our Brother, praising Him, worshiping Him from the first moment of His conception until this very moment as the Lord marks time with His pierced Heart beating for us in eternity.
  • A simplicity of life reflecting that simplicity of soul, whereby it is will be clear to all that they are to ignore me, but look to the one to whom I point by virtue of Mary’s intercession, Jesus, through whom and with whom and in whom we are to see our Heavenly Father, at the ready with prompt obedience to seal that testimony, that witness, with our blood, I, with my blood, should we, should I, be given the opportunity to do so.
  • A simplicity of life which follows after the One thing necessary, union of charity with Him who is the Way, the Truth, our Life.

I need… we priests need… prayer, if we are going to be any kind of priests of The Priest, the Prince of the Most Profound Peace, the dear Son of the Immaculate Conception, our Lady of Guadalupe.

Saint Juan Diego, pray for all of us! Yikes!

6 Comments

Filed under Catholic, saints, Spiritual Life

A King Size Bed for Christmas: Lest we forget true Advent preparations…

king size bed manger bethlehem sent in by reader

Sometimes people think they have to kill their children with the reason being that they have no place for them. There is always a place if we have love in our hearts. Truly.

I am reminded of Saint Vincent de Paul searching for someone to take care of one more orphan child in the midst of one of the horrific plagues raging throughout Europe at the time. He would only give the child to a woman for whom this would be impossible. Of course. This is the way true charity works. You can always add more water to the soup! Just the first couple of minutes of this 3rd snippet of this wonderful Catholic movie:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Pro-Life, saints, videos

Laudie, the guard dog, ever vigilant (and a note on Saint Teresa of Avila about keeping vigil)

I’m sorry, but these two pictures of Laudie guarding Holy Souls Hermitage in her sleep…

laudie guarding 1laudie guarding 2

…remind me of Saint Teresa of Avila saying that she learned how to keep one eye open, if you will, so to speak, looking to our Lord, spiritually, even while asleep. She complained that she didn’t quite know how that was possible or how to explain it, but that there it was. That’s what was happening.

Yep. Typical Saint Teresa. She let’s you know just enough so that you can begin to identify with what she was saying, and then — bam! — she’s off founding another convent and getting herself into trouble with all sorts of priests and bishops! A great saint. All her writings, autobiography included, make for great Advent spiritual reading. Why? Because it’s a saint who knows Jesus, and points out how He draws us to heaven. I love that.

2 Comments

Filed under Catholic, saints, Spiritual Life

The day Satan knelt down in my confessional and asked for absolution

I wish I had this account of Satan kneeling down in the Confessional of canonized stigmatist, Padre Pio of Pietrelcina, when I was teaching the Confession Practicum for the good and holy deacons (all now priests) at the Pontifical Seminary Josephinum up in Columbus, Ohio. In the words of the great saint himself:

“One day, while I was hearing confessions, a man came to the confessional where I was.

He was tall, handsome, dressed with some refinement and he was kind and polite. He started to confess his sins, which were of every kind: against God, against man and against the morals. All the sins were obnoxious!

I was disoriented, in fact for all the sins that he told me, but I responded to him with God’s Word, the example of the Church, and the morals of the Saints. But the enigmatic penitent answered me word for word, justifying his sins, always with extreme ability and politeness. He excused all the sinful actions, making them sound quite normal and natural, even comprehensible on the human level.. He continued this way with the sins that were gruesome against God, Our Lady, the Saints, always using disrespectful round-about argumentation.

He kept this up even with with the foulest of sins that could be conjured in the mind of a most sinful man. The answers that he gave me with such skilled subtlety and malice surprised me. I wondered: who is he? What world does he come from? And I tried to look at him in order to read something on his face.

At the same time I concentrated on every word he spoke, trying to discover any clue to his identity.. But suddenly; through a vivid, radiant and internal light I clearly recognized who he was.

With a sound and imperial tone I told him: “Say long live Jesus, long live Mary!” As soon as I pronounced these sweet and powerful names, Satan instantly disappeared in a trickle of fire, leaving behind him an unbearable stench.” [ h/t V ]

Had I had this account in the Confession Practicum, I would have used this as an example of a “penitent” who has zero penitence, and therefore cannot fruitfully take in the grace of the sacrament, and therefore is not to be provided with an absolution.

Of course, there are many priests who are not like Padre Pio, and who will, on perverse principle, absolve absolutely everyone no matter what, even if they are blaspheming and spitting on you in the confessional and screaming that they DO NOT WANT absolution. Yet, those priests will absolve them anyway, sending them ever more quickly on their way to hell, along with such priests themselves. It does no good, and truly hurts someone, even for eternity, to absolve them when they are not ready and/or do not want that absolution. It is to spit on Christ Jesus Himself.

As I read this account, I recall that perhaps, in fact, Satan has visited my own confessional, and not just once, but very many times. Not to worry! You see, it’s not a mind game. Cutting through the mind games of Satan is all about love, about reverence for Immaculte Mary’s Divine Son, Jesus. As Saint Pio found out with the added effect of a demonic stench, this way to cut through the mind games of Satan works every time, infallibly.

Such reverence is an expression of humble thanksgiving, friendship with our Lord, which is our Lord’s gift, not something we come up with ourselves. We can and should and must ask Him for this gift of His friendship, for the opportunity to be in humble thanksgiving before Him.

When going to Confession, remember the four “C”s. You will want to be:

  • courteous
  • complete
  • concise
  • contrite

In view of the account above, you’ll want to just accuse yourself in the simplest way of your sins, without making excuses that are irrelevant and unneccessary, and may be a real temptation not to be contrite. Yikes! It’s very refreshing just to confess, get absolution, and then rejoice in the Lord’s goodness and kindness. And He is just so good, just so kind.

I saw this view again while on my way to anoint one of the priests up the mountain before he had an operation. Meanwhile, all the rest of the priests were on retreat. Hermits do this kind of thing when need be! Meanwhile, I took the opportunity to go to Confession. Wonderful!

More recently, I went to Confession down the mountain. Priests are great for Confession anywhere of course. And you don’t need gorgeous views to go to Confession. You’ll love the view where that Confession will hopefully eventually bring you, that is, in heaven, face to Face with our Heavenly Father!

2 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Confession, saints

This fellow will just have to be a major patron saint of Holy Souls Hermitage

St. Leonard: I love just everything about him. A reader and dear benefactor sent this in. Thank you!

Feastday: November 6 Patron of political prisoners, imprisoned people, prisoners of war, and captives, women in labour, as well as horses [and donkeys, I'm sure!] Died: 559.

According to unreliable[!] sources, he was a Frank courtier who was converted by St. Remigius, refused the offer of a See from his godfather, King Clovis I, and became a monk at Micy. He lived as a hermit at Limoges and was rewarded by the king with all the land he could ride around on a donkey in a day for his prayers, which were believed to have brought the Queen through a difficult delivery safely. He founded Noblac monastery on the land so granted him, and it grew into the town of Saint-Leonard. He remained there evangelizing the surrounding area until his death. He is invoked by women in labor and by prisoners of war because of the legend that Clovis promised to release every captive Leonard visited. His feast day is November 6.

3 Comments

Filed under saints

How to Be a Saint — A Holy Souls Hermitage Special

By way of the grace of Mary Immaculate’s Divine Son, Christ our God, be in (1) humble (2) thanksgiving to Him for His having taken on what we deserve for original sin and any personal sin, namely death, the worst we can give out and the worst we did give out to Him, for in this way He, remaining innocent, gained the right in all justice to have mercy on us, mercy being founded on justice: “Father, forgive them, they know not what they do!”

So, humble thanksgiving… How does one go about that? (1) An integral confession, an occasion of awesome humility; (2) worthy reception of Holy Communion, the Eucharist (which word in Greek means thanksgiving).

This was the way of all the saints, all of whom were on their knees in humility, all of whom were on their knees in thanksgiving. This is lively friendship with our Lord.

Don’t think that remaining weak in this world means that one hasn’t made any progress in the spiritual life. Quite the opposite. Sinners do not think that they are weak in any sense. Only those who are being drawn to our Lord by our Lord Himself have an inkling of just how weak they are. This weakness is the cross, which our Lord commands us to take up and carry daily, that is, to the end of our lives, meaning that we will justly carry the just consequences of original sin and our own sin until we die. We will be weak of mind, of will, have emotions ranging all over the place, get sick and die. And we will be tempted to sin by way of the world, the flesh and the devil. All of this is our cross.

We often hear that the saints embraced the cross, not because they like pain, but because they get to know in this way, with real clarity, with reality, the extent of the havoc sin wrecked upon us, and therefore know more accurately just how far our Lord had to reach to get us (sacrificing Himself), and therefore are able, with all the more reality, to thank render Him the thanksgiving which is His due. And this is a real joy. This will be our joy in heaven. Humble thanksgiving. This is the joy of the saints. This is how to be a saint.

This just one minute video is a bit painful to listen to, but it is a joy for the soul:

Be a saint. You too. Especially you. Eternity is before us, right now.

(1) Humble

(2) Thanksgiving

3 Comments

Filed under saints, Spiritual Life

Padre Pio: Just your run-of-the-mill priest (To hell with novelty!)

This is Padre Pio reprimanding, literally, thankfully, the hell out of a bishop who had permitted, unbenounced to Padre Pio, that the good padre’s confessional be bugged. He’s furious. Rightly so.

Today is the 45th anniversary of the death of Padre Pio. While the Catholic media is persnickety about calling him Saint Pio, skipping the bit about him being a Father, the sensus fildelium gets it right, continuing to call him Padre Pio, Father Pio, or even, just to aggravate the situation, Saint Padre Pio. Hah!

People wonder what the secret of his sanctity was. His stigmata? His knowledge of souls? His visions of Jesus and Mary and the saints? No, none of this. To hell with novelty.

As with all saints, the “secret” of Padre Pio’s sanctity was the sanctifying grace provided to him in all friendship by Mary Immaculate’s Son, Jesus. End of story.

Pretty boring, huh? Not at all. All those who know something of sanctifying grace, in trying to keep up with the sacraments, know something about the love our Lord has for us, providing us with our faith, our hope, and the charity into which our Lord draws our lives. Enthralling.

Of course, all saints manifest a particular aspect of God’s love for us. Padre Pio’s “specialty”, if you will, was to show us what it means to be a priest, just your run-of-the-mill priest. The mill, mind you, which grinds the “wheat”, is the passion and death of our Lord, His resurrection, His Sacred Heart having priestly hearts be like unto His own.

  • The more Padre Pio was acutely aware of the stigmata of Christ Jesus Himself, the more he knew that such are imprinted upon the souls of all priests. If we were to see the eternally imprinted character of the Sacrament of Orders upon the soul of a priest, I think we should see the stigmata of our Lord. All priests are to carry about the death of Christ so as to manifest His resurrection.
  • The more Padre Pio heard confessions, hours and hours and hours on end, the more he is an example to all priests of what they are to do in their priestly ministry.
  • The more Padre Padre Pio knew things about the souls into which he came in contact, the more it is evident that all priests are to intercede for the souls given to them whether they know anything about them or not.
  • The more Padre Pio worked this or that miracle, the more your run-of-the-mill priest is to know that he is also take care, inasmuch as he can, of the physical needs of those in his care. He is to be a Father in every way.

You get the idea. We mustn’t be distracted with such things, as if they were special to Padre Pio. They are not. Not in any truly extraordinary fashion, outside of his having taken up the grace provided to him, of course. You have to understand that, as Padre Pio himself said, the worst suffering he had in this life is not the pain of the stigmata, or the attack of Satan, but the humiliation he had of being given the stigmata in his body, for he knew he was nothing special. He learned that it was his vocation to let us know that, indeed, such things are not special to him. Of course, there are many, very many priests who do not know anything of this. Pray for us priests.

An analogy. When I began the doctoral thesis on Genesis, I had the idea that I absolutely did not want to come up with anything novel, anything new, anything effervescently exciting and nice, anything politically correct. I just wanted to examine the text – rather closely mind you – like no one else had done so before, purposely distancing myself from anything that did not emanate from the text itself. I knew that it this way, I would meet up with that the very revelation of God, which is never boring, but always enthralling.

Indeed, after the most unrelentingly scientific, letter by letter, historical philological study, and after letting, against all odds, the historical syntax speak for itself across the centuries – and having done all this with a completeness incomparably outdoing the thousands of commentaries and studies and monographs and Festschriften and such like that I’ve been through – what I saw was a presentation of God, incarnate of the Immaculate Virgin, our Redeemer, our Savior, the One who will provide us with life eternal, having undone original sin (passed along by propagation, not imitation) and having brought us to Himself.

In other words, the results of an application of common sense, of steely reason (so boring to the innovators) mirrored what we have always believed about this passage by way of the faith, for faith and reason, both given by God, go together. I don’t mean that there was any eisegesis, any reading of any doctrine into the passage. Rather, faith rejoiced to see what was scientifically manifested in the passage, faith first of all having done the favor of stripping the soul of the researcher of any fear of what might be found, such as the absolutely terrifying battle between the Son of the Woman and Satan, a battle which we are all to witness.

The more thoroughly the work was stripped of novelty, the more enthralling it was, however agonizing the actual scientific work was to do. No novelty = great joy. O.K., one could say that the novelty of the work was to have no novelty whatsoever. One could say that the novelty was the proof of what the primary purpose of the text happens to be (outlined above) against the same having been thought to be merely a secondary nicety of the text by our more noveltied exegetes. To hell with novelty!

The same with Padre Pio.

This was the statement of his priesthood to us priests: To hell with novelty! We priests are just to manifest The Priest, Christ Jesus, Mary Immaculate’s Son, in our lives. That’s it, and that’s wonderful. But novelty, throwing in something of our own stupidity, is boring. There is nothing more boring than novelty. There is no One more life giving than Jesus.

Padre Pio was all about Christ Jesus, a good example for us priests.

But there is more. I’ve been thinking about Padre Pio quite a bit recently (here and here and here and here, etc., as has Father Gordon MacRae – abouthere). If I could make a prophesy, it would be this, that Padre Pio is destined to become a great saint in the eyes of most all priests in the world. This has not been the case. But this will come about. Padre Pio, pray for us!

If anyone thinks I’ve dissed the stigmata, miracles, etc., of Padre Pio in this article, that person would be wrong. These other manifestations of Christ’s enthusiastic priesthood among us were meant to bring us to Christ’s enthusiastic priesthood among us. The novelty to which I’m referring above is the idea that these other things were somehow extra special, even more important than the priesthood of Jesus in Padre Pio (by way of Holy Orders and sanctifying grace). What is most important is Who is most important: Jesus and His Priesthood.

3 Comments

Filed under saints

Balancing the weight of the wood on Jenny the Jeep (and on the Mystical Body of Christ) More on Padre Pio

Jenny the Jeep made it up the mountain, even though… even though… the path up was still a bit muddy after the 8 1/2 inches of rain the other day. How is that possible, you ask? Isn’t the path up Mount Carmel, that is, Holy Souls Mountain, already way too steep even when it’s dry and conditions are perfect for climbing? Well, yes, that’s true, unless…

The trick is to balance the wood, spreading out the burden, indeed, even coming up with extraordinary ways to do this:

In this way, with a good couple hundred pounds out front, not to mention — well, I don’t even want to think how much the total weight of this wet red oak came to in the rest of Jenny — she went right up the mountain, accompanied by some rather fervent prayers to guardian angels. Another two trips like coming up. Yikes!

The Lord Jesus, Mary’s Son, carried the cross for us, redeemed us, and, please God, provides us sanctifying grace, saving us, having us hope in the grace of final perseverance, of a happy death. Yes, that’s true. However! As Saint Paul says, we are to make up what is lacking to the sufferings of Christ.

What could be lacking? He’s God! Of course, we can’t make that redemption any more perfect than it was and is. However, upon reception of such friendship with our Lord, we become so one with Him that when He goes into battle with Satan, so do we. When He lays down His life for us, being crushed by Satan even as He crushes Satan, He lays down our lives with His own as well. For we are but one with Him, His Mystical Body of which He is the Head.

How very many times He told His apostles that He must suffer and die, and then rise on the third day. How very many times He told all his disciples that we are to take up the cross and carry it, looking not at the cross, but to Him, following Him. He doesn’t want to carry the cross alone. He wants our company so that we go up Mount Calvary together. He spreads out the weight of the wood, the wood of the cross. And up we go, right up Mount Carmel.

When we see horrific, diabolical injustice, we must ask our Lord for the grace to see that Satan easily manipulates those who are not perfectly saints, that we are not fighting them, but rather Satan, and that, indeed, we are not fighting Satan, but our Lord is, and He would have us with Him in this battle.

In the battle, the wood, the torture, physical, mental, spiritual, emotional, is to be carried up the mountain, but it takes spreading out the burden.

Padre Pio carried the weight of diabolical injustice wrecked on innocent priests, innocent himself. Jesus also carried this cross of being slandered.

There are many, ridiculously, betraying fear, who immediately say that our Lord, unlike Padre Pio and so many others, was not accused of sexual misconduct, as if suffering such a slander, as if undergoing such an injustice for the sake of the kingdom of the heavens, would not be proper for our Lord. What idiocy.

Instead… instead… our Lord carried all the injustice, all the weight of the wood of the cross that we carry, as if it were an injustice that happened to Him: “What you have done to the least of these, you have done to Me.”

Padre Pio carried the wood of the cross, and was nailed to the cross, helping to bear the burden that all of us should be carrying.

We receive from Christ and those who are with Him, like Padre Pio. However, we can’t just receive (for then, we don’t really receive anything), but we must shoulder the weight of the wood as well. We don’t have the strength, but Christ does, and we are to look to Him, not to ourselves.

It’s interesting that of stigmata of Padre Pio included the shoulder wound of Christ carrying the cross. Padre Pio said that this was a most painful wound, the shouldering of the weight of the wood. But we can shoulder this wood of the cross as well, looking to Jesus. And up we go, right up the mountain.

3 Comments

Filed under ., abuse, saints

Padre Pio Miracle Man — DVD film (Just. Wow.)

Padre Pio receiving the habit in the O.F.M.Cap.

I watched Padre Pio – Miracle Man on DVD last night. The neighbors know I’ve been mentioning Padre Pio on the blog, and gave me the DVD to watch. In was made in the 1990′s, copyrighted in 2000, and started to be redistributed by Ignatius Press in 2006.

Padre Pio’s canonization was in 2002 in the very midst of the sex abuse crisis, in the very midst, in fact, of The Judas Crisis. I think that Father Gordon MacRae (about) is on to something when he said that Pope John Paul II scheduled the canonization with a specific purpose in mind (see here).

If you’ve seen this film back in 2000, now is the time to see it again. You will be surprised at what you now see in the film, namely, the most horrific example of The Judas Crisis to date, though it started, in his case, in the early part of the last century and continued until the day of his death.

The pain of the stigmata was nothing compared to the betrayal he knew from among his own brethren in religious life, from priests, from bishops, archbishops, cardinals, from local ordinaries to unfortunate examples of the priesthood in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and in the Secretariat of State. He had the backing of many of the popes, but that didn’t matter to those who were so easily bent to be agents of Satan himself in Padre Pio’s persecution.

Here on Amazon: Padre Pio Miracle Man.

Padre Pio is very quickly becoming my all time favorite saint. I had lots of emotions during this film, including rage at those who ordered his confessional bugged with listening equipment. They should excommunicated post-mortem, just to make a statement, no matter where that order came from, however high up in the hierarchy. Remember, The Judas Crisis does not admit to a limit of evil.

But with our Lord there is no limit of goodness and kindness, and that is what we see with our Lord Jesus shining out from within this Father called Pio. Thanks be to God.

3 Comments

Filed under abuse, saints

An encounter with Padre Pio, chainsaw in hand, swarmed by yellowjackets (and Jenny the Jeep gets the last laugh)

Not that Padre Pio ever held a chainsaw, or could with those stigmata of his, or was ever swarmed by yellowjackets. That would be me, yesterday, cutting up a gargantuan red oak that had smashed down on Holy Souls Mountain road the other stormy day, still green, meaning wet, meaning incredibly heavy. The last piece I cut measured about 28″ across. Four trips with the pickup truck.

Yellowjackets were swarming all over the shattered bits of this tree, trying to lick up the sap on the edges. They were everywhere, under the rim of my hat, next to my ears and neck, landing on my hands. But they had little interest in me. I was storming heaven, mind you, that I not be taken out of this life then and there by the little flying beasts.

With chainsaw blazing, exhaust clouding, wood chips flying, sweat falling, branches creaking and breaking, chunks of log splitting off from the main tree and splashing into the water of the ditch beneath – not to mention the yellowjackets swarming – with all of that I couldn’t help but calmly think of a long phone conversation I had the other week with Father Gordon MacRae about Padre Pio. For something about that, read this.

Padre Pio, as Father said, repeating the words of the inquisitors sent from the Holy See, was a “most extraordinary soul.” The interrogators were quite antagonistic toward him before meeting with him. But they all independently and unbenounced to the others, came away in awe of Jesus in his soul, and manifested even in his body.

I had no heavenly visitation, no vision. Nothing like that. Just the tiniest smidgeon of a sense – with all that lumberjack mayhem going on – of the humble reverence in all humble thanksgiving that Padre Pio constantly lived before Mary’s Son, Jesus, seeing Jesus, as it were, in His love for us, giving Himself for us, still bearing those wounds now, manifesting the union of charity He provides for souls, union with the Most Holy Trinity. Such love for us itsybitsy creatures. We are just so very much nothing, but our Lord Jesus is just so very good and just so very kind.

I was encouraged not to be afraid of such love. Perfect love casts out fear, does it not? Yes, it does. But I am far from perfect love, often distracted, in fact, by the crashing of trees and the swarming of yellowjackets. But I was encouraged, it seemed, so very personally, by this Father called Pio.

Oh, and, just to say — HAH! — I didn’t use Jenny the Jeep to get the wood, as it is still too wet after that last storm (about 8 ½” of rain in about ten hours) to have her venture down the mountain path. If she started sliding, the sudden stop would be quite catastrophic. Had I been able to take Jenny down the way, I think she would have laughed, seeing which particular tree was to be cut to pieces. It was right there at that spot, I am given to understand, that the local kids, with their jeeps, would spin about just there in the ditch, where there was always water and plenty, plenty of mud. It’s great to cover one’s jeep with mud, mind you.

Anyway, one idiotic evening, as the story goes, one of the kids, who had a winch on the front of his jeep, threw the hook and cable over the branch of a great red oak, and then set the winch in motion, hauling his jeep right up the tree on a dare. When it left the ground, he found out that he had no way to right it again as he tried to set it down, causing much laughter all around. It seems that this is the very oak tree I cut up. I’m guessing that it was Jenny the Jeep who had the humiliating experience. This is, perhaps, how the seats got to be in such a terribly broken up state. At least Jenny will have the joy of bringing the wood up the last leg of Holy Souls Mountain. She has the last laugh. Hah!

I think I should mention in my next confession all the distraction with which I let myself be distracted. One doesn’t have to be distracted just because one is plagued with distractions. Laughter, of course, is not a distraction.

2 Comments

Filed under saints

More from Father Byers’ Jackass Trilogy: Some snippets in honor of Saint Robert Bellarmine

[[N.B. In these paragraphs, you'll meet Carpe Diem, that is, Polycarp, a severly autistic nephew of Cardinal Fidele. We enter a scene in which Father Alexamenos' friend, don Hash, is getting himself into deep trouble with some Cardinals of the Roman Curia. He's realizing that he needs to save the life of Father Alexamenos. These paragraphs should spike the interest of some of the more academic biblical scholars among the readership. Yikes!]]

Carpe Diem walked into the room, his clothes inside out and back to front, shoes untied, and wearing a helmet. He rarely banged his head against walls until he was too dazed to continue, but wearing a helmet was part of him. He offered the last of a box of chocolate to any takers, though he gave the chocolate to don Hash, who had taken the time to answer his questions. Don Hash was horrified to see that the nails of Carpe Diem’s fingers had been chewed down to their roots.

“The rules are… I can’t believe I’m saying this…” said don Hash, hesitating, thinking of Saint Lawrence while thanking Carpe Diem, who then left, flapping his hands as he so often did. “Saint Robert Bellarmine’s rules might have seemed to him to establish in a textual critical manner the words of Scripture in the way dogmatically insisted upon by the Council of Trent, but which, at the same time, surely seemed to him also to have the benefit of appeasing the so-called Reformers. But Trent was not followed and the Protestants couldn’t have cared less about anything Bellarmine did. His double-edged damage control, if accepted by the Church, would have to become a habit, a virtue, a ‘policy’… almost making of itself revealed Truth, manipulating Sacred Scripture as it did. Such a policy fears the authority of the Holy Father, effectively claiming that the only sources of infallibility are the temporary hypotheses of scientific methodology. For him, only science, artificially cut off from the Faith, could be the basis for the Magisterial discernment of what Sacred Scripture is in its extension, its books, sentences, phrases, words and letters. Bellarmine could not think of any other aid to judge whether one ancient manuscript was correct and another not. He ignored the fact that if a Scripture passage was consistently used in the Liturgy, though in Latin, that is how the Church could find the words of the original language manuscripts. Yet, this was the very discernment desired by the Fathers of Trent. If Bellarmine’s double-edged damage control succeeded, there would have been a new inquisition in which burning truth – as that which is not expedient to ecumenical unity – would be rewarded.”

“What on earth are you talking about?” demanded Cardinal Froben.

“Wake up and smell the smoke!” exclaimed Cardinal Fidèle. “Satan’s smouldering fires come to us even in the bella figura of angels of light. In controversy with Galileo, Bellarmine opened the windows to let in what he thought was the fresh air of Scripture choking science. He would have come close to suffocating the Church and the world – not because Scripture cannot help to purify the desire to breathe in scientific knowledge – but because his politically correct, overly-literal approach to Scripture attacked faith and science.”

“The bitter irony is overwhelming,” said Cardinal Elzevir.

“Dear Lord…” said don Hash into the dead silence of the room, staring into the last flames of the fire. He was certain that Bellarmine could not have been more mistaken. He asked Christ out loud: “Would I so easily be the one to light the fire, burning your saints at the stake?”

It was Cardinal Fidèle who answered: “I do not know the answer to that, yet, but, in this case, you have seen through the devil’s own work. The Holy See is necessarily the devil’s playpen.”

[...]

Don Hash was full of questions, but Cardinal Fidèle slipped the paper from don Hash’s hands, saying, “Explain what Bellarmine wanted to do, Hash.”

Don Hash didn’t know if he was being manipulated into criticizing a saint to the point of burning the truth. He silently asked the Lord for help, and then said aloud, “It seems that Bellarmine treated the Vulgate not as a textual critical measure to be used for the discovery of the original words in the original language manuscripts – as much as this is possible – as Trent had envisioned it, but merely as something ‘precious’, which could be disregarded for little reason.”

“Go on,” said Cardinal Fidèle.

“The Council Fathers of Trent knew that they didn’t have a textually critically established Bible, not for the Latin manuscripts for the Vulgate, nor the original language manuscripts in Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic,” continued don Hash, who then repeated: “They knew that God would not abandon His Church, and judged that if one could establish the consistency of the usage of the Latin Vulgate in, for instance, the Liturgy, then one could use that more accessible source as a measure for the original language manuscripts, coming up with an exemplar of the inspired Scriptures: lex orandi lex credendi, the law of praying is the law of believing. The Scriptures were written in a lived Tradition of Faith taking its life in the liturgy.

Cardinal Francisco began to understand that, now for so many years, the abomination was where it should not be. He had thrown the pearls to the swine, who also went by the name Catholic, who were trampling upon the pearls, and turning on the members of the Body of Christ.

Don Hash continued: “Bellarmine was distracted, I suppose, by pastoral problems and administration, becoming embroiled in problems that were extraneous to his expertise. He didn’t have the time to understand the importance of methodology, thinking that it was all a matter of how many manuscripts – though with respect given to those of antiquity – instead of it being a matter of the Vulgate also being of service in the discovery of the textual critical extension of the words of the original language manuscripts. Bellarmine’s was a pseudo-science, for so many of the decisions about which words belonged in Scripture are, in the end, otherwise arbitrary along the lines of Cardinal Froben’s Prinzip der Prinzipienlosigkeit…”

“I’ve got a saint with me,” said Cardinal Froben. “Where did you say Bellarmine’s tomb is?”

Carpe Diem walked into the room and started pacing from one corner to the other, listening intently, though not understanding anything he heard. He wanted to repeat something.

Don Hash asked, “Why entrust Revelation to decisions based on, as you said, what is merely ‘traditional’, pastoral, liturgical, apologetic, sociological, organizational, cultural, political, geographical, psychological, intellectual, attitudinal or even economic? Even the Nestle-Aland Greek edition of the New Testament was produced like this. It’s pseudo-science.”

“So, what is to be done with Bellarmine’s work… in practical terms?” asked Cardinal Fidèle.

“When Monsignor Sens arrives, Bellarmine’s work is to be burned,” said don Hash with intensity. “It is better to burn than to be burned. Why should it destroy people’s Faith?”

“I see you are eager to set fire to a saint. Is Bellarmine not like Saint Lawrence, your patron saint, who was burned to death?” asked Cardinal Fidèle, objecting with false pretense.

“Not in the least,” said don Hash. “I’m certain that Bellarmine was wrong, however great a saint he was. He simply didn’t know what he was doing. It is not Bellarmine himself that I would burn, please God, just his work. I repeat that what he did would do great harm to the Church.”

“So, you wouldn’t burn him?” asked Cardinal Fidèle.

“No, please God,” repeated don Hash.

“What if the Pope commanded you to burn him or be burned yourself?” persisted the Prelate. The other Cardinals thought this was quite humourous, since it all seemed hypothetical. Don Hash did not answer. To don Hash, he said, “The fire is almost out,” handing the paper to him. “Before burning anything substantial, like someone from America, try burning the paper in your hands.”

[...]

Just then, the doorbell rang and Cardinal Fidèle motioned with his eyes for don Hash to open the door of his apartment. Monsignor Sens, who walked in as if he were under a cloud of suspicion, was ushered into the study. Carpe Diem stopped his pacing so that he could stare intently at the new arrival. Cardinal Fidèle said, expectantly, “You’ve gained quite a bit of weight, Sens.”

Monsignor Sens stopped dead at the entrance to the study. His boss, Cardinal Elzevir, was clearly upset at his presence. “Get over it, Elzevir,” said Cardinal Fidèle. “Invite him in.”

“Sens,” said Cardinal Elzevir with severity. “It seems you have divided loyalties.”

“Oh! Isn’t it wonderful Georg! Maria has returned from the Abbey!” exclaimed Carpe Diem on behalf of Cardinals Elzevir and Fidèle, quoting the envious Baroness in The Sound of Music. Carpe Diem’s interruptions were triggered by his brain’s emotional associations.

Monsignor Sens involuntarily stepped back. “Elzevir!” exclaimed Cardinal Fidèle.

After a moment, the Cardinal Secretary of State calmly said, “Very well… Come forward.”

“Maria has returned!” repeated Carpe Diem, now twirling a piece of string above his eyes.

“Give Sens the paper, Hash,” instructed Cardinal Fidèle.

Monsignor Sens walked to don Hash and took it from him. Before he looked at it, Cardinal Fidèle said, “Throw it on the embers, Sens.” He did, and, after some seconds, it burst into flame.

Monsignor Sens removed his winter coat and gave it to don Hash, who immediately dropped it on the floor. The top of Monsignor Sens’ cassock was not buttoned, revealing the cause of his sudden weight gain, a large tome of obvious antiquity. He held it out to his superior, the Cardinal Secretary of State, who took it from him with some force. “Stand back, Sens, and clear these things off the coffee-table.” Cardinal Elzevir then opened the volume. The other Cardinals leaned over while Cardinal Elzevir read the ornate title page dedicated to Popes Damasus, Paul III, Sixtus V, Clement VIII and Paul V. He turned the folios one by one. Following the title page was a list of the same directions which Cardinal Fidèle had just asked Monsignor Sens to burn. The following pages listed the Greek and Latin manuscripts used for his new redaction, only some of which had been consulted through the Vatican’s Apostolic Library. The rest of the volume contained Bellarmine’s own pseudo-revised version of the Latin Vulgate along with the pseudo-revised Greek text on facing pages. Each chapter concluded with textual critical notes as damage control appeasing those worried about the Latin text.

“It could have been the jewel of the Counter-Reformation,” said don Hash.

“Now, Hash,” said Cardinal Fidèle, “turn to John, chapter eight. What do you find there?”

Don Hash had been on the edge of his chair, straining to see the volume on the low table. He immediately traversed the few paces and went down on his knees. He turned the volume around. It was almost three quarters of a metre wide when opened. He turned to the first pages, and then to the Gospel of John. “It’s what I don’t find there,” replied don Hash. “There’s no mulier adultera. Even Bellarmine had the adulterous woman stoned to death, right out of the text, completely against everything Trent dogmatically indicated. Bellamine should have burned at the stake…”

“My, my… aren’t you easy to agitate?” taunted Cardinal Fidèle. “Would you burn a canonized saint just so easily? I wonder what you would do with someone who wasn’t canonized, at least because he wasn’t dead… yet. Now, Hash, Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under books, Catholic, saints, Scripture

Saint Monica and Saint Augustine and a Jackass

Just thinking about Monica and Augustine, and the little brother today. The power of persistent prayer, but free will as well. Yikes! The prayers of many, methinks, are an occasion by which the Lord provides us the grace to have a heart so restless that it cannot rest until it resteth in Him, in fact, in heaven. When one fellow complained that he was unworthy of the Lord’s attention, Augustine reprimanded him, saying, “Asinus es, sed Christum portas!” (You are a Jackass, but you carry Christ). How restless our hearts are. It’s as if we’re carrying them outside of ourselves showing them to the Lord Jesus, Mary’s Son. It seems to me that I am such a Jackass… Thanks be to God! Must be the prayers of many, for which I thank you. Yikes!

3 Comments

Filed under saints, Spiritual Life

Saint Lawrence, Father Alexamenos, Don Hash, Jackass for the Hour & Holy Souls Hermitage

In “Jackass for the Hour”, a tightly scripted and so needing to be revised, not yet published ecclesiastical thriller novel of some 750 pages (which I wrote while in between chapters of the doctoral thesis on Genesis 2,4–3,24), the major conversion of one of the protagonists, Don Hash, comes about when he realizes that his previous self-congratulations that he would never burn someone like Saint Lawrence to death was the very proof that he would do just that. Of course he would, given the circumstances, the political correctness, the fervor of the day.

Any attitude of self-congratulations is a license to kill, carrying with it the same attitude that saw the genocide rage in Rwanda. How stupid we are to build the shrines of the saints and proclaim we are their friends, saying that if we had lived back in the day, we would have kept such saints safe, never harming them ourselves. Such hypocrisy! Listen to Christ’s words:

Matthew 23,27 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within they are full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness. 28 So you also outwardly appear righteous to men, but within you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. 29 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you build the tombs of the prophets and adorn the monuments of the righteous, 30 saying, `If we had lived in the days of our fathers, we would not have taken part with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.’ 31 Thus you witness against yourselves, that you are sons of those who murdered the prophets. 32 Fill up, then, the measure of your fathers. 33 You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell? 34 Therefore I send you prophets and wise men and scribes, some of whom you will kill and crucify, and some you will scourge in your synagogues and persecute from town to town” (rsv).

When we pray to the saints, or have them as our patrons, or build their shrines, or give them a word of praise, or ask their intercession, we are, instead to put ourselves before them with humility, saying that surely we would have killed them just as others had killed them back in the day, that we are no different, that we stand in need of his or her intercession before the Throne of the Most High God in order to live by Christ’s love and not by way of our own self-congratulation. You get the idea.

For your distraction, here is part of a chapter from that novel, Jackass for the Hour. We are in media res, some hundreds of pages into the story. The hero, Father Alexamenos, after having been submitted to a violent interrogation at the airport, is being sequestered away in a prison which housed Saint Lawrence for three days. Father Alexámenos was to be put on trial, but his death was sought by too many for him to be put in a normal prison. The tiny church dedicated in honor of Saint Lawrence, which had been built over the prison, had been temporarily closed and reclaimed by the city for some restoration work which never seemed to begin. It was the dead of winter, on a particularly cold night, well below freezing. Excuse the English spelling of English, which I used to write the novel…

Two soldiers in plain clothes showed up to transport Father Alexámenos. They drove him to the junction of Via Leonina and Via Urbana, the lower entrance of the Metro stop on Via Cavour. The trains were not running at this time of night. Father Alexámenos had been blindfolded, but was listening carefully, trying to discern where they were taking him. They unlocked the gate and brought him in, locking it behind them, and throwing him to the floor. He successfully fell on his side, avoiding crushing his hands, which were cuffed behind his back. One of the soldiers made a phone call, letting it ring three times. He didn’t speak. Father Alexámenos noted through his blindfold that the lights of wherever they were had been cut.

They went far into the station and, instead of bothering to walk around the kiosk, grabbed Father Alexámenos and tossed him over the turnstiles like a sack of potatoes. Through their laughter, and through his pain, Father Alexámenos heard the telltale sounds of their climbing over the locked turnstiles, and knew that he was in a subway stop, somewhere with no steps leading into the station.

They dragged him to his feet and pushed him along for a short distance, then shouted at him to stop. Father Alexámenos listened to the cavernous silence and thought he must be on the platform itself. They told him to turn left and walk. Father Alexámenos counted the paces.

Before they came to the end of the platform they simply pushed him off, blindfolded, unto the tracks, a four and a half foot drop. He landed hard on his back between the rails, on the rocks and cement ties. The momentum of the impact rolled him over onto his face, almost unconscious, against one of the rails. His hands were still hand-cuffed behind his back. He had landed on them. The soldiers jumped down next to him, slamming the rocks into the back of his head.

They dragged Father Alexámenos by his hand-cuffs for a short distance, but then lifted him to his feet, pushing him along the tracks, walking in a north-easterly direction toward Stazione Termini. Father Alexámenos was still counting. At exactly one hundred and forty paces, one of the soldiers put his foot out and shoved him hard, causing him to fall once again onto the rocks and cement ties between the rails. Because of the way he was tripped, he fell directly on his face, opening the cuts next to his eyes once again. He had instinctively tried to break his fall by holding out his hands, but since they were shackled, his violent pulling on the handcuffs only managed to cut his wrists more, right through the bandages. He was again almost knocked unconscious. He knew he was on subway tracks, and wondered if being run over by a subway train would be his fate.

He heard the two soldiers busy behind him, making metal on metal noises. They were opening a manhole cover. They rolled him onto his back and dragged him into the hole, letting him drop. They heard him hit the water below and started cursing at him loudly, trying to get a reaction out of him. When this didn’t work, they repeatedly kicked rocks into the hole. They heard him try to move out of the way, splashing in the shallow water. He wasn’t unconscious. He wouldn’t drown. They had done their work. They replaced the cover, bolting it down, hiding it again with the stones.

It was then so absolutely quiet that Father Alexámenos could hear the pulse of his blood in his ears. He was in no sewer, which would be full of noise. This water was stagnant, and there were no rats. He rubbed his head against the wall in an attempt to remove his blindfold. It took him some minutes, but he finally succeeded. He could feel blood trickling down his face once again. What he then saw disappointed him. He didn’t see anything. It was pitch black.

But then he heard the rocks being weakly knocked away from the cover, and then some feeble struggling with the bolts… to no avail. He then heard his name being called, “Don Alexámenos, Don Alexámenos…” He recognised the voice. It belonged to Signor Kondrat, an engineer from Sophia, Bulgaria. For the crime of believing in God, his parents and his priest had been burned alive in the local communist era gulag, in which even cannibalism was not an uncommon fate for many Jews, Muslims, Orthodox and Catholic Christians. Father Alexámenos had rescued him from the Roman street mafia, which had amputated his left foot and maimed his right hand, so that he had to make his way by hopping on one crutch. After his wounds healed, he lived in the subway tunnels at night – loving his independence – finding it easy to avoid detection by the security cameras at the ends of the subway platforms during the early morning and late afternoon rush. He would sleep in the adjacent storage areas under whatever material was there. During the day he volunteered for some religious Sisters as a greeter of visitors to their street hospice.

Father Alexámenos didn’t even try to respond to him, knowing that he had been almost totally deaf for years. He concluded from this, however, that he must be close to the hospice, since Signor Kondrat couldn’t walk very far. [...]

Father Alexámenos now took stock of his situation. The hole he was in had about thirty centimetres of water in it, and was hardly larger than the manhole cover, but was fairly deep. He could feel with his head that there was a hole in the wall to the right, which rose about half a metre above water level. The floor level rose above the water on the other side of the hole, but there would be enough room to squeeze through. The risk was that he would be completely soaked with the freezing water if he did this, though he was almost entirely soaked already. There was no guarantee that there would be enough room for him on the other side of the hole, yet, it was a lost cause waiting for someone to rescue him there. Signor Kondrat could not leave the metro station until morning. After much effort, he finally pushed himself onto the dry dirt floor.

He was able to stand up, and wondered where he was. With his hand-cuffed hands, despite the injuries, he felt diamond shaped rocks making up the lower part of the wall behind his back. He took a step to the left of the floor and hit his head on the low ceiling. He moved along another step and immediately came to a spiral, rock staircase. Taking a few steps up, he stopped. Both the ceiling and the staircase were sealed off. Coming down the steps, crouching down, he slowly went in the opposite direction, scraping his elbow along the wall as a guide. He seemed to be in a narrow passageway, the low ceiling of which – as he could feel with his head – was smooth concrete. As he cautiously used his feet to sense any change in direction in what seemed to be a catacomb, he noted that the floor suddenly fell away. It was a staircase. He walked down a half dozen steps, sitting down on the lowest step, having lost his balance on what he then realized were two wobbly planks having water on either side. The ceiling was very low once again. He now knew exactly where he was. The low concrete ceilings were the bottoms of the subway tunnels which cut through the historic site. He had been here a number of times on pilgrimage. The church entrance was one hundred paces from the Metro stop, which was the only one in Rome without an escalator or any steps, inside or outside the station, and whose platform was not on an incline. It was another forty paces down into the prison from the church to the point where he had been dropped into the water.

Father Alexámenos remembered don Hash having spent a day during the previous summer taking him around to all the churches dedicated to Saint Lawrence, who, don Hash said, was imprisoned here, in the cellar of the Centurion Hippolytus, just before he was burned to death on the hill above, on Via Panisperna, in 258 A.D. Father Alexámenos remembered don Hash’s passion in recounting Lawrence’s ‘crime’ of having distributed the goods of the Church to the poor so that, when asked by the Emperor where the treasures of the Church were, Lawrence pointed to the poor, who were themselves the treasures of the Church. Father Alexámenos knew that, for a few days so long ago, that cellar, deep underground, witnessed great rejoicing in the Lord. Don Hash had said that Lawrence’s fellow prisoner, Lucillus, was blind, but, after being catechised and baptised by Lawrence, was cured. The Centurion, seeing this, also desired to be baptised by Lawrence. When the Centurion Hippolytus proclaimed his conversion to the Emperor Valerian, he was dragged to death behind horses along the Via Sacra just below the Palatine Hill. Father Alexámenos wondered if the first Alexámenos, his namesake, had witnessed the martyrdom.

[...] /// [Note to readers of the blog: I'm guessing that the first Alexamenos was also a martyr. He was the one being mocked for worshiping a crucified God, depicted by his mockers as a Jackass. See the detail of this ancient graffito in the header of the blog: here] /// [...]

Father Alexámenos knew that if he followed the passage up, he would come to a metal gate. Yet, the air would be less humid higher up. Seeing that he was sopping wet, that would be a plus. He crossed the wobbly planks, which required total concentration. All pilgrims would steady themselves with both hands on the walls to either side of the passage as they bent over. He, however, was handcuffed. Finally reaching the other side, he walked up the steps of the winding passage and pressed against the metal gate. It was locked. He couldn’t decide if it was colder there or colder further below.

He sat down on the steep steps and thought about this move of the Italian government, putting him in the prison of Saint Lawrence. Surely they were keeping him out of the reach of the media, and surely he was out of the way of causing trouble in public or military prisons, where he himself would be in danger because of the crimes with which he was being accused. This would certainly be the last place anyone would think to look for him, but there were a multitude of such unknown places. Why here? Were they sending a message to the Holy See as to the kind of punishment they expected for him? He thought of how Saint Lawrence had pointed to the poor when asked where the treasure of the Church was, and that he himself would not have the same opportunity, for he was accused of crimes against the poor themselves.

It was the coldest part of winter, and the coldest part of the night. He guessed that the temperature was below zero, and that his wet clothes were not freezing hard quite yet, perhaps because of the little body heat that he had left. He knew that he should keep moving in order to keep warm, but he was afraid that if he did so he would pass out on his feet from a combination of pain, lack of sleep and the confusion that comes with hypothermia. He could not afford to fall down the steps. Sitting crouched up to conserve body heat was a dangerous option, but was the only one he had. His hands, like his feet, were now completely numb. He could not even tell if his hands were touching the floor behind him as he sat with his back to the metal gate. Yet, some vertebrae and ribs were so painful that he could hardly breathe. Distracted by his pain, he didn’t remember that the gate opened inwardly.

He then realised his mistake in sitting down; he began to violently and uncontrollably shiver. He perceptibly felt heat escape his body in successive waves, but he felt too weak to get up. He remembered don Hash telling him about some military exercises in the Italian Alps, when one of the soldiers came down with hypothermia. “To sleep is to die,” he said.

In order to keep himself awake, he began reciting the mysteries of the Rosary out loud, but soon found himself drifting into longer and longer periods of reciting the prayers only in his mind. The prayers he did manage to say out loud made him wonder if he had been drugged, for his words were unclear even to himself. He finished and said, “No gaoler yet.” [...]

After the Litany of Loretto, he recited the end of the Salve Regina in earnest: “and after this our exile, show unto us the fruit of thy womb, Jesus, O Clement, O loving, O sweet Virgin Mary.”

When he finished these words, he was still shivering, though with much less vehemence. As the hours went by, his body was going through various stages of shutting down, becoming so cold that he could not move even with concerted effort. He was dying. He knew it. He couldn’t even open his eyes. He watched his own confusion, as if from a distance. He didn’t realise that, medically speaking, he had already long slipped into a coma. He started to recite Psalm 22 in Hebrew, but only reached the first line, not remembering the rest. He repeated the first line in Aramaic, words which Christ Himself had quoted upon the Cross: “Eli! Eli! Lema sabachtani? My God! My God! Why have you abandoned me?” He knew the cry spoke of an ongoing relationship, filled, like the rest of the Psalm, with filial love and praise of the Father… Jesus was speaking with the Father, who was listening. The abandonment – in the eyes of those on Calvary – confirmed the sign of the greatest love, that of the Son dying for us, as sent by the Father. The abandonment manifested their unity, just how completely Jesus, continuing in obedience to the will of the Father, took on what we deserved for our sins so as to have the right in justice, before the Father, to have mercy on us: “Father! Forgive them!” These thoughts swirled through his head. He was trying to stay awake. [...]

6 Comments

Filed under Catholic, saints

15 Holy Souls Hermitage Heroes and Heroines — Saint Aloysius Gonzaga, S.J.

The 1962 Missale Romanum has this as the opening prayer for the feast of Saint Aloysius:

Cæléstium donórum distribútor, Deus, qui in angélico júvene Aloísio miram vitae innocéntiam pari cum pæniténtia sociásti: ejus méritis et précibus concéde; ut, innocéntem non secúti, pœniténtem imitémur.

O God, Distributor of heavenly gifts, Who in the angelic youth Aloysius combined a wonderful innocence of life with penance, grant to his merits and prayers that we, who have not followed him in innocence, may imitate his penance.

What wisdom the Church has. Of course, there are those who equal Aloysius in purity of soul, and even, I would think, surpass him. I’m one of those who don’t come anywhere near his clarity of vision, his agility of soul. That’s one of the reasons why he’s a patron of the hermitage. A good reason, no?

Take note of the vesting prayers for Mass, in particular that of the cincture:

Præcinge me, Domine, cingulo puritatis, et exstingue in lumbis meis humorem libidinis; ut maneat in me virtus continentiæ et castitatis.

Gird me, O Lord, with the cincture of purity, and extinguish within me all evil desires, that the virtue of continence and chastity may abide in me.

We must pray that all priests might always have this virtue, no? We want all priests to have that purity of soul, that agility of spirit whereby we priests might all take in what is happening at the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, no?

I remember I was very quietly saying this very prayer in the sacristy of the chapel of Saint Gabriel in preparation for Holy Mass. A gentleman came into the sacristy who wanted to know what hymns were to be sung. He stopped himself from enquiring about this, and decided to berate me for praying such prayers, since that belonged to another time and we just don’t do that kind of thing anymore. Really? Today we don’t need these prayers? Really?

I remember that in the dark years of the latter half of the 20th century, Saint Aloysius was singled out to be mocked by those who should know better. They almost equated purity with being effeminate. This is really stupid. Only the most manly can be pure with the grace of God. I contend that people are scared to death of purity not so much because they won’t be able to indulge themselves in sensuality, but especially because they are afraid of the agility of soul that they would have, permitting them, by the Lord’s grace, to see what the wounds of Christ’s Passion and Death were and are all about. This is a crushing reality of truth and charity for those who are impure, but the weight of the glory of God bringing one into humble reverence before our Redeemer for those who are thankful in the Lord’s grace.

The artwork I chose for this post reflects his preoccupation at the end of his life. It is how he died, caring for those thrown away. He died of the plague he thus contracted, a man’s man expressing Christ’s love. Good on him.

If I remember correctly, that artwork is to be found in Santo Spirito in Saxia hospital on the Tiber River near the Vatican, where he did a bit of his care for the sick. It was in that very hospital where I myself was a patient. It was like being on the receiving end of his saintly ministrations. The nursing staff, however, were not expressive of the purity of Saint Aloysius. Yikes! I think that he should be a patron saint of health care workers.

Leave a Comment

Filed under saints

Saint who? Romuald? Born before electricity? What’s that got to do with Holy Souls Hermitage blogging?

“Saint Romuald was an Italian hermit born around 950 A.D. The son of aristocratic parents, Saint Romuald indulged as a lavish and thoughtless youth. Shocked by witnessing his father win a dual, Saint Romuald fled to a local abbey and entered religious life. Drawn to eremitic simplicity, he traveled through Italy reforming monasteries and eventually founded the Camaldolese Order. As Saint Peter Damian described, Saint Romuald’s goal was to, “…turn the whole world into a hermitage, and make all the multitude of the people associates of the monastic order” (divineoffice.org) :)

Not everyone will know that the great saint kind of more or less hermit (though admittedly super incredibly austere) not only has his feast today in the Novus Ordo, but had his feast for one year on this date in a post-tridentine calendar just a bit after the reforms. His feast was then transferred to the date of the transfer of his relics.

Leave a Comment

Filed under saints

The arrogant hell of universal salvation – the heaven of humble thanksgiving for the few being saved

O.K. folks! You want a cool (so to speak) fire and brimstone sermon that will shake you up? http://olrl.org/snt_docs/fewness.shtml That’s the great Saint Leo of Port Maurice. Super wonderful.

Now then, having read that most Yikesfull sermon, see the post AND comments of the post: Why would a nice priest go to hell? – Yikes! - HERE!

It’s about humble thanksgiving for Mary’s Son, about enthusiastic friendship with Him! Look to Him!

But, that’s only if you’re brave enough to have a serious thought for the day…

I double dare you!

Yep. This thought for the day is like extreme sport fully sick awesomeness.

1 Comment

Filed under Catholic, saints, Spiritual Life

The Feast of the Immaculate Heart of Mary on Holy Souls Mountain

[re-posted from last August]

An Extraordinary Mass today. She is Queen, of course, because she is the Immaculate Mother!

After a year or two, I might ask for a special indult for Holy Souls Hermitage, that I might be able to have an appropriate liturgical calendar, including feasts of some of the saints not on the calendar, and raising the level of certain feasts (such as the Immaculate Heart of Mary). I would also ask for a privilege which I noted in the 1962 rubrics concerning certain Masses offered at various shrines (such as Lourdes). Some Masses, such as those for the Holy Souls, for priests and bishops and the Supreme Pontiff, would then be possible on more days.

Like Son, like Mother, and vice versa…

The understanding in my becoming a hermit, besides prayer for priests, etc., was that I would write and write and write and write, particularly about the Immaculate and sorrowful heart of Christ our God’s Virgin Mother. This will involve detailed commentaries on Genesis and Luke. I can’t wait!

In my spiritual direction for the guys up at the Pontifical College Josephinum, I would emphasize how to go about developing a lively childlike devotion to the Immaculate and Sorrowful heart of Mary. We are afraid of such purity because it can bring such great pain… Mary had such clear spiritual vision, such agility of soul, that she could see her Divine Son for who He is: God Himself, who loves us so very much. She could also see, perfectly, and in contrast, all the sin of mankind from the first man to the last, seeing this all at once on the crucified Body of her Son. There is no one who could ever have been more sorrowful than she, precisely because she her heart was so immaculate. Her heart was pierced by a sword of sorrow (see Luke 2,35).

Lamentations 1,12 (NAB) “Come, all you who pass by the way, look and see Whether there is any suffering like my suffering, which has been dealt me When the LORD afflicted me on the day of his blazing wrath.”

Now, all this is not to say that Mary had no joy! In fact, it was because she knew such joy — the joy of being with our Lord, the joy of doing the will of our heavenly Father, the joy of being in His grace — … it was because of that great joy that she so wanted to share this joy with us. We however, were of a different opinion, in our sin, causing her great anguish. How very, very joyful she is when we are her good children in the grace of her Divine Son.

What a joy it is to be the cause, however indirectly, of the joy of such a Mother! Thanks, Immaculate Mary, for having interceded for me, for us, and for continuing that prayer to this very moment!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Immaculate Conception, saints

UPDATE: Praying for a happy death ["happy death"?!] Saint Joseph and the Immaculate Conception!

A reader writes about that to which I, of course, agreed:

PLEASE! Emergency Chaplet [of the Immaculate Conception]! For the husband of a pro-life warrior…..was not expected to live past Monday. Too weak for further treatment. So grateful that you told us about this powerful offering.

UPDATE: Liz writes: Prayers for the grace of a happy death for my mother as well, please! She is nonresponsive and not breathing on her own. Also prayers please for the family and our differing opinions, that we all seek God’s will instead of our own. Thank you and prayers for the above mentioned person.

On occasion, we might want to offer that chaplet for all who are to die this day. Our Lady, of course, knows more about death and dying than all of us put together. Saint Joseph surely died in her arms, and she held… Jesus…

I remember a priest forbidding the Ave Maria to be sung during/after Holy Communion at a funeral for the stated reason that Mary has nothing to do with the Mass, particularly a funeral Mass. I appealed to him again when I heard he had said this to a family, saying that we Catholics ask our Lady umpteen gazillion times during our lives to “…pray for us now and at the hour of our death. Amen!” He wasn’t in the least impressed, citing “liturgists.” I’ve always made sure to include the Ave Maria in any funeral I’ve done. Yikes!

Having said that, Saint Joseph has always been hailed as the patron saint of a happy death, that is, a well provided for death, in which one is in the state of grace and ready to meet one’s Maker. The reason for the happiness in his case is that surely he had Jesus and Mary right there while he was dying. In praying to him, we are asking for the grace of final perseverence for ourselves and those who are in their last agony. I’ve edited the following prayer just a bit to make it easier to say for someone who is dying right now:

ETERNAL Father, by the love Thou bearest toward St. Joseph,
who was chosen by Thee from among all men to exercise Thy
divine fatherhood over the Thy Son made Man, have mercy on
N. and upon all poor souls who are in their agony.

Our Father . . . Hail Mary . . . Glory Be . . .

ETERNAL Son of God, by the love Thou bearest toward
St. Joseph, who was Thy most faithful guardian upon earth,
have mercy on N. and upon all poor souls who are in their agony.

Our Father . . . Hail Mary . . . Glory Be . . .

ETERNAL Spirit of God, by the love Thou bearest toward
St. Joseph, who guarded with such tender care most holy Mary,
Thy beloved spouse, have mercy on N. and upon all poor souls who are in their agony.

Our Father . . . Hail Mary . . . Glory Be . . .

8 Comments

Filed under saints