Category Archives: politics

JUST IMPEACH OBAMA

Just impeach Obama:

The IRS official who led the tax-exempt organizations unit when Tea Party groups were targeted is now in charge of the IRS office responsible for ObamaCare, two Capitol Hill sources tell Fox News.

In other words, if you’re Catholic and don’t pay into Obama’s abortion super-fund via Obamacare, this henchman will cut you down. It’s a promotion for him.

Just impeach Obama. Do it now.

14 Comments

Filed under news, Persecution, politics

Update: ANONYMOUS instigates attack on Catholic Ordination: Seminarians I taught

guy fawkes mask anonymous googled image

Two seminarians whom I taught and advised — good friends — at the Pontifical College Josephinum in Columbus, Ohio, will be ordained today to the transitional diaconate at 7:00 PM. (May 3, 2013). Prayers for them, please! Hail Mary…

ANONYMOUS has scheduled a protest to “occupy” Cathedral Square in downtown Columbus during this time. Cowards. They hide behind masks and computer screens.

ANONYMOUS say they are protesting the firing for breach of contract of a recently self-identified homosexualist from a Catholic school, but, in all reality, they are capitalizing on the ordination of two seminarians so as to make their point that they are going to fight the Catholic Church as such. And to start their onslaught, they are attacking two individuals, my friends, who have absolutely nothing to do with any of this. This means that ANONYMOUS is a group of absolute total cowards.

Some wise direction that was sent out to all involved:

We have been made aware of a potential protest for the Diaconate Ordination this evening. The group Anonymous [...asked...] for people who support “gay marriage” to “occupy” Cathedral Square starting at 4 pm. [...] As you may well be aware, these protests sometimes turn violent. The protesters are simply out to cause a scene and to cause emotional damage to the Catholic community as a whole. Their goal will be to engage anyone who is willing, and then to quickly bring about shame or harm. I cannot emphasize this enough, please do not engage the protesters in any way. It is what they want, and no matter how much you wish to evangelize or defend the Church they are not willing to participate in a fruitful discussion of any kind. When you pass by them, if you feel compelled to say anything, it should be no more than “hello” or “good afternoon.” But even this will invite unwanted responses from them.

Yes, well. That’s a bit naive as well. I mean, these kind of professional protesters can send in those who look like they want to support the Ordination Mass, getting escorted into the Cathedral, but then, just before going inside, purposely engage ANONYMOUS, even violently, so that ANONYMOUS looks to be the victim.

ANONYMOUS made use of a terroristic threat in the event that the Diocese of Columbus does not cave into the request of ANONYMOUS to run the Catholic Church and trash its doctrines and morals. Making a terroristic threat is a felony of the third degree in the State of Ohio:

2909.23 Making terroristic threat.

(A) No person shall threaten to commit or threaten to cause to be committed a specified offense when both of the following apply:

(1) The person makes the threat with purpose to do any of the following:

(a) Intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

(b) Influence the policy of any government by intimidation or coercion;

(c) Affect the conduct of any government by the threat or by the specified offense.

(2) As a result of the threat, the person causes a reasonable expectation or fear of the imminent commission of the specified offense.

(B) It is not a defense to a charge of a violation of this section that the defendant did not have the intent or capability to commit the threatened specified offense or that the threat was not made to a person who was a subject of the threatened specified offense.

(C) Whoever violates this section is guilty of making a terroristic threat, a felony of the third degree. Section 2909.25 of the Revised Code applies regarding an offender who is convicted of or pleads guilty to a violation of this section.

Effective Date: 05-15-2002

Those who associate with ANONYMOUS in the present protest may be liable for felony proceedings. Penalties run from nine months to three years. I think everyone in a mask or otherwise causing trouble should be arrested forthwith if they anywhere near the Cathedral. The Super-Max Department of Corrections facility just to the West of Columbus could surely hold them all.

I would also say to the homosexualist one-time teacher who was fired: If you don’t immediately repudiate the terroristic threats of ANONYMOUS, who make it seem that they are speaking on your behalf, well then, that would make it seem that you yourself are the one who has brought them in on this situation. If you are associated with this, I mean, how dare you threaten my friends? I’m personally offended. And this is the way that you want to get reinstated as a Catholic teacher? Anonymous thinks it is the way for sure. Think about it. ANONYMOUS hates you, and is stomping on you in every way. You’re being used and abused by ANONYMOUS.

While analyzing the diatribe of ANONYMOUS, I note that there was an indication that ANONYMOUS has a professional, that is, salaried core group, with everyone else being their puppets. This is a dangerous group. If mercenaries are paid to be violent, they will be.

Threats have been coming into the school itself for days. And that would be consistent with ANONYMOUS. Threatening to interfere with a place which children frequent is what terrorists do. Yep. It’s always the children. Always. And this isn’t just another Sandy Hook incident with some crazy guy. Instead, this is an international terrorist group. And it’s pre-meditated. I hope the police can stop them and their puppets in their tracks.

possible LGBT puppets of the terrorist group ANONYMOUS

What will ANONYMOUS do in a situation like this, as retaliation for them not becoming the head of the Catholic Church? They’ll do what they so often do, as reported by those who have been attacked by ANONYMOUS, and that is to hack into websites and plaster homosexual porn all over the screens of the various pages of the websites. And then they go further. They go out of their way to push the police into using tear gas and, in various venues around the world, even live ammunition.

Why do they do that?

Because that’s the kind of person you would want in your local grade school teaching your kids, right? Isn’t that their message?

And, really, why bother the seminarians? Because ANONYMOUS is at war with the Catholic Church.

Update: Protesters were about — what? — a dozen? Those in masks were, like, maybe two or three in number. So sad altogether. I see that they’re blackmailing someone with already public information to be “revealed” on Monday.

3 Comments

Filed under Catholic, homosexuality, news, politics, seminarians, terrorism, Vocations

Fisking the lyrics of Leonard Cohen’s Hallelujah with animatronic Sarah Palin and Larry King: taking on the most popular song of all time for the new evangelization

duel steven spielberg

From Steven Spielberg’s *Duel* — Shooting someone who outdrew you…

I have the opinion that http://holysoulshermitage.com boasts of some of the most incisive readers/commenters on the internet. I have a little project that needs some feedback, some tweaking of Leonard Cohen’s Hallelujah.

Just before Christmas of 2010, when I was teaching at the Pontifical College Josephinum, I was invited by the seminarians to be one of the presenters for the popular culture night they put on, the idea of the event being to analyze a villainous point of culture.  Surprising many, I chose to critique Leonard Cohen’s Hallelujah, which is nearly the all-time all-time most popular song ever. Just the very first page of YouTube alone counts up hundreds of millions of hits.

The version I played for the seminarians is sung by Kurt Nilsen, Espen Lind, Askil Holm and Alejandro Fuentes. Another version was used in Shrek. It’s been an ultra favorite of the popular talent shows such as American Idol, Britain’s Got Talent, and dozens of television and stage and radio productions.

Here are the highly poetic words, extremely condensed statements which were continuously rewritten, Leonard Cohen says of himself, in great anxiety and agony. You really have to stare at each word for quite a while:

1. I heard there was a secret cord that David played and it pleased the Lord. But you don’t care for music do ya? Well, it goes like this, the fourth, the fifth, the minor fall and the major lift. The baffled king composing, “Hallelujah!” Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah!

2. Your faith was strong but you needed proof. You saw her bathing on the roof. Her beauty and the moonlight overthrew ya. Well, she tied you to a kitchen chair. She broke your throne and she cut your hair. And from your lips she drew the “Hallelujah!” Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah!

3. Well, maybe there’s a God above. But all I’ve ever learned from love is how to shoot somebody who outdrew ya. It’s not a cry that you hear at night. It’s not somebody whose seen the light. It’s a cold and it’s a broken “Hallelujah!” Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah!

My analysis in part depended on an article by my friend, Father Louis V. Iasiello, O.F.M., retired Two Star Admiral, one time Head Chaplain for the entire Department of Defense, and now laboring in the Lord’s vineyard by helping out with the formation of the seminarians at the Pontifical College Josephinum. Here’s the *.pdf of the article of Father Louis V. Iasiello, O.F.M. on “Betrayal of Trust - David and Bathsheba Revisited” at the New Theology Review, 2008.2. (Betrayal of Trust–  David and Bathsheba Revisited – PDF).

Anyway, here’s the video critique of these verses of Leonard Cohen’s song that I created myself. You might have to watch it a couple of times to get all the nuances. The “text” voices of the characters aren’t always as clear as I would have liked them to be. You might have to adjust the volume a bit.

So, given that, I wonder if it would be helpful to tweak the words just a bit, just one or two, here and there, to readjust the theology to be a bit more in line with what is actually found in the books of Judges and Samuel. I have a rather mighty project in mind with a number of super-talented people. Heh heh heh.

Any no-secret-cords-attached suggestions to offer? Think about it. You can do it.

4 Comments

Filed under evangelization, interreligious dialogue, Military, politics, Spiritual Life, videos

But that terrorist Boston bomber guy is such a nice guy! Don’t be such a meanie!

boston marathon terrorist bomber dzhokhar googled image

This is the nice-guy stare, a bit smirky, knowing he’s going to kill you oh so very soon.

Surely, you’ve seen the commentary that terrorists are all nice guys, especially this guy — What a nice guy! — just looking for a bit of adventure, for something bigger than themselves, and for an escape from a life that sucks in whatever way. It’s said that it couldn’t possibly ever have anything to do with Islam of whatever form of whatever interpretation, since Islam is always nice just like these nice guys. What could radicalize them into doing something that isn’t nice?

But that’s an inconsistent question, assuming in their argument that what is at the root of Islam (root=radical) is violence, though these commentators insist that Islam is nice.

Given that prevailing confusion, which is so politically correct, which is so very unhelpful, would it not be more helpful to find out something about what’s to be found with that which is at the root of Islam? Is this to be avoided because it might not be considered to be nice by the ostriches with their heads in the sand?

Just to say, nicey-nice commentators just tend to upset terrorist types enough to commit terrorist acts. Terrorist types don’t like being called nice. They don’t want to be nice. Nicey-niceness just so does not belong to their outlook. It’s not what they’re about. To be nicey-nice is to be an infidel. To be nicey-nice puts a target on one’s head.

Claiming nicey-niceness for terrorists won’t achieve nicey-niceness. It’s a bit counterproductive. Kind of like reverse psychology.

(1) Nicey-nice person: “You’re nice!”

(2) Terrorist type: “And you’re dead!” (and the bomb explodes…)

I think people should stop with the pop-psychology and do some serious study to see what’s actually in the Qur’an, etc.

Update: 8:42 PM Suspect in custody.

Update: I wonder if the existence of any anti-Islamic youtube videos will be used by the defense as proof that the terrorist had no choice but to kill innocent people.

14 Comments

Filed under politics, terrorism

France’s non-*liberal* “socialists” smacking down continuing protests of “gay-marriage” by homosexuals

It seems that the only ones pushing for “gay-marriage” in France are the more Marxist types among the socialists, who demonstrate thereby the tyranny of the so-called liberal agenda. France’s Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité pushes anything but.

gay marriage protests in paris - h-t guardian

“Violent protests” have continued the other week. So violent were the huge crowds that they held up… um… you know… balloons (Oooooo!!!) and signs (Oooooo!!!) and banners (Oooooo!!!). They were tear-gassed, sprayed down and beaten down.

Sorry for the vulgarity, but this is like peeing into the wind...

Sorry for the vulgarity, but this is like peeing into the wind…

And mind you, the protesters were also made up of active homosexuals who want nothing to do with any “gay marriage”. They also know that children come from a mother and a father, both of whom have different gifts to offer on so very many levels, from which the children learn, on so many levels. Homosexuals in France recognize this and support one-man one-woman marriage for the sake of the children.

The few bullies in the French government pushing for gay marriage seem to be beholden to the American President, Barack Obama. Strange, that, for France. I wonder why that is. Perhaps because Obama incarnates the French socialist agenda.

6 Comments

Filed under homosexuality, politics

Obama Calls on Boy Scouts to Welcome Homosexuals

Obama Calls on Boy Scouts to Welcome Homosexuals

Feb 3, 2013 /

By Todd Starnes

 

President Obama called on the Boy Scouts to open their ranks to homosexuals.

His response came during an interview ahead of Super Bowl XLVII. CBS News’ Scott Pelley asked the president if scouting should be open to gays.

“Yes,” the president replied. “Gays and lesbians should have access and opportunity the same way everyone else does.”

BSA national leaders are meeting this week in Dallas to discuss lifting a ‘no-gay’ ban on both members and leaders.

On Monday a group of 42 religious groups will publish a half-page ad in USA Today calling on the Scouts to resist political and economic pressures to lift the ban.

The group is taking out a major advertising buy tomorrow denouncing the Scouts’ decision to consider changing their longstanding policy prohibiting openly gay Scout leaders or Scouts.

“To the Boy Scouts of America: Show courage,” the advertisement read. “Stand firm for timeless values.”

The Supreme Court upheld the Boy Scouts’ rights to determine their own membership standards – but that hasn’t stopped opponents from putting fierce pressure on the group.

“How will parents be able to entrust their children to the Boy Scouts if they trade the well-being of the boys for corporate dollars,” the group asked. “To compromise moral principles under political and financial pressure would teach boys cowardice, not courage. Every parent concerned about guiding and protecting their own children should also be alarmed by the proposed change to Boy Scout policy.”

Last year, the BSA confirmed that the “vast majority of the parents” of BSA members “reserve to themselves the right to introduce and give guidance on sexual topics.”

Related posts:

  1. Religious Groups Warn Boy Scouts Not To Change ‘No-Gay’ Policy
  2. Texas Gov. Perry says Boy Scouts Should Keep No-Gay Policy
  3. Southern Baptists Furious At Possible Change in Scouts No-Gays Policy
  4. Churches Struggle with Possible Change in Boy Scouts No-Gay Policy
  5. Obama calls Conscience Clause for Military Chaplains “Ill-Advised”

HSH comment: When a sitting President wants to put pressure on private groups for political points, you know that we have a budding dictator on our hands. Putting militant homosexualists in charge of young boys is criminal on so very many levels. Why isn’t Obama impeached?

2 Comments

Filed under homosexuality, news, politics

Bill Donohue on HHS revision of abortion mandate

New HHS Rules Welcomed

February 1, 2013
Bill Donohue comments on the revised rules, announced today, regarding the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate:

The rules proposed today by HHS appear to go a long way toward rectifying the most problematic provisions of the mandate. Essentially, the rules provide insularity for Catholic institutions: they will not be directly involved in providing health insurance coverage for contraception, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs.

Perhaps the most welcome aspect of the new strictures is the elimination of the criteria that define what constitutes a religious institution. Gone altogether is the highly objectionable definition that excludes an exemption for those religious entities that hire and serve mostly people of other religions. As has been pointed out many times, this definition punishes Catholic institutions for not discriminating against Jews, Protestants, Muslims, Mormons, agnostics, and atheists.

The new rules now simply revert to the established understanding of a religious employer as defined by the IRS. This makes eminently good sense.

Still unresolved is the issue of private employers who invoke a religious objection to providing insurance coverage for services they deem morally objectionable. Because the new rules have not been finalized, and there is an opportunity for further public discussion, more progress may yet be made.

While many aspects of the new proposal need to be examined before a final conclusion can be rendered, the decision to expand religious exemptions, and to adopt the IRS definition of a religious institution, is a sign of goodwill by the Obama administration toward the Catholic community.

HSH Comment: Actually, I just think Obama figured out that he was going to lose in court, so instead of being slammed down by the courts again, he took the hit, kind of, for he can still play with it for months. And, actually, the court cases can still go forward since nothing is finalized yet, and, therefore, the penalties still apply, right?

2 Comments

Filed under Catholic, news, politics, Pro-Life

Buahh ha ha! Disconected politicians and a salute to farmers. America follows Australia (sigh)

cattle guards emailed image

The great C.W. mailed this in: Cattle guards are horizontal steel rails placed at fence openings, in dug-out places in the roads adjacent to highways (sometimes across highways), to prevent cattle from crossing over that area. For some reason the cattle will not step on the “guards,” probably because they fear getting their feet caught between the rails.

In 2008, Kevin Rudd received and was reading a report that there were over 10,000 cattle guards over main roads in NSW & Queensland. Graziers had protested his proposed changes in grazing policies, so he ordered the Minister to fire half of the cattle guards immediately!!

Before the Minister could respond and presumably try to straighten him out, Minister for Employment Julia Gillard, intervened with a request that before any cattle guards were fired, they be given six months of retraining.

And now she is running the country.

* * *

And now, for Paul Harvey at his very best: A Salute To Farmers. I’ve put this up before, but it is so good, it bears repeating.

* * *

Even more disconnected from reality are those politicians who, attempting to be politically correct, fanatically make aborting humanity the goal of their lives, even while not only are most people pro-life, but the natural law to which these politicians are also beholden demands respect for life. But they run like blind cattle across the yawning abyss of hell, and get their feet caught up, and sink down. Not a pretty sight. Today we also pray for their conversion. Good, decent farmers wouldn’t want their politicians to be condemned, just that they get to know reality sooner than later, for everybody’s benefit.

2 Comments

Filed under politics, Pro-Life, videos

Sir Thomas More & Justice Antonin Gregory Scalia at Obama’s Inauguration = But God first

saint thomas more judge scalia

4 Comments

2013/01/22 · 10:42

Full video and text of Martin Luther King Jr’s I Have a Dream speech. I would love to have him as president instead of Obama the racist

That’s the full video. The following is the full text. But first, just to say, MLKJr, who was pro-life, is everything that Obama is not. Only racists want the vast majority of abortion clinics in black neighborhoods as a method of genocide, and that’s what Obama the racist is all about. Instead, MLKJr, had this to say:

* * *

I am happy to join with you today in what will go down in history as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation.

Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity.

But one hundred years later, the Negro still is not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languished in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land. And so we’ve come here today to dramatize a shameful condition.

In a sense we’ve come to our nation’s capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the “unalienable Rights” of “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note, insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check, a check which has come back marked “insufficient funds.”

But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. And so, we’ve come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice.

We have also come to this hallowed spot to remind America of the fierce urgency of Now. This is no time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism. Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. Now is the time to make justice a reality for all of God’s children.

It would be fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment. This sweltering summer of the Negro’s legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality. Nineteen sixty-three is not an end, but a beginning. And those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam and will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual. And there will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights. The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges.

But there is something that I must say to my people, who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice: In the process of gaining our rightful place, we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again, we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.

The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to a distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny. And they have come to realize that their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom.

We cannot walk alone.

And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead.

We cannot turn back.

There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, “When will you be satisfied?” We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality. We can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities. We cannot be satisfied as long as the negro’s basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one. We can never be satisfied as long as our children are stripped of their self-hood and robbed of their dignity by signs stating: “For Whites Only.” We cannot be satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New York believes he has nothing for which to vote. No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until “justice rolls down like waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells. And some of you have come from areas where your quest — quest for freedom left you battered by the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality. You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the faith that unearned suffering is redemptive. Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed.

Let us not wallow in the valley of despair, I say to you today, my friends.

And so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.

I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.”

I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia, the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.

I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

I have a dream today!

I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of “interposition” and “nullification” — one day right there in Alabama little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers.

I have a dream today!

I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, and every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight; “and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed and all flesh shall see it together.”

This is our hope, and this is the faith that I go back to the South with.

With this faith, we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith, we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.

And this will be the day — this will be the day when all of God’s children will be able to sing with new meaning:

My country ’tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing.

Land where my fathers died, land of the Pilgrim’s pride,

From every mountainside, let freedom ring!

And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true.

And so let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire.

Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York.

Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania.

Let freedom ring from the snow-capped Rockies of Colorado.

Let freedom ring from the curvaceous slopes of California.

But not only that:

Let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia.

Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee.

Let freedom ring from every hill and molehill of Mississippi.

From every mountainside, let freedom ring.

And when this happens, when we allow freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual:

Free at last! Free at last!

Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!

[N.B. There seems to be some sort of copyright dispute about this. Whatever it is, I'm not selling this blog post. In fact, I may well make some enemies by putting it up. I put this up on the blog just because I think it's pretty cool. Whoever thinks they own the copyright can ask me to take it down, and I certainly will do so immediately. I would just like to let his words ring out. That's all.]

Leave a Comment

Filed under politics, Pro-Life, racism, videos

An obervation about HSH, the NYT and the Holocaust

I just find it interesting that the article I put up back in November 2012 detailing the complicity of the New York Times in the Holocaust back in the day — and with an attitude that I prove continues to this day — is daily since that time high up or even number one in the blog stats. The first paragraph:

The upshot of this article: Not only was The New York Times run by Holocaust denying Nazi sympathizers during and after World War II, but this is still the case today, with the particularly tragic edge of sarcasm and cynicism known only to those who defend their crimes against humanity. It is not too harsh to speak of sympathy with Hitler when the most powerful mass media instrument of the day downplayed and buried and, indeed, effectively denied that there was anything even like a Final Solution, as Hitler called his genocide. And that denial is, of course, a crime.

You can access the rest of that post on this blog, HERE.

Leave a Comment

Filed under news, Persecution, politics

Catholic Pro-Life Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli says his bishop needs to go to jail over the Obamacare abortion mandate

lion wdtprs

I love it when I see the Lion of the Tribe of Judah among the beloved of His sheepfold, having them lay down their lives out of love for the brethren, in this way confirming them in the faith. The grace of our Lord has His shepherds die to themselves so as to live for the Head and members of the Mystical Body of Christ.

For a spectacular article on the status quo of the developing Kristallnacht against all people of good will, see this FoxNews story: HERE.

1 Comment

Filed under Catholic, news, Persecution, politics, Pro-Life

Autobiography – Chapter 5 – The Living Dead and coming to know the Prince of the Most Profound Peace

lourdes - sky

Lourdes during a 2012 pilgrimage — You’ll meet many of the walking dead at Lourdes. They couldn’t be more alive. So many do not look for any entitlements for health and well being when they meet their fellow pilgrims, but rather ask the Lord that others be healed. To put it in the words of the Para-rescue Jumpers: “That Others May Live.”

[Some will have seen just a few of these paragraphs before. Sorry!]

Many a priest has joked with me that I’m an expert at finding a dark cloud behind every silver lining, even if that silver lining is so blindingly bright that no one else can possibly see a cloud of any kind. As an example, a Cardinal once invited me to go with him to a rendition of Georg Friedrich Händel’s Messiah in the Paul VI Audience Hall in Vatican City, with the Holy Father, Pope John Paul II, in attendance.

Paul VI Audience Hall

Paul VI Audience Hall

● The more wonderfully the orchestra played, the more I thought of the minuscule canister prisons for bishops and priests in China.
● The more finesse was radiated by the director, the more I thought of the horrific street mafias in Calcutta, purposely maiming the children they stole from the other part of the city so as to make them look more pitiable for begging purposes.
● The more exalting to the heavens were the vocalists, the more I thought of the Site Solèy of Haïti and, along with earth-quakes, hurricanes, flooding and epidemics, its highly manipulated poverty.

This was not, however, the existential conundrum it must seem to be. Instead, it was a vision of God’s love. Here He was, entering the world, born to die, to bring us to life. The further I saw that He had to reach to get us, especially in our sin, the more thanksgiving filled my heart and soul, rejoicing in His great love. After the concert, I mentioned what I had been thinking about to the Cardinal, but he simply told me not to do that, just to enjoy the music. I protested until he got the point about Christmas, and he did get it, in the end.

* * *

I only mention such irony in case someone might feel sorry for me because of what I am now to recount, which is that I have a certain extremely rare malady which, although it has never interfered with the exercise of my priestly ministry – nor was it ever viewed as a point against me – is rather annoying for its inconvenience.

terror googled image

Just too sad.

I call it the exploding disease, which has nothing to do with the ultra-sad use of kids by terrorists. More on that in another chapter, please God.

Instead, various parts of my body can basically just explode, well, over the course of some days, in slow motion, just to the point of the skin actually bursting, so that white blood cells begin to ooze through the skin. When it happens to a hand or a foot, it’s not so bad, just inconvenient. The gut is worse, as I then have to shut down for a few days. When it happens in the face people get nervous, frightened even, and turn away. When it happens in the esophagus – which can only take minutes – the probability of dying from suffocation is a clear and present danger. My mom died that way. I’ve been close to death for this reason as many as twenty-five times. People with this die in the emergency room because the nurses turn their backs for a couple of minutes and then it’s all over.

The possibility of dying at any time puts a bit of an edge on things that some others cannot begin to understand, what with having had no health problems, and even having avoided those who did all their lives. Suffering can be a real education about the possibilities of the depths and shallowness of fallen mankind, an enlightenment as to the enduring value of the life of any man regardless of the circumstances of what the egotistic, arrogant, power mongering escapists call “quality of life,” but only so as to think that they have the right to murder by “euthanasia” those who would remind them of their own mortality. No, no. Every man has inestimable value, always, and in every circumstance, especially, I might add, when the going gets tough.

There is a number of medicines for this hereditary malady. One costs about USA $70,000.00 a month, and requires haz-mat handling. So… no. There is another, which is, however, carcinogenic among a thousand other side effects. Maximum recommended window for using this med is, I think, five months. I’ve been taking it daily for decades. It works, to a degree. It’s effectiveness can be overridden if I am exhausted, for instance, from extensive travels with luggage filled with reference books (as was my practice), or by blunt trauma, such as any day to day injury one might otherwise ignore while, say, piling up mountains of massive, double-length logs. Yikes!

wood2

One day the medicine will not work at all, or I will not have the medicine available, and then I will probably die within days. Simple as that. Or I could go to my judgment in, say, twenty minutes from now. I don’t know. It’s pretty quick.

Putting up with this as a child was easy in that kids can quickly get used to anything. They have no sense of being entitled to anything other than total respect, which is only right. They don’t take themselves seriously and just get on with life, doing what kids do within their means, as best they can, in whatever daily hilarity may come their way. Who of us can say that as adults. This is great for an examination of conscience before Jesus, for a prayer that we might be as little children and set about doing the best we can in His friendship regardless of any circumstances.

Coming to know that one is a member of the living dead because others are concerned for you, well, that’s another thing. The last thing a kid wants is to be smothered with concern. It was confusing then, and is aggravating now. If I died, I died. What’s the big deal? God loves us! Let’s go meet Him! If there is anxiety, it is only because others have anxiety. Bad example, that. Kids shouldn’t be burdened with the tunnel-vision of adults, but rather encouraged with a bright outlook, with enthusiasm for life regardless of anything that might be going on.

I remember defending myself quite adamantly for my three and a half years of age when my family was trying to come to grips with my exploding disease, feeling sorry for me. I insisted that I was fine. I knew I didn’t want what seemed to be their own feeling sorry for themselves in having to feel sorry for me, however genuine their concern for me also was. I wanted them to know that my spirit was just as rambunctious as ever. If they wanted to be in solidarity with me, it would have to be their rejoicing in the ferocity of my spirit. I did not want to be reduced to a medical condition. Not being able to put this into words, I was frustrated with exclamations such as “Poor little Jordan!” I wasn’t “poor little Jordan.” I was just me! I didn’t want anyone to care in the least about some stupid exploding disease! I sure didn’t. Kids overlook such things. Attitudes behind “poor little Jordon” rob children of their childhood, piling the narrow-mindedness of “adult” anxieties onto them.

The irony is that I saw God’s love all the more because of all this. And that is still the case. Three and half years old or more than half of a century doesn’t make any difference when it comes to God’s love. The effects of original sin, so very manifest, only had me look to Him all the more, with all the more humility, all the more trust, all the more simplicity, all the more thanksgiving for His having come among even us. As it should be.

There are times,  of course, when I’m totally self-centered and blind, looking to myself for strength, tempted to feel sorry for myself. That darkness — which is truly horrific in its stagnant, fetid loss of a sense of self before God — becomes all the more reason to thank the Lord, that is, when finally I note His invitation to me, once again, to take note of His goodness and kindness.

My family got over the “poor little Jordan” thing, and didn’t go near it again. Thank God. I could be a little kid again.

* * *

deer in garage googled image

Some months later, in the autumn, after the opening day of deer season, two of my friends from next door breathlessly arrived at the garage door of our house, and dragged me over to their garage. There they were, five fully gralloshed deer carcasses hanging from the low rafters right down to their own pools of blood on the cement floor, some with antlers, some without. They were preparing some venison steaks and filling up the freezers they had for the purpose. I thought that this kind of death was just magnificent. On the one hand, it was a bit distressing, as it is always great to see wildlife living in the wild. On the other hand, it just had something right about it, as the venison would taste really good. It wasn’t long before my own family was hunting up in Northern Minnesota and shared the joy of a gralloshed deer carcase hanging up on a makeshift gallows made out of downed tree branches.

Sometime later, perhaps a couple of years later, I was brought to see the movie Bambi in a nasty little theater on the East side of Saint Germain Street in downtown Saint Cloud. Even at that young age I felt like I was being manipulated, like I was supposed to hate the hunter in the film. I immediately developed a rather severe distaste for anything Disney. In later years, when we moved out of town, closer to Lake Wobegon, I would often take out the variety of weapons we had at home, mostly rifles and shot guns, and bring them to the fields and forests around the house, shooting at various targets for practice. Just about the first day I could own a gun legally, at twelve years of age at that time in Minnesota, I had one, having gone through a course of gun safety and marksmanship in the basement of the local VFW.

Mind you, my heart would thrill upon seeing, for instance, a mighty buck crashing through a marsh, bounding over tangles of thorn bushes, flying around trees, only to stop and snort and smell the breeze and stamp its hooves, challenging all comers. I thought the gun, at that point, was a bit unfair, and that if I wanted something to eat, I would have to bring no more than a pocket knife, wrestling it to the ground with my bare hands. They certainly were not shy, especially in the evening, when their snorting and stomping would get quite loud, sometimes only thirty feet away or so.

While guns are always a reminder of original sin – with the ever present possibility of killing even another man – they can also make a positive contribution to the virtue of justice, as in a strong defense, even if it means killing another man. It’s not a case of a lesser of two evils: it’s a positive thing to do for society. It’s ugly, and sad that it has to be that way, but it’s the right thing to do, and should be rewarded in this life and the next.

* * *

jfk assassination googled imageIt wasn’t long after the deer carcases experiences that, on November 22, 1963, John F. Kennedy was assassinated. Although it was a Friday, my dad came home from work with the news right before lunch. My family was again in front of the television, and then on their way to Church. Imagine that.

They were telling me again and again what was happening and I was struggling to understand, bewildered, as if this couldn’t possibly be true. We were on our way out the door when all of a sudden I stopped everyone, turning around, almost shouting out with my three and half year old voice, “But who’s running the world?” Everyone stopped with confused looks on their faces, not knowing how to answer such a youngster. I cried out again, “Who’s running the world?” My dad asked what I meant and my mom, ever perceptive, asked an unspoken question with my name, “Jordan?” I said, all very anxiously, “The Pope is dead and the President is dead. Who’s running the world?”

Though I had been grieving for Pope John XXIII for many months (and regardless of Paul VI taking the reigns), my reaction to the news of our nation’s president’s death was instead rather utilitarian, what with the security of my family and of the nation at risk. This realization in itself – and I am referring to the awareness I had of this realization, as if taking a step back from myself– opened my eyes to a whole new universe of reflection at that young age, and I was filled with wonder at being able to take in such breadth of reality. I was overawed at man’s participation in the governance of nations and the world. But I felt no grief. Not for him. Not until I was to see the funeral procession.

I guess my family was just as surprised as myself at my new found geopolitical and pastoral urgency, and were dumbfounded for a few seconds as to how to answer my question concerning who was running the world. They looked at each other searching for an answer. Someone mumbled something about Pope Paul VI having been elected, but my mom talked over this and wisely said, “God. God is running the world, Jordan.” And then it hit me. Of course, it had to be God who was running the world. I connected the word “God” with the Someone who loved me so very much, even back in the day, half a lifetime ago for me, just the previous year, at that very special Sunday Mass. The rightful place of political personages before the sovereignty of God was firmly established in my neophyte perspective. I didn’t know I had things better figured out than the ex-president did in his campaign speech in Texas. I felt betrayed even decades later, when I read that speech of his. How dare a Catholic, who had been given such authority, so cleverly marginalize the Pope and God in society and in own his responsibilities?

JFK funeral procession limber and caisson googled image

As everyone raced out the door, my own heart and soul were lifted up to heaven, and I understood something of the majesty, of the goodness and kindness of the Providence of the God of the whole universe. Pope Paul VI? Yes, he was there, and I had nothing against him whatsoever. I was his papist son, after all. I knew he was Pope. Yet, I had the very strong sense that it is better that God is in charge of the Church, and that the Pope is but His humble servant. I didn’t know until some forty years later that these were the very words that Saint Robert Bellarmine, S.J., would use just a few years before his own death, during an incident that would later be reported in the process for his beatification. But we will get to that later. I vividly remember the funeral procession of President Kennedy, with the casket drawn by limber and caisson. Heart stopping was the salute of JFK Jr., who was just a bit older than myself.

JFK Jr salute

* * *

It was Christmas morning, before daybreak, and I was the only one awake in the whole house. I had already been awake for a good while, filled with a sense that sacred mysteries were being revealed. But then, in a flash, I jumped out of bed and got dressed. There I was, at three and half years old, sitting at the top of the steps again, all ready to go to Mass, reddish-brown boots for a cripple and all. My first thought on looking down the steps had been to rush down to see the Christmas presents below the tree, the edge of which I could see, all decorated and lit up. If I had gone down, I saw that I could have investigated the bulging Christmas stockings hanging just below me on the bannister of the stair case. But I couldn’t. It’s as if my guardian angel wanted me to sit there without distractions and just take in the mystery.

just me not yet four years old early 1960s

Today is the birthday of Jesus, of God, who loves me so much, came down to earth among us, now born. I was in quiet awe. I just sat and sat, my heart filled to overflowing. As the rest of the family started to wake up, they wondered why I was all dressed up, and when I protested that it was time to go to early Mass because Jesus was born today, I heard some sleepy mumblings about presents and Santa. Don’t get me wrong, I thought that was also super wonderful and I was very happy and grateful, and there were lots of hugs and kisses and thanks to go around when we opened the presents… but… Jesus was born today! I have often thought that I would have made a good donkey so that I could be right next to Jesus in the manger of Bethlehem.

Without even considering the problem of loss of faith, we, as adults, can have the temptation to think that not being in awe with the simplicity of a little child before the Sacred Mysteries being revealed by the Incarnation of Christ our God is somehow to be considered more sophisticated and intellectually adept at appreciating the articles of faith. But He who is Truth, is also Charity, whom we can get to know and love. To prescind on purpose from such a prayerful experience is, I think, one of the worst effects of original sin that man can suffer. It can only be countered with prayer, with the simplicity of, well, simply praying. Just lift up heart and soul to the Most High, even… right now…

* * *

Six and half weeks later, February 9, 1964, while I was not quite four years old, the Beatles appeared on the Ed Sullivan Show. I was down in the basement, sitting in an upholstered chair with a little card table in front of me. One of my half-sisters had set this up in a bit of a flurry, possibly knowing what was going to happen next. She put milk on the table along with a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. She turned on our little black and white television, which was downstairs for the moment, tuning into the Captain Kangaroo Show. I couldn’t understand the point of the Captain Kangaroo Show.

The next thing I know, my other half-sister raced down the steps in zero seconds flat, screaming the whole way and flying straight to the television without, it seems, even using the steps or hitting the floor. “The Beatles! The Beatles!” she screeched again and again, mechanically turning the channel with the T.V.’s primitive gears – kerchunk kerchunk kerchunk kerchunk – to the Ed Sullivan Show. Sure enough, there they were, playing guitars, banging on drums, shaking their heads this way and that. They seemed nice enough, respectable even, given that they were wearing suits and ties and starched white shirts. But the audience was filled with hysterically screaming girls, just like my one sister. The hysterics of it turned my stomach.

The first sister lunged for the television — kerchunk kerchunk kerchunk kerchunk — the Captain Kangaroo Show.

Smack! She was down on the floor. The other sister was screaming something about the Beatles – kerchunk kerchunk kerchunk kerchunk — and they appeared again with the hysterically screaming girls.

This went on, back and forth, with one saying that I wanted to watch the Captain Kangaroo Show and one saying I had to watch the Beatles. Meanwhile, no one asked me. I just went on eating my sandwich and drinking my milk as fast as I could, quietly slithering under the card table to escape being noticed when I was finished. And I was finished with the Kangaroo and all Beatles.

I needed to go for a walk. I went out on the back field between our house and the airport, and found an “ancient” tree house, and was amazed. All was right with the world again. Had I known that it was an old deer hunting station, put there before the city had expanded this far, I would have felt even better. I was in a kind of no-man’s land, not belonging at all to the baby-boomer generation, and certainly not to generation X. I think I was born at a perfect time to be a hermit. I was already figuring out that it’s not about running from something, but a running toward Someone, that is, being drawn by Him, His love, which didn’t mean leaving anyone behind, but rather also embracing mankind more profoundly.

I checked google maps to see if “my” tree was still there. No such luck. Housing developments had taken over everything.

But I can still remember what I loved about the tree house experience. It was a place to figure things out so as to be more immersed in the goings on of the world, separated physically, but embracing mankind more intimately. I did not reason any of this out in the least. That’s just how it was. This is what any hermit worth the name does by way of prayer. How terrible it is that there are so many who think they can run away from everything, everyone, themselves, even God, by way of the all consuming distractions of drugs, liquor, lust, greed and power… But they can also come to themselves and be lifted up by God, if only they would turn to Him in trust, in His grace.

The tree house was my favorite place when I was alone. It was a little oak tree, perhaps no more than fifteen feet high, but very sturdy. The only other tree, way on the other side of the field, must have been eighty feet high, with branches beginning only after fifty feet. No one bothered with it. The tree house in the other, humble tree, wasn’t much more than a couple of boards nailed to the side of the tree, as a kind of ladder, and a board or two to sit on once one had climbed through the labyrinth of branches. This was a little hermitage to me, perhaps something like the stylites of old. I was amazed that people would walk right under the tree and not even know I was there, never lifting their eyes. I would bring books to read in years to come, and a rosary. Mostly, I would just be there, before creation, and before God, before Him whom I was coming to know as the Prince of the Most Profound and Lively Peace.

* * *

The next summer – with me now sporting four and a half years of age – was spent perfecting the new skill of riding a bike without falling down and being gutted by the handlebars, which happened many times. But soon I was flying along at breakneck speed, leaving the longest skid marks I could on the sidewalks and driveways of everyone in the neighborhood. I wouldn’t try any wheelies or other tricks, however, until the next Summer. For now, I was content with my back-peddle brakes.

gopher googled imageFlying kites and bouncing superballs high into the air with the neighbor kids – or sometimes off of houses – were occasional pass-times. Baseball, football and basketball, in that order – and none with any rules to speak of – were more frequent. In football, I was always a line-backer, even at inter-varsity school games, to which we arrived in orange school buses with the newfangled fiberglass seats that were good for nothing except magnifying all the bumps in the road. During the games, I was always told just to kill anyone who remained on their feet. If not any of these things, we would sometimes grab any dog we could find and go hunting for the abundant gophers of the back field, who stood up on their two back paws like sentinels of prairie life.

Firecrackers were also usually great fun, though once in a while someone would have to go to the doctor to have their fingers sewn back on. We tended to light the firecrackers and let the wick burn down for a few seconds before throwing it as near someone’s head as we could, that is, near not on. Sometimes this backfired. I don’t know how many times the little bombs exploded within inches of my hands. Once, blowing on a stubborn wick temporarily blinded me as the silly thing exploded in my face. Stupid is as stupid does. Thank God we were not blowing ourselves up like other kids would do in years to come on the other side of the world.

Sometimes danger did not always have its source with us kids. There was someone who lived on the North side of town who was an archer. He liked to get us neighbor kids around him while he shot arrows at his targets. He was an excellent marksman and was fun to watch. But I was afraid. Something wasn’t right. Once he said, “Watch this,” and sent an arrow high, high, way, way up into the sky. It landed, after what seemed like minutes, only about ten feet away. Having gaged the wind in this way, he told my brother to stand about fifteen feet away, just off to the side. I guess my brother didn’t realize the danger. No one went near him. Up the arrow went. No one breathed or blinked. I lost sight of the arrow. It wasn’t coming down. It just wasn’t. And then, thud. My heart stopped. Everyone gasped, but remained speechless. It landed just inches away from my brother’s feet. It could have sunk deep into his skull.

Other than that, if we were really looking for trouble at that age, we would go and check out the concrete company on the other side of the field (now gone), or climb into the old airplanes and helicopters stored in the hangers of the airfield right next to us (also gone).

In the Summer of 1968, when I was but eight years old, Hubert Horatio Humphrey came to town in a DC 3. He was in the middle of a presidential campaign against Richard Nixon. Dad wanted us to be there for pictures since he was the local politician. Catholics were Democrats in those days. But those demographics would change soon enough. Dad called home, and would be going directly to the airport. We were supposed to make our own way there.  We knew right where to go, across the back yard, the field – past my hermitage tree – and right down the runway.

What I saw there was not something I liked. Too much hysteria, thought I. Something’s just wrong with all of this. I was supposed to shake his hand, but then stood off to the side a bit. I didn’t understand. He’s just a human being. I didn’t join the antics. A useful trait, that, but one which lands one in trouble. I despise political correctness, the brute force of a mob, as should we all.

* * *

These kind of events, the deaths and assassinations of Popes and Presidents, the blood and guts of the deer, my own death-threat exploding disease, always before me, the arrow almost cutting my brother in two, the superficiality of the hysteria over the Beatles and, in a different way and for different reasons, over Hubert Humphrey, all had a profound effect on me, broadening my vision but in a critical manner. If there was any escapism or any compromise of integrity, anything that was not real, that is, not respectful, was, to me, anathema, to be cut off, abandoned. The way to lead would be to stand back and make an analysis of where things would go and why, always my pet project.

In highschool, the headmaster (who died very young, I think at only 33) gave our class a psychological exam on leadership. The scale, after a zillion answers were given, was from 1-10, with ten maxing out the possibilities. I landed 11.2, which he just could not understand. Leadership is usually defined as that charisma which gathers the sycophantic politically correct to itself, a charisma that is manipulated by the politician according to the mood of the day.

Instead, leadership steps out of the way, letting justice, integrity, patriotism and all good virtues speak for themselves, so that one places not oneself before any crowd, but rather that which is good and holy, the natural law, and Him who provides the wherewithal to follow that law in His good grace, in His goodness and kindness.

One need not be a priest or a politician to provide leadership. One only needs to point people to Jesus. He leads the way. And He has many followers, many who are unsung heroes, but who are heroes indeed. Those who come to mind are, again, those wonderful souls to be found at Lourdes, who ask the Lord to show their neighbors a thing or two about His goodness and kindness. And He does, He being the Prince of the Most Profound Peace.

9 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Just me, politics, separation of church and state, Spiritual Life

AGENDA – GRINDING AMERICA DOWN (Must see new documentary on the Marxism of the present U.S. Admininistration)

marxism obama googled image

Here’s the six minute trailer to whet your appetite. You will watch the entire film after seeing this.

The entire film for free for the moment only: http://vimeo.com/52009124

The website, at which there are reading lists, etc.

Comments: The documentary has two main ideas:

(1) The communist activity of the present administration was never wrapped up in conspiracy theories since everything they did was always in the open, published and broadcast and trumpeted, an agenda, not something secretive.

(2) The objectification, that is, the de-personalization of people is always the aim.

More on that in another post.

You owe it to yourself and to your fellow countrymen, wherever you are in the world, to watch this film.

Spread the word. It’s an education. Very worth while.

Nota bene: While I watched this film I felt myself becoming angry a number of times. You have to know that I’ve met out and out violent Marxists in my life, some of whom were priests. I’ve also met untold numbers of clergy and bishops who were, as Lenin called them, useful idiots. How much damage they’ve done. And for what? Bulldozing corpses into mass graves? That’s what they want. But, more on that in another post. For now, just watch this most excellent film.

13 Comments

Filed under martyrdom, Military, Patriotism, Persecution, politics, separation of church and state, videos

The American Pledge of Allegiance — Christmas version from K of C — a great example of the separation of Church and State (under God – born/unborn)

usmc flag marines googled image

I pledge allegiance to the flag of
the United States of America and
to the Republic for which it stands,
one nation under God, indivisible,
with liberty and justice for all, born & unborn.

From the Knights of Columbus:

The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States originated on Columbus Day, 1893. It contained no reference to Almighty God, until in New York City on April 22, 1951, the Board of Directors of the Knights of Columbus adopted a resolution to amend the Pledge of Allegiance as recited at the opening of each of the meetings of the 800 Fourth Degree Assemblies of the Knights of Columbus by the addition of the words “under God” after the words “one nation”.

The adoption of this resolve by the Supreme Board of Directors had the effect of an immediate initiation of this practice throughout the aforesaid Fourth Degree Assembly meetings. At their annual State Meetings, held in April and May of 1952, the State Councils of Florida, South Dakota, New York and Michigan adopted resolutions recommending that the Pledge of Allegiance be so amended and that Congress be petitioned to have such amendment made effective.

On August 21, 1952, the Supreme Council of the Knights of Columbus, at its annual meeting, adopted a resolution urging that the change be made general and copies of this resolution were sent to the President, the Vice President (as Presiding Officer of the Senate) and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. The National Fraternal Congress meeting in Boston on September 24, 1952, adopted a similar resolution upon the recommendation of its President, Supreme Knight Luke E. Hart. Several State Fraternal Congresses acted likewise almost immediately thereafter. At its annual meeting the following year, on August 20, 1953, the Supreme Council of the Knights of Columbus repeated its resolution to make this amendment to the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag general and to send copies of this resolve to the President, Vice President, Speaker of the House, and to each member of both Houses of Congress.

From this latter action, many favorable replies were received, and a total of seventeen resolutions were introduced in the House of Representatives to so amend the Pledge of Allegiance as set forth in the Public Law relating to the use of the flag. The resolution introduced by Congressman Louis C. Rabaut of Michigan was adopted by both Houses of Congress, and it was signed by President Eisenhower on Flag Day, June 14, 1954, thereby making official the amendment conceived, sponsored, and put into practice by the Knights of Columbus more than three years before.

In a message to Supreme Knight Luke E. Hart at the meeting of the Supreme Council in Louisville, August 17, 1954, President Eisenhower, in recognition of the initiative of the Knights of Columbus in originating and sponsoring the amendment to the Pledge of Allegiance, said:

“We are particularly thankful to you for your part in the movement to have the words ‘under God’ added to our Pledge of Allegiance. These words will remind Americans that despite our great physical strength we must remain humble. They will help us to keep constantly in our minds and hearts the spiritual and moral principles which alone give dignity to man, and upon which our way of life is founded. For the contribution which your organization has made to this cause, we must be genuinely grateful.”

In August, 1954, the Illinois American Legion Convention adopted a resolution whereby recognition was given to the Knights of Columbus as having initiated, sponsored and brought about the amendment to the Pledge of Allegiance; and on October 6, 1954, the National Executive Committee of the American Legion gave its approval to that resolution.

* * * Rant * * *

I once knew a Catholic priest who campaigned to remove the phrase “one God” from the Pledge of Allegiance for the reason that he didn’t want to offend Muslims, because… (begin sarcasm:) as we all know, of course, Muslims would never ever say that the world and the United States belong to Allah, whom they hold to be God. (end sarcasm).

As it is, any Muslim who happened to have a sword in his hand at the time it was said to him by a liberal Catholic priest that the words “under God” should be removed from the Pledge would just that quickly cut the head off the liberal Catholic priest. On second thought, he would probably let him live, since he served to deaden his parish to their virtue of patriotism so as to think that they were being nice to Muslims. That can serve a purpose for Islam.

Fortunately, real patriots are not slowed down by liberal Catholic priests. Real patriots are good servants of the nation, but of God first, always faithful to the Church.

* * * end rant * * *

The Knights have also begun to add the words “born and unborn” at the end. Good thing, because this is what we’ve come to in anti-Christmas America:

eagle baby

The president’s Planned Parenthood even opens on Christmas just to mock both God and man. This can’t go on. Such bloodshed must be followed by a persecution of the church of unprecedented proportions.

Mind you, many martyrs are a blessing for eternal life and even for the conversion and enlivened faith of those who remain on earth for just another short period of time before they also enter into eternity.

Now, this from a story of hope and healing after abortion.

2 Comments

Filed under Catholic, politics, Pro-Life, religion, separation of church and state

LANDFILL HARMONIC. I’m skeptical, yet hopeful. Is it a first?

J.M. alerted me to the this phenomenon. I like it, a lot, but…

If you dig deep enough, you’ll see things that raise red flags, but this bit is good.

I’m not convinced that those on the dump aren’t being taken for a ride on a political journey that is not their own, like so many unknowing puppets, but this bit is good, kind of…

I hope that all proceeds go to the city on the dump so that they can get the food and clean water and medicine and education that they need, instead of going to the pet projects of backers somewhere else.

I hope that “women’s empowerment” and “gender equality” that you’ll find if you dig for it with the advertised backers of this project, simply refer to voting rights and such things, not to abortion, abortifacients and gay marriage. I hope that these poor people are not brainwashed with the culture of death, which would be the ultimate cynicism of the part of those promoting the project. I don’t know if that’s what this is all about. If you know better, let me know. I remain skeptical. But hopeful. And yet…

One girl in the trailer says that her life would be worthless without music. Let those words hang in the air a bit and let yourself think about them. What if that music is taken away? What then? Being overwhelmed with different circumstances and sensory experience isn’t the be all and end all of our lives. Eventually we come to know this. Eventually we come to know that the Creator of mankind, the Creator of the soul which has musical capacity, is the One who provides that our lives are of worth because of the music He makes of our lives. To feel worthless if we don’t have something is a recipe for despair that works on someone even while they are in the midst of prosperity. They are being set up for a fall into a darkness much worse than they ever knew before unless they come to know a deeper meaning of life.

The local instigator in all this says correctly that “people realize that we shouldn’t throw trash away carelessly; well, we shouldn’t throw people away either.” I love that… Yet…

It’s just that I’ve seen exactly this kind of thing so many times in so many like places, and such things in my experience, to date, have never been done just for the sake of the good of those involved, ever. But maybe this is a first. Let me know.

I am reminded of Archbishop Fulton Sheen’s statement about our throwing a note of discord into the universe with original sin, but that our Lord took that note and made it the first note of a symphony that would resonate with redemption and salvation to the ends of that universe, to every heart and soul from the first man to the last. O.K. Let’s pray that it be so with this Landfill Harmonic, that symphony played with the sour note of people living on a landfill will be a glorious melody played to the Lord by the Lord Himself.

Confession: It’s true that I drove right by the dump depicted, or rather was driven by this dump while I was being taken to a certain location across the street from the presidential palace of the president of this country back in the day. My mission there only involved some hours, and there was no way for me to stop. Sorry! But let’s just say that to this day I’m able to vicariously visit most Communicants in the entirety of South America, and most certainly those in this dump, thanks be to my parents (R.I.P.) and about six months work of the F.B.I. against an enemy in the Cayman Islands. One day I’ll have to get to that autobiography. Yikes!

4 Comments

Filed under Just me, politics

Electile Dysfunction: Obama’s Orwellian fulfillment of 1984 in 2012 (Father Gordon MacRae’s call to martyrdom)

tsw10

Father Gordon MacRae (about) has written an awesome post on the proper Separation of Church and State, whereby the State is not to persecute and control the Church, defining and establishing a state religion which controls every aspect of everyone’s lives, effectively having everyone worship the head of state.

george orwellOf course, no one could care less with all the Orwellian brainwashing that goes on, and no amout of punditry and commentary will change anyone.

That’s why Father Gordon, with great pastoral zeal, brings the message home to the Lord’s little flock, citing the Gospel of Matthew, and then closes with some rather incisive encouragement from Father John Harden, S.J.

“In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus cautioned us that we must go out in public as though sheep in the presence of wolves, but He never intended that we should follow the wolves.”

“Unless we recover the zeal and spirit of the first-century Christians – unless we are willing to do what they did, and pay the price they paid – the future of our country, the days of America are numbered.” Fr. John Hardon, S.J.

Now, I’d like to point out to HSH readers that when you head over to Father Gordon’s TheseStoneWalls, don’t forget to be taken by the irony of what you are doing, that is, reading some of the most incisive, thoughtful observations and meditations on the blogosphere today, that is, written by someone, wrongly accused, wrongly imprisoned, who has lived for more than 18 years in the midst of the 24/7 absolute mayhem of prison.

Whether Father realizes it or not, all the posts have the sharpest of analogies with his own prison life, so edgy, in fact, that I wonder if most people get this. Just something to keep in mind. For this week’s post, you have to know that Father has recently read over some of the very recent rehashes of the prosecution. I’m sure he must be wondering if the prosecutors are suffering from some of the electile dysfunction that he writes about in this great article. Oh, yes… that link for a terribly good read today: here. What a title.

2 Comments

Filed under martyrdom, Persecution, politics, separation of church and state

SO, LET’S FISK “ACCOMPLICE” with Cardinal Burke’s help regarding the HHS abortifacient mandate

cardinal raymond burke googled image

IN THIS POST, I’ll fisk the article in the Catholic Encyclopedia on being an ACCOMPLICE, something which I hope will bring a bit of clarity to the situation.

But first, let’s begin with a few words of Cardinal Burke whom I hope will be the next Roman Pontiff should he somehow outlive Pope Benedict XVI, gloriously reigning, who, I hope, will outlive everyone.

Thomas McKenna: “So a Catholic employer, really getting down to it, he does not, or she does not provide this because that way they would be, in a sense, cooperating with the sin…the sin of contraception or the sin of providing a contraceptive that would abort a child, is this correct?”

Cardinal Burke: “This is correct. It is not only a matter of what we call “material cooperation” in the sense that the employer by giving this insurance benefit is materially providing for the contraception but it is also “formal cooperation” because he is knowingly and deliberately doing this, making this available to people. There is no way to justify it. It is simply wrong.”

Here’s the audio for that. Turn the volume up on your computer before starting. The above two paragraphs follow after about a minute of conversation to that you can get the flow of what’s being said.


See LifeSiteNews for the full article. People dismiss the Cardinal’s statement, saying that he is a canon lawyer, not a moral theologian, and therefore has no right to speak of such things. But this isn’t about “authority” of name-throwing or the declared competencies declared by letters after one’s name, is it? No. In fact, it is a matter of natural law, of reason. So, let’s reason this out, shall we?

From the old Catholic Encyclopedia digitized by NewAdvent and [fisked] by yours truly. Let’s use the example of providing a gun to someone, and then make some distinctions afterward.

Accomplice

A term generally employed to designate a partner in some form of evildoing. An accomplice is one who cooperates in some way in the wrongful activity of another who is accounted the principal. [The "principal" is a girl who will murder innocent people with a gun that she buys from you.]

From the viewpoint of the moral theologian not every such species of association is straightway to be adjudged unlawful. It is necessary to distinguish first of all between formal and material cooperation.

To formally cooperate in the sin of another is to be associated with him in the performance of a bad deed in so far forth as it is bad, that is, to share in the perverse frame of mind of that other. [You know of her plan to shoot innocent people, and willingly sell her the gun, wanting this to happen.]

On the contrary, to materially cooperate in another’s crime is to participate in the action so far as its physical entity is concerned, but not in so far as it is motived [motivated] by the malice of the principal in the case. [You don't know of her plan to kill innocent people, and sell her the gun in view of all the other motives there can be, such as self-defense, recreational target shooting, etc.]

For example, to persuade another to absent himself without reason from Mass on Sunday would be an instance of formal cooperation. To sell a person in an ordinary business transaction a revolver which he presently uses to kill himself is a case of material cooperation.

Then it must be borne in mind that the cooperation may be described as proximate or remote in proportion to the closeness of relation between the action of the principal and that of his helper. The teaching with regard to this subject-matter is very plain, and may be stated in this wise:

Formal cooperation is never lawful, since it presupposes a manifestly sinful attitude on the part of the will of the accomplice. [Wanting to murder the innocent is always evil.]

Material complicity is held to be justified when it is brought about by an action which is in itself either morally good or at any rate indifferent [Selling a gun to someone you don't know wants to murder innocent people], and when there is a sufficient reason for permitting on the part of another the sin which is a consequence of the action [Guns can also be used for self-defense, which is a commensurate reason as you don't know the other's intention of malice]. The reason for this assertion is patent; for the action of the accomplice is assumed to be unexceptionable , his intention is already bespoken to be proper [Selling guns with good intentions is always unexceptionable and proper, all things being equal], and he cannot be burdened with the sin of the principal agent, since there is supposed to be a commensurately weighty reason for not preventing it [such as the use of guns for self-defense].

[Let's re-cap that with the example of the HHS abortifacient mandate. Murdering the innocent in the womb is the express intention of the principal agent. She takes abortifacients to kill children. This must also be the wilfull intention of the accomplice, who provides Obamacare abortifacient mandated insurance. One is paying for the abortifacients to be used with the express intention of murdering innocent children. One is, de facto, ipso facto, in agreement with the girl who is out to murder children in her womb. Paying for Obamacare insurance cannot be mere material cooperation. While guns can be used for good purposes, abortifacients are very precisely manufactured to have the one purpose of murdering innocent people in the womb.]

Practically, however, it is often difficult to apply these principles [not in this case], because it is hard to determine whether the cooperation is formal or only material [not in this case], and also whether the reason alleged for a case of material cooperation bears due proportion to the grievousness of the sin committed by the principal, and the intimacy of the association with him [The evil of losing one's business because of not being able to pay fines because of not providing Obamacare fades into insignificance compared to the evil of willingly facilitating the murder of innocent people in the womb].

It is especially the last-named factor ["intimacy of association"] which is a fruitful source of perplexity. [This bit about being able to distance oneself from the perception of being an accomplice out of concern for scandal is simply an added factor. Whether or not others know of the sin doesn't mean there is no sin. Note well that this bit about "distancing" is very common among some bishops. But, our Lord sees all, no matter how distanced one is. Hell is not so far that He cannot put someone there.]

In general, however, the following considerations will be of value in discerning whether in an instance of material cooperation the reason avowed [saving one's business by paying for Obamacare] is valid or not. The necessity for a more and more powerful reason [not to be an accomplice] is accentuated in proportion as there is

• a greater likelihood that the sin would not be committed without the act of material cooperation [It has been shown time and again that the introduction of contraceptives/abortifacients is immediately followed by a sharp rise in sexual activity, promiscuity and abortion. When you throw such things at people, they will be used, even and especially by those who would have stayed chaste until marriage.];

•a closer relationship between the two [The employer/employee relationship is about as close as it gets. If the employer provides abortifacients, the employee will feel encouraged to think that it is O.K. to use them with the blessing of the employer, even though the employer has said that he personally disagrees with their use. No one builds a crematorium in Auschwitz and then says to the Commandant that he personally disagrees with the use of the crematoriums. That would be ludicrous. It is what some bishops already do with very bad advice.]; and

•a greater heinousness in the sin, especially in regard to harm done either to the common weal or some unoffending third party. [The common weal is destroyed more easily and quickly and thoroughly in this way than in any other way. The unoffending third party, the innocent child in the womb, is murdered. This is a greater heinousness any way you look at it.]

It is to be observed that, when damage has been done to a third person [the murdered child in the womb], the question is raised not only of the lawfulness of the cooperation, but also of restitution to be made for the violation of a strict right [How does one even restore the right to life to one who is already murdered?]. Whether in that case the accomplice has shared in the perpetration of the injustice physically [Yes.] or morally (i.e. by giving a command, by persuasion, etc.) [Yes.] whether positively [Yes.] or negatively (i.e. by failing to prevent it) [Yes.] the obligation of restitution is determined in accordance with the following principle. All are bound to reparation who in any way are accounted to be the actual efficient causes of the injury wrought, or who, being obliged by contract [In this case, natural law and the ten commandments], express or implied, to prevent it, have not done so [There it is]. There are circumstances in which fellowship in the working of damage to another makes the accomplice liable to restitution in solidum; that is, he is then responsible for the entire loss in so far as his partners have failed to make good for their share. [One will be at a loss on the brink of hell, will one not?] Finally, mention must be made of the Constitution of Benedict XIV, Sacramentum Poenitentiae, governing a particular case of complicity. It provides that a priest who has been the accomplice of any person in a sin against the Sixth Commandment is rendered incapable of absolving validly that person from that sin, except in danger of death, and then only if there be no other priest obtainable. [I wonder what politically correct priests will say to our Lord about their lack of fatherly governance in parishes.]*

*The article’s bibliographical data are placed in this post after the “continue reading” button below.

* * *

The author of this article is a bit carried away with “intention”. This feeds into what would later be condemned by Pius XII as situation ethics with its proportionalism lacking, by definition, any true comparative possibility. However, one merely needs to ask what one is doing as well as what the intention is. For instance, providing flowers for your wife to beautify her dreary hospital room is no reason to steal flowers from the local flower shop. In this case of the provision of abortifacients, what one is doing is commensurate with why one is doing it, even if one comes up with different reasons. For instance, the what of buying Obamacare abortifacient insurance is evil. The only reason why one would provide abortifacients is to murder the innocent in the womb. Even if one says that one’s only intention is to save one’s business from being shut down by Obama, this rings as hollow as any cry for help that one screams out as one falls into hell.

By the way: There are those who say that since the murder of innocent people in the womb is only a possibility, though really a probability, there is not guilt involved. But that would be like saying that the gun dealer who sells a gun to someone for the specific purpose of killing innocent people is not guilty of a sin just because it snowed later that day and the intended victims got away. That’s just ludicrous.

Please, use the sharing buttons!

Continue reading

6 Comments

Filed under Catholic, martyrdom, Persecution, politics, Pro-Life, separation of church and state

Father Jeffrey Montz and the Federal Electoral Commission[!], Department of State, House of Reps

It seems that Father Jeffrey Montz has ruffled some feathers of the vultures in D.C. with his great, N.B., non-partisan, N.B., post-election sermon. Let’s do a summary:

DHS HSH POTUS

The House visit was surely benign. They come regularly enough, surely good Catholics on coffee breaks.

washington DoS

The Department of State is also benign in a case like this, since they would really need to delegate an investigation to other offices. But, my… they do have an interest, don’t they?

US DoS Father Montz

But the Federal Electoral Commission, just six people (and staff), are notorious for being belligerently aggressive in their attack of… free speech.

father jeffrey montz federal election commission

father jeffrey montz

Their visit the other day, a month, mind you, after the sermon (which means a lot on the blogosphere), makes one wonder if they are wondering if the sermon is partisan, and whether, in that case, the Catholic Church is acting as some sort of unregulated PAC, which would-be infringement is the day-in, day-out, regular attack fare for the F.E.C.

I just don’t see it. There’s no partisanship in his fantastic post-election sermon. Some have taken grave exception. But that’s their problem. I think the Federal Election Commission will agree. Here’s a snippet:

One of the worst contributing factors to the moral decline of our country has been the lukewarmness that has plagued the Catholic Church for years all the way from the Bishops down to the people in the pews.

Pope St. Pius X once said that “All evil in the world is due to lukewarm Catholics. Think about that for a second,

All evil in the world is due to lukewarm Catholics.”

So, here’s a re-posting of the transcription of that great sermon which everyone should read, from Catholics to atheists, from your regular voters to the Federal Electoral Commission, from priests who promoted pro-abortion voting to Catholic pro-abort politicians, from weak bishops to strong. I’ve added a special link and video at the end:

* * *

I want to begin today by thanking those of you who went out on Tuesday and voted for the sacredness of human life. Just as the widow’s deed in our 1st reading will never be forgotten as long as the Scriptures are read, be assured that no righteous deed that we ever undertake will be forgotten by Almighty God.

This past Wednesday, the day after the election, I received a message on my phone at the parish office, from a gentleman who didn’t identify himself by name but who said he was a parishioner. And in this message, this gentleman ranted for several minutes about Tuesday’s election results. And here were the first words out of his mouth, “You lost Father; you lost!” Well, the first thing I want to say about Tuesday night’s election results is that I didn’t lose on Tuesday night our entire country lost!

Now, having said that, I know that there are several of you who have just decided to tune me out, or you’re now burning up with anger at me because of what I just said and you can’t wait to give me a piece of your mind. But let me say two things in this regard. Number one, I am a priest of Jesus Christ, not because of any merit of my own, not because I’m any better than anyone else. God probably chose me because I am nothing and He wants to make something out of me. But I have been anointed and consecrated by God to preach His truth. And so, you can tune me out, but be warned, you do so at your eternal peril.

Second, if you’re angry because you read into my words that this homily is going to be about one elected official that you probably voted for, you’re wrong. What I have to say today goes far beyond just one elected official. What I have to say is about the over all trend that was put on display in Tuesday’s election results.

Did you know, for instance, that on Tuesday several states voted by popular majority to legalize the recreational use of marijuana? Did you know that a plan to legalize physician assisted suicide was barely rejected in Massachusetts? Did you now that for the first time in our country’s history several states, by popular vote, chose to legalize gay marriage? Did you know that two of these states are run by Catholic governors who actively encouraged their constituents to vote in favor of same sex unions? Did you know that in Florida, a ban on tax payers funding of abortion was rejected by the people? Add to all of this the fact that some who were elected in Tuesday’s elections are pathological liars, people who have been exposed in their lies numerous times. Apparently, a majority of Americans now condone lying, or perhaps worse, for them the lie has become the truth, evil has become good. Now can you begin to see the trend?

In the days after the elections all the talking heads in the media have been trying to explain how this all happened. But not one person in the mainstream media has gotten it right. You see, these election results are not about one party’s marketing advantage over another. Ultimately, they’re not about the appeal of one person over another, nor are they about one party being more up-to-date while the other is behind times. What we saw on Tuesday night IS about the moral decline of our nation.

Tuesday’s voting results are a mere confirmation of a choice that a majority in this country made, some as far back as 50 years ago, to reject God and to embrace evil in one form or another! And who’s to blame for this choice? Well, ultimately, each individual is responsible for his or her choices. Those who chose to vote with evil are to blame for their own choices, and they all have to answer to God for the way they voted. But the reality is I don’t think any of us can take ourselves completely off the hook on this one. Why? Because one of the worst contributing factors to the moral decline of our country has been the lukewarmness that has plagued the Catholic Church for years all the way from the Bishops down to the people in the pews.

Pope St. Pius X once said that “All evil in the world is due to lukewarm Catholics. Think about that for a second,

All evil in the world is due to lukewarm Catholics.”

Well, I have to be honest with you. I’ve seen this lukewarmness in every church parish at which I’ve served. But you know where else I see this lukewarmness? I see it when I look in the mirror; I see it in myself. And if we’re honest with ourselves I think all of us would see one or more area of lukewarmness in our own spiritual lives.

My brothers and sisters, each one of us has a moral obligation to do all that we can to try to reverse the moral decline of our nation. And the first place that we have to begin is within ourselves. We have to begin by responding to that vocation which is common to all of us, what the Church calls the universal call to holiness, the call from Jesus to each one of us to become a saint!

In his letter to the Philippians, St. Paul says, “work out your salvation with fear and trembling.” How many of us, each day, tremble as we strive for holiness?! How many of us live with a lively fear of hell, a place that is real and a place where souls go for all eternity?! Or have we instead accepted mediocrity in our spiritual lives? ‘Oh, I’m too busy to pray Lord; I just don’t have the time… I’m too tired to pray; I’ll get to it tomorrow… Oh, I don’t like that teaching of the Church, I am not going to do that, who do they think they are coming up with this stuff… Well, I think I’ve done enough for God; what more do I have to do for Him…’

In one of His parables Jesus poses an important question that we would all do well to ask ourselves. “Which of you wishing to construct a tower does not first sit down and calculate the cost to see if there is enough for its completion?” Well, what cost is Jesus talking about? He’s not giving construction advice to builders and contractors. The context of that Gospel is the cost of discipleship, what it costs to be a saint, ultimately what it costs us get to Heaven. But all too often we act as if that cost is cheap! ‘Well, I go to Mass on most Sundays. I’m a good person; I haven’t murdered anybody. Of course I’m going to Heaven!’

Jesus dealt with this kind of cheap discipleship in the Gospels when He said, “Not everyone who says to me -Lord, Lord will enter the Kingdom of Heaven.” On the day of judgment many will say to Jesus, ‘Well, didn’t we go to Mass fairly often on Sundays and didn’t we put some money in the collection basket? Didn’t we accept at least some of the Church’s teachings? Besides, as I said before, I’m a good person; I didn’t murder anybody.Then Jesus will declare to them, “I never knew you; go away from me you evildoers!”

My brothers and sisters, in ordinary times lukewarmness in our approach to salvation is deadly. But we are not entering into ordinary times. We are not moving forward into ordinary times. There is a great battle brewing; in fact this battle is already upon us, a battle in our country between good and evil and I can feel this battle in the very marrow in my bones. If we are not striving for holiness with every fiber of our being we will not have what it takes to pay the cost of discipleship, we will not have what it takes to get to Heaven! As Jesus says near the end of Matthew’s Gospel, “For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now and never will be. And if those days had not been shortened, no one would be saved…no one would be saved; but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened.”

It’s clear from the trends that we see in Tuesday’s election results that people of faith in this country are going to be attacked relentlessly over and over again by one wave of evil after another. And so we must be sure that we have included these attacks in our calculations. A lukewarm faith will never survive the attacks of an army of evil that is Legion. We must become saints! And do not wait for tomorrow to work out your salvation with fear and trembling, for tomorrow may be too late. Today let us resolve to root out all sin from our lives! Today let us resolves to remove all evil from our hearts! Today let us double our efforts at prayers! Today let us pray that Mary, the Mother of God, our Mother, will once again crush the head of Satan, and intercede for us the grace of perseverance!

Today, let us resolve to take up our cross and be a disciple of Jesus Christ! Christ, who in the words of the Servant of God Bishop Fulton J. Sheen, “will restore within us moral indignation, Who will make us hate evil with a passionate intensity, and love goodness to a point where we can drink death like water!”

The final message that I received from that gentleman’s call on Wednesday was that I need to stop preaching the way I do. I need to stop telling people how they ought to live their lives, what teachings of the Church they need to follow. “If he wants to support gay marriage I just need to shut up and give him a choice.”

Well, sir, in answer to your request I give you a choice: You can either come here to this Catholic Church and listen to the Word of God and to the teachings of Jesus Christ and His Church or you can leave and go somewhere else!

* * *

As a follow-up, as a good example of how to come to the Lord, follow a friend of mine, who is post-abortive, and has come to know Jesus, Author of Life. Here’s her blog, with the link going to a great post on grace, and Grace, and Grace! HERE. And here’s the video at the end of that post. Really, very wonderful:

3 Comments

Filed under politics, Pro-Life, separation of church and state

Exclusive Report: Fiji quietly falls to Chinese backed Islamicist extremists at the end of 2012, a coup within the coup d’état

fiji coup detat destruction 2000 just me

I took this picture in Eastern Fiji during the coup d’état of 2000. Looks peaceful, right? You would be wrong on that. The house is cement with a tin roof. The inside is charred. Nothing left. Plenty of deaths and lots of destruction. The coup within the coup d’état of 2012 promises to be much worse in both the short and long term. This time, it’s all about Islamicist radicals and China.

There’s a news blackout in Fiji that is being enforced not only by terrorist censors of the “government” fining journalists with unpayable fines (six figures in USA$ for that poor country) and imprisoning them for two years, but also, as a lead up, smashing into their work places and violently trashing reporters’ homes. All communications are blocked or censored.

One reporter, risking life and limb (already violently smacked down by censors) smuggled out news of a coup within the present coup d’état. That news was given by personal courier to a mutual friend. I publish it here since no one else is covering this story of the fall of the Pacific to Islamicist radicals supported by, you guessed it, China.

But you won’t see any updated travel advisories. No, no. None of that. Obama is Islamicist friendly, didn’t you know? China’s not a threat to world stability. No, no. None of that. Obama is Asia friendly, didn’t you know?

A snippet:

“The reality is that China comes along and the USA is sleeping away. By the time you wake up the Pacific is going for good to China. My friend said is it a scary situation as the election is promised to be held in 2014. In the mean time we are living in fear.”

And another:

“The 2nd in command of the military is Muslim and he is running the show instead of the commander. I suppose he fears for his head. The 2nd in command apparently put all his fellow Muslims as heads of the government departments so everything is controlled in an Islamicist fashion. What a frightening situation to live with.”

Comment: Much of World War II was fought in the Pacific precisely over things like this. I wonder what our Veterans think. I wonder what the present Military thinks. I wonder what our spooky friends think, who have known all this for the longest time.

It’s politically correct not even to notice that it is taking place. This is what America voted for. This is what the world gets.

Look, I know Frank Bainimarama. I spoke with him at length about where Fiji was coming from, what he was trying to do with Fiji, and where he wanted to go with Fiji in the future. I spoke with him about their military and their U.N. “training”. I spoke with him about Marxist elements and the danger of ethnic cleansing, which was being promoted at a national level among all leaders of the Island group. I know, because I was there, and I personally know extremely well these Marxist elements and the ethnic cleansing they promote on a popular and political level. I know where they meet and what they say, because… they tell me, and I witness it firsthand.

My surmising of the situation: There will be… there is… violence in Fiji, which will fall into… which has already fallen into… Islamicist control. Ever so quietly. Unless you live in Fiji. Unless you want freedom of speech. Forget about any free and fair elections. China rejoices. A civil war is in the making. I personally know the “players.” They will brook no dissent in order to make it happen.

I have much to say about this. I have much to say about the complacency, even complicity, even direct involvement, even on the level of instigation of some few Catholic clergy in all this. But that’s for another post. I wonder if I should name names, you know, of Cardinals, Archbishops, Bishops and priests, diocesan and religious, from the South Pacific all the way to a certain dicastery in the Roman Curia. That may be necessary in order to avoid an impending blood bath.

Oh, and reporting by MSM? Nah. It’s not politically correct. And they know nothing. And play down tensions. For instance, The New York Times, typical of their non reporting on violence and genocides  (like the Holocaust) downplays the slave trade bringing Indians to work the sugar cane as “cheap labor.” Really? Wars are fought over just that. Typical “Times.”

4 Comments

Filed under Just me, Military, news, politics, terrorism

Father Montz and Holy Souls Hermitage: These stats don’t lie. His post-election sermon nailed it.

father jeffrey montz stats

father jeffrey montzI gotta hand it to the great Father Jeffrey Montz. It took him three weeks, but his post-election sermon has now surpassed in popularity all other posts on the blog except for my common sense prediction concerning the upcoming decision on the fate of Medjugorje. God bless you, Father Montz.

Let this be a lesson to all priests who want to preach strongly, but still have a bit of fear. Have NO fear. Take a good example:

Update: Transcript of a great post-election sermon by Father Jeffrey Montz

Leave a Comment

Filed under Catholic, politics, priests, religion, separation of church and state

Frying Pan to Fire to Furnace: Clinton to Rice to Kerry: my promised debate with “catholic”John Kerry

Rumor has it that John Kerry is being considered instead of Rice to replace Clinton as Secretary of State.

When I last spoke with John Kerry, he promised, with heaps of witnesses, a televised debate. This hasn’t materialized yet. But should he get the nod to head up the Department of State, I’d like to take him up on the offer. His aides were trying to drag him away, literally pulling on his arms again and again to get him to stop such a conversation, but he insisted in his desire to continue, even reprimanding them repeatedly.

Our discussion lasted only ten to fifteen minutes, covering topics like faith being lived out in the public square, like obedience to the Vicar of Christ, like catholic pro-abortion politicians receiving Holy Communion with television cameras rolling. We were in the Vatican Gardens at the time. But, let me tell you, it was a frightening experience.

I’ve spoken with many a politician or diplomat in my day, but I’ve never come across anyone to equal random spewing forth of sound-bytes which may or may not have had anything to do with the flow of the conversation at hand. The disingenuity was jaw-droppingly stunning.

Really, I simply can’t imagine him going head to head with über-competent secretaries or heads of state with whom he would have to deal regarding the most difficult diplomatic problems in the world today.

How many Catholics like this are there? Pelosi, Sebelius, Biden, Kerry…

1 Comment

Filed under Catholic, politics, separation of church and state

THE NEW YORK TIMES — COMPLICITY WITH THE HOLOCAUST STILL TODAY

The upshot of this article: Not only was The New York Times run by Holocaust denying Nazi sympathizers during and after World War II, but this is still the case today, with the particularly tragic edge of sarcasm and cynicism known only to those who defend their crimes against humanity. It is not too harsh to speak of sympathy with Hitler when the most powerful mass media instrument of the day downplayed and buried and, indeed, effectively denied that there was anything even like a Final Solution, as Hitler called his genocide. And that denial is, of course, a crime. Continue reading

5 Comments

Filed under martyrdom, news, Persecution, politics, religion

Go Father Jeffrey Montz! And another great priest in the deep South speaks out in Congress: Yikes!

If you liked this post: Update: Transcript of a great post-election sermon by Father Jeffrey Montz

Then you love this parish web-page: http://www.sjb-ola.org/

This is what I love to see: Great priestly fraternity of priests who know why they are priests.

Update: Continuing to inspire!

Click to enlarge.

1 Comment

Filed under Catholic, politics, priests, Pro-Life, separation of church and state

New York Times Company stock set to go into an even more severe decline starting 28 November 2012. I predict advertizers will run.

Disclaimer: I don’t have any stock or put any stock in the NYT corporation.

But I do predict that advertizers, who have already been abandoning the NYT, will speed up their departure, leaving the NYT in an impossible position.

This isn’t just about constant losses of what seems to be a foreseeably bankrupt and already beleaguered NYT, nor is this about the scandal involving in some way the new director of the New York Times (a story covered by Bill Donohue at the Catholic League), but about something else altogether, at least seemingly. I’m betting that advertizers are going to run fast because of what’s coming on Wednesday.

But before we get to that on Wednesday, let’s just take a snippet from an article of the NYT about itself: here.

October 25, 2012, 8:42 am

New York Times Company Posts a Profit but Advertising Falls, Lowering Revenue

By CHRISTINE HAUGHNEY

Updated | 9:20 p.m. The share price for The New York Times Company stock tumbled nearly 22 percent on Thursday after posting lower-than-expected earnings.

The company reported third-quarter net income of $2.28 million on Thursday, a decline of more than 85 percent from the period a year earlier, when the company posted a large gain on the sale of investments and took a charge for paying down its debt ahead of schedule.

The net income is equal to about 2 cents a share, compared with net income of $15.7 million, or 10 cents a share, in the third quarter of 2011. Analysts had forecast income of 8 cents a share. Total revenue declined 0.6 percent, to $449 million, dragged down by continuing weakness in advertising revenue, which fell 8.9 percent, to $182.6 million, from $200.5 million.

Print advertising at the company’s newspapers, which include The New York Times, The Boston Globe and The International Herald Tribune, shrank 10.9 percent, and digital advertising across the company fell 2.2 percent.

Shares closed at $8.31, down $2.34 for the day.

Douglas Arthur, an equity analyst at Evercore Partners, an investment bank that follows The Times and has a buy on the stock, said the company performed far worse than its competitors in advertising sales. Gannett, for example, recently reported a 6.6 percent decline in publishing-related ad revenues for the third quarter.

“It was an absolute awful quarter for The New York Times; there were no ifs, ands or buts,” Mr. Arthur said. “The print being down 11 percent is a head-scratcher. We’re not seeing those kinds of drops at other companies. In fact, some companies are seeing a pickup. The Times is an outlier.”

* * *

My comment: There’s a Pulitzer-worthy piece (not written by me) that has already gone to press, and which will appear on 28 November 2012 (but not in the NYT, so stay tuned). Mark your calendars. Actually, never mind. You’ll hear about it, though probably not from the NYT, the Boston Globe, The International Herald Tribune, and any other subsidiaries of the NYT, at least not for a day or two. And then you’ll probably see an extremely adept defense and rationalization, which has already been tried in the past. But we’ll be anyalyzing their spin. There will be a lot of that. But spin with this kind of thing just won’t work anymore. I’m just guessing, but I think the Wall Street Journal and FoxNews will be interested in this story within a week or two. And then it will go from there. Sorry, but I’m under embargo until 28 November as to what this is all about.

4 Comments

Filed under news, politics