Category Archives: martyrdom

[Saint] Alexamenos [Confessor Martyr] and Jesus as *The Donkey* on this Palm Sunday [and Pope Francis Regensburg]

This is a picture of the third century Roman graffito, etchings which are almost invisible in the original wall, which is surely why the graffito has lasted for so many centuries. Archaeological remains can be seen on Monte Palatino, Rome, Italy. The graffito was on part of a wall which had been salvaged from the Imperial School for slave boys on the south-western slope of the Palatine Hill during the 1800s. I took many pictures of this graffito.

Greek words had been scratched into the wall along with a drawing of Christ as a crucified jackass, and as the recipient of the worship of a boy named Alexámenos. The graffito dates to the persecution of Catholics by the Romans in the mid-third century. The words ΑΛΕΞΑΜΕΝΟΣ ΣΕΒΕΤΕ ΘΕΟΝ, meant Alexámenos says ‘Worship ye God!’ or, because of the artist’s poor orthography, Alexámenos worships God, so that he wanted to write ΣΕΒΕΤΑΙ ΘΕΟΝ.

Alexámenos – the name means Defender (The One Who Is Defending)– may have been a Jewish slave, who became a Christian, and who was evangelizing his fellow slaves. He risked his life by telling the others to worship Christ, at least with his own example. The response of one of the slaves — drawing such a graffito — shows that Alexámenos may well have been put to death for this evangelization, as were so many at the time, one after the other. It is even most probable that he is a martyr, perhaps put to death by the Emperor Valerian. Rome’s Palatine Hill overlooks the Colosseum, built by Jewish slaves, the Circus Maximus, which directly faces the Imperial School, and the Roman Forums.

It’s unknown what happened to the artist, but mockery arising from fear, or later, grief, can be an occasion when God’s mercy works conversion. The blood of the martyrs waters the seed bed of the Faith. It’s good to be a fool for Christ’s sake, a jackass in the eyes of the world, the off-scouring of the earth, as Saint Paul says. After all, did not Jesus become a Jackass for us, taking on such abuse so as to redeem all us, who truly are such jackasses? Yes, He did.

For all these reasons, Alexámenos is a hero of Holy Souls Hermitage, and why a detail of this graffito makes up the header for http://holysoulshermitage.com I have a special appreciation for all those held to be fools for Christ’s sake, for those who are kicked in the face for Christ, for those who are condemned by friend and foe alike for Christ’s sake, for those who are marginalized for Christ’s sake.

He is especially a hero because I know I would not be a worthy jackass for the sake of Christ, but I know I can count on his most worthy intercession for me, for all of us. Thanks for witnessing to the Lord, Alexámenos! Way to be a jackass for the Lord of all!

N.B. I mention that he might have been a Jewish convert. I say that because Jews were nicknamed as jackasses by all the gentiles since time immemorial. I’ve written much on jackasses and on Alexámenos, who is a hero in a perhaps too tightly scripted ecclesiastical thriller novel I wrote a while back of some 750 pages.

B.T.W., are not jackasses intimate members of the Holy Family? From Nazareth to Bethlehem, at the crib, from Bethlehem to Egypt, from Egypt all the way to Nazareth, at the entrance of Jesus to Jerusalem… Jackasses are intelligent, they can sing, and… and… not being in the least stubborn (as mules are), jackasses only do what they understand (very smart, that).

✵ ✵ ✵

I’ve previously put up some snippets from that novel — Jackass for the Hour — on this blog. Here’s another, for your edification, I hope! Just some braying here. These scenes take place towards the end of the novel. There are some Islamicists who are storming into Vatican Gardens from inside Saint Peter’s Basilica soon after the Easter Vigil. Meanwhile, the Holy Father, in a certain monastery in Vatican Gardens, is finishing and signing a document that he is writing in haste immediately after the Easter Vigil, knowing that he has only minutes to live… ///

It was just now becoming apparent that a large number of the crowd inside the Basilica – upwards, it seemed, of a thousand people – were pressing toward the exit that wound its way underneath Bernini’s sculpture of Pope Alexander VII. The Swiss Guards became suspicious, but wasted the few seconds they had in trying to be polite with the diplomats whom they were moving away from the multiple sets of doors of the passageway, attempting to seal the exit to Vatican Gardens. But then the Muslims acted as one man with one voice, stampeding under the image of the skeleton holding the hourglass of the passage of time and down into the short tunnel, fatally trampling a thousand times over diplomats and guards alike. Their death chant was thunderous:

takbir“The blasphemy will not be forgotten! Burn the jackass! The hour has come!” A Papal Knight, watching in horror, said, “Tempus fugit; memento mori… Time flies; remember death!” allahu akbarHe also noted how one of the Muslims betrayed his provenance by screaming, “La France a l’Algérie! La France a l’Algérie!” He shouted, “Takbīr!”; the others replied: “Allāhu akbar!”

✵ ✵ ✵

“Si quis traditiones prædictas sciens et prudens contempserit: anathema sit,” said the Holy Father, writing the last words of the Apostolic Constitution. “The Easter Candle,” he continued, “would be appropriate for the needed flame. Alexámenos!”

Father Alexámenos went to get the Easter Candle which the Sisters lit when they returned from the Easter Vigil. While he was away, the Pontiff signed the bulla, writing, “Ego Tsur-Ēzer, Catholicae Ecclesiae Episcopus, ita definiendo subscripsi.” He then punched some holes in the velum with the pen and laced the scarlet cord through it.

Father Alexámenos returned as he finished. The Pope took it from him and gave him the pen. “You too Emet… Fidèle…”, he said.

When they read it, amazed at its content, they all signed it. Padre Emet commented on the wisdom of adding that the bulla did not have to be published in the Acta Apostolicæ Sedis in order to be authentic, and that it was promulgated by the very act of its being signed and sealed with the Ring of the Fisherman. It was an ex-cathedra statement.

The Pope held the sealing lead over the flame of the Easter Candle, letting it pool over the cord. He then impressed the image of the Ring of the Fisherman into the congealed lead.

✵ ✵ ✵

The stampede had moved from the Basilica, around and over the cars waiting for the diplomats just outside in Piazza Santa Marta [...]

✵ ✵ ✵

In putting this bit up, these paragraphs, I am recalling what I mentioned immediately after the publication of the address of Pope Francis to the Diplomatic Corps, saying that it is strikingly, incisively, starkly similar to the most important points of the address of Pope Benedict XVI to the crowd at Regensburg: Pope Francis // Pope Benedict. If you want some essentially important continuity, here it is.

Pope Francis, the Pope of interreligious dialogue, is treated as an imbecile by even supposedly devout Catholic pundits. He is, instead, one of the most brilliant and believing gentlemen ever to grace the See of Rome.

Pope Francis continues to draw deep lines in the sand blasted with insults off himself, the Rock, daring all peoples to cross those lines and be converted to the goodness and kindness of Jesus. I just love it.

9 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Donkey, ecumenism, interreligious dialogue, martyrdom

A disturbance in the Force there is — but today is looking up — keeping in perspective just how bad things can get

Jesus Peter water googled image

Yesterday was a tough day. I was reading and reflecting about some posts I would like to write. My mind just did not want to get wrapped around the enigmas and mysteries. Sometimes you can write about certain things, things that are really very evil — such as this post in the exorcism series on politicians on the sidebar of this blog (a favorite of readers, especially in Asia) — but at other times you are actually faced with a sense of what the wounds of our Crucified Lord manifest about the reality of evil… and also of His mercy, though that can seem distant when we are swamped by a bit more knowledge of how much we are trusting in ourselves instead of Him who is so good and kind. I didn’t finish writing those posts.

alderaan destroyed googled imageInstead, I prayed a bit, and drove down the mountain to see what the UPS Store had by way of packages and letters. Empty. :) So, I went to see the neighbors to catch up on any logistics of whatever. Asked how I was, I said that I felt like a spider that I had killed earlier in the day, a really big spider, juicy… POP! and splatter. Part of Spring cleaning. But it might remind one of Alderaan getting destroyed. So I added, that, obviously, “A disturbance in the Force there is” with appropriate voice. This set people into hysterical laughter. Anyway, that’s how I felt.

It seems to me that the entire world was smacked down, hard, when Pope Benedict abdicated. Well, that’s what it felt like, and to very many people. But “smacked down” is not the gist of it. I would rather describe it in this way:

Today's ad orientem picture, 7 March 2013

Today’s ad orientem picture, 7 March 2013

When there is a very great need in the Church, the Lord looks to those who are His own in any way and has them share the burden. Saint Paul speaks of this aspect of the Body of Christ at length. We are to be available, in His grace, for being the living sacrifices of intercession He wants us to be. This can be occasioned by both internal and external circumstances. Our Lord knows how to work on us. Just leave it to Him. Just be faithful. Just be in humble thanksgiving, whatever is going on.

chickensAnd there is that which lifts the spirit as well. There are chickens eating and a Laudie-dog who is ever so content under the wood stove after just having come in from a hard night of chasing monsters in the forest. What a good dog. Great smile. And cute too.

Of course, there is very much for which to be thankful, especially how our Lord takes care of our spiritual lives no matter what, if we are but willing to cooperate with His grace. I’m thinking about hard spiritual times as well, that many know right around this world, such as in China and Vietnam and North Korea and all Islamicist countries, because of oppression of religious freedom, and such as in Ireland and so many Western countries, because of a willing throwing away of the faith, giving that external oppression full reign. Those who are able to let the faith shine in their parishes really ought to do so, now, for times change very, very quickly.

laudieWe read various nefarious things about what some Cardinals have done or failed to do. Does this shake our faith? I should hope not. Is it a disappointment? I should hope so. There are many on the internet who are providing “What if?” scenarios. I have to wonder about that.

For instance, what if a Cardinal is elected to be the Bishop of Rome who is entirely, thoroughly inept theologically, who says all sorts of rubbish at Wednesday audiences and to this and that group, heretical things, just plain stupid things, and who is obviously just full of himself, the old “I’m Pope and you’re not! Neyah neyah neyah neyah neyah!” kind of thing? What would you do then? Throw yourself into free fall, or would you pray and intercede for the Church, even while being mocked by friends who let themselves go to hell, blaming the Pope for bad example, but being judged only on what they did by our Lord?

And, by the way, Popes can be heretical, privately, to groups of people, to countries, though NOT to the entire Church specifically as the Successor of Peter while speaking on faith and morals. And Popes can be real jerks. We’ve had a few. They’re human too. Will you pray for them? Or will you run away and say, “I told you so! I told you so! I’m still a sede-vacantist! Neyah neyah neyah neyah neyah!” Is that any better?

Jesus Crucified googled image

Can things be looking up even when things could be so very bad? Sure. But in that case, we have to look up to Him who is lifted up, up high on the Cross.

IF an excommunicate apostate heretic freakoid is elected to the See of Rome, do you know what happens? In Canon Law, all excommunications and penalties are lifted. He can start fresh. I love that.

Remember Saint Thomas Becket? The moment he was made bishop, he repented of all his knuckleheadedness and became a devout follower of Christ and defender of the Church, so much so that his one time friend, King Henry II, had him martyred.

Those who separate themselves from the Church, using individuals and their ineptitude as an excuse, have no understanding either of their own sins or the power of the grace of God. We all deserve to rot in hell for original sin and our own personal sins. But Jesus is good and kind. So good and so kind.

There is simply no excuse to fall apart, go into free fall, lose the faith. None. Jesus takes care of us even if all priests are taken from us. But we have to be faithful. Doctrine. Morals. All of it. If we do our own thing apart from Christ and His Church, we are lost.

I remember an incident while giving a retreat to priests and brothers of a religious congregation in Albania just a short time after the communist government fell in that poorest of all countries. It was a good hour before Mass on a Sunday, and loud singing was to be heard in the Church. I investigated and was amazed. The Church was packed with young and old. No hymn books. It was one, very long, 40 minute chant they all knew by heart, with nothing repeated. It was the catechism. This is how they kept the faith alive during decades of fiercely murderous religious oppression. There will be many great saints from such conditions.

But what about us? In the USA? Too comfortable? Too self-congratulatory? So many have for so long abandoned the faith that it wouldn’t make any difference to them if the Pope was a saint or was a minion of Satan. It would not matter to them because they do what they want to do anyway. Many of them are the power-brokers in parishes. They have their reward now. They will lead the oppression of religious freedom.

So, what to do? Be faithful, in good times and bad. And, in whatever occasion, let the faith shine for all to see. There is no greater love…

10 Comments

Filed under Catholic, martyrdom, Persecution

Te Deum Laudamus! The Martyr’s Plenary Indulgence on 31 December. Blood and guts everywhere. Faith flourishing.

Te Deum laudamus: te Dominum confitemur.
Te aeternum Patrem omnis terra veneratur.
Tibi omnes Angeli; tibi caeli et universae Potestates;
Tibi Cherubim et Seraphim incessabili voce proclamant:
Sanctus, Sanctus, Sanctus, Dominus Deus Sabaoth.
Pleni sunt caeli et terra maiestatis gloriae tuae.
Te gloriosus Apostolorum chorus,
Te Prophetarum laudabilis numerus,
Te Martyrum candidatus laudat exercitus.
Te per orbem terrarum sancta confitetur Ecclesia,
Patrem immensae maiestatis:
Venerandum tuum verum et unicum Filium;
Sanctum quoque Paraclitum Spiritum.
Tu Rex gloriae, Christe.
Tu Patris sempiternus es Filius.
Tu ad liberandum suscepturus hominem, non horruisti Virginis uterum.
Tu, devicto mortis aculeo, aperuisti credentibus regna caelorum.
Tu ad dexteram Dei sedes, in gloria Patris.
Iudex crederis esse venturus.
Te ergo quaesumus, tuis famulis subveni: quos pretioso sanguine redemisti.
Aeterna fac cum sanctis tuis in gloria numerari.

V. Salvum fac populum tuum, Domine, et benedic hereditati tuae.
R. Et rege eos, et extolle illos usque in aeternum.

V. Per singulos dies benedicimus te.
R. Et laudamus nomen tuum in saeculum, et in saeculum saeculi.

V. Dignare, Domine, die isto sine peccato nos custodire.
R. Miserere nostri, Domine, miserere nostri.

V. Fiat misericordia tua, Domine, super nos, quemadmodum speravimus in te.
R. In te, Domine, speravi: non confundar in aeternum.

O God, we praise Thee, and acknowledge Thee to be the supreme Lord.
Everlasting Father, all the earth worships Thee.
All the Angels, the heavens and all angelic powers,
All the Cherubim and Seraphim, continuously cry to Thee:
Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God of Hosts!
Heaven and earth are full of the Majesty of Thy glory.
The glorious choir of the Apostles,
The wonderful company of Prophets,
The white-robed army of Martyrs, praise Thee.
Holy Church throughout the world acknowledges Thee:
The Father of infinite Majesty;
Thy adorable, true and only Son;
Also the Holy Spirit, the Comforter.
O Christ, Thou art the King of glory!
Thou art the everlasting Son of the Father.
When Thou tookest it upon Thyself to deliver man,
Thou didst not disdain the Virgin’s womb.
Having overcome the sting of death, Thou opened the Kingdom of Heaven to all
believers.
Thou sitest at the right hand of God in the glory of the Father.
We believe that Thou willst come to be our Judge.
We, therefore, beg Thee to help Thy servants whom Thou hast redeemed with Thy
Precious Blood.
Let them be numbered with Thy Saints in everlasting glory.

V. Save Thy people, O Lord, and bless Thy inheritance!
R. Govern them, and raise them up forever.

V. Every day we thank Thee.
R. And we praise Thy Name forever, yes, forever and ever.

V. O Lord, deign to keep us from sin this day.
R. Have mercy on us, O Lord, have mercy on us.

V. Let Thy mercy, O Lord, be upon us, for we have hoped in Thee.
R. O Lord, in Thee I have put my trust; let me never be put to shame.

The usual conditions for any plenary indulgence:

  • Sacramental confession, within abut 20 days before or after
  • Eucharistic communion, preferably on the day, or the days before or after
  • Prayer for the intentions of Supreme Pontiff, for instance, the Creed, the Lord’s Prayer, the Glory Be
  • The will to be detached from even venial sin

The recitation or singing of the Te Deum Laudumus is to be solemnized in a church, chapel or oratory.

Whatever the origin of this hymn, it seems that Saints Ambrose and Augustine were seen exclaiming the verses in alternation from memory. I love that kind of enthusiasm.

I’m hoping my little Holy Souls Hermitage Chapel counts, and that the way I sing this, perhaps quite pitifully, will count as “solemn”!

I’m going to ask our Lord to free the soul of priest in purgatory. Perhaps he will greet me at the gates of heaven and help to welcome me, as I hope, into the eternal habitations, as they are called in the Gospels.

Nota Bene: Don’t think that our Lord is misery in indulging souls with His good graces. He is good and kind. There are many, however, who insist that an indulgence is farcical, that there is no such thing, insisting that the soul has to be virtually enjoying the beatific vision, transformed in grace as much as the Immaculate Conception, before any indulgence would be granted by our Lord, which, by the way, would make the indulgence superfluous, right?

No, no. The will to be detached from even venial sin means that this is one’s intention. It does not mean that one is not weak. Honestly!

So, do an act of charity, offer an indulgence for one of the faithful departed.

Tomorrow, there is another special indulgence. Perhaps offer that for yourself. You can’t offer an indulgence for any other living person.

Anecdote: I know of a seminarian who was thrown out of an international Marian pilgrimage destination because he mentioned that the Stations of the Cross carried a plenary indulgence. Yikes!

Blood and guts everywhere: There are many stories of the martyrs going to their deaths singing the Te Deum Laudamus in thanksgiving for having been given the priviledge to bear witness to our Lord in the most trying of circumstances, which makes that witness, that martyrdom, shine all the more brilliantly.

When we are thankful to our Lord, that thankfulness must include all that which He has has permitted to happen to us which is rather horrific, in the sense that we know that He can and will draw a much greater good out of such events for our good and the good of others.

Thank you, Jesus!

4 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Holy Souls, martyrdom

AGENDA – GRINDING AMERICA DOWN (Must see new documentary on the Marxism of the present U.S. Admininistration)

marxism obama googled image

Here’s the six minute trailer to whet your appetite. You will watch the entire film after seeing this.

The entire film for free for the moment only: http://vimeo.com/52009124

The website, at which there are reading lists, etc.

Comments: The documentary has two main ideas:

(1) The communist activity of the present administration was never wrapped up in conspiracy theories since everything they did was always in the open, published and broadcast and trumpeted, an agenda, not something secretive.

(2) The objectification, that is, the de-personalization of people is always the aim.

More on that in another post.

You owe it to yourself and to your fellow countrymen, wherever you are in the world, to watch this film.

Spread the word. It’s an education. Very worth while.

Nota bene: While I watched this film I felt myself becoming angry a number of times. You have to know that I’ve met out and out violent Marxists in my life, some of whom were priests. I’ve also met untold numbers of clergy and bishops who were, as Lenin called them, useful idiots. How much damage they’ve done. And for what? Bulldozing corpses into mass graves? That’s what they want. But, more on that in another post. For now, just watch this most excellent film.

13 Comments

Filed under martyrdom, Military, Patriotism, Persecution, politics, separation of church and state, videos

Very cool poem about the children of Sandy Hook: The Lord is evident

sandy hook shooting prayer vigil googled image

From an email:

Twas’ 11 days before Christmas, around 9:38
when 20 beautiful children stormed through Heaven’s gate.

Their smiles were contagious, their laughter filled the air.
they could hardly believe all the beauty they saw there.

They were filled with such joy, they didn’t know what to say.
they remembered nothing of what had happened earlier that day.

“Where are we?” asked a little girl, as quiet as a mouse.
“This is heaven.” declared a small boy.
“We’re spending Christmas at God’s house.”

When what to their wondering eyes did appear,
but Jesus, their Savior, the children gathered near.

He looked at them and smiled, and they smiled just the same,
then He opened His arms and He called them by name.
And in that moment was joy, that only Heaven can bring;
those children all flew into the arms of their King,

and as they lingered in the warmth of His embrace,
one small girl turned and looked at Jesus’ face.
And as if He could read all the questions she had
He gently whispered to her, “I’ll take care of mom and dad.”

Then He looked down on earth, the world far below
He saw all of the hurt, the sorrow, and woe.
Then He closed His eyes and He outstretched His hand,

“Let My power and presence re-enter this land!”
“May this country be delivered from the hands of fools”
“I’m taking back my nation. I’m taking back my schools!”

Then He and the children stood up without a sound.
“Come now my children, let me show you around.”
Excitement filled the space, some skipped and some ran,
all displaying enthusiasm that only a small child can.

And I heard Him proclaim as He walked out of sight,
“In the midst of this darkness, I AM STILL THE LIGHT.”

Written by [a lady] in Mt. Wolf, PA [ I edited the name of the author out since all this is so crazy with death threats for anyone who has a nice thing to say about the kids and their teachers, or approves of mourning for the loss of life.]

Comment: I bet that there are adults who laid down their lives in trying to protect the children that are on their way as well. Also, just to say, our Lord never did abandon the USA. People will do horrible things, using their free will the wrong way.

  • Our Lord is evident in the teachers laying down their lives to try to protect the children.
  • Our Lord is evident in the bravery of the police who rushed into the school.
  • Our Lord is evident in the grieving of so many.
  • Our Lord’s continual care for us is evident when we really take a look at Him, and see the wounds on His hands and feet, His side, His Heart.

God knows what it means to suffer injustice, mortal violence, torture and death. He takes all this on to have the right in justice to have mercy on us. We still go through these things here on earth because of the justice of original sin and the misuse of free will that people are to have. But then there’s heaven. The author of the poem has it right about the kids.

To such children belong the Kingdom of the heavens.

We need to be little children.

These children lead the way. They are cheering us on.

5 Comments

Filed under martyrdom

In times of persecution, what are priests to do? Hide? Be in-your-face? On traditionalist Catholics who condemn Pius XII as a Marxist homosexualist

horses

“It will most likely end up being a sanctuary for holy Priests in time of persecution,” a reader of HSH writes. Yikes! Which brings up the question:

In times of persecution, what are priests to do?

Hide? Be in-your-face?

One priest said that he would like to hide out at Holy Souls Hermitage during a persecution. What he meant, I’m sure, is that he would provide the sacraments to the faithful, but in a hidden way, until he was betrayed. Another said, “I will die with my people.” What he meant, I’m sure, is that he would provide the sacraments to the faithful until he was betrayed until he was betrayed. There’s no use filling up churches publicly just to get everyone killed in one go, you know, for the drama of it all. But is going about providing the sacraments to the faithful at the risk of one’s life, doing this with prudence, even hidden, and without otherwise speaking out, no more than cowardice? Some think so. Let’s investigate this.

What’s the purpose of the priestly vocation? Does it include having that much touted prophetic voice? Perhaps it is helpful to rephrase this question:

When does a priest’s prophetic voice become self-serving?

  • There are those who spit in Jesus’ face, when He says that we are to be as prudent as serpents but as innocent as doves as we go about preaching the Kingdom of God (see Luke 10,16). They say that the prudential bit is satanic, that Jesus has a demonic spirit. Prudence, they say, is a demonic vice, not a cardinal virtue. Real virtue, they say, consists in always and everywhere screaming about well… it doesn’t matter, as long as someone is screaming.
  • There are those who spit in Jesus’ face when they read that He passed through the midst of the crowd that would throw him down the cliff on which the town was built, and then walking away, that is, instead of preaching what they refuse to hear (see Luke 4,30).
  • There are those who spit in Jesus’ face when they read that, in fact, He hid himself and went out from the temple, instead of being stoned (see John 8,59).
  • There are those who spit in Jesus’ face when they read that He went up to feast privately, even though He later spoke publicly (see Luke 7,8-14ff ), for, they say, he should have gone up publicly as well, not in secret.

But they don’t stop there:

  • There are those who say that all the seminarians at the Venerable English College who were preparing to be ordained and then head off to England to be martyred where they would inevitably be found in their priest holes, were damned fools to provide the sacraments to the Catholic faithful, for they should have revealed themselves as priests and rail against the persecution as they stepped off the boat. They say that Campion’s Brag was no more than the diatribe of a coward. They say that they deserved all they got in being racked, and hung and drawn and quartered, for that is the just end of the one who acts with what they consider to be the demonic prudence of quietly bringing the sacraments to the faithful.
  • There are those who say that all the underground priests in Russia, who quietly went about providing the sacraments to the faithful, were rightly betrayed by the KGB spy at the Russicum in Rome, so that they were murdered in their many dozens in a wave of violence, for, they say, this is the just end of those who would be prudent in remaining silent in the face of persecution, and instead merely risk their lives ever so hiddenly, quietly, providing the sacraments to the faithful.
  • There are those who condemn the bishops and priests who are faithful to Rome in mainland China, thinking that their prudence of risking their lives in quietly going about providing the sacraments to the faithful is diabolical, for they should all go about screaming about injustice on the streets in order to prove that they are nice. They think that when they are imprisoned and tortured and put to death, when they are interred in labor camps, re-education camps, that they get what they deserve for their having been prudent in quietly providing the sacraments to the faithful.
  • There are those who condemn the seminarians of this past generation, who, without denying the faith or morals of the Church, always upholding the same, but who didn’t stand up and scream against heresy in every class they had in the seminary, but were quietly going about faithfulness to the Lord and somehow getting ordained, perhaps having been thrown out of multiple seminaries. They say that these seminarians are to be condemned for their trust in the Lord, who, they say, is to be spit upon, for they should only trust in screaming about anything and everything, as long as they are screaming.
  • There are those who, finally, condemn Saint Thomas Aquinas for his commentary on fraternal correction, thinking that the prudence spoken about by the angelic doctor surely makes him into a (and I quote) “Marxist homosexualist infiltrator” liberal idiot (whew!).

You get the idea! Maybe…

Perhaps not yet.

  • There are those who condemn Pius XII for his extreme activism in saving more Jews than all others put together during the Holocaust, for they say that he is a demonic Marxist homosexualist infiltrator because he didn’t also scream against the Holocaust in front of the New Reich Chancellery in Berlin, but saved more Jews than he otherwise could have by working quietly, not worrying about scoring points with those who would condemn him for doing much better than those who screamed.
  • And then there are those who praise those who condemn Pius XII because they think they are being politically correct with traditionalist Catholics who actually are not traditionalist nor Catholic in such endeavors.

Not you get it, for sure.

I recommend, instead, a voice of reason in all this: Father Gordon MacRae (about). Take a look at this article of his about Hitler’s Pope, Nazi Crimes and the New York Times, along with the incisive comments by the likes of, say, Dorothy Stein.

As it is, I think that any prophetic voice ends up being self-serving when the speaker is doing this for one-up-man-ship, for self-righteous “I’m better than you are” inversion. Sure, speak out while you can and in whatever way you can as long as that does not get people unnecessarily murdered.

Was Benedict XVI right to speak out against Islamicist violence in Regensburg even though later there were retaliatory killings? Sure.

Was it right for Pius XII to do the best he could to save as many as he could even if this didn’t fit the scream at all times categories of later pundits? Absolutely.

But the complicity of the New York Times in the Holocaust is what it is.

Look at the circumstances.

I think that those who strike out at the Lord’s anointed, at Pius XII, and against so many who were martyrs in the midst of their prudence, will regret having done this on the day of judgment.

Our Lord will not be mocked. Our Lord will not be mocked in His martyrs.

Really.

3 Comments

Filed under Catholic, martyrdom, Persecution, priests

Electile Dysfunction: Obama’s Orwellian fulfillment of 1984 in 2012 (Father Gordon MacRae’s call to martyrdom)

tsw10

Father Gordon MacRae (about) has written an awesome post on the proper Separation of Church and State, whereby the State is not to persecute and control the Church, defining and establishing a state religion which controls every aspect of everyone’s lives, effectively having everyone worship the head of state.

george orwellOf course, no one could care less with all the Orwellian brainwashing that goes on, and no amout of punditry and commentary will change anyone.

That’s why Father Gordon, with great pastoral zeal, brings the message home to the Lord’s little flock, citing the Gospel of Matthew, and then closes with some rather incisive encouragement from Father John Harden, S.J.

“In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus cautioned us that we must go out in public as though sheep in the presence of wolves, but He never intended that we should follow the wolves.”

“Unless we recover the zeal and spirit of the first-century Christians – unless we are willing to do what they did, and pay the price they paid – the future of our country, the days of America are numbered.” Fr. John Hardon, S.J.

Now, I’d like to point out to HSH readers that when you head over to Father Gordon’s TheseStoneWalls, don’t forget to be taken by the irony of what you are doing, that is, reading some of the most incisive, thoughtful observations and meditations on the blogosphere today, that is, written by someone, wrongly accused, wrongly imprisoned, who has lived for more than 18 years in the midst of the 24/7 absolute mayhem of prison.

Whether Father realizes it or not, all the posts have the sharpest of analogies with his own prison life, so edgy, in fact, that I wonder if most people get this. Just something to keep in mind. For this week’s post, you have to know that Father has recently read over some of the very recent rehashes of the prosecution. I’m sure he must be wondering if the prosecutors are suffering from some of the electile dysfunction that he writes about in this great article. Oh, yes… that link for a terribly good read today: here. What a title.

2 Comments

Filed under martyrdom, Persecution, politics, separation of church and state

SO, LET’S FISK “ACCOMPLICE” with Cardinal Burke’s help regarding the HHS abortifacient mandate

cardinal raymond burke googled image

IN THIS POST, I’ll fisk the article in the Catholic Encyclopedia on being an ACCOMPLICE, something which I hope will bring a bit of clarity to the situation.

But first, let’s begin with a few words of Cardinal Burke whom I hope will be the next Roman Pontiff should he somehow outlive Pope Benedict XVI, gloriously reigning, who, I hope, will outlive everyone.

Thomas McKenna: “So a Catholic employer, really getting down to it, he does not, or she does not provide this because that way they would be, in a sense, cooperating with the sin…the sin of contraception or the sin of providing a contraceptive that would abort a child, is this correct?”

Cardinal Burke: “This is correct. It is not only a matter of what we call “material cooperation” in the sense that the employer by giving this insurance benefit is materially providing for the contraception but it is also “formal cooperation” because he is knowingly and deliberately doing this, making this available to people. There is no way to justify it. It is simply wrong.”

Here’s the audio for that. Turn the volume up on your computer before starting. The above two paragraphs follow after about a minute of conversation to that you can get the flow of what’s being said.


See LifeSiteNews for the full article. People dismiss the Cardinal’s statement, saying that he is a canon lawyer, not a moral theologian, and therefore has no right to speak of such things. But this isn’t about “authority” of name-throwing or the declared competencies declared by letters after one’s name, is it? No. In fact, it is a matter of natural law, of reason. So, let’s reason this out, shall we?

From the old Catholic Encyclopedia digitized by NewAdvent and [fisked] by yours truly. Let’s use the example of providing a gun to someone, and then make some distinctions afterward.

Accomplice

A term generally employed to designate a partner in some form of evildoing. An accomplice is one who cooperates in some way in the wrongful activity of another who is accounted the principal. [The "principal" is a girl who will murder innocent people with a gun that she buys from you.]

From the viewpoint of the moral theologian not every such species of association is straightway to be adjudged unlawful. It is necessary to distinguish first of all between formal and material cooperation.

To formally cooperate in the sin of another is to be associated with him in the performance of a bad deed in so far forth as it is bad, that is, to share in the perverse frame of mind of that other. [You know of her plan to shoot innocent people, and willingly sell her the gun, wanting this to happen.]

On the contrary, to materially cooperate in another’s crime is to participate in the action so far as its physical entity is concerned, but not in so far as it is motived [motivated] by the malice of the principal in the case. [You don't know of her plan to kill innocent people, and sell her the gun in view of all the other motives there can be, such as self-defense, recreational target shooting, etc.]

For example, to persuade another to absent himself without reason from Mass on Sunday would be an instance of formal cooperation. To sell a person in an ordinary business transaction a revolver which he presently uses to kill himself is a case of material cooperation.

Then it must be borne in mind that the cooperation may be described as proximate or remote in proportion to the closeness of relation between the action of the principal and that of his helper. The teaching with regard to this subject-matter is very plain, and may be stated in this wise:

Formal cooperation is never lawful, since it presupposes a manifestly sinful attitude on the part of the will of the accomplice. [Wanting to murder the innocent is always evil.]

Material complicity is held to be justified when it is brought about by an action which is in itself either morally good or at any rate indifferent [Selling a gun to someone you don't know wants to murder innocent people], and when there is a sufficient reason for permitting on the part of another the sin which is a consequence of the action [Guns can also be used for self-defense, which is a commensurate reason as you don't know the other's intention of malice]. The reason for this assertion is patent; for the action of the accomplice is assumed to be unexceptionable , his intention is already bespoken to be proper [Selling guns with good intentions is always unexceptionable and proper, all things being equal], and he cannot be burdened with the sin of the principal agent, since there is supposed to be a commensurately weighty reason for not preventing it [such as the use of guns for self-defense].

[Let's re-cap that with the example of the HHS abortifacient mandate. Murdering the innocent in the womb is the express intention of the principal agent. She takes abortifacients to kill children. This must also be the wilfull intention of the accomplice, who provides Obamacare abortifacient mandated insurance. One is paying for the abortifacients to be used with the express intention of murdering innocent children. One is, de facto, ipso facto, in agreement with the girl who is out to murder children in her womb. Paying for Obamacare insurance cannot be mere material cooperation. While guns can be used for good purposes, abortifacients are very precisely manufactured to have the one purpose of murdering innocent people in the womb.]

Practically, however, it is often difficult to apply these principles [not in this case], because it is hard to determine whether the cooperation is formal or only material [not in this case], and also whether the reason alleged for a case of material cooperation bears due proportion to the grievousness of the sin committed by the principal, and the intimacy of the association with him [The evil of losing one's business because of not being able to pay fines because of not providing Obamacare fades into insignificance compared to the evil of willingly facilitating the murder of innocent people in the womb].

It is especially the last-named factor ["intimacy of association"] which is a fruitful source of perplexity. [This bit about being able to distance oneself from the perception of being an accomplice out of concern for scandal is simply an added factor. Whether or not others know of the sin doesn't mean there is no sin. Note well that this bit about "distancing" is very common among some bishops. But, our Lord sees all, no matter how distanced one is. Hell is not so far that He cannot put someone there.]

In general, however, the following considerations will be of value in discerning whether in an instance of material cooperation the reason avowed [saving one's business by paying for Obamacare] is valid or not. The necessity for a more and more powerful reason [not to be an accomplice] is accentuated in proportion as there is

• a greater likelihood that the sin would not be committed without the act of material cooperation [It has been shown time and again that the introduction of contraceptives/abortifacients is immediately followed by a sharp rise in sexual activity, promiscuity and abortion. When you throw such things at people, they will be used, even and especially by those who would have stayed chaste until marriage.];

•a closer relationship between the two [The employer/employee relationship is about as close as it gets. If the employer provides abortifacients, the employee will feel encouraged to think that it is O.K. to use them with the blessing of the employer, even though the employer has said that he personally disagrees with their use. No one builds a crematorium in Auschwitz and then says to the Commandant that he personally disagrees with the use of the crematoriums. That would be ludicrous. It is what some bishops already do with very bad advice.]; and

•a greater heinousness in the sin, especially in regard to harm done either to the common weal or some unoffending third party. [The common weal is destroyed more easily and quickly and thoroughly in this way than in any other way. The unoffending third party, the innocent child in the womb, is murdered. This is a greater heinousness any way you look at it.]

It is to be observed that, when damage has been done to a third person [the murdered child in the womb], the question is raised not only of the lawfulness of the cooperation, but also of restitution to be made for the violation of a strict right [How does one even restore the right to life to one who is already murdered?]. Whether in that case the accomplice has shared in the perpetration of the injustice physically [Yes.] or morally (i.e. by giving a command, by persuasion, etc.) [Yes.] whether positively [Yes.] or negatively (i.e. by failing to prevent it) [Yes.] the obligation of restitution is determined in accordance with the following principle. All are bound to reparation who in any way are accounted to be the actual efficient causes of the injury wrought, or who, being obliged by contract [In this case, natural law and the ten commandments], express or implied, to prevent it, have not done so [There it is]. There are circumstances in which fellowship in the working of damage to another makes the accomplice liable to restitution in solidum; that is, he is then responsible for the entire loss in so far as his partners have failed to make good for their share. [One will be at a loss on the brink of hell, will one not?] Finally, mention must be made of the Constitution of Benedict XIV, Sacramentum Poenitentiae, governing a particular case of complicity. It provides that a priest who has been the accomplice of any person in a sin against the Sixth Commandment is rendered incapable of absolving validly that person from that sin, except in danger of death, and then only if there be no other priest obtainable. [I wonder what politically correct priests will say to our Lord about their lack of fatherly governance in parishes.]*

*The article’s bibliographical data are placed in this post after the “continue reading” button below.

* * *

The author of this article is a bit carried away with “intention”. This feeds into what would later be condemned by Pius XII as situation ethics with its proportionalism lacking, by definition, any true comparative possibility. However, one merely needs to ask what one is doing as well as what the intention is. For instance, providing flowers for your wife to beautify her dreary hospital room is no reason to steal flowers from the local flower shop. In this case of the provision of abortifacients, what one is doing is commensurate with why one is doing it, even if one comes up with different reasons. For instance, the what of buying Obamacare abortifacient insurance is evil. The only reason why one would provide abortifacients is to murder the innocent in the womb. Even if one says that one’s only intention is to save one’s business from being shut down by Obama, this rings as hollow as any cry for help that one screams out as one falls into hell.

By the way: There are those who say that since the murder of innocent people in the womb is only a possibility, though really a probability, there is not guilt involved. But that would be like saying that the gun dealer who sells a gun to someone for the specific purpose of killing innocent people is not guilty of a sin just because it snowed later that day and the intended victims got away. That’s just ludicrous.

Please, use the sharing buttons!

Continue reading

6 Comments

Filed under Catholic, martyrdom, Persecution, politics, Pro-Life, separation of church and state

THE NEW YORK TIMES — COMPLICITY WITH THE HOLOCAUST STILL TODAY

The upshot of this article: Not only was The New York Times run by Holocaust denying Nazi sympathizers during and after World War II, but this is still the case today, with the particularly tragic edge of sarcasm and cynicism known only to those who defend their crimes against humanity. It is not too harsh to speak of sympathy with Hitler when the most powerful mass media instrument of the day downplayed and buried and, indeed, effectively denied that there was anything even like a Final Solution, as Hitler called his genocide. And that denial is, of course, a crime. Continue reading

5 Comments

Filed under martyrdom, news, Persecution, politics, religion

Laudie-dog: determined to remind me of Saint Thomas More — “I am the president’s obedient servant, but God’s first.”

Laudie-dog likes to stand in front of the open fire and warm up when I let her in for a few moments. She eats inside so that her food doesn’t get wet, or eaten by the chickens, or by other beasts, or mice or rats or what have you. Then she stands there, warming up.
Recently, I put an old wooden seat (a recent donation) in front of the stove so as the more conveniently to stoke the fire. Great for this old hermit! Laudie-dog thought this would be a good place to rest her head.

I’m sorry, but I just could not help thinking of a scene at the end of A Man for All Seasons, when Saint Thomas More is getting his head chopped off, saying, “I am the King’s obedient servant, but God’s first.”

I hope I can say that, and mean it, in God’s grace, even now, and in whatever other circumstance: “I am the president’s good servant, but God’s first.”

Yikes!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Catholic, martyrdom, Persecution, separation of church and state

The Gates of Hell shall not prevail — non praevalebunt — The Fulton Sheen version

Obama’s Obamacare persecution — hand in hand with a most willing John Boehner — will not prevail against the Church, which conquers in the fidelity of the martyrs.

Leave a Comment

Filed under martyrdom, Persecution, politics, separation of church and state

02 For Greater Glory – Cristeros – Film review – Just war theory (Part 2)

Obama says that he can constitutionally limit freedom of religion to worship in closed buildings. Chief Justice Roberts agrees. Roberts signed his legislation, his judicial trumping of the constitution, which cannot but have the effect of a death warrant, a persecution of Catholics, even to death as time marches quickly on.

So, the attempt is already being made to force Catholics to formally participate in murdering their young neighbors in the womb by trying to force them to pay for abortifacients for girls who, in Obama’s opinion, just because they are girls, just can’t help themselves in their college years and need to have sex, sex, sex, you know, for free, as if they are having sex with him (as per his obscene political television message). But it’s O.K., he says, for Catholics to have Mass indoors, all that hocus pocus stuff.

Lots of Catholics agree. I’ve met many. They think Obama is God’s gift to the world, that abortion and contraception and planned parenthood is just great. They will vote for Obama, of course, and then go where after they die?

Anyway, one cannot divide one’s conscience which must be formed by the Church and which one must act on in public life (rejecting Obamacare and its penalties), from worship.

How is it that one could offer Jesus, the Head of the Mystical Body, during Mass, but then go ahead and put the littlest, most defenseless members of that same Mystical Body to death in the womb? “What you have done to the least of these you have done to me” says the King of the Universe. The cowardice of killing such defenseless people is what? There’s just no description…

As Obama wades through the corpses of the little ones he’s helped to slaughter on his way to judgment (for we will all be judged by our Lord), do you think he and those who vote for him so enthusiastically will get a good hearing?

Just to say, there will be no freedom of worship if he is re-elected. Catholics will be held to be enemies of the state. The Department of Health and Human Services, the new polit-bureau (which can legislate at will, on anything), has already stated that the Catholic Church is out to bring down the Government of the U.S.A. by not wanting to support Planned Parenthood.

This is the worst it’s ever been ever in the history of mankind. I mean, usually, tyrannical rulers just want people to go against their conscience by offering incense to the gods, to the politicians of the day. Sometimes, as in this past century, until today, they have instigated genocides of hundreds of millions of peoples. Hundreds of millions.

But now, it is insisted that people pay for the sacrifice of the little ones to the politicians of the day against their consciences. That brings it all to a whole other level. We are on the threshold.

There will be no freedom of worship. Instead, let’s just repeat that picture:

For Greater Glory is now on DVD. A. Must. See.

Leave a Comment

Filed under films, martyrdom, Persecution, politics, religion, separation of church and state

Beheading the saints, anytime, anywhere (even here and now)

First of all, just to say, what a great painting of the beheading of Saint John. Even as the executioner places the still dripping head onto the platter held by the slutty daughter of Herod — (and will I get arrested for that comment even today by the LGBTTIQQ2SMAPAVMZ crowd?) — you can see the utterly calm expression of Saint John, even as you can witness the “I’ve now come of age” look given by the girl to her mother, to whom she delivers the head. Yikes!

You have to understand that times don’t change. If you search out the history of persecutions of the Church in any given age or place, you’ll see that there is always a percentage who are faithful, indeed martyred, and a percentage who become persecutors, and a percentage who couldn’t care less, you know, the lukewarm crowd that God will vomit away, as we read in the book of Revelation.

Sure, any given culture may be “nice” — for a while — but then some knucklehead stirs things up for a persecution. It’s not that what was in the pot changed at all. He just stirs it up. “Nice” turns into murder. But it was always that way under the surface. The same people who turn into the murderers are the ones who were simply “nice”, but who didn’t really believe. These are the gossips, slanderers, the “in” people, who have nothing to do but tear others down, pretending to build themselves up.

It’s great when most people are going to confession, as this cuts down on the “niceness” of people, having them be in humble thanksgiving and be about enthusiastically helping each other out, because it is then, and only then, that people come to realize how much our Lord Jesus did for them in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

He still bears those wounds, for us. That is… for ourselves. Yep. We did that. I did that. If anyone wants to say something about another, say the same thing that is to be said about ourselves, that we persecuted the Son of the Living God, that we were sons of the devil until our Lord took us to Himself. He sanctifies us.

I deserve to get my head cut off because I’ve crucified the Son of the Living God because of my sins, original sin and otherwise. And then, by His grace, I deserve to have my head cut off because I’ve just said such a thing, proclaiming faith in the Son of the Living God. That’s how that works.

I would behead John the Baptist, because that is just how evil I am apart from the grace of God. As are we all, without exception. But I would join John, as would we all, in living by the grace and friendship provided by the Son of the Immaculate Conception.

And that’s nothing to be frightened about. This is the epic drama that is playing out at any given time in any given place, without exception, until the return of the Son of Man, of God, of the Immaculate Conception, upon this earth. We can be, in fact, as calm about it, as filled with humble thanksgiving about it, as is Saint John depicted above. What an expression on his face! How wonderful is that? Very wonderful indeed.

2 Comments

Filed under martyrdom

Updated again… Obamacare enforcement: “Catholics ought to immitate the submissive cooperation of the Jews” in their final solution

You spooky friends of mine (CIA, FBI, DHS…) ought to check out the fellow who was seated next to me on my U.S. Air flight from Paris to Charlotte on 26 July, 2012. All seats were assigned except for mine, until the last second.

The last time I was not assigned a seat was back in 1984, on my way to war torn Managua from Miami, on route to the Bluefields Vicariate. It was an open seating, first-come first-served situation. Though I and a friend were one of the first in line, we weren’t allowed on the half-empty plane, given the excuse that the plane was already full! The next day, it looked like we were to be refused again, but then a gentleman arrived and we were given assigned seating, with that gentleman between us. It turns out that he was CIA agent who wanted to know what we were doing going to such a country just then. He was very courteous, figuring us out, and gave us some expensive liquor to give to the great Cardinal of Managua, which we did.

Now, on the flight from Paris the other day, a way overbooked flight with all assigned seating, I did not have an assigned seat, even though there were some 100 people behind me in line. My boarding gate was changed to the “Envoy” gate. Just as I was about to board the plane, the airport speaker system announced my name. With that, I was told to go to a certain counter of another gate on the far side of that part of the terminal. There I was provided with a special ticket, this time with assigned seating. Next to my seat was a gentelman who, instead of sitting with his wife, he said, up in the front of the plane, came to sit next to me in a just-happened-to-be-vacant seat of a terribly overbooked flight. His excuse was that his wife was sick. Maybe the fellow who was supposed to be next to me had to sit next to his sick wife! All just coincidence, surely…

Anyway, this fellow is the present chairman of a super-NGO affecting untold numbers of run of the mill NGOs and a multitude of directly vetted and chosen individuals of countries around the world, all of them hyper-influential people. His super-NGO makes it it’s business to very effectively steer perspectives of countries and regions of countries with large sums of money as bait, though making this appear to be a grassroots initiative. No debate. No room for inititive. All participants must be sycophants, of which there are many in this world, apparently. This fellow liked to talk, so he couldn’t but mention now and again the branches of the U.S. government which had a direct, dicisive interest in his activities. Of course, I also like to ask questions and make comments that are bound to get things out of people, but I digress. In effect, he was happy to be a government pawn, changing his decades old, prestigious super-NGO into a willing puppet of the Obama administration.

He reeked of a liberalism which gets nervous around principled people. The stakes were jacked up in the conversation (perhaps five hours total), every time he realized I was more studied up in whatever direction the conversation wandered, for instance, into liberation theology (my teacher having been Gustavo himself). Soon he let himself repeat all the lines of Obama and the HHS, for instance about Catholics illegally “forcing” others not to contracept because Catholics didn’t want to pay for abortifacients. He insisted that the common good of encouraging sex followed by abortion had to be protected by the government, even if that meant forcing Catholics to go against their consciences, having them pay for the misbehavior of others.

When I brought up the great film of this Summer called “Cristeros”, about the self-defence of the Catholics who were getting slaughtered in Mexico in their tens of thousands as their religious rights were being trampled, he came out with the line in the title of this post: “Catholics ought to immitate the submissive cooperation of the Jews in their final solution.” He said this with a tone of voice that indicated praise for the Jews who so nicely went along with their own executioners. Get it, my Jewish friends? If you don’t help us Catholics now, don’t think it will not happen to you as well, all over again. This has got to stop, and it’s got to stop now. He’s just as willing to kill Jews right now as he is willing to kill Catholics. Get it? What kind of influence is he spreading with your tax dollars?

Now, if I was at a real computer, I would check out this fellow who was sitting next to me on the plane. But I’m not. But some of you reading this post are. Help us Catholics. Help the Jews. It’ll give you work, but that’s good, no?

Update… Touched a button. Good.

Updated again (27 August 2012): You’ve surely heard the stupid saying that religion is responsible for all violence in the world. That’s usually said as a throwaway line by atheist knuckleheads who have an axe to grind against whatever member of the Church, somehow speaking to the violence that they would like to do as revenge against any real or perceived stupidity by that individual. Well, take an advance course in all this:

The other day I went into a business and was asked how I was doing, and how my trip overseas went. I said fine, except that I had the strangest conversation with a gentleman on the return flight. I told the story above. Both examples, mind you, as above, were about the Nazi government killing off all the Jews and about the Socialist government of Mexico slaughtering the Catholics  in the earlier part of last century.

The response was to ask me whether I was a Catholic priest. I said yes, and that it is difficult, isn’t it, to know it someone wearing a Roman Collar is really just a Lutheran or Anglican “priest”. The response to my saying that I’m a Catholic priest was to say that religion is responsible for all the violence in the world. Get that? The hatred against Catholics and those of any religion has been jacked up recently. What’s going on?

Just to say, huge persecutions have been taking place in this most bloodiest, violent, hellish past century. And it’s still going on. It may be that America will be next. There are those who hate religion, who hate life. They should be voted out of office. But most importantly, there is prayer: Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee. And… Our Father…

I think I might mention all this to the Jewish community in Brevard. They use Sacred Heart Catholic Church. I mean, how can we forget the horror, and who did it? Here’s the video I made, once again, of the names of the children being read out at the Yad vaShem Holocaust Memorial in Jerusalem:

The banner of the Cristeros:

9 Comments

Filed under Just me, martyrdom, politics, separation of church and state, terrorism

(updates) 04 HSH dhimmitude series: I asked for my “insurance” to be cancelled by 31 July 2012 (if it’s not exempt)

I’ve been following an important set of comments, and adding quite a few of my own, on WDTPRS, about Obamacare and the HHS mandate, here. There are important links with great material, such as this one here.

At a certain point, I wrote an email requesting for my “insurance” to be cancelled if it were not exempt from the Obamacare and HHS provisions for abortion, abortifacients, etc., by the end of July 2012, that is, before enforcement begins.

Whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord’s! Praised be the name of the Lord!

When I began this series on the spirituality one might enjoy even though living under the yoke of dhimmitude, I imagined I would be writing for readers who are anywhere but in the United States, that is, until the Supreme Court decision making Catholics pay a penalty for the practice of their religion in not paying into the abortion superfund of Obamacare.

Of course, no one is forced to do anything. I won’t be paying any “penalties” or “taxes” either. That just goes back into the abortion fund, right? So, no.

I just can’t see paying for the deaths for the deaths of the least among us, those who are just conceived, those who are not yet born. I won’t do it.

Those who live under oppression can always do the right thing. We are called to be faithful. If we want to get to heaven, and heaven is forever by the way, then it’s all about…

Fidelity! Fidelity! Fidelity!

Look to Jesus. He’s conquered the world. He bears the scars to prove it. Do we?

UPDATE: Someone said that the enforcement dates are different according to the renewal date on the policy. Thus, if the renewal is comes up only after 1 August, it is only then that the enforcement would kick in. So, I’m checking into that.

UPDATE: There is a plea to map out for everyone in all their circumstances that which is formal or material cooperation, proximate or remote, distanced or not, etc. My response is to ask the USCCB, which has been pushing for civil disobedience based on the fact that paying into an abortion insurance fund, however you make it look, is what it is, formal cooperation in the death of children in the womb or just born, etc. Formal cooperation is a grave evil. And… and… there is a latae sententiae excommunication for formal cooperation in such a case, is there not? The bishops have called for massive civil disobedience. I won’t pay into such insurance, and won’t pay any penalties or taxes. Nope.

UPDATE: In response to a comment on that comments post on WDTPRS linked to above, I answered this:

As for the precedent of dioceses doing untoward things, well… that’s not how moral theology works. There’s no morality by democracy. You can always but always find a super conservative priest, a super conservative canon lawyer, a super conservative moral theologian, a super conservative ethics board, a super conservative moral theology journal, a super conservative ethics think tank, etc., all of whom will back one’s opinion about doing whatever one wants just because it’s the politically correct thing to do, not because it is consonant with Scripture, Tradition and the Magisterial interventions of the Church, which they will only haphazardly cite so as to look nice.

We also have to be discerning. I’ve also done quite a bit of moral theology in my day, that is, with some advanced, as it were, doubly post-graduate studies. I have plenty to say about formal and material cooperation which is proximate or remote or even “distanced[!]“. I have plenty to say about how the USCCB in decades past have misapplied these terms to get what they wanted in health care regarding the combinations of Catholic and non-Catholic hospitals in regard to abortion, etc.

The most conservative Archdiocese at the time, for instance, said that abortions were fine in Catholic hospitals for the reason that it was an out-patient procedure. The Catholic hospital was therefore “distanced” in cooperation.

The most conservative diocese at the time said that handing out date-rape pills was fine because, the super-conservative icon of orthodoxy moral theologian said: “It’s so small [the possibly just conceived baby], who will know the difference? So who cares?” Get it?

However, times have changed, perhaps. The USCCB has said that they are pushing so hard for the reason that paying into an abortion insurance fund would be formal cooperation. If they come up with some other sort of rubbish to say that one is only remotely, materially cooperating, you know, from a “distance”, changing their tune just because they are now under pressure from the laity instead of the government… well… I’d have some choice words to say about all that.

For myself, I can’t see cooperating in the death of little kids, whether by paying into the abortion super fund or subsidizing abortifacients (whenever all that kicks in). The super fund will gain about, what, 3 1/2 billion dollars a year if everyone kicks in? It’s a dollar a month for everyone, but I would guess that even the entire amount of a tax or penalty would go to these ends.

For my own insignificant life, we will see what happens. I suppose I’ll survive to see Obamacare tossed. Maybe not. Whatever… I just want to do the right thing. No compromise. Jesus has loved us too much, right unto death, with no compromise, for us, for me to start compromising by helping to murder the littlest among us. I don’t want Jesus to say to me at the judgment: “Get away from me you evildoer, I never knew you!” So, instead of that: Fidelity! Fidelity! Fidelity!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Dhimmitude, martyrdom, Persecution, politics, religion, separation of church and state, Spiritual Life

POTUS & SCOTUS & THE END OF AMERICA: OBAMA CARE SURVIVES

6 Comments

Filed under martyrdom, Persecution, politics, religion, separation of church and state

POTUS Obama – FATHER Weslin // DIOCESE of Manchester – FATHER MacRae

To read one of the best takes ever on this, just click on the picture.

:) I double-dare you. :)

1 Comment

Filed under abuse, martyrdom, Persecution, politics, Pro-Life, separation of church and state

Screwtape on the USCCB: “Make sure their bid for religious freedom is simply a desire for relativizing academic freedom, just controversy among scholars

In C.S. Lewis’ Screwtape Letters, the demon Screwtape writes to the demon Wormwood about the man they want to get into hell:

“Your man has been accustomed, ever since he was a boy, to have a dozen incompatible philosophies dancing about together inside his head. He doesn’t think of doctrines as primarily “true” of “false”, but as “academic” or “practical”, “outworn” or “contemporary”, “conventional” or “ruthless”. Jargon, not argument, is your best ally in keeping him from the Church. “

At the USCCB meeting in Atlanta, this week, John Garvey, an attorney, had this to say to their Eminences and Excellencies — my emphases and [comments]:

I hope to show that the very ideal of religious tolerance – born of the notion that every individual should be free to believe whatever he wants about God –is one of the principal forces driving us toward the abyss.

I’m just thinking out loud. But it might be that the argument for religious freedom lies farther back than we have put it. Preserving religious liberty may not be a job for lawyers like me. It may be a job for lawyers like Thomas More. Our society won’t care about religious freedom if it doesn’t care about God. That’s where reform is needed. We won’t have –and we probably won’t need – religious exemptions for nurses, doctors, teachers, social workers if no one is practicing their religion. The best way to protect religious freedom might be to remind people that they should love God. [Who IS Love and IS Truth] This is, after all, why we have a first amendment. And why in better times we have not needed to rely on the Constitution at all, because we could depend on our elected representatives to respect our liberty.

The tragedy of Thomas More was that he had to die because he loved God. He could not be both a good subject and a faithful Catholic. ["The King's good subject, but God's first"] Our tragedy is different, though it is no less about the protection of religious liberty. The mechanisms to preserve religious liberty only work when people care about their religion. Religious liberty will expand or contract accordingly. Saving religious liberty means reminding people that they should love God. Thomas More taught us that we need religious liberty. More importantly, he taught us that loving God is worth dying for. If that is so, then the freedom to love God is worth the fight. [Be martyrs. Die for the faith. And if you're going to do that, manifest that faith even now.] That’s the message we need to get across. I think that asking people to keep this cause in their prayers during the Fortnight for Freedom is precisely the right remedy for what ails us.   /// June 13, 2012

7 Comments

Filed under Catholic, martyrdom, Persecution, politics, separation of church and state

Obama’s oppression of religious freedom and a 1/2 hour documentary “For Greater Glory”

Obama’s not mentioned. However, 1 August is mentioned. That’s the date when laws already on the books against religious freedom began to be enforced in Mexico by the Freemason socialists with acts of murder and destruction and mayhem.

1 August, mind you, is the date when Obama’s laws already on the books against relgious freedom will begin to be enforced in the U.S.A.

I put a countdown widget at the bottom of the blog page: Yikes!

4 Comments

Filed under martyrdom, Military, Persecution, politics, separation of church and state

Ecclesia Militans – The Church Militant – Benedict XVI and “Friends”

 HSH emphases and [comments]

WORDS OF HIS HOLINESS BENEDICT XVI
AT THE LUNCHEON WITH THE CARDINALS

Hall of Dukes, Apostolic Palace – Monday, 21 May 2012

Your Eminence, Dear Brothers,

At this moment my words can only be of gratitude. A “thank you” first of all to the Lord for the many years he has given me; years filled with many days of joy, marvelous times but also with dark nights. Yet, in retrospect, one understands that those nights were necessary and good, a cause for thanksgiving. [He is using his experience in the spiritual life to teach the Cardinals. He never says things that are not needed to be spoken. He is confirming his brothers in the faith. These are not mere words of nostalgia, but the testimony of someone who knows that death will come sooner than later, but only by way of very, very dark times, with much evil afoot, but with much goodness being brought out of that evil, for the greater glory of God. He is rightly imposing on the hearts and souls of the Princes of the Church. He is calling on them to be faithful, now, and in times to come, no matter what. Lets see:]

Today the phrase ecclesia militans [the Church Militant, or better, reflecting the participle: The Church Being Militant!] is somewhat out of fashion [put out of fashion by those who would have the Church surrender, as they have done, to the enemy forces, to Satan himself...] but in fact we can understand ever more so that it is true, that it contains within it the truth [The Church on earth is only the Church inasmuch as it is Militating against the Evil One. Being with Christ Jesus in His victory, in the ultimate victory in the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, in The Battle spoken of in Genesis 3,15, is where this battle is done par excellence.]. We see how evil wishes to dominate in the world ["dominate" = it's always about power. Always. Non serviam! I will not serve! For I, Satan, want to be God!] and that it is necessary to fight against evil [necessary to fight = sine qua non. Passifists just go to hell. Consensus builders with Satan go to hell. Nicey nice people who never stand up in all truth and charity for all truth and charity just go to hell. To repeat: "It is necessary to fight."]. We see that it [evil] does so in so many ways: cruelty, through the different forms of violence, but even disguised as good and thereby undermining the moral foundations of society. [such as giving Holy Communion to pro-abort politicians who mock God, the Church and their fellow man. This erodes the moral foundations of society. This is using the Blessed Sacrament to further divide the Church. "But I was just trying to be nice!" Nope. You've lost the battle. Those who are not with Christ are fighting against Him.]

St Augustine said that all history is a struggle between two loves: [1] love of self to the point of despising God; and [2] love of God to the point of despising oneself, in martyrdom. [He's saying that he's been prepared to be a martyr, and that he is asking his cardinals to be martyrs with him. Martyrdom is fullest sign of love of neighbor as well, for this is a witness to the love of God, an invitation to believe in a love that is stronger than death, a love that calls ones enemies, "friends", just as Christ did to Judas in the Garden of Gethsemane even as Judas was betraying Jesus (see Matthew 26,50).] We are caught up in this struggle and in this struggle it is very important to have friends. [Remember, the first collegial act of the apostles was recalled in one short verse, Mark 14,50: "And abandoning Him, they all fled."] And as for myself, I am surrounded by my friends in the College of Cardinals; you are my friends and I feel at home with you, I feel safe in this company of great friends, who are here with me and all together with the Lord. [Our Holy Father is always, always the most perfect gentlemen, always trying to attract by way of goodness and kindness. It's not that he is unaware of the presence of Judas among the ranks. It is because he is aware of this that he so graciously says such things in the hope of winning them over for Christ before it is too late for them.]

Thank you for this friendship. [Those who are true will feel that friendship themselves. Those who are with Judas will feel only contempt.] Thank you, Your Eminence, for all you have done for this event today and for all that you always do. Thank you for the communion in joys and in troubles. Let us move ahead, the Lord said: Courage, I have conquered the world. We are on the Lord’s team, hence on the winning team. [just to use the terminology of the consensus builders. Hah!] I thank you all. May the Lord bless all of you. And let us raise our glasses. [The fraternity of the saints in heaven is very wonderful indeed. We have nothing to fear with being martyrs. Let's us arise and go forth!]

© Copyright 2012 – Libreria Editrice Vaticana

Did I mention that “For Greater Glory” (Cristiada) is now playing. Go and see it!

Info HERE and here and, on this blog, here!

2 Comments

Filed under Catholic, martyrdom, Military, Persecution, politics, separation of church and state

Father Francisco Vera! It can happen here and now. Time for heaven!

1 Comment

Filed under martyrdom

For Greater Glory – Cristiada – The Movie Obama’s DHS Might Just Forbid You To See (wink wink)

Is there a trailer without commercials at the beginning? Is there a best trailer? I have very little bandwidth. Some help, please.

This is the kind of movie that Obama’s Department of Homeland Security, etc., fears would foment a civil war in the United States should the Supreme Court decide in favor of the abortion mandate, against religious freedom. That decision is scheduled to be on the docket this June, in one form. The USCCB is laudably bringing more examples of Obama’s relentless persecution of religion, particularly persecution of the Catholic Church, to court.

I always thought that this is the Marxist purpose of Obama: to foment civil war by trashing the Constitution of the United States. That’s what our local Marxists do. That’s what Obama’s admin is doing. Too bad, that.

Actually, the DHS doesn’t fear any such thing. They encourage it. That’s the policy. Get it? Why? Because you can’t fight the government of the U.S.A. You will die. The government knows that, and wants people to try, just to kill them “legitimately.”

Don’t take up arms against the government. Be martyrs. Not in the Muslim sense. No. In the Catholic sense. Be led like sheep to the slaughter. That’s how the faith will grow in the U.S.A. In no other way.

Remember how Cristero, beatified Father Miguel Pro, was martyred while he exclaimed, “¡Viva Cristo Rey! ¡Viva la Virgen de Guadalupe! “

It can and most likely will happen here if Obama gets re-elected. But it will be stupid Catholics who will re-elect him, among them Catholic priests, you know, such as those who scandalously and loudly proclaim that they voted against the “one man and one woman = marriage” amendment during North Carolina’s recent election, insisting, as such priesets do, that homosexual “marriage” has to be promoted and protected. Sigh. Such priests should repent or, if not, simply crawl under a rock and die. They are helping to bring on a violent persecution.

Pray for priests. We need those who lay down their lives for the faith.

Am I a terrorist for saying these things? No. Am I fomenting war? No. I’m just saying that we need priests to be martyrs for the faith, not wimps who are sycophants of Obama.

11 Comments

Filed under Catholic, martyrdom, Military, Persecution, religion, separation of church and state

Monsignor Michael and These Stone Walls

Monsigor Michael, an extraordinary canon lawyer, has an awesome guest-post over on These Stone Walls. It’s a great read about not counting the cost, about witnessing to our Lord when no one else will, about taking the heat for that but rejoicing in the friendship of our Lord. Totally cool! He has a much easier style of writing than yours truly. Very enjoyable. A sign that someone knows what they’re talking about. Lots of suffering behind what he’s written. Awesome. HERE.

Leave a Comment

Filed under abuse, martyrdom, saints

These nuns pray for there to be MORE MARTYRS! Vocations, anyone?!

http://www.tyburnconvent.org.uk/home/martyrs.html
Today’s the feast of all the Tyburn Martyrs, by the way.

1 Comment

Filed under Catholic, martyrdom, Vocations

Thomas More, Thomas Aquinas and Christ Jesus on mercy being a potential part of the virtue of justice: Yikes!

One of the interrogation scenes with Saint Thomas More:

More: “You threaten like a dockside bully.”

Cromwell: “How should I threaten?”

More: “Like a minister of State, with justice.”

Cromwell: “Oh! Justice is what you’re threatened with!”

More: “Then I am not threatened.”

The provision of justice is the provision of mercy. More was a lawyer, so let’s turn to a theologian for some precision:

I love how the Angelic Doctor has it that mercy is a potential part of the virtue of justice. In other words, if there is no justice, there is no mercy possible. Those who avoid being just with others necessarily avoid being merciful to others. Here’s the whole paragraph for context:

Super Sent., lib. 3 d. 33 q. 3 a. 4 qc. 1 co.

Respondeo dicendum ad primam quaestionem, quod justitia in hoc differt a temperantia et fortitudine, quod illae moderant passiones intrinsecas, sed justitia moderat extrinsecas operationes: unde philosophus dicit, circa operationes justitiam esse. In adulterio enim, secundum quod est contra justitiam, attenditur usus inordinatus, scilicet rei alienae; secundum autem quod opponitur temperantiae, attenditur concupiscentia non refrenata sub debito rationis. Moderatio autem actionum exteriorum ex duobus regulatur. Primo per comparationem operationis ad ipsum operantem; et sic ejusdem rationis est et regulatio exteriorum operationum et interiorum passionum, quae ad exteriores inclinant operationes. Alio modo per comparationem ad alium; et in hoc est jam alius modus regulandi: et ideo exigitur alia virtus; et hoc proprie ad justitiam pertinet; unde ab eodem actu, scilicet percussione alicujus, retrahit mansuetudo, scilicet secundum quod procedit ex passione interiori, et justitia in ordine ad alium. In omni autem moderationem; oportet quod illud quod moderatur, mensurae sive regulae alicui adaequetur. Unde sicut moderatio passionum est adaequatio ipsarum ad ratione: ita moderatio exteriorum actuum, secundum quod sunt ad alterum, est quod adaequentur illi ex comparatione ad quem moderantur. Et haec quidem adaequatio est quando ei redditur quod et quantum ei debetur; et haec adaequatio proprius modus justitiae est. Unde ubicumque invenitur ista adaequatio complete, est justitia quae est virtus specialis; et omnes virtutes in quibus salvatur, sunt partes subjectivae justitiae. Ubi autem ista adaequatio non secundum totum salvatur, sed secundum aliquid, reducitur ad justitiam ut pars potentialis, aliquid de modo ejus participans. Ista autem adaequatio tria complectitur, ut ex dictis patet, scilicet ut sit ordinatum ad alterum; ut sit ei debitum, alias superexcederet actio eum ad quem fit; et ut tantum reddatur quantum debetur; alias deficeret in minus. Sunt autem quaedam virtutes quibus redditur alteri quod debetur ex necessitate legis, non tamen tantum, quia impossibile est; sicut in honore qui est ad Deum, quod facit religio; et qui ad parentes et ad patriam, quod facit pietas. Unde istae virtutes deficiunt quidem a justitia, et sunt partes ejus potentiales, et propinquissime se habent ad ipsam. Quaedam vero sunt quibus redditur alteri quod debetur non ex necessitate legis, sed quadam honestate, sicut philosophus dicit in 8 Ethic.: sicut gratia quae est retributio beneficiorum, secundum Tullium, misericordia, et hujusmodi: et hae virtutes aliquantulum magis distant a vera justitia. Quaedam autem virtutes sunt quibus hoc circa quod principaliter est virtus, ordinatur ad alterum, non tamen secundum rationem debiti, sicut liberalitas; et hae adhuc magis distant a vera justitia. Quaedam vero hoc circa quod est virtus, non principaliter, sed secundario, ordinant ad alterum; sicut quando fortitudo actum exteriorem, circa quem secundario est, ordinat ad alterum ut ad bonum gratiae, et sic induit quodammodo formam justitiae; et sic omnis virtus potest reduci ad justitiam; unde justitia legalis est idem quod omnis virtus in 5 Ethic. Quantum ad passiones autem, circa quas principaliter sunt illae virtutes, nihil possunt habere de modo justitiae, eo quod per passiones immediate homo non ordinatur nisi ad seipsum; tamen per quamdam similitudinem est ibi quaedam forma justitiae, secundum quod diversae vires computantur ut diversae personae; unde sic est justitia metaphorica, de qua philosophus loquitur in 5 Ethic. Ex dictis igitur potest patere de facili, qualiter omnes partes a philosophis assignatae, sunt partes justitiae: quia inter partes quas Tullius ponit vindicatio et observantia sunt partes subjectivae verae justitiae: quia vindicatio reddit malum debitum, observantia autem bonum ad quod se obligavit. Vindicatio enim, secundum eum, est virtus, qua vis aut injuria, et omne quod obfuturum est, defendendo et ulciscendo propulsatur. Religio autem quae est ad Deum, et pietas quae est ad parentes et conjunctos sanguine vel patria, sunt partes potentiales, sed propinquae: quia reddunt quod debent, et ex obligatione legis, sed non quantum; quia impossibile est. Has autem sic definit: religio est quae superiori cuidam naturae, quam divinam vocant, curam caeremoniamque affert; et dicitur a religando secundum Isidorum, vel secundum Augustinum, a reeligendo Deum quem amiseramus. Pietas vero est per quam sanguine conjunctis patriaeque benevolis officium et diligens tribuitur cultus. Gratia autem et veritas reddunt quod debent ex quadam honestate, qua fit ut homo gratiam beneficio impendat (quamvis non possit ad id in judicio cogi), et quod talem se in dictis et factis exhibeat qualis est, quod ad veritatem pertinet: de qua philosophus etiam determinat in 4 Ethic. Est enim gratia in qua amicitiarum et obsequiorum alterius memoria, et remunerandi voluntas continentur.

But what the Common Doctor has is a bit too refined for our common understanding. He was a theologian writing for theologians.

Jesus is rather incisive in His presentation of the matter:

Matthew 10,25 – It is enough for the disciple to be like his Teacher, and the slave like his Master. If they have called the Master of the House “Beelzebul” [="the lord of the flies" = "the lord of corruption and death"], how much more will they malign those of His household?

In Jesus, justice and mercy are but one and the same. He takes on what we justly deserve for original and personal sin, and therefore has the right in all justice — He being innocent — to have mercy on us: “Father! Forgive them! They know not what they do!” For us to receive this mercy, we have to be brought up into His justice. We ourselves must be like Him, taking on the worst injustice and providing forgiveness, mercy, in return. Yikes!

Comment: While I am surely tempted in my weakness to be bitter with injustice, the Lord has been extraordinarily good and kind to me, carrying me close to His Heart, so that I might be instant in forgiveness with those who trample on justice and therefore trample on mercy. This promptness with forgiveness is, for me, perhaps the greatest consolation I have ever received in the spiritual life. Surely it is the most notable. It is the way in which I find myself close to that pierced Heart, knowing forgiveness myself, and wanting that for all others, even those whom I see in this world of ours trampling on others without mercy, with hatred for justice. After all, perhaps they will come to know the Lord’s forgiveness and also offer themselves as living sacrifices (see Romans 12,1), as a living intercession of all the members of the Mystical Body of Christ.

The more we know justice and mercy to be the same thing in God, the happier we are, the more blessed we are, the more we live the Beatitudes.

4 Comments

Filed under martyrdom