Category Archives: liturgy

Pentecost: Extraordinary and Ordinary Form Calendars / Florae for the Immaculate Conception

florae-

No flower is too insignificant to present to the Immaculate Conception. There are no “ordinary” or, to be consistent, “extraordinary” flowers. We can exclaim Ooohh! and AAAAaaahh! before this or that flower, but the closer we look, the more agile our souls are, the more, I think, we can appreciate the greatness of all that which we would otherwise consider merely ordinary. Each has its place. Each has its glory.

Having said that, we note that this is a rather confusing week in the Latin Rite of the Church, what with both Ordinary and Extraordinary Forms of the Liturgy going on at the same parishes in increasingly many places. There is an Octave of Pentecost in the Extraordinary Form but not in the Ordinary Form.

I think it would be great if the Ordinary Form of the Liturgy would include an Octave of the Pentecost.

Until that happens, perhaps we might inscape the concept into the Ordinary Form calendar that all of ordinary time is to be considered an extended octave of Pentecost. Does not the Extraordinary Form calendar count the Sundays after Pentecost instead of Sundays of Ordinary Time? Yes, it does.

We are, in fact, ever since Pentecost, living in the time of Pentecost, the end times, the times in which the Holy Spirit forms us as members of the Body of Christ.

We are to look to the Holy Spirit, asking that He put us to death, death to ourselves, that we might be enlivened with His fiery love, manifesting the very love of Christ in these lowly bodies of ours, our weakness, then, pointing to very strength of His glory.

[By the way, I use the word liturgy, which some think is, you know, suspect of being somehow a liberal word. Such people fail to realize that the liturgy is made up of more than the Mass. There is the Breviary (LotH) etc. ;) ]

5 Comments

Filed under florae, liturgy

If you want a Scriptural analysis of the washing of feet mandatum, here it is

Jesus crucified feet h-t 60 seconds with God

I’ve been on retreat since Tuesday of Holy Week, but I thought I would take a look how Pope Francis is faring. It seems people are in a huff over his washing the feet of young prisoners at Casal del Marmo during the Mass of the Lord’s Supper on Holy Thursday evening. In my lightning quick survey, I may have missed it, but it really looks like there’s not even one comment about what’s going on in Scripture other than that the Apostles were the receivers of the mandatum, the mandate, to wash feet.

I fully realize that the Liturgy is its own source, as it were, so to speak, but just as Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition and the Sacred Magisterium form a kind of tripod which will not correctly manifest for us weak men what it is that the Lord provides for us if any leg of that tripod is kicked away, just so will the Liturgy, as a living expression of the entirety of that tripod, as a kind of burning lamp on top of that tripod, be unable to enliven and enlighten without the threefold support of that tripod.

We’ve seen emotional commentary, legal commentary, liturgical commentary and so on. Perhaps a Scriptural comment would help us to understand a bit more. The Most Holy Bible is often dismissed by those in the ditch on the right or the left as irrelevant, but we should be loath to say that what the Lord of History has provided and permitted and what the Holy Spirit has inspired is useless for our lives and the very Liturgy which is to have us worship the Most High God.

Recall the following:

  • lourdes serpent satan-In the Garden of Eden, the serpent was cursed to eat the dust of the cursed ground into which the dead body of Adam and the rest of us would return. Note well that the dust of the ground is cursed and is the home of Satan.
  • There was a time when a very particular patch of dirt was un-cursed, made holy, because of the presence of He-Who-Is in the burning bush. Moses was ordered to take off his sandals, which had raised him up above the cursed dust, because right there, right then, that dust was not cursed. It had been taken out of the realm of Satan.
  • Jesus commanded his disciples to kick the dust off their feet when their preaching had been rejected by any village, because in doing this, the Divine Son of God Himself explained, a sign would be provided against that village, indeed, a curse. That dust is the home of Satan, just as they are for rejecting the Kingdom of the Heavens. The curse is so ferocious that our Lord says that their lot will be worse than that of Sodom and Gomorrah. Pretty bad, that.
  • At the Last Supper, when Jesus washed the dust off the feet of the disciples and said that his Apostles were to imitate this humble service, our Lord was referring to being charitable, humbly, in all service.

Sure. But there is more. Our Lord refers to this “more” Himself, so we ought best pay attention to this.

  • John 13,1 — We read that Jesus knew that His Hour had arrived. Indeed, that is the time that all hell would break loose.
  • John 13,2 — We read that Judas had already been diabolically smacked down that he might betray Jesus. Judas is unclean in every sense of the term.
  • John 13,3 — We read that Jesus knows that the Father has provided that Jesus is omnipotent, that all things are in His power and that, despite what Judas and Satan were up to, He, Jesus, was from God and was returning to God.
  • John 13,4 — We read in the very same sentence of all that precedes, including the bit about Judas being smacked down by Satan, that Jesus got up, shed His outer garments, and girt Himself with a towel in view of the foot-washing to come.
  • John 13,5 — We read that He began to wash the feet of the disciples, who, in this case, are, in fact, the Apostles.
  • John 13,6 — We read of Simon Peter questioning Jesus about his feet being washed.
  • John 13,7 — We read, mysteriously, that Jesus says to him, that he does not now understand what He, Jesus, is doing, but that, in the future, he will. If this were merely about a nice symbol of service, that would be simple to understand, but there is more.
  • John 13, 8 — We read that Peter, obviously dismissing the observation of Jesus and thinking that he completely understands, remonstrates with Jesus, saying that He will never have his feet washed by Jesus. But Jesus’ reprimand for this is extremely severe, warning Peter that he will be cut off altogether if he does not allow this. Our Lord indicated that there was more. It is best to listen to Jesus.
  • John 13,9 — We read that Peter still dismisses the observation of Jesus that he, Peter, does not now understand, and Peter charges ahead to say that he offers not only his feet, but his head and hands as well. But it is best to listen to Jesus.
  • John 13,10 — We read that Jesus says that the one who has been cleansed (a perfect passive participle calling baptism to mind) has no need to be cleansed except for the feet (where that cursed dust is), for Jesus says, he is already entirely clean. But then Jesus adds, “but not all,” that is, not all among ye all.
  • John 13,11 — We read John’s own comment: “For He knew who would betray him. For this reason, He said, “Not all of you are clean.” This is a direct reference to Judas, who is smacked down by Satan. The connection to the cursed dust on the feet could not be clearer. It is Judas who will raise his heel with its cursed dust, the home of Satan, against Jesus, a horrific reversal of the Son of the Mother of the Redeemer in Genesis 3,15, raising His heel to crush Satan on the head. But it is in getting crushed Himself that Jesus will defeat Satan, having gained the right in all justice, in this way, to have mercy on us.
  • John 13,12 — Having finished, we read that Jesus asks the Apostles if they understand what He has done for them, although this is a rhetorical question, for He already said that they do not now understand this. It simply looks like a nice service of foot-washing.
  • John 13,13-17 — We read that Jesus immediately explains that if He, Lord and teacher, has done this for them, they likewise ought to do this for one another, for they, slaves and messengers, are not above their Lord and the One who is providing a mandate. If they only understand the nice service aspect of this, that’s nice, but truly blessed are they who understand what this is really all about and then go about doing it. This is about more than just a nice service. This has to do with establishing the Kingdom of the Heavens by simultaneously exorcising the earthly kingdom of Satan.
  • John 13,18 — We read that Jesus immediately explains more about this: He singles out him whom He has chosen, His betrayer, Judas, possessed by Satan, speaking of the fulfillment of Scriptural prophesy (Scripture is important), namely, “He who eats my bread has lifted his heel against me,” that heel with the dust of Satan upon it.
  • John 13,19 — And for those who doubt the connection that I have made to He-Who-IS in the Garden of Eden and at the Burning Bush, we read here that Jesus says that He is telling us these things before they happen so that when they do happen, that will believe that He is the One who is I AM.
  • John 13,20-26 — We read about the discovery of the betrayer, Judas, to whom Christ Jesus gives the morsel of bread.
  • John 13,27 — We read of the full possession of Judas by Satan, and that Jesus commands him (Judas? Satan?) to do quickly what he is going to do.
  • John 13,28-30 — We read of the non-perception of the Apostles and then of the departure of Judas, after having taken the morsel. We read that, “It was night.”
  • John 13,31ff — We read of Jesus speaking of the great glory of what is now happening with the betrayal, that is, Jesus and the Father being glorified with the great love which Jesus is manifesting, and which He commands the remaining Apostles to show to each other. It is a love that will bring Him to His death, and this is what He expects of His Apostles in their ministry of establishing the Kingdom of the heavens while simultaneously exorcising the kingdom of Satan, namely, that they will also provide witness to Him with that love that loves even in the face of death. We read of our promises to be faithful, but that our Lord knows that we can deny Him nonetheless.

Cardinal Bergoglio Pope Francis googled image

Now then, is Pope Francis wrong in choosing to emphasize the service aspect of this foot-washing? No, he can choose to do that, and with great benefit for the Church.

In seeming not to emphasize the other particular aspect of the foot-washing, which has to do with the Satan’s kingdom being washed away, it is not as if Pope Francis is saying that he does think that Satan does not exist. He has mentioned Satan more often in a brief space of time perhaps more than any other Pontiff on record, and to great effect.

In washing the feet of the youth, it is not as if Pope Francis is participating in some sort of antidisestablishmentarianisticalness on behalf of Satan. No, no. He’s just showing us what his idea of the new evangelization is all about: Have people of whatever sex, religion, culture, social status or condition draw close to God so that Satan will run away.

Just because Jesus washed the feet of the Apostles does not mean that only those who are symbolic of the Apostles, for instance, viri, men, are alone to have their feet washed in this way.

When the Apostles then wash the feet of others in this way, it does not mean that the others have to be ordainable, that is, men. This is not an ordination rite.

So, think about it. What does this say about the Holy Father’s idea about interreligious dialogue? Heh heh heh.

He has already mentioned reason for dialogue with Muslims in his fantastic Regensburg-like address to the diplomats. Heh heh heh.

The Holy Father has not at all ignored the other aspect of being washed from the evil influence of Satan. Not at all. Heh heh heh.

None of this is antithetical to the Mass of the Lord’s Supper. It has everything to do with the ones for whom Christ allowed Himself to be crushed. Beautiful.

I am very thankful to Almighty God for Pope Francis!

30 Comments

Filed under Catholic, liturgy, Mass, Scripture

Aujourd’hui: Fête de l’âne – Festum asinorum – The Feast of the Jackass [14 January: Solemnity only at Holy Souls Hermitage]

jackass header

The header for Holy Souls Hermitage blog. If you look closely, you will see a crucified jackass. In the full version, you’ll see young Alexamenos, surely a Jewish convert and martyr, likewise being mocked by his fellow Imperial students, at a time when it was the sport of the day in Rome to kill Catholics like himself. This is a graffito found on the Palatine dating back to the time of the martyrdom of Saint Lawrence. Alexamenos is a protagonist in an ecclesiastical thriller I wrote some years ago, all about the murderous intrigue of interreligious politics. Yikes!

In fine Missae sacerdos, versus ad populum, vice Ite, Missa est, ter hinhannabit: populus vero, vice Deo Gratias, ter respondebit, Hinham, hinham, hinham.

At the end of Mass, the priest, having turned to the people, instead of Ite missa est, brays three times; the people, in place of Deo Gratias, respond, Hinham, hinham, hinham.

I did not follow these rubrics, nor did I have a congregation. At least the rubrics presume that one is facing ad orientem for the Mass! The “feast” commemorates the flight into Egypt, an exile in which a donkey was most important. Donkey’s are always in with the Holy Family. Always.

I do like the idea behind this feast of the jackass. It’s all very Chestertonian. If you’ve never read it, it’s well worth the read:

This is the donkey that is found at the base of Holy Souls Mountain, a palestinian donkey, of course, what with that cross on his back.

“The jackass”* by G.K. Chesterton

When fishes flew and forests walked and figs grew upon thorn
Some moment when the moon was blood, then surely I was born

With monstrous head and sickening cry and ears like errant wings
The devil’s walking parody of all four footed things

The tattered outlaw of the earth, of ancient crooked will
Starve, scourge, deride me: I am dumb; I keep my secret still

Fools! For I also had my hour, one far fierce hour and sweet
There was a shout about my ears and palms before my feet

* See Zechariah 9,9 and John 12,12-16. Original title: “The Donkey.”

Saint Augustine’s jackass encouragement

When I was a chaplain in Lourdes, a very wonderful reader from Minnesota had an Orthodox artist paint this up for me. That’s Saint Augustine holding his restless-until-it-rests-in-God heart, on fire with ardent love of God and neighbor. He is speeding along the Way, being carried by a jackass. Saint Augustine is famous for having said these encouraging words: “Asinus es, sed Christum portas!” (You are a jackass, but you carry Christ!).

Alexamenos and Jesus as the Jackass

This is edited a bit so that you can see the etchings a bit better.

This is a picture of the third century Roman graffito, etchings which are almost invisible in the original wall, which is surely why the graffito has lasted for so many centuries. Archaeological remains can be seen on Monte Palatino, Rome, Italy. The graffito was on part of a wall which had been salvaged from the Imperial School for slave boys on the south-western slope of the Palatine Hill during the 1800s. I took many pictures of this graffito!

Greek words had been scratched into the wall along with a drawing of Christ as a crucified jackass, and as the recipient of the worship of a boy named Alexámenos. The graffito dates to the persecution of Catholics by the Romans in the mid-third century. The words ΑΛΕΞΑΜΕΝΟΣ ΣΕΒΕΤΕ ΘΕΟΝ, meant Alexámenos says ‘Worship ye God!’ or, because of the artist’s poor orthography, Alexámenos worships God, so that he wanted to write ΣΕΒΕΤΑΙ ΘΕΟΝ.

Alexámenos – the name means Defender (The One Who Is Defending)– may have been a Jewish slave, who became a Catholic, and who was evangelising his fellow slaves. He risked his life by telling the others to worship Christ, at least with his own example. The response of one of the slaves — drawing such a graffito — shows that Alexámenos may well have been put to death for this evangelization, as were so many at the time, one after the other. It is even most probable that he is a martyr, perhaps put to death by the Emperor Valerian. Rome’s Palatine Hill overlooks the Colosseum, built by Jewish slaves, the Circus Maximus, which directly faces the Imperial School, and the Roman Forums, all places for the slaughter of Catholics.

It’s unknown what happened to the artist, but mockery arising from fear, or later, grief, can be an occasion when God’s mercy works conversion. The blood of the martyrs waters the seed bed of the Faith. It’s good to be a fool for Christ’s sake, a jackass in the eyes of the world, the off-scouring of the earth, as Saint Paul says. After all, did not Jesus become a Jackass for us, taking on such abuse so as to redeem all us, who truly are such jackasses? Yes, He did.

For all these reasons, Alexámenos is a hero of Holy Souls Hermitage. I have a special appreciation for all those held to be fools for Christ’s sake, for those who are kicked in the face for Christ, for those who are condemned by friend and foe alike for Christ’s sake, for those who are marginalized for Christ’s sake.

He is especially a hero because I know I would not be a worthy jackass for the sake of Christ, but I know I can count on his most worthy intercession for me, for all of us. Thanks for witnessing to the Lord, Alexámenos! Way to be a jackass for the Lord of all!

N.B. I mention that he might have been a Jewish convert. I say that because Jews were nicknamed as jackasses by all the gentiles since time immemorial. I’ve written much on jackasses and on Alexámenos.

B.T.W., are not jackasses intimate members of the Holy Family? From Nazareth to Bethlehem, at the crib, from Bethlehem to Egypt, from Egypt all the way to Nazareth, at the entrance of Jesus to Jerusalem… Jackasses are intelligent, they can sing, and… and… not being in the least stubborn (as mules are), jackasses only do what they understand (very smart, that). I wish I could say that about myself.

5 Comments

Filed under Just me, liturgy

Eternity breaking into time, into our hearts and souls: ad orientem in art

Did you know that this is what is happening in your heart and soul during the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass? This is what happens. So, we are in reverence and humble thanksgiving.

I know I’ve put this up before, but there are some of you who haven’t seen this two minute video yet. This is from a Christus Rex production. The best two minutes you’ll spend for a long time. We’re always on pilgrimage, but not because we are on the move towards heaven. We can’t get there from here, but He draws us from there. Yikes! The video:

Leave a Comment

Filed under Catholic, liturgy, Mass, Vocations

Praying before statues during adoration of the Most Blessed Sacrament?

From an email:

Today we had Eucharistic adoration at our church. It is scheduled on the first Sunday of each month. I saw something today that bothered me. After Father placed the consecrated Host into the monstrance, gave the final blessing and dismissed the congregation [!], some of us remained behind for adoration. (I think everyone should stay for a least a few minutes – but that is another rant).

As I knelt, a woman came to the front of the church and stood before the statues of the Holy Family and prayed, then left. In doing this, she had her back to the Eucharist on the main altar right in there, front and center, in the church. (we don’t have a big church) I’ve seen people pray before the Holy Family statues before, but I never noticed anyone doing it with the Eucharist in full sight in the Monstrance on the altar. I suspect this woman is sincere and devout – but why would she pray in front of the statues (even though they are beautiful) when Jesus is there a mere few feet away from her?

I wondered how Jesus felt about this. It bothered me that she would direct her focus to the statues when Jesus (the Real Thing) was a few feet behind her. There isn’t anything I can do about this and I don’t mean to be judging her (God only knows how many faux pas I do and what a mess I am!) – but if you have time I would like you take on this.

My ranting answer is, instead, primarily about the priest. It is terribly incorrect, not to say entirely obnoxious (O.K., that too), for the priest to himself bless the congregation and then dismiss them after exposing the Blessed Sacrament. The correct procedure, at least in the Novus Ordo, is to recite the post-Communion prayer. Then expose the Blessed Sacrament with attendant incensation and hymns and prayers. Then… then… that’s it. No blessing from the priest while he ignores the High Priest on the altar. No dismissal of the congregation. Honestly!

Now, please excuse me if I continue to rant. Please take this in good stride. I mean no offense. But you got me ranting, so I will continue. Forgive me!

The lady may get her queue to do what she did from what Father did. And… and… what she did wasn’t wrong anyway. If there were some liturgical action, such as pictured with Pope John Paul II providing benediction of the Most Blessed Sacrament, probably during the Eucharistic Procession in Lourdes, then what she did would be incorrect. Moreover, if she was making a fuss which distracted others, even on purpose, so as to draw attention to herself, well, that would be wrong too. But that doesn’t seem to be the case.

Instead, her looking at the statue, though having her back turned to the Blessed Sacrament, was surely never done as a replacement of the real Jesus on the altar, but merely a way to remind herself, perhaps in distressful family circumstances, just how wondeful this real Jesus on the altar is, not forgetting for a second that He was there.

Is this not the same as glancing now and again at a prayer or a holy picture while we are at adoration? Would we ever dare cast a glance over to the Stations of the Cross during adoration, or at any other statue or image? We are human after all, and don’t want to fall into the heresy of iconoclasm, which banned all such images from churches. This was a kind of an incarnational heresy which didn’t want anything to do with our needing images. And we do need them, since we have both souls and bodies.The images are never adored or prayed to. They are just a reminder. Pictures of family members don’t make us adore them, but simply remind us of them.

I bet Jesus thought that that lady was pretty cool.

O.K. End of rant. Please, forgive me.

2 Comments

Filed under liturgy