Category Archives: interreligious dialogue

Pope Francis and Dialogue. Don’t forget it’s Pentecost! Share the greatest love of your lives!

I made this video — edited into ultra-slow-motion, frame by frame — when I lived on Mount Carmel, over the Cave of Saint Elijah, for a month, upon the invitation of the Discalced Carmelites, even while I was a chaplain at Lourdes, France. The dove showed up on the patio-roof where I was, and stayed with me for the longest time just as I was trying to figure out the most difficult of conundrums. At the time I was working on dialogue with both our Jewish brothers and various Muslims. Pope Francis has a great interest in both. The gorgeous singing that you hear in the video I recorded when, in the cave itself, a pilgrimage group started to sing. There’s a pretty constant flow of pilgrims who sing away at Mount Carmel as they move about Israel and Palestine. [Note that I shut down the blog advertised at the end of the video some four years ago.]

POPE FRANCIS AND DOVE GREAT PICTURE googled image

I think that the sorrow our Holy Father, as Cardinal Bergoglio (just a few months before his election as the Bishop of Rome), shared with our Jewish brothers for the events of Kristallnacht in the Catholic Cathedral of Buenos Aires was most appropriate. He was bitterly, horrifically condemned for this by some few. HSH defended the Holy Father.

In fact, I had occasion after that to record the memories of a wonderful Jewish lady some 93 years young about her recollections of surviving the Holocaust era in Europe. I intend to put up that interview, but wanted to wait until after this evening, when she will give a presentation in Western North Carolina. I was told that I absolutely must meet another wonderful Jewish lady who will also be there this evening. Perhaps we will be able to set up an appointment for another interview. Much of her family was put to death in the camps.

Pope Francis Dove googled image

One of the first things Pope Francis did in his Pontificate was to re-iterate the main point of Pope Benedict’s Regensburg Address on dialogue with Islam, which is that one is to use reason, the very thing that Islamicists absolutely refuse to do. But it has to be insisted upon. He did. In the next days, I’d like to post an analysis I did some years ago on Muslims and Nostra aetate of the Second Vatican Council. Some are afraid of this because, although they know Latin, they won’t do the work on the Latin of Nostra aetate, and rely on translations which are justifiably to be rejected.

Some reject the idea of dialogue altogether, as if they were somehow better than any others in the world just because they call themselves Catholic. But one is not saved because one calls oneself Catholic. One is saved because of sanctifying grace and gift of final perseverance, neither of which we can give ourselves. We’ve all crucified the Son of the Living God, the greatest Jewish Man ever to walk this earth, with our sins. If one does not want to share with others the greatest love of one’s life, one doesn’t know anything about the Son of the Living God, who, not seeing the Holy Spirit within such a one, will say: “I never knew you.” Wanting others to come to know the greatest love of our lives is not an insult to them.

2 Comments

Filed under Catholic, interreligious dialogue

Fisking the lyrics of Leonard Cohen’s Hallelujah with animatronic Sarah Palin and Larry King: taking on the most popular song of all time for the new evangelization

duel steven spielberg

From Steven Spielberg’s *Duel* — Shooting someone who outdrew you…

I have the opinion that http://holysoulshermitage.com boasts of some of the most incisive readers/commenters on the internet. I have a little project that needs some feedback, some tweaking of Leonard Cohen’s Hallelujah.

Just before Christmas of 2010, when I was teaching at the Pontifical College Josephinum, I was invited by the seminarians to be one of the presenters for the popular culture night they put on, the idea of the event being to analyze a villainous point of culture.  Surprising many, I chose to critique Leonard Cohen’s Hallelujah, which is nearly the all-time all-time most popular song ever. Just the very first page of YouTube alone counts up hundreds of millions of hits.

The version I played for the seminarians is sung by Kurt Nilsen, Espen Lind, Askil Holm and Alejandro Fuentes. Another version was used in Shrek. It’s been an ultra favorite of the popular talent shows such as American Idol, Britain’s Got Talent, and dozens of television and stage and radio productions.

Here are the highly poetic words, extremely condensed statements which were continuously rewritten, Leonard Cohen says of himself, in great anxiety and agony. You really have to stare at each word for quite a while:

1. I heard there was a secret cord that David played and it pleased the Lord. But you don’t care for music do ya? Well, it goes like this, the fourth, the fifth, the minor fall and the major lift. The baffled king composing, “Hallelujah!” Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah!

2. Your faith was strong but you needed proof. You saw her bathing on the roof. Her beauty and the moonlight overthrew ya. Well, she tied you to a kitchen chair. She broke your throne and she cut your hair. And from your lips she drew the “Hallelujah!” Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah!

3. Well, maybe there’s a God above. But all I’ve ever learned from love is how to shoot somebody who outdrew ya. It’s not a cry that you hear at night. It’s not somebody whose seen the light. It’s a cold and it’s a broken “Hallelujah!” Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah!

My analysis in part depended on an article by my friend, Father Louis V. Iasiello, O.F.M., retired Two Star Admiral, one time Head Chaplain for the entire Department of Defense, and now laboring in the Lord’s vineyard by helping out with the formation of the seminarians at the Pontifical College Josephinum. Here’s the *.pdf of the article of Father Louis V. Iasiello, O.F.M. on “Betrayal of Trust - David and Bathsheba Revisited” at the New Theology Review, 2008.2. (Betrayal of Trust–  David and Bathsheba Revisited – PDF).

Anyway, here’s the video critique of these verses of Leonard Cohen’s song that I created myself. You might have to watch it a couple of times to get all the nuances. The “text” voices of the characters aren’t always as clear as I would have liked them to be. You might have to adjust the volume a bit.

So, given that, I wonder if it would be helpful to tweak the words just a bit, just one or two, here and there, to readjust the theology to be a bit more in line with what is actually found in the books of Judges and Samuel. I have a rather mighty project in mind with a number of super-talented people. Heh heh heh.

Any no-secret-cords-attached suggestions to offer? Think about it. You can do it.

4 Comments

Filed under evangelization, interreligious dialogue, Military, politics, Spiritual Life, videos

We treat them just as if they were real people! An update on the Gonzalez mockery of the holocaust

jewish star

Update on the previous blog entry about Rorate Caeli and Dawn Eden: I glanced at the numerous anti-Semitic comments flooding the comments-box on Dawn’s post on her blog and on other posts on other blogs about her post on her blog. Some observations:

  • It would seem that, for some commenters, mocking the holocaust rather than outright denying it is not so bad. But, of course, mockery of something like the holocaust is what makes such a holocaust possible, right? What are they thinking?
  • It would seem that, for some commenters, revising to ever smaller numbers those killed in the holocaust is not a matter of faith, and therefore it is O.K. But, of course, the supernatural virtue of charity which would honor the fact of the dead, is as important as the supernatural virtue of faith, right? What are they thinking?
  • It would seem that, for some commenters, blaming the failures of the priest who was charged with providing the TLM on Archbishop Bergoglio is logical, as is holding the failures of a priest over the head of a newly elected Supreme Pontiff. But, of course, this is simply a cheap smear campaign, right? What are they thinking?
  • It would seem that, for some commenters, the mockery of the holocaust, that is, the mockery of the torture and death of millions of people — the mockery of that, mind you — doesn’t at all impugn the journalistic integrity of Gonzales, who is surely correct about all this other assertions. But, of course, they forget that there is another side to the story, and that other side may well have to do with Archbishop Bergoglio having to deal with people like Gonzalez, right? What are they thinking?
  • It would seem that, for some commenters, the mockery of the holocaust is as if it were nothing, you know, that which is forgivable even though not repented from, something you conveniently ignore in favor of giving such people what they want as a way to shut them up. But, of course, this is pastorally inadvisable, with the pastorally advisable action being not being intimidated, right? I mean, such brutality actually deserves interdict for the culprits. They got off lightly. What are they thinking?
  • It seems that, for some commenters, the holocaust is not a holocaust, since non-Jews were also killed. But, of course, this, along with some of the other tactics above, were the typical negationist line of who else but the New York Times, right? Those in the ditch on the right are just like those in the ditch on the left. What are they thinking?

I am reminded of a statement of a racist lady in the deep south to me some years ago. She knew I was concerned about a streak of racism in the area. She said: “Oh, Father! We’re not racist here! We treat those blacks just as if they were real people!”

5 Comments

Filed under Catholic, interreligious dialogue, Persecution

WAY OF THE CROSS VIDEOS FROM MOUNT CARMEL: YIKES!

I made this set of videos (about 20 minutes all told) during my time living just over the cave of Elijah on Mount Carmel, Israel. The O.C.D.s had invited me to stay there for an entire month during the years that I was a chaplain at Lourdes. I must say that these videos are very emotional for me to watch to this day. What a fright! But… Jesus, Mary’s Son, is just that good and kind! Even though in watching these you don’t move from station to station yourself, I’m sure your heart will be transported to be right next to Jesus, to be with Him in solidarity, and to be right next to His dear mother as she accompanies our Lord, again in all solidarity.

[[I'm still on retreat, but I just thought I'd put these up today!]]

Comments Off

Filed under Catholic, Forgiveness, interreligious dialogue

[Saint] Alexamenos [Confessor Martyr] and Jesus as *The Donkey* on this Palm Sunday [and Pope Francis Regensburg]

This is a picture of the third century Roman graffito, etchings which are almost invisible in the original wall, which is surely why the graffito has lasted for so many centuries. Archaeological remains can be seen on Monte Palatino, Rome, Italy. The graffito was on part of a wall which had been salvaged from the Imperial School for slave boys on the south-western slope of the Palatine Hill during the 1800s. I took many pictures of this graffito.

Greek words had been scratched into the wall along with a drawing of Christ as a crucified jackass, and as the recipient of the worship of a boy named Alexámenos. The graffito dates to the persecution of Catholics by the Romans in the mid-third century. The words ΑΛΕΞΑΜΕΝΟΣ ΣΕΒΕΤΕ ΘΕΟΝ, meant Alexámenos says ‘Worship ye God!’ or, because of the artist’s poor orthography, Alexámenos worships God, so that he wanted to write ΣΕΒΕΤΑΙ ΘΕΟΝ.

Alexámenos – the name means Defender (The One Who Is Defending)– may have been a Jewish slave, who became a Christian, and who was evangelizing his fellow slaves. He risked his life by telling the others to worship Christ, at least with his own example. The response of one of the slaves — drawing such a graffito — shows that Alexámenos may well have been put to death for this evangelization, as were so many at the time, one after the other. It is even most probable that he is a martyr, perhaps put to death by the Emperor Valerian. Rome’s Palatine Hill overlooks the Colosseum, built by Jewish slaves, the Circus Maximus, which directly faces the Imperial School, and the Roman Forums.

It’s unknown what happened to the artist, but mockery arising from fear, or later, grief, can be an occasion when God’s mercy works conversion. The blood of the martyrs waters the seed bed of the Faith. It’s good to be a fool for Christ’s sake, a jackass in the eyes of the world, the off-scouring of the earth, as Saint Paul says. After all, did not Jesus become a Jackass for us, taking on such abuse so as to redeem all us, who truly are such jackasses? Yes, He did.

For all these reasons, Alexámenos is a hero of Holy Souls Hermitage, and why a detail of this graffito makes up the header for http://holysoulshermitage.com I have a special appreciation for all those held to be fools for Christ’s sake, for those who are kicked in the face for Christ, for those who are condemned by friend and foe alike for Christ’s sake, for those who are marginalized for Christ’s sake.

He is especially a hero because I know I would not be a worthy jackass for the sake of Christ, but I know I can count on his most worthy intercession for me, for all of us. Thanks for witnessing to the Lord, Alexámenos! Way to be a jackass for the Lord of all!

N.B. I mention that he might have been a Jewish convert. I say that because Jews were nicknamed as jackasses by all the gentiles since time immemorial. I’ve written much on jackasses and on Alexámenos, who is a hero in a perhaps too tightly scripted ecclesiastical thriller novel I wrote a while back of some 750 pages.

B.T.W., are not jackasses intimate members of the Holy Family? From Nazareth to Bethlehem, at the crib, from Bethlehem to Egypt, from Egypt all the way to Nazareth, at the entrance of Jesus to Jerusalem… Jackasses are intelligent, they can sing, and… and… not being in the least stubborn (as mules are), jackasses only do what they understand (very smart, that).

✵ ✵ ✵

I’ve previously put up some snippets from that novel — Jackass for the Hour — on this blog. Here’s another, for your edification, I hope! Just some braying here. These scenes take place towards the end of the novel. There are some Islamicists who are storming into Vatican Gardens from inside Saint Peter’s Basilica soon after the Easter Vigil. Meanwhile, the Holy Father, in a certain monastery in Vatican Gardens, is finishing and signing a document that he is writing in haste immediately after the Easter Vigil, knowing that he has only minutes to live… ///

It was just now becoming apparent that a large number of the crowd inside the Basilica – upwards, it seemed, of a thousand people – were pressing toward the exit that wound its way underneath Bernini’s sculpture of Pope Alexander VII. The Swiss Guards became suspicious, but wasted the few seconds they had in trying to be polite with the diplomats whom they were moving away from the multiple sets of doors of the passageway, attempting to seal the exit to Vatican Gardens. But then the Muslims acted as one man with one voice, stampeding under the image of the skeleton holding the hourglass of the passage of time and down into the short tunnel, fatally trampling a thousand times over diplomats and guards alike. Their death chant was thunderous:

takbir“The blasphemy will not be forgotten! Burn the jackass! The hour has come!” A Papal Knight, watching in horror, said, “Tempus fugit; memento mori… Time flies; remember death!” allahu akbarHe also noted how one of the Muslims betrayed his provenance by screaming, “La France a l’Algérie! La France a l’Algérie!” He shouted, “Takbīr!”; the others replied: “Allāhu akbar!”

✵ ✵ ✵

“Si quis traditiones prædictas sciens et prudens contempserit: anathema sit,” said the Holy Father, writing the last words of the Apostolic Constitution. “The Easter Candle,” he continued, “would be appropriate for the needed flame. Alexámenos!”

Father Alexámenos went to get the Easter Candle which the Sisters lit when they returned from the Easter Vigil. While he was away, the Pontiff signed the bulla, writing, “Ego Tsur-Ēzer, Catholicae Ecclesiae Episcopus, ita definiendo subscripsi.” He then punched some holes in the velum with the pen and laced the scarlet cord through it.

Father Alexámenos returned as he finished. The Pope took it from him and gave him the pen. “You too Emet… Fidèle…”, he said.

When they read it, amazed at its content, they all signed it. Padre Emet commented on the wisdom of adding that the bulla did not have to be published in the Acta Apostolicæ Sedis in order to be authentic, and that it was promulgated by the very act of its being signed and sealed with the Ring of the Fisherman. It was an ex-cathedra statement.

The Pope held the sealing lead over the flame of the Easter Candle, letting it pool over the cord. He then impressed the image of the Ring of the Fisherman into the congealed lead.

✵ ✵ ✵

The stampede had moved from the Basilica, around and over the cars waiting for the diplomats just outside in Piazza Santa Marta [...]

✵ ✵ ✵

In putting this bit up, these paragraphs, I am recalling what I mentioned immediately after the publication of the address of Pope Francis to the Diplomatic Corps, saying that it is strikingly, incisively, starkly similar to the most important points of the address of Pope Benedict XVI to the crowd at Regensburg: Pope Francis // Pope Benedict. If you want some essentially important continuity, here it is.

Pope Francis, the Pope of interreligious dialogue, is treated as an imbecile by even supposedly devout Catholic pundits. He is, instead, one of the most brilliant and believing gentlemen ever to grace the See of Rome.

Pope Francis continues to draw deep lines in the sand blasted with insults off himself, the Rock, daring all peoples to cross those lines and be converted to the goodness and kindness of Jesus. I just love it.

9 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Donkey, ecumenism, interreligious dialogue, martyrdom

Join me with this video Way of the Cross I made on Mount Carmel, Israel — What a fright. Such violence in the Holy Land.

I made this set of videos (about 20 minutes all told) during my time living just over the cave of Elijah on Mount Carmel, Israel. The O.C.D.s had invited me to stay there for an entire month during the years that I was a chaplain at Lourdes. I must say that these videos are very emotional for me to watch to this day. What a fright! But… Jesus, Mary’s Son, is just that good and kind! Even though in watching these you don’t move from station to station yourself, I’m sure your heart will be transported to be right next to Jesus, to be with Him in solidarity, and to be right next to His dear mother as she accompanies our Lord, again in all solidarity.

Please God, I’ll be able to watch these heart-rending videos frequently during this Lent…

And… and…

Update Required To Play MediaUpdate your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.

8 Comments

Filed under Catholic, interreligious dialogue, videos, Way of the Cross

In preparation for talking about Genesis 2,4–3,24 in D.C., I read this… [and now I'm petrified]

For a summary of the thesis, scoll to the end of this page.

Click on the picture of the thesis in order to download the *.PDF of the original technical version. Yikes!

Preliminary disclaimers:

(1) I would like to get the thesis out there a bit more, and not only downloaded, but printed out, examined, and put forward for a much wider publishing. Thus, with a few edits, I’m republishing this post from my now defunct blog I had when a chaplain in Lourdes. This post is my advertisement for the project of my life, not just the thesis, but the popular version of the thesis. For many reasons, on so many levels, some of which I mention below, this is a battle in our Church Militant that needs to be fought and won. Other things have always gotten in the way. You decide.

(2) I would ask those who get nervous with any “controversy” whatsoever, who crawl out of their skin at the least indication that the status quo of the lowest common denominator is being challenged, who think any controversy is a dismissable controversy merely among scholars, and would never, as a controversy, have anything seriously to do with defending the established doctrine and morality of the Church, and therefore shouldn’t be aired in public… I would ask them to calm down and be deadly careful about what is put into such a dismissable category as “mere controversy among scholars.” Are doctrines of faith and morals dismissable controversies of scholars just because some scholars reject the teaching of Holy Mother Church? Really? One should think long and hard about that.

Now there is, I admit, in this post and in the future posts about Genesis that I hope to write, some good amount of “controversy”.

In fact, I hope to cite some of the most in-your-face statements of Continue reading

5 Comments

Filed under Catholic, Genesis, Immaculate Conception, interreligious dialogue, Scripture

180 HeartChanger viral video on abortion & voting — You gotta get everyone to see this before the election

Just. Wow. Share this.

1 Comment

Filed under Catholic, interreligious dialogue, politics, Pro-Life

More from Father Byers’ Jackass Trilogy: some snippets on the deadly politics of interreligious dialogue (Nostra aetate and Islam)

I’m happy that the Holy Father has returned to Rome safely. This trip was incredibly dangerous. I’m very surprised that he wasn’t martyred.

A “spooky friend” was telling me of the internal intelligence reports about Iran (meaning Syria, meaning Lebanon), that those those reports about nefarious terrorist activities being planned had increased to unprecedented levels, that is, exponentially so, that is, alarmingly so, but that, very, very suprisingly, these reports were not being acted upon. This was then coupled with reports that His Holiness would not be guaranteed safety, nor would anyone else (that is, ambassadors, etc.).

And then… and then… when the USA was attacked by terrorists in the person of the American Ambassador, Obama, surprise, surprise, was quick to apologize for the USA being the USA, throwing all diplomats and all citizens under the bus, having it that if anyone, anywhere, at any time insults Islam, all Muslims are innocent of the violence they wreck on anyone, anywhere, at any time.

Obama blamed an obscure youtube filmette that no one, including 99.99999999999999999% of Muslims ever heard about, even now, and in this way gave Islam the right to kill Americans. Instead, no Muslim could care less about a stupid youtube filmette. What happened with the violence was all planned before. Choosing a symbolic stupidity is mere afterthought of convenience. Obama still thinks he can blame the film, but, you know, our people on the ground at the embassy say that there was absolutely no disturbance of any kind at the embassy before the killings took place. And how could there be? That would jack up the security measures to no end, right? Obama is not saying it as it was. We now have a president who is out of control, praising Islam for violence against the USA. How Congress tolerates him is beyond me. He’s not only un-American, but anti-America.

More than this — and it gets worse — intelligence reports had it that all Catholic Churches in the USA are under severe threat from terrorist attacks. Get that? That, I think, it gratuitous, and gives knuckleheads ideas, permission, if you will, from the president. Perhaps I’m exaggerating, but I think that there is a connection with this Catholic Churches in the USA thing and the Pope going to Lebanon. Hey! Let’s blame the Catholics for al-Qaeda attacks! Obama already has another war going on with the Catholic Church in the USA over religious freedom. The HHS Secretary went so far as to say that the Catholic Church in the USA wants to shut down the American government in that it doesn’t want to support Planned Parenthood (thus equating Planned Parenthood and the government). Honestly, this has all gone too far.

* * *

I am reminded of a passage in the Jackass Trilogy, a little piece on Nostra aetate, that little document in Vatican II about interreligious dialogue, which is so very misunderstood because of poor translations. Pope Benedict has been complaining about those translations for decades. I take on the most important sentence herein.

We are about three quarters of the way through this novel, this ecclesiastical thriller. We are now in the midst of the trial of our hero, young Father Alexamenos, who is being interrogated concerning the uproar he unintentionally made when speaking privately of the violence of sura 37:100-113, of the Qur’an. The trial is taking place in the Paul VI Audience Hall next to the Holy Office in Vatican City. The trial could not but be televised live.

Archbishop Ahan changed his questions, asking, “Have you never read where it is written, ‘Ecclesia cum aestimatione quoque muslimos respicit qui unicum Deum adorant, viventem et subsistentem, misericordem et omnipotentem, creatorem caeli et terrae, homines allocutum’?”

Father Alexámenos replied, “If it is said in the simple declaration, Nostra ætate, of the Second Vatican Council, that ‘the Church also looks with respect to Muslims who adore the One God, living and subsistent, merciful and omnipotent, the Creator of the heavens and the earth, who has spoken to man,’ this is not to say that Qur’anic Islam represents what each Muslim actually holds. The declaration speaks not of the doctrine of Islam, but of the assent of individual Muslims to what those particular individuals hold, if they hold that God is One, living and subsistent, merciful and omnipotent, the Creator of the heavens and the earth, who has spoken to man.’ The Council Fathers were making a distinction between the true God and a make pretend god, Allah.”

“What! How can you see that in that sentence?” demanded the Archbishop, worried that he had read the declaration in Latin. “Translations are good enough! Who do you think you are?”

“Although these same Muslims mistakenly, though sincerely, call the true God ‘Allah’,” continued Father Alexámenos, “these particular Muslims esteemed by the Council Fathers do not accept all of what is written in the Qur’an. The Council Fathers speak of ‘merciful’ as an attribute of the true God, but this being ‘merciful’ contradicts much of what is written in the Qur’an, especially in regard to child-sacrifice. Besides, it is not the Qur’an to which the declaration refers when it says that Muslims believe that God has spoken to man, for the Qur’an itself constantly refers to the Judaeo-Christian Scriptures, holding Jesus, Son of the Virgin Mary, to be…”

“But you must be mentally incompetent! That is not what the sentence in Nostra ætate says,” asserted the Archbishop. “You are reading your own, narrowminded meanness into that sentence.”

“Ah yes, that sentence… I always suspected that that was the problem. That sentence we are talking about actually continues with no full-stop, no semi-colon, no colon, no dashes or ellipses. False translations cited by the 38 attackers of the Pope add those things. I’ve been commenting on the whole sentence, not just the first half you recited. Did you not know, your Grace, that half-truths are more dangerous than blatant lies, more misleading, more hurtful of dialogue and unity, suppressing both Truth and Charity? Do you really love our Muslim brothers, your Grace?”

“Damn you!” exclaimed the Archbishop. “Can’t you understand that differences in belief are not to be done away with so that we have unity in one big super-religion. We make valid contributions by working for the good of a super-society. We respect not only religious minded people, but also their religions. We don’t want one religion! This is how we avoid relativism and syncretism. It is we who have a clear voice. This is the patrimony of our Cardinal, may he rest in peace. But you! You destroy all that we’ve worked for, what we’ve spent our lives promoting!”

“And what is that, your Grace, yourself instead of Christ Jesus?”

“Damn you!” he repeated, sputtering.

“I’m sure that’s the reason why you would Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under books, Catholic, ecumenism, interreligious dialogue

You think Paul VI was prophetic in Humanae vitae on 25 July 1968? Try Paul Harvey 3 April 1965. Yikes!

Leave a Comment

Filed under abuse, Catholic, ecumenism, exorcism, interreligious dialogue, religion, separation of church and state

Let’s put Obama’s feet on his desk talking with Israel in context

If you don’t remember this scene from four years ago, do you think you’ll have the opportunity to remember it four years from now?

Leave a Comment

Filed under interreligious dialogue, politics, terrorism

The Good Friday prayer for the Jews: This hermit repents…

Before beginning this post in earnest, I’d just like to mention something about the above picture. It depicts Hebrew University on Mount Scopus, which overlooks the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. That’s where I also went to school in my umpteen years of post-graduate studies. It’s situated in the West Bank. I used to walk through the West Bank to get there and back, being on a first name basis with the Palestinians. But now there’s a wall. I find it all so very sad. This makes my proposed book on the would-be sacrifice of Abraham’s son all the more pressing for me. Anyway…

As time goes on, I discover, to my joy, what an idiot I’ve been, that is, because such a recognition only comes about because of seeing a bit more clearly Him who is Truth and Charity. There is, after all, quite a contrast!

(1) One of the ways I’ve been an idiot has been to wonder about the appropriateness of the apologies expressed by Blessed Pope John Paul II. You can read about my rather fortuitous conversion to the deeper realities of the Church and the economy of salvation regarding those apologies in what I wrote in a post I could easily re-title as YIKES! In my humble opinion, that post is well worth the read, again, not because I’m so briliant, but because, before the Lord, I found our how stupid I was. If you read that post, you’ll quickly find out that what I say is not liberal drivel, but instead is a rather intense traditional Catholic evangelization.

(2) Another way in which I’ve discovered just how much of an idiot I’ve been regards the Good Friday prayer for the Jews.

  • I’ve been a ferocious defender of the old prayer for the Jews in the Missale Romanum pre-dating Blessed John XXIII’s intervention. The reason for this is my rather freakish desire to know what words meant back when they were first used, so that perfideous referred, way back in the day, many centuries ago, merely to a lack of faith in Jesus.
  • I’ve also been a ferocious defender of the Blessed John XXIII’s intervention, what was presented in the 1962 Missale Romanum. O.K.!
  • I’ve also been, quite consistently I might add, a ferocious defender of Pope Benedict XVI’s revised prayer for the Jews for the Extraordinary Form of the Mass.

Here’s Father Z’s comparison of the last two versions back in 2008 (read the rest there):

MR62 Latin MR62 English Revised ‘62 Latin Revised ‘62 English
Oremus et pro Iudaeis: ut Deus et Dominus noster auferat velamen de cordibus eorum; ut et ipsi agnoscant Iesum Christum Dominum nostrum. …   Let us also pray for the Jews: that our Lord and God take away the veil from their hearts; that they too may acknowledge Jesus Christ to be our Lord.  Oremus et pro Iudaeis: ut Deus et Dominus noster illuminet corda eorum, ut agnoscant Iesum Christum salvatorem omnium hominum. Let us also pray for the Jews: that our God and Lord may illuminate their hearts, that they acknowledge that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all men.
Omnipotens sempiternae Deus, qui Iudaeos etiam a tua misericordia non repellis: exaudi preces nostras, quas pro illius populi obcaecatione deferimus; ut agnita veritatis tuae luce, quae Christus est, a suis tenebris eruantur. Per eundem Dominum. Almighty eternal God, who also does not repell the Jews from Your mercy: graciously hear the prayers which we are conveying on behalf of the blindness of that people; so that once the light of Your Truth has been recognized, which is Christ, they may be rescued from their darkness. Omnipotens sempiterne Deus, qui vis ut omnes homines salvi fiant et ad agnitionem veritatis veniant, concede propitius, ut plenitudine gentium in Ecclesiam Tuam intrante omnis Israel salvus fiat. Per Christum Dominum nostrum. Amen. Almighty and eternal God, who want that all men be saved and come to the recognition of the truth, propitiously grant that even as the fullness of the peoples enters Your Church, all Israel may be saved. Through Christ Our Lord. Amen.

I could go on forever about how incisive the new prayer is for the Extraodinary Form of the Mass, perhaps much more so than the old (against unthinking reactionaries), but I’ll let that go until another day. You can read, if you like, a conference on a study by Benjamin Leven, which he presented to Boston College back in 2010. Benjamin’s an old friend. We spoke much of this topic: Pro iudaeis - On liturgical change. He also spoke of the Novus Ordo, but I would like to add some of my own comments on the validity[!] of the Novus Ordo prayer in this post.

I’ve always been less than enthusiastic about this version of the prayer. It’s not that I’ve changed my mind about anything I’ve ever always thought. It’s just that I’ve more recently applied what I already knew about Catholic-Jewish relations to this prayer in a rather in-your-face manner. That’s a good thing, and, if you read the rest of this post, you’ll find out that what I have to say is not ambiguous liberal drivel, but instead is a rather intense traditional Catholic evangelization…

Here’s the Novus Ordo version:

Oremus et pro Iudaeis, ut ad quos prius locutus est Dominus Deus noster, eis tribuat in sui nominis amore et in sui foederis fidelitate proficere.

Omnipotens sempiterne Deus, qui promissiones tuas Abrahae eiusque semini contulisti, Ecclesiae tuae preces clementer exaudi, ut populus acquisitionis prioris ad redemptionis mereatur plenitudinem pervenire.

Here’s the new ICEL translation:

[1] Let us pray also for the Jewish people, [2] to whom the Lord our God spoke first, [3] that He may grant them [4] to advance in love of His Name, and [5] in faithfulness to His Covenant.

[6] Almighty ever-living God, who bestowed your promises on Abraham and his descendants, [7] graciously hear the prayers of your Church, [8] that the people you first made your own [9] may attain the fullness of redemption. [10] Through Christ our Lord.

[1] Just to say, praying for the Jewish people is not an act of hatred, like we don’t want them to exist anymore just because we want to share with them the greatest love in our lives! This isn’t a threat. It’s a manifestation of our love, and even an invitation. It’s a good willed intercession with our Lord.

[2] “Spoke first”, though not differently, in the sense that the Jews proclaimed the coming of the Messiah whom we accept as the Jewish Messiah. First Jews, then Gentiles. Fine. But, it’s always about Jesus.

[3] “Grant them…”tribuat… This doesn’t mean that the Lord isn’t doing anything. He is the One, after all, who is supplying the grace with the granting. This is what lifts the veil to that the faith, already having been provided, might be seen. This “grant them” bit simply recognizes that we also have free will.

[4] “To advance in love of His Name.” This name is Yahweh, He who is, He who causes to be. That is always an apt Name of the Most High. I’ve written a great deal on this elsewhere, but that comment suffices here. There is no bid here for the Jews to remain non-Christian. But, just to say, if “Name” has its reference in “Jesus”, which name means Savior, who is identified with the Messiah, then the prayer is more explicitly for conversion to the Savior we have already accepted has come among us. That Savior and Yahweh are identified. Indeed, in the New Testament citations of the Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures, references to Yahweh are consistently translated with Kurios, that is, Lord, the usual title of Jesus, as in: the Lord Jesus (Yahweh Jesus).

[5] Most of the controversy about this prayer is over the covenant mentioned here. The advance is wrought by the action of the Lord’s grant of grace, which, in turn, is provided according to the prayer being offered. (Sorry, B.L.!) The idea of advancing in faithfulness to a covenant does not speak of multiple covenants, but of a new covenant which fulfills the old. We are not saying that there is a covenant for the Jews, just as valid today as it ever was, and a covenant for Catholics, that New and Eternal Covenant in the Blood of the Lamb, which however, excludes all Jews, and accuses them of not being faithful even to the first covenant they had. No, not that. Instead, the old covenant is fulfilled in the new. The essential nature of the old was to be fulfilled in the new. When the new arrived, the old ceased to exist outside of its being fulfilled in the new. Any advance in faithfulness would mean converting to the fulfillment of the old in the new. If there are two covenants, both active, both efficacious, then there are no covenants at all, for the two cancel each other out. That is just how much the old is essentially fulfilled in the new.   

[6] “Almighty ever-living God, who bestowed your promises on Abraham and his descendants…” We are all descendants of our Father in Faith. He looked forward to the Messiah, to Jesus. In this sense, Catholics are fulfilled Jews.

[7] “Graciously hear the prayers of your Church…” Again, it isn’t evil to pray for others that they might know the greatest love of one’s own life.

[8] “That the people you first made your own…” Again, we are that people by way of faith. Also in the Jewish Scriptures, one could become Jewish by way of faith. Being Jewish is not tied absolutely to physical descendency, nor is the prayer trying to say that. It is speaking about those who looked forward to the Messiah before Jesus came.

[9] ”May attain the fullness of redemption…” Everyone is redeemed. Some of those who are redeemed are also saved. An important distinction. We pray that all Jews might know salvation, which is the “fullness of redemption.”

[10] ”Through Christ our Lord.” Just in case anyone was wondering what kind of prayer this was. This phrase proclaims that this is all the will of Christ, our Lord. Amen!

I don’t agree with the reasoning of the promoter of the changes, but the stands on its own apart from him. Having said that, here’s what he said:

Click to enlarge. Careful of the column changes from bottom all the way to the top!

I’m not getting more liberal! Just a bit calmer! That’s a good thing!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Catholic, ecumenism, interreligious dialogue

Of Jackasses, Jews, April Fools and Palm Sunday: How totally appropriate!

File:Aprilsnar 2001.png

This above April Fools joke was meant to celebrate the opening of a new subway! Very cool! Do you have any practical jokes planned for today? (perhaps not so elaborate, but maybe!) And, by the way, some practical jokes can laudably have a wonderful message to them, shaking us to the core of our existence, letting us know who we are before man and God, in need of the goodness and kindness of Jesus, in need of the salvation He came to bring to us, riding on a… donkey.

Today, wonderfully is also Palm Sunday. We read in the Gospels how our Lord was welcomed into Jerusalem, riding on a Jackass, while the children spread out palms and garments on the path on which the donkey was to trod. This reminds us of Zechariah 9,9:

Rejoice heartily, O daughter Zion, shout for joy, O daughter Jerusalem! See, your King shall come to you. A just Savior is He, meek, and riding on a Jackass, on a colt, the foal of a Jenny.

Quite a while back, on a post about the Holy Name of Jesus, I wrote this:

From the Hebrew, we have: הוֹשַׁע־נָא, which, transliterated into the Greek of the New Testament, is Ὡσαννὰ, which, transliterated into the Latin of the Vulgate, is Osanna, which, transliterated into English, is Hosanna.

This is what all the crowds were crying out as Jesus entered into Jerusalem on my all time favorite beast, the donkey, the Jackass:

“And the crowds were going before Him, and those following cried out, saying, ‘Hosanna to the Son of David. The One who is coming in the Name of the Lord perfectly continues to be perfectly blessed. Hosanna in the highest places’” (Matthew 21,9).

I remember perhaps the most highly hailed spiritual director in Rome (not mine) giving a homily about this word, hosanna, which he insisted with effervescent niceness was no more and no less than a wonderfully joyous exclamation of exuberant niceness. Well… um… No! After I told him what the word meant, he half threw a tantrum, insisting that I never, ever give a homily based on the meaning of that word, for “that would be the worst thing.” Let’s just ignore his protestations, and see what this is all about.

The meaning of הוֹשַׁע־נָא, in Hebrew, the start of all this, is “Therefore, because of that… Save us!” In context with the crowds welcoming Jesus into Jerusalem, the “Hosanna in the highest places” bit, the meaning is, “Because you are in the highest places (hailing Him as the Son of God), therefore, because of that, save us!” In other words, we are not in the highest places. We have no power to save ourselves. Because you are, in fact, in the highest places, therefore, save us! You can do it. We can’t. So, do it! Save us!

Now, the mockery of Jesus when He was in the highest places, that is, when He was lifted up on the Cross, when He would draw all to Himself, when He would save us, was spoken by the religious leaders of the time: “Come down from there. Save yourself and save us! Just come down, and then we will believe!” But He chose to stay in that highest of all places, and actually save us.

To the point, “Hosanna!” (Therefore, save us!), is the verbal form of the Holy Name of Jesus, so that the Name Jesus means “Savior.”

Christ, meaning “anointed”, is, in Hebrew, Messiah. So, Christ Jesus means “Anointed Savior.”

So, it being that Jesus means Savior, how is it that we are to use that Holy Name? Well, we are to believe what the name says, and so use it from the perspective of one who is being saved by the One who is doing the saving, the Savior, Jesus!

Jesus, have mercy on me, a sinner! = O Savior, have mercy on me, a sinner! The Lord’s mercy saves us. When we call on Jesus’ name, Savior, we call on His mercy.

Oh, and just to say. In the Gospels, the use of the appelative “Lord” — Kurios — is what is used for Yahweh, taking the example of the Greek Old Testament. Some people think Yahweh is strictly Old Testament, and that it would be evil to use it today. That’s just anti-Semitism flaunting blasphemy against the Holy Spirit who inspired the Sacred Scriptures. Yahweh means “The One who causes to be.” Sounds ever applicable to the Lord, to Jesus, through whom all things were made and are held in existence, no?

The Lord Jesus = the Savior who causes to be, that is, who brings about a new creation within us by way of the mercy, the salvation, which He, the Savior, Jesus, brings to us.

Now then, back to April Fools and Palm Sunday! …

As I’ve also noted elsewhere, the twelve tribes of the sons of Jacob, taken as one nation, were symbolized by a donkey, a Jackass, and this from time immemorial (way, way, way before Jesus and Zechariah). I, for one, think donkeys are the most wonderful beasts in the world, for they are hard workers, can sing superbly (and loudly), and are exquisitely intelligent, doing only what they understand (which really is very intelligent, and rare in any age).

Not all think so highly of the Jackass, and consider the Jackass to be a symbol of foolishness, of slavery, of stupidity. The old childhood saying that I remember is appropriate here: What you say is what you are.

The sons of Jacob bore the revelation of Almighty God to the world as God’s chosen people. But God’s good and just ways make fallen mankind nervous, and so there is a rejection of that revelation as foolishness, something fit for Jackasses, for the Jackass among all the nations.

That’s the way it has to be. The sons of Jacob have suffered tremendously for being thought of as fools in the whole world. But the sons of Jacob are proud to be bearers of God’s revelation. It is a badge of honor to be thought of as being foolish when one is so very in the right that it shakes fallen human nature to its core.

Jesus said that salvation comes from the Jews. Jesus was the Son of David, the Messiah, the Savior, He Who Is. There is no one more Jewish than He. Of course He is going to ride a donkey into Jerusalem where He will accomplish our salvation. He is riding proudly on all of the sons of Jacob to do so, and they are proud to carry Him: Hossana to the Son of David!

I think that our problem these days is that we don’t rejoice in irony. We must. Judaeo-Catholic revelation is full of irony. Jesus is Irony Incarnate. Read the Scriptures. Read Augustine. Read Chesterton. Read Belloc. Discover irony!

But just remember this. Those who so eagerly hailed Jesus would also be there to condemn Him. And that includes all of us. Our sins have done that. Jesus took on the worst we could give out, what we deserve for original and personal sin, death, and so had the right in justice to have mercy on us. Hossana to the Son of David! Hossana to the Son of God! Hosanna to the Son of the Immaculate Conception, that Woman of Genesis 3,15. We are all guilty, and therefore we are all included in Jesus’ request to His Father: “Father, forgive them; they know not what they do.”

10 Comments

Filed under interreligious dialogue, Jesus

FAITH BY THE SWORD

As a bit of a hobby on the side, while writing my doctoral thesis over in Rome and later in France, I once had a blog that baited terrorist funding groups in the middle east and elsewhere. I was pretty good at getting them to come out with their wicked agendas. Even המוסד למודיעין ולתפקידים מיוחדים‎ gave me a bit of advice at the time. Meanwhile, I was learning a great deal about the religious motivation of terrorism.

On a recent trip to Israel, I easily met with some young Muslims who were proselytizing near the Temple Mount. As I find out, they are becoming key players in Israeli/Gaza/Palestinian (and, indeed, international) politics. Anyway, they connected with me a terrorist further East, whom I baited all the more about the religious motivation behind terrorism. One learns quite a bit in this way.

More recently, in pre-hermitage days, I was getting terrorist groups in the U.S.A. to speak of their plans by way of their religious motivation. That was in Chicago and Columbus. Truly, truly frightening. They are getting very bold in speaking of the religious motivation of terrorism.

More recently yet, though still while teaching up at the Pontifical College Josephinum, I was setting up a live debate on “faith by the sword”. Arrangements were being made for me to meet with Tony Blair, a friend of some dear common friends of mine, to have him chair a live debate between the present Imam over at الجامع الأزهر‎ and, quite diversely, the famed director of Jihad Watch, who had agreed to the debate. The topic was set, but then I became a hermit and the whole thing was dropped. Hermitness happens. But all is not lost.

I think I did learn something over the years about all this, and have been thinking for the longest time about writing a book about the religious motivation of terrorism.

But Father! But Father! Don’t you know that there’s no such thing as religious motivation for terrorism, because then, it’s like, that motivation isn’t religious!?!

Agreed. You know that and I know that. Others, many of whom are terrorists, don’t agree. And they number quite a few. That would be the reason to investigate if there is a difference between Judaeo-Catholic and Islamic presentations, using the Jewish and Catholic Scriptures, and the Qur’an (with its early presentations).

The edge of the sword for all this, so to speak, would be the would-be sacrifice of Abraham’s own son, an account more or less common to these three groups.

However! There are those who, as I am finding out, despise those such as myself having a voice in the public square. They want nothing more than to shut me down altogether, to have this blog shut down, so harmful do they think it is to everyone who reads it. The blog even suffered a cyber-attack the other day. Is freedom of speech to be suppressed?

Have no doubt. Truth will win out, whether in this life or in the next. I’d like to write more about truth here and now. Is truth inconvenient for some? Sure. Does that mean we are to be forbidden to speak the truth? Surely not.

Does the Lord want a false, politically correct, lowest common denominator type of “peace” which instantly disintegrates into rancor, hatred and murder? Nope.

Does the Lord want to see a sword of division, of truth, in this world, so that by such words of true peace from the Prince of the Most Profound Peace we might then be united in that truth, after those words have struck home, killing off our egotistic selfishness? Yep.

Does all this make some feel spiritually and emotionally uncomfortable? I bet it does. That’s what truth especially pronounced in all charity does. I, for one, will not back down from speaking the truth in all charity. I want to share this greatest love of my life with others. Those who disagree with me can choose not to read the blog! But I want to continue with the goodness and kindness of our Lord.

Perhaps I’ll be smacked down in one way or the other by those who disagree with freedom of speech. Perhaps my blog will one day be hacked successfully. But until then, the cowards will not have won the day, and the truth, in all charity, will continue to be brought forth here by yours truly. Praised be the Most High.

There are some things that need to be talked about, no? It’s always the children who are involved. Always. We’ll see how this works out.

Leave a Comment

Filed under interreligious dialogue

The names of the children…

Every once in a while I like to put up this video I made at Yad vaShem Holocaust Memorial in Jerusalem. The names being read are those of the children put to death. Children…

I’m getting reved up to write a little booklet about a little known and little understood document put out under orders of Pius XII that would otherwise have huge impact on Catholic/Jewish relations, for the better. I’ll have to add that to my list of My Books to write.

1 Comment

Filed under interreligious dialogue, videos

Assisi and Pope Benedict XVI

Since the Holy Father wrote this to a Lutheran pastor about the upcoming 27 October meeting, we have hopes, don’t we? Remember when the oversight of the liturgy was taken from the OFM.Conv. at Assisi and handed over to a Cardinal under Pope Benedict? I remember an OFM.Conv. being furious over this. Good sign.

“I understand quite well your concern regarding the participation at the Assisi meeting. However, this commemoration would have to have been celebrated in some way and, all things considered, it seemed to me that the best thing would be for me to personally go there being thus able to determine the direction of it all. I will nevertheless do everything in order that a syncretistic or relativistic interpretation of the event will be impossible and so that what will remain is that I will always believe and confess that which I had called to the attention of the Church with [the Declaration] ‘Dominus Iesus’.”

BTW, just because of militant buddhist monks threw a statue of buddha on the tabernacle in Assisi doesn’t mean that Pope John Paul even knew about this. It would be absurd to think that the Holy Father knows everything about everyone. Really.

Leave a Comment

Filed under interreligious dialogue