القاعدة is written all over it: al-Qaeda, not to mention local terrorist groups. We’ve known that quite from the start, maybe even beforehand.
Turkey grabbed one of the perps, Ali Ani al-Harzi, a known terrorist. Turkey packed him off to Tunisia, which refuses to let him be interrogated by these United States, and with good reason. Tunisia thinks he is a terrorist. We don’t. That’s right, Obama says that the well coordinated, military style violent takeover and destruction of the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, the torture and murder of the U.S. Ambassador, his aid, and two Navy Seals was not an act of terrorism on the anniversary of September 11 by known terrorists tied to al-Qaeda and other local terrorist groups, but that the gentlemen such as the fellow pictured above are to be tried (but not by us) merely for a civil act of not being nice, not for terrorism. If it’s not terrorism, it’s not an act of war, and the U.S.A. has no right to the prisoner.
Obama has protected terrorists again and again. Remember Fort Hood, where the perp was tied to the most wanted terrorist of the day, and that was not called terrorism, but an act of not being nice in the workplace?
What’s going on, you ask? I think this is Obama’s diplomacy. He’s giving al-Qaeda a trophy with impunity so as to calm the islamicists down after the loss of Obama Osama bin Laden. Permission to do a tit for tat. Or am I jumping to conclusions? The trouble is, everything points in that direction. It’s the theory that answers the most questions. I’m just wondering out loud. Correct me if you think I’m wrong, but with that which answers more questions than what I’ve come up with.
Accompany me, Father George David Byers, S.S.L., S.T.D., as I begin life as a Catholic Priest-Hermit by choice. Holy Souls Hermitage is dedicated to the sanctification of my fellow priests, bishops, deacons & seminarians going through the purgatory of this life or the next. Prayer and sacrifice go up, of course, for both Benedict XVI and the next Successor of Saint Peter. 
Follow the weapons. There are indications that Stevens was in Benghazi to meet with the Turkish ambassador over weapons that were being shipped from Libya to Syria on a ship that had been stopped at a Turkish port. Weapons were from a militia group in Libya and going to an anti-Assad al-Qaeda associated group in Libya. So basically the Obama administration might have been facilitating shipments of arms to a terrorist group.
So one question becomes is the group Stevens was dealing with the group that killed him? Another is did the CIA and administration stand by (and try to prevent the local contract CIA people from interfering) because they didn’t want to have to explain what Stevens and the CIA contract people were doing in Benghazi?
This smells like the Iran-Contra cover-up.
TerryC: Can you provide some links, or…