Daily Archives: 2012/04/30

UPDATE: Killer-snake! Killer-snake-eating ninja chicken! Killer vines! (update)

Philip warned me never to pick up a baby copperhead, since they don’t know how to let go, and so inject all the venom they have. I couldn’t resist. Unlike last year, I thought I might see what the chickens would do. They went berzerk, all chanting in chicken-talk: “Kill the snake! Eat the snake! Rip it to shreds!” What mayhem! One chicken grabbed the snake and ran. Here’s the result, fast and furious, a blurr of blood and scales. The snake hadn’t a chance.

I did find some killer vines with leaves (and thorns):

UPDATE: On second thought, and having looked through umpteen zillion snake pictures, I’m thinking that the snake is an Eastern Fox Snake, a constrictor that will eat anything it can get its mouth around, including rabbits and… and… chickens. At least the eggs! They get to be six feet long. The second one I’ve seen at the hermitage. Non-venomous. O.K.! I’m happy for them to get the rats and mice, but not the chickens or the eggs.

12 Comments

Filed under Chickens, faunae, florae

The incredible irony of the real Saint Catherine of Siena — A HSH special — parce que je suis un enfant terrible! Hah!

Some snippets from a previous post:

We find some of the fruits of the conversations between our Lord Jesus and Saint Catherine in The Divine Doctrine of Jesus Christ. In this post, I include a vignette representing the incisiveness of this doctrine and the wonderful clarity of her own spiritual life. These few words provide the key to understanding what is – it seems for us priests – by far the most difficult passage in the Gospels, a passage found, in one way or another, throughout the Scriptures of both Testaments. One will have to go through quite a purgatory in this life or the next in order to sound out the truth of her words. I once heard her words being mocked by an ecclesiastic who is influential in seminary formation for many Episcopal Conferences, and who for many years now has begged me not to publish the comments in this post, wanting, as he does, to be the first to write on this passage of Catherine, but to mock it instead of explaining it. Such drama! What to do? Publish the post, of course!

In this passage of The Divine Doctrine, Christ’s words are incisive and ironic, and lead us to the seeming paradox of caritas in veritate, of charity in truth

She is relating her report of what our Lord is dictating to her. Jesus is speaking about Saint Paul’s interpretation of the key of knowledge, by which we see what the eye cannot see, hear what the ear cannot hear, and understand in our hearts what otherwise cannot arise in the heart of man. Saint Paul, in 1 Corinthians 2,9, does interpret Isaiah 64,10 – cited in Matthew 13,15, Acts 28,27, et al. – by saying it is by way of the love of God, by way of the crucified Lord of glory, that we see and hear and understand. Paul is accurate, says our Lord – as Saint Catherine relates – so much so that “questo parbe che volesse dire Paulo,” so much so that “this seems to be what Paul wanted to say,” that is, as if it were Paul’s revelation, Paul’s knowledge, Paul’s very own desire. In other words, Paul was so transformed by grace, that it was as if Paul spoke on his own authority. Yet, in this passage, the most erudite of all academic Pharisees himself happily admits that he is speaking by the power of God and the revelation of the Holy Spirit. Jesus was not conjecturing about what it seems to Him that Paul wanted to say, as if Jesus were Paul’s student: “It seems to me that Paul wanted to say this…” Jesus was rather confirming just how correct Paul’s words were, for they were actualized in Paul’s life with the grace of Jesus, that power of God, and the revelation of the Holy Spirit.

Jesus Himself fulfilled the vocation of Isaiah, to blind eyes, stop up ears, harden hearts, and remove all understanding lest people, including us priests, turn to the Lord to be saved. Good! We are not to pretend that we can turn to the Lord under our own power like some Pelagian work-your-own-way-to-God idiot. We must allow ourselves, by God’s grace, to be turned to the Lord, to be brought up into His mercy. We hate any demand to give up control over ourselves, even of our spiritual lives, even to the Lord Himself. This is our fallen human condition. It is a crucifixion of our fallen spirits simply to watch the Lord bringing us to Himself. If people want to have a work to do in the spiritual life, it is this, to be crucified. When we have our eyes fixed on Him, our ears listening in obedience, our hearts able to love whatever the cost of a pierced heart, this will then be our greatest joy, a proof of the resurrection of the Lord in our lives, for we cannot be led by a dead god in this way, but only in friendship with the Living God.

But let’s test this friendship with our Lord, shall we? Let’s take a sentence from the Theologian, Saint Gregory of Nyssa, who also makes a comment on Paul’s letters, this time on Ephesians, 5,23 – “The husband is the head of the wife just as Christ is also the Head of the Church, Himself Savior of the Body.” The question is, who interprets whom? Does Jesus guess what His Body wants, or does the Body know, because of intimate friendship, what the Head of the Body wants?

O de kefalhn thV EkklhsiaV ton Criston einai maqwn, touto pro pantwn dianoeisqw, oti pasa kefalhn tw upokeimenw swmati omofuhV esti kai omoousioV.

Here’s my translation of that, since the usual one is absolutely pitiful:

But the one learning the Head of the Church to be Christ thoroughly understands this before all things, that the entire Head, in subjection to the Body, is of the same nature and same being.

[Gregorius Nyssenus, De Perfectione et qualem oporteat esse Christianum, ad Olypium Monachum, Patrologia Graeca, XLVI, 1863, ed. J.-P. Migne, 1863, 251-286. If I remember correctly, this quote is spread across columns 274-275.]

This is Gregory’s greatest spiritual work, and he here flies into the heavens. He is at his absolute best, his most sublime. He doesn’t say that Christ is subject to us, but that Christ is teaching us to be subject to Himself, making us capable of learning this by way of Himself taking on our human nature. Christ Jesus doesn’t need to learn from us what we seem to want to express (“questo parbe che volesse dire Paulo” – “this, it seems to me – is what Paul wanted to say”). Instead, as Catherine analogously reports Jesus’ words, It seems as if this is what Paul himself wanted to say, though Paul actually said this by the power of God and the revelation of the Holy Spirit!

So, in this friendship with our Lord, blessed are we priests if we thank our Lord for sending women like Saint Catherine of Siena into our lives in every which way. Thank you, Lord!

1 Comment

Filed under saints

“Non toca a te” – “Ultra vires” – Savonarola – True obedience in sinful situations – A HSH special

"NON TOCA A TE!" was Father Savonarola's reaction to the "ULTRA VIRES" "excommunication from heaven" leveled against him by his fellow Dominicans. Saint Philip Neri was devoted to the burned-at-the-stake Savonarola, O.P., who's up for beatification.

“I command you never to speak of that case of sexual abuse of minors! Let it go! It’s just your imagination! It didn’t happen! I’ll just re-assign him! Problem solved! But for you: Don’t you dare complain!”

Don’t for a second think that we are any less barbaric than the Dominicans of bygone centuries, a barbarism depicted in the picture above. There are many ways to burn one’s coreligionists at the stake, and many have such “matches” to start the flames of execution, and use them regularly, with impunity, for now anyway. The Lord has the final judgment, as always.

“You will be obedient!” sounds nice, but when the matter involves any degree of sin, so that one is being commanded to sin, one is not disobedient in rejecting such a command given “ultra vires” (beyond one’s capacities, beyond one’s mandate in the law).

In fact, one shows true obedience in rejecting such a command to sin. There will be vengeance, of course, for such a rejection, but we are to suffer as did our Lord.

There are those liberals in sheeps’ clothing, those neo-conservatives, those politically correct in the new age of conservative atmosphere sychophants, those ultamontanistic flatterers of any abuse of office, those prostituting themselves to the ”just get along by caving in to anything” culture… who will, of course, immediately speak of any “disobedience” to an illegitimate command as being that which issues from someone who has psychological problems with authority, when, truth be told, those who would use a position of authority to abuse their office so as to command others to sin are the ones who have problems with authority, being disobedient to the Church as they are, and trying to make others twice the children of hell as themselves, turning religion on its head by having man worship man instead of God.

What’s the excuse for abuse of office? “Pro bono Ecclesiae!” (For the good of the Church!) of course. Abuse of office is the ultimate in cynicism. Those who reject such cynicism are not themselves cynics, but simply note the irony. It’s time, again, for a note from the great Hilaire Belloc, who has something incisive to say about irony wrongly undestood as cynicism, as my long time readers know. Just remember, in reading this, the point of view of those who abuse office, for they are wonderfully pious in their own eyes. They can do  no wrong. They are the epitomy of religion. They are pure, ingenuous. Anything they command, even sin, is virtuous, for the good of the Church, so they say, and, in their minds, so does God say this. Not. But how to get through to them? More irony, I say, Irony Incarnate, Jesus Himself. Jesus is the One who’s been missing in all this abuse of office, for He is not the one who is followed, for the blind lead themselves into a pit.

To the young, the pure, and the ingenuous, irony must always appear to have a quality of something evil, and so it has, for [...] it is a sword to wound. It is so directly the product or reflex of evil that, though it can never be used – nay, can hardly exist – save in the chastisement of evil, yet irony always carries with it some reflections of the bad spirit against which it was directed. [...] It suggests most powerfully the evil against which it is directed, and those innocent of evil shun so terrible an instrument. [...] The mere truth is vivid with ironical power [...] when the mere utterance of a plain truth labouriously concealed by hypocrisy, denied by contemporary falsehood, and forgotten in the moral lethargy of the populace, takes upon itself an ironical quality more powerful than any elaboration of special ironies could have taken in the past. [...] No man possessed of irony and using it has lived happily; nor has any man possessing it and using it died without having done great good to his fellows and secured a singular advantage to his own soul. “On Irony” (pages 124-127; Penguin books 1325. Selected Essays (2/6), edited by J.B. Morton; Harmondsworth – Baltimore – Mitcham 1958).

Jesus on the cross: Irony Incarnate. Self-congratulators just don’t want to understand. But, eventually, they will understand, whether they want to understand or not. For they will all look on Him whom they have pierced.

Hier stehe ich. Ich kann nicht anders. Gott helfe mir! Amen.

[ὅπερ ἔδει δεῖξαι (q.e.d.)]

Leave a Comment

Filed under Catholic

Steven’s note on an orphanage in Uganda: Yikes!

Long time readers will remember Steven in Uganda. He’s presently trying to help an orphanage. Yikes! HERE!

1 Comment

Filed under .