Daily Archives: 2011/09/15

06 Priestly Celibacy — Notes from Holy Souls Hermitage — Eunuch! [Part I]

Mt 19,12 – Eunuchs for the sake of Heaven’s Kingdom

(1) For there are eunuchs who have been brought forth from their mother’s womb like this and (2) there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men and (3) there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven. He who is able to make room, let him make room.

Eunuch — from the Greek words εὐνη, which means bed, and ἔχειν which means to have [and, in context: have charge of something], is understood to be someone who has [charge of] the bed [that is, for someone else]. “The bed” may very well refer to a large harem of a powerful king. The eunuchs would not dream of touching any of the women of a king like Solomon, even with his three hundred wives and seven hundred concubines (1 Kings 11,3). This kind of misbehavior would mean certain death. To keep them from physical temptation, most eunuchs were castrated by means of even total removal of the genitals… However, this is merely the prudence of whatever king, and has nothing in itself to do with the actual office that is being executed by the eunuch, the keeper of the bed. To be a eunuch and to be castrated are not synonymous. At any rate, eunuchs, not surprisingly, were often the most trusted individuals of most any empire. They were often second only to the king in power. Not infrequently, they were more powerful than king or emperor who was only a figurehead for the eunuch who actually ruled the land. The “bed” which is being supervised by the bed-keeper, the eunuch, was often the political relations of the king. Eunuchs were so respected, I suppose, because the horrendous barbarism so often inflicted upon them was seen to be some sort of participation in a materially effective redemption, something seen as a correction of the havoc original sin has caused, havoc which is manifest both within individuals and in relations with others. Indeed, the destruction of the image of God in man by original sin wrecks havoc on the impetus for man and woman to come together and procreate. But hacking off genitals is not the way to go for the true redemption of specifically that kind of destruction. Such violence only causes further spiritual and psychological chaos inasmuch as attempted repression of the dreaded devastation caused by original sin can only bring about more frustration. This only makes the individual and all of society much worse.

Having said all that, the word eunuch is by far the richest of all of the terms we’ve seen, and it is the only one used by Jesus Himself in describing those men whom He draws to Himself for the sake of the Kingdom of heaven, though there is a synonymous phrase He uses, which will also be examined briefly further below. Again, Matthew 19,12 reads as follows, with my rather precise translation:

(1) For there are eunuchs who have been brought forth from their mother’s womb like this and (2) there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men and (3) there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven. He who is able to make room, let him make room.

The usage of the term eunuch by Jesus admits of three types, the first two have similarities, while the third is unique.

The first, “there are eunuchs who have been brought forth from their mother’s womb,” is a not infrequent correctable congenital defect.

The second, “there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men,” refers to those who not only have the office of eunuch described above, but have also suffered the humiliation of being castrated.

The third type of eunuch, “there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven,” cannot refer to self-castration despite the fact that some of the greatest thinkers, such as Origen († @ 254), have mutilated themselves because of what they thought they saw in this passage (perhaps paying too much attention to the Latin Vulgate translation). The Vulgate at this point changes the phrase to say “castrate themselves” (se ipsos castraverunt). While this has a correct spiritual sense, one must further nuance this rendition by paying more attention to the original Greek!

Those who do something for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven do what they do only with the greatest respect and reverence for God’s economy of salvation. It would be positively anti-evangelical to castrate oneself while saying that this was done for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven. Thinking one can save oneself from temptation and sin, and also do something positive for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven, and simply because one castrates oneself, is a most gross, crass insult to the saving power of the grace or charity (χάρις – caritas) which Christ granted to us from the Cross.

Being continent, chaste, celibate and virginal for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven must be wrought in a manner which demonstrates that the establishment of the Kingdom is paramount in our lives, that the transformation in grace of the individual (Ephesians 1,3ff ) who would generously give himself to the Lord (with the generosity provided to Him directly by the Lord) is what has enlivened the individual in the Trinity’s fullness of life.

This does not mean that the carrying of the cross in regard to faith-filled chastity is any kind of burden, a woeful curse, a cruel condemnation to suffer the most useless loneliness – an attitude only those suffering from the most stultified torpidity come up with. That there would be those who would not be open to the radiance of Jesus’ loving union with His Bride, the Church, is here recognized by Jesus with His ever unsurpassed agility in setting the matter straight. He offers this admonition: “He who is able to make room, let him make room.” This is often mistranslated to read: “Let he who can receive this, receive it,” or “Let he who can understand this, understand it,” or some such thing along the lines of “Let him who has ears to listen, listen!” Instead, here, we read about making room. This, take note, is the named office of the eunuch, who is to have care specifically of the bedroom (again: εὐνη, which means bed, and ἔχειν, which means to have [and, in context: have charge of something], is understood to be someone who has [charge of] the bed [that is, for someone else]). One’s vocation to the priesthood depends upon one’s being able “to make room” because of having received that very ability from the Lord. What is “making room”?

Stay tuned for Part II !

Leave a Comment

Filed under priestly celibacy

Solemn Blessing fo the Cross at Holy Souls Mountain

Yesterday, on the Feast of the Triumph of the Cross, there was a rather solemn Extraordinary blessing of the gargantuan cross at the base of Holy Souls Mountain, incense and all. Awesome.

Leave a Comment

Filed under .

Our Lady of Sorrows and WDTPRS

The Immaculate Conception is, for the reason of that very conception, a most sweet soul, “dulcissimam animam”. Because she was pure, agile of soul, clear in vision, she could see the goodness of her Divine Son, and therefore, in contrast, all the hell we vomited on Him, and all the intercession we needed from her maternal heart, so sorrowful because so sweet, so immaculate. What a good mother!

Fr Z, over at WDTPRS, has this translation of today’s Extraordinary Collect:

O God, at whose Passion,
according to the Simeon’s prophecy,
the most sweet soul of the glorious Virgin, Mary our Mother,
was pierced by a sword of sorrow:
mercifully grant
that we who observe her sorrows by veneration
may attain to the happy result of Your Passion.

Read the rest over there!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Immaculate Conception

22 Exorcism tips from Holy Souls Hermitage – Demonizing religion, religious demonizing, and the genius-project of jacking up the stakes for world peace

Having spent just under a couple of dozen years in Rome and the greater Europe, and more years in the Middle-East and Asia, having been in religious academia for most all of that time, having made lasting friendships with some of the most influential religious figures shaping and explicating political and religious policy and doctrine – particularly regarding the Middle-East – it strikes me that there isn’t much merit or creativity among so very many who make themselves heard on behalf of the status quo.

While some of the irreligious oxymoronically demonize religion, and while some of those claiming to have a bit of religion demonize the irreligious, others congratulate themselves, jingoistically glomming onto international organizations of all kinds, pretending to tweak the direction of the status quo, but only succeeding in boring all and sundry with the same old same old excuse to avoid reality.

How to break through such insecurity, such bitter, desperate, and then elitist, sophisticated, genteel cynicism? When being demonized, so many rebel against the generalizations leveled at themselves, breathlessly returning the volley with their own unanswerable abstract projections of themselves. That’s not the answer. To pretend it is the answer, then moving on with a disdain that could not be more aloof, to go on to “more important things,” is precisely when political and religious personages are tempted to become entrenched in reactionary emotionalism. This is not good for peace, cooperation, justice or development in this ever so tiny shared world of ours.

When Napoleon stormed the office of the Archbishop of Paris and threatened to bring an end to religion, the Archbishop calmly leaned back in his chair and wished him all the luck in the world, saying with a bit of sarcasm that the bishops have been trying to destroy the Church for all these centuries without any success. What was said to Napoleon could easily have been said to Stalin, Hitler, and so many others. The irreligious killing off of demonized religious people doesn’t work.

And for that matter, whatever the legitimacy of capital punishment in whatever circumstances, the religious killing off of the irreligious doesn’t seem to work either, at least in the long run. Take Father Giordano Bruno, O.P. (incompetent political double agent and mushy religious relativist), who was burned at the stake in Rome, though, btw, with the new Anglicans, the new Calvinists and the new Lutherans, among others, cheering very loudly indeed. A monument in his honor was constructed on the spot where he was burned. To this day, this is the meeting point for the irreligious, particularly the Marxist crowd. It’s where the new Marxists gathered before rushing off to the Tiber River near the Vatican, in order to intercept the funeral procession for Blessed Pope Pius IX, so as to toss him in the river. The future Pope Leo XIII saved the day, having the body hid in back side air vent in the lower basilica of Saint Lawrence outside the walls in Rome.

At any rate, today, as “religious violence” is on the increase, what is it that one is to do other than pretend to shrug it off as “unimportant because it has to do with religion” or “unimportant because that’s just all those unbelievers causing trouble”? The time has come to an end in which people can just shrug it all off. 9-11, anyone? Wars raging around the world, anyone?

We have to be careful. Take the picture at the top of this post. It’s a photo-op in Ramallah during a march on Land Day. Is this about religion or about justice and development? Is it about politics or is it about terrorism? A bit complicated. There is more than one religion in the Occupied Territories, BTW. Nevertheless, in the end, deep down, it is all about religion, or what people claim to be thier religion. After all, when you perceive that you have a mandate from God to kill others (sigh…), then things are a bit easier, are they not?

Jacking up the stakes for world peace is the way to go.

Jacking up the stakes involves something that those wrapped up in the chains of the all-too-easy self-congratulatory status quo immediately drop into the too hard bucket, be they believers or unbelievers. A common sense examination of beliefs is what is needed, with common sense being the leverage that is an occasion for the world to be moved. I’m not referring to catechisms or apologetics on the one hand, or to comparative religion or relativistic syncretism or to Marxist or other self-congratulatory, merely ideological hermeneutical perspectives by which religion is “analyzed” on the other hand.

In a non-official manner (with the freedom that entails), I’ve tried to open up a dialogue with those officially responsible for Jewish-Catholic dialogue (between Israel and the Holy See). That progressed for quite some time with this Cardinal of the Roman Curia here and that Chief Rabbi in Israel there. Eventually, as the proposal went forward, and it was said at the highest levels that what I had went way beyond all the official dialogue that had gone on for the past number of decades, I finally met the interlocutor chosen by these others for this purpose. After he saw the implications for unity promoted by common sense in my proposal, he balked, and, in trying to save face, said that the first interest of a Rabbi is not to be found with Biblical texts (which were part of my proposal, since I thought these to be important). Sigh.

In a non-official manner (with the freedom that entails), I’ve tried to open up a dialogue of common sense with various imams right around the world. Just about eight months ago, I was ready to jump on a plane to go to England, to Westminster, that is, right next to Hyde Park, so as to speak – in the house of a mutual friend – with A.B., who now spends his free time in interreligious dialogue on an international level. He might have had the opportunity to chair a live-televised dialogue between a rather famous individual in New York and a certain imam in Cairo. That was not to be for the reason that, well, I’ve become a hermit and the interreligious dialogue has been put – at least temporarily – on the back burner. (I’ve got to spend some time tacking up a shelter, a hermitage, before winter comes again. I arrived last February. The winter in the mountains here is rather unforgiving.) At any rate, the answer of the imams to date has been rather diverse at the beginning of conversations, ranging from rather violent antagonism against common sense on the one hand, to detailed explanations of Islam sincerely given from whatever perspective on the other hand. However, so far, as conversations progressed, as a bare bones common sense examination of beliefs delved into hard questions, I was met suddenly, in each case, with the silence that manifests a meeting up with common sense, which can leave one quite speechless.

Awesome, thought I, while wondering how all this could proceed even just one more step. Counter intuitively, with a bit of lateral thinking, I thought that this could be part of the hermitage experience, praying, and thinking, and writing, and writing, and writing, preparing a few points about common sense and religion. This is not in any way like the Common Ground Initiative, or other dialogue groups in England or Germany or wherever, which oxymoronically (again) disallow common sense, voting, as they do, according to special interest groups. I’m just interested in common sense, which can ask questions about the epistemology structuring the dialogue, and can be open to thinking about answers proposed. No prescinding from any faith is necessary, but those with no faith can participate. Thomas Aquinas brilliantly said that there could not be any contradiction between faith and reason. O.K. Great! Let’s see what reason has to say about faith. To understand, first believe. But, at the same time, with that faith, ask questions which seek to understand all the more.

Why put all this up in the exorcism tips series of Holy Souls Hermitage? What does the status quo of demonizing religions and the religious demonization of others have to do with actual exorcism? Think of it this way: the discernment of whether someone is being harassed by Satan will be clouded if the exorcist is too much a product of his own age, too much given over to political correctness, too ready with prejudice to make a prudential judgment about what is happening with an individual in his or her own unrepeatable circumstances. If there is any demonization on a large scale, what will happen when one is face to face with an individual? All those Catholics, they must be possessed! All those Jews, they must be possessed! All those Muslims, they must be possessed! And, as I’ve heard from a rather disobedient exorcist: All those Freemasons, they must be possessed! I’m sure there are some who are harassed by Satan in all those groups and others. But to generalize, that’s rather counterproductive, isn’t it?

Now, just to be clear: I have nothing special to offer for this jacking up the stakes of world peace outside of the mania of relentlessly insisting on common sense, while at the same time not being beholden to a constituency, to political correctness, to the status quo, the traps into which I’ve seen many colleagues fall. Sure, I’m a staunch Catholic and I prescind from nothing in the faith whatsoever, but that doesn’t stop me from doggedly insisting on common sense. Instead, it frees me to bring unfettered common sense in all truth and charity to others. I’m enthusiastic about the project. Somehow, please God, it will be made possible.

What’s the genius of all this? Why, to have no genius at all of course. It’s common sense! [which is also good for exorcism...] [[So much for any genius award from the MacArthurs!]]

Leave a Comment

Filed under exorcism

The John D and Catherine T MacArthur Foundation visits Holy Souls Hermitage

That is, a visit by way of the internet. I never contacted them. Someone must have nominated me for the next round of fellowship awards (the genius awards). What a fright! Just the thing for me, since this grant would not involve the hermitage being a non-profit. The interest was in the area of exorcism. Yikes! I didn’t receive a phone call, yet, by the way.

Leave a Comment

Filed under .

HSH florae for the Immaculate Conception

Leave a Comment

Filed under florae

faunae, that is, beasts of Holy Souls Mountain

Just down the Mountain a bit:

Missing some back legs. Tired of kicking, I guess. Notice that this is the famous Palestinian donkey, which would have been well known by the Holy Family on the way to Bethlehem, to Egypt, back up to Nazareth, and then, for Jesus, into Jerusalem. Note the cross on the back of this glorious beast of burden:

As the psalms say: I am a worm and no man:

This flying beast was one of about five in a group:

Leave a Comment

Filed under faunae

Jenny the Jeep at the Soup Kitchen

Unending are the trips to the soup kitchen, cleaning the dumpter area, collecting compost, having a bite to eat, delivering meals. Jenny came along this time, as someone said that the trip would do her good. They worst thing, it was said, is for her to go up the mountain and back down, just short trips. She needs to get out in the open for the sake of the engine about once a week. O.K. She’s not too comfortable on the Highway, but she’s happy to be such a fright to look at that all and sundry give her a wide berth. I had to smile when some very rich gentlemen stood in awe of her in a particular parking lot in town. Hah! Maybe it was the rosary hanging on the just hanging on rear view mirror!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Soup Kichen

More danger on the road of Holy Souls Mountain

If the road is this steep and this narrow and this difficult just to get to Holy Souls Mountain, immagine what the road to heaven is like. That Way departs from hell to go upwards, steeply, vertiginously, on the most impossible of paths. Good thing we have our Lord to carry us along the Way, going through, with and in Him. Our Lord is very good and very kind.

Leave a Comment

Filed under road

Looking up into the sky. Reading the signs of the times at Holy Souls Hermitage

Early this morning, a cross reflected from the moon, in the light of Stella Matutina…

An hour later: “Red in the morning, sailors take warning…”

Forewarned is to be forearmed: Take up the Cross! Follow Jesus! This is, btw, a Church Militant!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Weather

Trouble with internet yesterday: Trucks, Wreckers, Rand-McNally

Not much posting yesterday. The Verizon was low to non-existent. So, I went down the mountain a bit to get a better signal, only to find a disaster on this most roughest of mountain roads:

The one car width wide dirt road, dotted with 180 degree hair pin turns, sported a tractor trailer, that is, a full conventional triple axle tractor and a full length arched flat-bed trailer, with, get this, a massive forklift fit to the end of the trailer, not on top, but sticking out the end. The whole rig was nearing 90 feet in length. Needless to say, at the first hair pin turn, he had the cab over the ditch on the one side and the trailer hanging over the ditch on the other side: stuck. He told me that he had already emailed Rand McNally Truckers’ GPS division to tell them that this road should not be marked trucker friendly.

Going back up the mountain, I met the wrecker, itself about 40 feet long, and almost unable to negotiate the turns on the road. He had already backed down the road about a mile — impossibly – and was going to continue this way. I thought this dangerous for them, and so offered to show them where to turn around, drive down in a more normal manner, turn around again, and then back up only about 800 more yards to get the rig hanging over the ravine. They did that, thankfully. Otherwise, we would have had to have had many wreckers to sort out the mess.

I suggested that the wrecker follow the rig back out. The rig had to back out that 800 yards, and then attempt to turn it around in a driveway. The rig would have to purposely put himself over another ravine, cab on the road and back end stretched over to the driveway, so as to then be have the back end pulled sideways up the drive by the wrecker. Amazing what these guys can do in the mountains. Where there’s a will, there’s a way.

BTW: It’s good the rig did himself in where he did. Had he been able to go further, I think they might have had to abandon the trailer for good. There’s no way even the cab itself could have made it around some of the turns. What a fright! If you’re ever on this road. Be careful!

Leave a Comment

Filed under road